Assessing Infrastructure Performance of Indian States

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ANAEMIA AND MALNUTRITION MILD ANAEMIAMODERATE ANEMIA SEVERE ANEMIAANY ANAEMIA g/dl g/dl
Advertisements

Povertyactionlab.org How to Randomize? Abhijit Banerjee Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Indian Atlas of Rainfall Spatial and Temporal Variations INSTRUMENTAL PERIOD RAINFALL VARIATION OVER HOMOGENEOUS ZONES, STATES AND METEOROLOGICAL SUBDIVISIONS.
Adverse Child Sex Ratios Challenges for Development International Workshop on Feminist Economics in China and India Mary E John.
POSTAL INDEX NUMBER(PIN) Postal Index Number is a 6-digits code introduced w.e.f It is the last piece of information in the address.
Population Problem of India Kamal singh Lecturer in Economics GCCBA-42,Chandigarh
THE STATE OF INDIA’S PUBLIC SERVICES BENCHMARKS FOR THE NEW MILLENNIUM PAC April 17, 2002.
Determinants of Poverty, Food Security & Nutrition.
National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3)
Census of India 2011 Provisional Population Totals DATA HIGHLIGHTS URBAN AGGLOMERATIONS & CITIES.
Compliance of Audit Reports Audit Report for the year received from the SIS were reviewed and a deficiency letter indicating the deficiencies/discrepancies.
Click to edit Master title style Doing Business in India 2009 Penelope Brook Acting Vice President, Financial and Private Sector Development The World.
Analyzing the Impact of Fiscal Policy on Poverty: Seven Stories Shanta Devarajan South Asia Region World Bank.
The importance of backbone Rohan Samarajiva and Harsha Vardhana Singh (at time of data collection: Secretary, TRAI; since September 2005: Deputy Director.
Economic Growth and Democracy in India: the beginnings of a `Scissors Crisis´? Mritiunjoy Mohanty Indian Institute of Management Calcutta in Kolkata, India.
Health Care Sector in India: Some Key Issues VR Muraleedharan Dept of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology Madras
Scheme of Assistance for Working Women Hostel MINISTRY OF WOMEN AND CHILD DEVELOPMENT GOVERNMENT OF INDIA.
Conference on “Calamities: Nature or Human Action? Challenges and Responsibilities” March 05, 2014, New Delhi Rising Calamities: Impact and Challenges.
Presentation on Internal Audit of SSA Accounts. By: Shri N.P. Chauhan ConsultantFM/TSG.
The Economics of “Fiscal Space” Shanta Devarajan World Bank.
The World Bank Group Ashish Khanna India Energy Team Leader South Asia Sustainable Development.
Assessment of Role of Leadership in Dairy Co- operatives of India Sushila Kaul Division of Econometrics Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute,
DR.SHRIRAM V GOSAVI HEALTH SURVEY BY NATIONAL COUNCIL OF APPLIED ECONOMIC RESEARCH.
CHILD NUTRITION : CURRENT CONCERNS Dr Shanti Ghosh.
Census of India 2011 Provisional Population Totals URBAN AGGLOMERATIONS & CITIES
Day 6 – Session: 3 (b) Session Title : Preparation and usefulness of (i) “Accounts at a Glance” and (i) “Combined Finance and Revenue Accounts”
CDR Analysis & Investigation Basic Course - Presentation by Ketan Computers Mobile: Website :
