Overview nate-trust.org Who (describe your organization)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Manatt manatt | phelps | phillips New York State Health Information Technology Summit Initiative Overview and Update Rachel Block, Project Director United.
Advertisements

| Implications for Health Information Exchange – MetroChicago January 2011.
Minnesota e-Health Initiative …accelerate use of HIT to improve quality, increase safety, reduce costs and enable informed decisions. Private-Public collaboration.
Supporting National e-Health Roadmaps WHO-ITU-WB joint effort WSIS C7 e-Health Facilitation Meeting 13 th May 2010 Hani Eskandar ICT Applications, ITU.
California Trust Framework Pilot Request for Funding Informational Webinar 24 June 2013.
TFTM TFTM Committee working call to discuss how to describe the “IDESG-Acknowledged Identity Ecosystem” in its interim or long term state October.
Increasing public concern about loss of privacy Broad availability of information stored and exchanged in electronic format Concerns about genetic information.
TM The HIPAA Privacy Rule: Safeguarding Health Information in Research and Public Health Practice Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Beverly A.
NATE’s Blue Button for Consumers (NBB4C) Trust Bundle Direct Project Connect-a-Thon January 22, 2015 Aaron Seib, NATE CEO
Identity Management Based on P3P Authors: Oliver Berthold and Marit Kohntopp P3P = Platform for Privacy Preferences Project.
NNEPQIN as a Patient Safety Organization NNEPQIN Fall Meeting November 14, 2009 Timothy J. Fisher, MD.
The HITCH project: Cooperation between EuroRec and IHE Pascal Coorevits EuroRec 2010 Annual Conference June 18 th 2010.
1 Overview of Other Global Networks Exchange Network User Group Meeting April 2006.
Connecting Health and Care for the Nation: A Shared Nationwide Interoperability Roadmap – DRAFT Version 1.0 Joint FACA Meeting Chartese February 10, 2015.
HIPAA Health Insurance Portability & Accountability Act of 1996.
Minnesota Law and Health Information Exchange Oversight Activities James I. Golden, PhD State Government Health IT Coordinator Director, Health Policy.
Common recommendations and next steps for improving local delivery of climate finance Bangkok, October 31, 2012.
Discussion Topics Healthcare: Then, Now and in the Future
NSTIC ID Ecosystem A Conceptual Model v03 Andrew Hughes October October IDESG Version 1.
Organizational and Legal Issues -- Developing organization and governance models for HIE Day 2 -Track 5 – FIRST SESSION – RHIO GOVERNANCE CONNECTING COMMUNITIES.
TFTM Interim Trust Mark/Listing Approach Paper Analysis of Current Industry Trustmark Programs and GTRI PILOT Approach Discussion Deck TFTM Committee.
Nationwide Health Information Network: Conditions for Trusted Exchange Request For Information (RFI) Steven Posnack, MHS, MS, CISSP Director, Federal Policy.
HIT Policy Committee Information Exchange Workgroup NwHIN Conditions for Trusted Exchange Request For Information (RFI) May 15,
Beyond the EMR – Exchanging Health Information Outside of Your Organization John W. Loonsk, MD, FACMI Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information.
HIT Policy Committee NHIN Workgroup Recommendations Phase 2 David Lansky, Chair Pacific Business Group on Health Danny Weitzner, Co-Chair Department of.
HIT Policy Committee Privacy & Security Workgroup Update Deven McGraw Center for Democracy & Technology Rachel Block Office of Health Information Technology.
Updated September 30, 2010 Open Health Tools (OHT) Strategic Plan.
Coordinating Telehealth Services Delivery in New Mexico The Telehealth Alliance as a Trusted Third Party Broker New Mexico Telehealth Commission Presentation.
Imagine a health system that focuses on health, not just health care. Imagine a sustainable health system with one goal: to improve the lives of the people.
Consumer Authentication for Networked Personal Health Information Redwood Health Information Collaborative March 18, 2008 Josh Lemieux Director, Personal.
Is HIPAA Ready for the EHR? Practical and Legal Considerations of the Interoperable Electronic Health Record Barry S. Herrin, CHE, Esq. Smith Moore LLP.
HIT Policy Committee NwHIN Governance Workgroup NwHIN Conditions for Trusted Exchange Request For Information (RFI) May 15,
© 2004 Moses & Singer LLP HIPAA and Patient Privacy Issues Raised by the New Medicare Prescription Drug Program National Medicare Prescription Drug Congress.
Break out Session 3: Promising Practices for Implementing Blue Button National Association For Trusted Exchange (NATE) PHR Ignite Pilot HHS Auditorium.
Mariann Yeager, NHIN Policy and Governance Lead (Contractor) Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT David Riley, CONNECT Lead (Contractor) Federal.
HIT Policy Committee NHIN Workgroup HIE Trust Framework: HIE Trust Framework: Essential Components for Trust April 21, 2010 David Lansky, Chair Farzad.
Standards and Architecture Recommendations NHII 04 “Cornerstones for Electronic Healthcare”
HIT Policy Committee Meeting Nationwide Health Information Network Governance June 25, 2010 Mary Jo Deering, PhD ONC, Office of Policy and Planning NHIN.
PHDSC Privacy, Security, and Data Sharing Committee Letter to Governors.
Roundtable on Privacy in Transition: Is Privacy Policy Working in the Healthcare Sector?
HIT Policy Committee Privacy & Security Workgroup Update Deven McGraw Center for Democracy & Technology Rachel Block Office of Health Information Technology.
Documentation Requirements for Hospital Accreditation -By Global Manager Group.
1 David C. Kibbe, MD MBA DirectTrust Collaborating to Build the Security and Trust Framework for Direct Exchange June 20, 2013.
Interoperability Measurement for the MACRA Section 106(b) ONC Briefing for HIT Policy and Standards Committee April 19, 2016.
1© Copyright 2016 EMC Corporation. All rights reserved. VIEWTRUST SOFTWARE OVERVIEW RISK MANAGEMENT AND COMPLIANCE MONITORING.
Policies, practices and technologies… …that enable and promote trusted exchange… …within and across state lines... …among unaffiliated organizations…
ONC Listening Session June 26, 2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Section 3013: State Grant Program.
Audit Trail LIS 4776 Advanced Health Informatics Week 14
eHealth Standards and Profiles in Action for Europe and Beyond
NATE Blue Button Directory Detailed overview
Care Management Software
Update from the Faster Payments Task Force
A little about NATE… Policies, practices and technologies…
The Internet of Things and Consumer Wellness
HIPAA Administrative Simplification
EMV® 3-D Secure - High Level Overview
HIE Landscape in California
Saturday, January 27 & Sunday, January 28
Refuah Community Health Collaborative (RCHC) PPS
Commonwealth of Virginia Health Information Technology
CTEN Trust Framework Overview of the Trust Framework for the California Trusted Exchange Network © 2017 California Association of Health Information Exchanges.
Connecting for Health Preliminary Terminology Consensus Statements
"The achievements of an organization are the results of the combined effort of each individual." -Vince Lombardi Cooperative Exchange was launched as a.
Enforcement and Policy Challenges in Health Information Privacy
Patient Safety Institute
Understanding Rural Health Networks
Quality Framework Overview
Health Information Exchange for Eligible Clinicians 2019
Health Care Executives Statement Highlights
EU Standardisation Policy
Presentation transcript:

