Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Comparison of the Unstructured Clinician Gestalt, the Wells Score, and the Revised Geneva Score to Estimate Pretest Probability for Suspected Pulmonary.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Comparison of the Unstructured Clinician Gestalt, the Wells Score, and the Revised Geneva Score to Estimate Pretest Probability for Suspected Pulmonary."— Presentation transcript:

1 Comparison of the Unstructured Clinician Gestalt, the Wells Score, and the Revised Geneva Score to Estimate Pretest Probability for Suspected Pulmonary Embolism  Andrea Penaloza, MD, Franck Verschuren, MD, PhD, Guy Meyer, MD, Sybille Quentin-Georget, MD, Caroline Soulie, MD, Frédéric Thys, MD, PhD, Pierre-Marie Roy, MD, PhD  Annals of Emergency Medicine  Volume 62, Issue 2, Pages e2 (August 2013) DOI: /j.annemergmed Copyright © 2013 American College of Emergency Physicians Terms and Conditions

2 Figure 1 Study population.
Annals of Emergency Medicine  , e2DOI: ( /j.annemergmed ) Copyright © 2013 American College of Emergency Physicians Terms and Conditions

3 Figure 2 Comparison of the predictive accuracy of the 3 clinical probability assessment methods in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism, using clinical probability groups (low, moderate, and high). Annals of Emergency Medicine  , e2DOI: ( /j.annemergmed ) Copyright © 2013 American College of Emergency Physicians Terms and Conditions

4 Figure E1 ROC curves: Comparison of the predictive accuracy of the 3 clinical probability assessment methods in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism, using clinical probability groups (low, moderate, and high). Patients with gestalt assessment alone (n=870). AUC, Area under the curve; ROC, receiver operating characteristics; CP, clinical probability; RGS, revised Geneva score. Annals of Emergency Medicine  , e2DOI: ( /j.annemergmed ) Copyright © 2013 American College of Emergency Physicians Terms and Conditions

5 Figure E2 ROC curves: Comparison of the predictive accuracy of the 3 clinical probability assessment methods in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism, using clinical probability groups (low, moderate, and high). Patients with a clinical decision rule assessment besides gestalt assessment (n=168). AUC, Area under the curve; ROC, receiver operating characteristics; CP, clinical probability; RGS, revised Geneva score. Annals of Emergency Medicine  , e2DOI: ( /j.annemergmed ) Copyright © 2013 American College of Emergency Physicians Terms and Conditions


Download ppt "Comparison of the Unstructured Clinician Gestalt, the Wells Score, and the Revised Geneva Score to Estimate Pretest Probability for Suspected Pulmonary."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google