Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Connecting for Health Preliminary Terminology Consensus Statements

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Connecting for Health Preliminary Terminology Consensus Statements"— Presentation transcript:

1 Connecting for Health Preliminary Terminology Consensus Statements
James J. Cimino,M.D. May 21, 2003 1/18/2019

2 Overview The development and widespread adoption of a comprehensive and common set of terminologies is critical to realizing an interoperable health care system. On April 4, 2003, Connecting for Health convened experts to move the agenda forward on key issues related to terminology. 1/18/2019

3 Objectives Explore the need for the development and distribution of a comprehensive terminology set for health care. Develop a clear understanding of the relationship among terminologies, including those that are and are not currently mapped into UMLS. Discuss methods for mapping additional terminologies into UMLS. Specify additional work that should be undertaken to make the UMLS terminologies usable in real systems. Determine highest priority gaps to fill in current terminologies. Generate options for the long-term maintenance and distribution of terminologies; identify strategies that will encourage providers to switch to common terminologies. 1/18/2019

4 Outcomes Developed series of preliminary consensus statements addressing terminology requirements and processes; statements are currently under review by the group. Additional statements have been submitted and are under discussion. Participation has been active and the views of all stakeholders are being represented. All consensus statements presented here should be considered as a draft and will be refined in future discussions. 1/18/2019

5 Draft Consensus Statements: Terminologies Requirements
1/18/2019

6 Requirements Consensus Statement 1 - An interoperable health care system requires an information terminology set that is: Cross domain Open Inclusive Promotes movement and interpretation of health care data Utilizes appropriate domain expertise Allows accurate exchange, aggregation, and interpretation of health care data Uniform in structure 1/18/2019

7 Requirements Consensus Statement 2 - Health care terminologies should be integrated into a single reference terminology set. Users require an integrated single reference terminology. 1/18/2019

8 Requirements Consensus Statement 3 - A single integrated model of health care information is required as a foundation for the integration of current and future health care terminologies. This information model will provide the context for the use of terms and enable interoperability. The integrated model should have the following characteristics: Crosses all terminology domains Relies on domain specific contributions Supports various levels of abstraction 1/18/2019

9 Requirements Consensus Statement 3 (cont) - The integrated health care information and terminology model should deliver value to the following users: System developers Clinicians Knowledge managers Pharmaceutical manufacturers Terminology developers International bodies 1/18/2019

10 Requirements Consensus Statement 4 - Health care terminology supports a single systematized way of describing every aspect of the health status and health care of an individual and populations of individuals. 1/18/2019

11 Requirements Consensus Statement The integrated terminology set should be: Source transparent Common to all users Non-duplicative Resident in a single repository Supported by clearly defined responsibilities for maintenance Designed to provide appropriate credit to contributors 1/18/2019

12 Draft Consensus Statements: Terminologies Process
1/18/2019

13 Process Consensus Statement 1 - The process for developing the integrated health care information and terminology model should have the following characteristics: Openness Meets the needs of all users 1/18/2019

14 Process Consensus Statement 2 - The same terminologies should be used by all stakeholders. 1/18/2019

15 Process Consensus Statement 3 - The development, integration, maintenance and adoption of standard terminologies require that a comprehensive set of functions be specified and clear roles and responsibilities assigned. A preliminary functional model is highlighted below. 1/18/2019

16 Terminology Standards Process
Oversight (includes evaluation) Information /Terminology Modeling (Cross Domain) Integration (Cross Domain) Development Maintenance Endorsement/ Selection Distribution Implementation Adoption 1/18/2019

17 Process Consensus Statement 4 - The terminology integration function identified in the above model should have the following characteristics: Serve the public interest Participation by all interested parties Include a coordination and oversight function Empowered to get through the “brick walls” Independent of financial interests in a product Endorsed by Standards Development Organizations (SDOs) Determines the domain where a specific terminology need should be addressed Impartial Utility driven Accountable Responsive Long term funding 1/18/2019

18 Process Consensus Statement 5 - The terminology integration function encompasses the following responsibilities: oversight, process management, and repository maintenance. Different bodies could carry out each of these roles or they could be combined within a single organization. 1/18/2019

19 Process Consensus Statement 6 - The terminology integration oversight role should be carried out by an entity with the following characteristics: Public/private representation Independent Stable funding Authority/mandate (the ability to break down barriers) Encourage a coalition with sufficient influence, prestige, clout, and support, to act as “tipping point” 1/18/2019

20 Process Consensus Statement 7 - The goal of terminology integration is “harmonization”. Harmonization is defined as organizations with overlapping terminologies creating a single integrated terminology that is supported by all of the “stakeholder” organizations. 1/18/2019

21 Process Consensus Statement 8 - Terminology domain boundaries should be clearly defined. Within each domain redundancies should be eliminated. 1/18/2019

22 Process Consensus Statement 9 - Terminology integration should result in a single terminology within a terminology domain. Where there is duplication, the terminologies should be merged not mapped. 1/18/2019

23 Process Consensus Statement 10 - The integration process needs to encompass linkages between domains. Owners should be designated as having responsibility for maintenance of the cross-domain linkages. The cross-domain linkages should have the following characteristics: Scalable Explicate the significance of the linkage Represent the medical knowledge associated with the linkages 1/18/2019

24 Process Consensus Statement 11 - Demonstration projects are needed to determine how to optimize the development and implementation of an integrated health care terminology. The demonstrations should test and evaluate the deployment of standard terminologies over time. The VA, DoD, and Kaiser could be considered demonstrations that are already underway. 1/18/2019

25 Summary and Next Steps Summary Points
There should be an oversight entity. There needs to be a focal point for process management. There needs to be a repository for terminologies. Next Steps Conduct a series of conference calls with the work group to refine and augment the consensus statements. Obtain Connecting for Health Steering Group endorsement of consensus statements. Disseminate consensus statements to the broader community. 1/18/2019


Download ppt "Connecting for Health Preliminary Terminology Consensus Statements"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google