Overview nate-trust.org Who (describe your organization) The National Association for Trusted Exchange (NATE) is a not-for-profit membership association focused on facilitating consumer access to information and enabling trusted exchange among organizations and individuals with differing regulatory environments and exchange preferences. NATE is a 501(c)(3) mission driven organization focused on enabling trusted exchange that includes the patient. NATE’s membership is open to government entities, non-government organizations, associations and individuals. nate-trust.org

Overview Consumer Directed Exchange What (what does your organization do? What type of exchange do you support?) Consumer Directed Exchange Consumer directed exchange provides patients with access to their health information, allowing them to manage their healthcare online in a similar fashion to how they might manage their finances through online banking. When in control of their own health information, patients can actively participate in their care coordination by: Bringing their health information to new providers Identifying and correcting wrong or missing health information Identifying and correcting incorrect billing information Tracking and monitoring their own health

Overview What (what does your organization do? What type of exchange do you support?) The NATE Blue Button for Consumers (NBB4C) Trust Bundle is a trust mechanism that provides, to HIPAA covered entities (CEs) that use Direct, a facile method of exchange with Consumer Controlled Applications (CCAs) that must meet or exceed a specific set of evaluation criteria and user experience requirements in order to become a NATE-Qualified Entity. The NBB4C makes it easier for providers and consumers to trust consumer applications and easier for consumers to use them. Providers CEs must comply with HIPAA CEs constrained to permitted purposes of use CEs spend 95% of their time working with health data … Direct functionality Consumers CCAs must comply with FTC regulations Consumers can do anything they want with their data Consumers spend less than 5% of their time with health data

Overview continued Participants (who participates in your trust framework) Exchange metrics The correct metric is: “What percentage of Americans have access to their data from all of their providers?” It’s not about total exchange volume What matters to people is can I fetch my data when I need it in the form and format that I can use?

Overview continued How does your organization support interoperability? The National Association for Trusted Exchange (NATE) is the only national non-profit organization focused exclusively on reducing the barriers that inhibit a consumer’s access to their health information.  NATE has found that sponsoring the development of lightweight trust mechanisms that sit at critical interoperability intersections is one of the most effective ways to realize the intent of applicable law. NATE is an independent, trusted and technology-agnostic convener of interested stakeholders that operates enabling infrastructure for scalable methods of consumer centered data exchange. NATE has been operating its own trust community since 2012, and since that time, NATE has become the recognized leader in enabling HIPAA covered entities (CEs) to compliantly share protected health information with consumers using the app of their choice.  NATE will continue to serve as a trusted third party, overseeing trust transactions between CEs and consumers via multiple protocols, including Direct secure messaging and FHIR APIs.

Overview continued What additional services, policies, infrastructure, etc. does your organization provide to do so? The NATE Blue Button Directory (NBBD) allows patients to discover how best to submit their request for health information and establishes a secure end-point that can be used by the HIPAA covered entity’s staff responsible for managing these requests. Participating in the NBBD mitigates accusations of “information blocking.” The NBBD makes it easier for consumers to discover how their providers support the individual right of access. PROTOTYPE

Overview continued PROTOTYPE What additional services, policies, infrastructure, etc. does your organization provide to do so? The NATE TrustHarbor is a new trust mechanism for API based exchange. The TrustHarbor facilitates trustworthy exchange at the intersection of consumer apps, provider’s APIs and validated endorsers. The TrustHarbor enables: Relying parties to discover the endorsements applied by recognized endorsers for a given app Consumer apps to seek endorsements from competing endorsers A building blocks model of endorsements to fit the different requirements of different transactions in a modular way An open resource where bad actors (either apps or endorsers) can be black listed across the ecosystem PROTOTYPE