Powered By G-2, Plot No. 29, Marudhar Vihar, Near Reliance Fresh, Khatipura Circle, Jaipur , Rajasthan, India Mobile No: ,
Trade, Infrastructure and Regional Disparity in India and China Prabir De, RIS Fourth International Russia-India-China Annual Conference, New Delhi
Tackling child malnutrition the LAGAAN approach S B Agnihotri 15/01/2015.
Conditions in Which Microfinance has Emerged in Certain Regions and Consequent Policy Implications M.S.Sriram Radha Kumar Indian Institute of Management.
State-Business Relations in Indian States Siddhartha Mitra Director (Research)
CSC/ECE 517 Pre-Survey Results Fall Key / A — I have done/used this / B — I know about this / C — I want to learn about this / A — I have done/used.
Investment Climate Assessment of India 2004 Why does infrastructure and business regulation matter?: Findings from World Bank ICA 2004 Priya Basu & Taye.
Poliovirus Surveillance and Risks to Polio Eradication in India Dr. Hamid Jafari WHO-NPSP.
SLIDES FOR POWERPOINT 2007 & MAP OF INDIA Illustrations of country and administry districts.
SABSE BADA PRESENTS….. ‘ JNANI ‘ 3. £ £ £ £ £ 1, £ 1, £ 2, £ 2, £ 4, £ 4, £ 8,000 8.
Why river linking project in India INDIA having total land area is 3,287,263 sq km in this Irrigated land is only 558,080 sq km, rest of the land are un.
UNICEF IN INDIA NEW CHALLENGES AND CHANGING ROLE Dr. S.K. CHATURVEDI UNICEF.
AMBRISH DONGRE AVANI KAPUR & VIBHU TEWARY How much does India spend on Elementary Education (EE)?
How is NREGA doing? (200 districts, ) Jean Drèze and Christian Oldiges.
LUXURY TAX & ENTERTAINMENT TAX. Luxury tax in different states States Luxuries KarnatakaAssamDelhiHaryana HotelsCharge for luxury 1) between Rs. 500 –
Supervision and Monitoring of ICDS Scheme
Fig. 1 An association between U5MR and coverage gap (%) for (A) urban (B) rural and (C) overall area across states in India, 1992–93 to 2005–06. Note:
SOCIAL AND CULTURAL TABLES - AGE
POPULATION DENSITY BASED ON Geographi-cal AREA of india
Fiscal Analysis Division
INDIA AND IT’S CULTURE By A.Abilash V std A sec
Population Problem of India
LIFE INSURANCE COUNCIL Press Meet on Overview of Indian life insurance industry: trends & opportunities 20th FEBRUARY, 2014 Hyderabad.
IMPACT OF MAHATMA GANDHI NREGA ON RURAL WAGES
Get Search State, Category & Education Wise
The contribution of private schools to education in India and in Uttar Pradesh NISA conference.
Table 6. State Science & Technology Councils in India
Current Status of Polio Cases July 2011
Social Mobilisation Network
A Presentation on Maternal Mortality Levels ( )
Current Status of Polio Cases Dec 2010
Culture 8 - National Capital Territory of Delhi Culture 6B - Goa
India: Opioid Availability—An Update
Current Status of Polio Cases 2009
Social Mobilisation Network
STRUCTURAL CHANGES IN INDIAN ECONOMY
Public Financial Management System (PFMS)
Population Issues in India in the foreseeable future
STRUCTURAL CHANGES IN INDIAN ECONOMY
India countrY OUR.
1.2 lives every hour of every day of the year
2019 Indian Elections Phases Polling dates I April 11 II April 18 III
Area under cultivation (mn hectare)
Presentation transcript:

Assessing Infrastructure Performance of Indian States 20th Thinkers and Writers Forum of Skoch Summit June 22, 2014 Assessing Infrastructure Performance of Indian States Ramakrishna Nallathiga Associate Professor NICMAR - Pune

Structure Introduction The Study Quadrant Analysis of Performance Framework Methodology Quadrant Analysis of Performance Performance Ranking of States Correlation Analysis Conclusions References

Introduction Infrastructure provides the necessary services that support economic growth by increasing the productivity of labours and capital, thereby reducing the costs of production and raising profitability, production, income and employment. Cross-country empirical studies of infrastructure development impact clearly indicate that the level and quality of infrastructure contributes to economic growth and promotes more equitable development through access to the poor (Claderon and Serven 2004). This is further asserted by recent studies e.g., Estache and Garsous (2012). Infrastructure development has been one of the key driver of economic development in Asian economies like Japan and Korea (Kim 2006).

Introduction Some cross-country studies also point to the importance of good/effective governance in overall infrastructure development (De 2012). Extensive and efficient infrastructure is critical for ensuring the effective functioning of any economy – national, sub-national as well as regional. However, the development of infrastructure and its growth depend upon the peculiar priorities as well as the performance of the State governments in a federal structure of government such as that of India Therefore, as assessment of infrastructure performance of Indian States holds importance

Study Framework The study made an attempt to assess the performance of Indian States on infrastructure through a study using the framework of inter-State analysis Here, only ‘Developable /Constructible Infrastructure’ is examined covering the categories of: Power, Roads, Railways, Posts, Telecom and Banking. The inter-State analysis of development performance was first brought out under the State of States survey carried out by Bibek Debroy and Laveesh Bhandari during the years 2010-2013 Another study by Mundle et al (2012) brings out an inter-State comparison of how the Indian States performed on governance front

Study Methodology  The study has drawn a sample of 15 Indian States and compiled secondary data on the six infrastructure categories viz., roads, railways, power, postal services, telecom and banking, over a time period of 15 years covering two observations (1995/96 and 2005/06). The study sample includes: Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Punjab, Assam, Kerala, Rajasthan, Bihar, Madhya Pradesh, Tamil Nadu, Gujarat, Maharashtra, Uttar Pradesh, Haryana, Orissa, West Bengal The infrastructure performance of the States has been analysed first using levels and growth data i.e., showcasing better/poor performers by comparing with group average. ‘Quadrant analysis’ has been done to imply the comparative status of the States. The assessment of Infrastructure performance of the States was done later with reference to each infrastructure categories through the ranking of States in terms of levels and growth performance.

Quadrant Analysis of Infrastructure Performance of the States Performance Summary Power Sector The States of Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh and West Bengal are out-performers (top right quadrant of figure). A good number of States are poor performers (bottom left quadrant of figure).  Karnataka and Gujarat have above average power generation but growth rate is below average (bottom right quadrant). Rajasthan, Orissa and Uttar Pradesh achieve well above average growth rates but below average generation levels (top left quadrant).

Quadrant Analysis of Infrastructure Performance of the States Performance Summary Roads Sector Maharashtra, Andhra Pradesh Orissa and Uttar Pradesh are out-performers (top right quadrant). Bihar, Haryana, Rajasthan and Punjab - are poor performers (bottom left quadrant). Karnataka, Kerala and Madhya Pradesh achieve above average road formation but their growth rate is below average (top left quadrant). Tamil Nadu, Assam, Gujarat and West Bengal achieve below average growth rates but above average levels of road length (bottom right quadrant).

Quadrant Analysis of Infrastructure Performance of the States Railways Sector Performance Summary Maharashtra, Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh, Gujarat, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh and Tamil Nadu are out-performers (top right quadrant). Assam and Bihar are the poor performers (bottom left quadrant). Haryana, Orissa, Kerala, Punjab and West Bengal - achieve above average growth rate but below average railway line formation (top left quadrant). Only Madhya Pradesh achieved well below average growth rate but above average level of railway line (bottom right quadrant).

Quadrant Analysis of Infrastructure Performance of the States Performance Summary Postal Services Orissa, Tamil Nadu and Madhya Pradesh are out-performers (top right quadrant). Assam, Haryana, Maharashtra, Punjab, Uttar Pradesh and West Bengal are poor performers (bottom left quadrant).  AndhraPradesh, Gujarat, Karnataka, Rajasthan achieve above average level of postal services level but well below average growth rate (bottom right quadrant). Only Bihar and Orissa achieve above average growth but below average service levels (top left quadrant).

Quadrant Analysis of Infrastructure Performance of the States Performance Summary Telecom Services Gujarat, Tamil Nadu and Orissa are out-performers (top right quadrant). Maharashtra, West Bengal and Uttar Pradesh are poor performers (bottom left quadrant). Assam, Bihar, Haryana, Kerala and Punjab achieve above average growth rate but below average services (top left quadrant). AndhraPradesh, Karnataka, Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan achieved below average growth rate but above average level of telecom services (bottom right quadrant).

Quadrant Analysis of Infrastructure Performance of the States Banking Services Performance Summary AndhraPradesh, Haryana, Karnataka, Kerala, Punjab and Tamil Nadu outperformed (top right quadrant). Assam, Bihar, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Orissa, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh and West Bengal are poor performers (bottom left quadrant). There is no State with above average growth rate but below average level of banking services (top left quadrant). Only Gujarat achieved below average growth rate but is above average level of banking services (bottom right quadrant).

Performance Ranking of the States and Correlation Analysis Summary Power Sector Gujarat has more or less maintained its top ranking, Maharashtra, Andhra Pradesh, Tamil Nadu, Rajasthan and West Bengal have improved their ranking during the period. Assam, Bihar, Madhya Pradesh, Haryana and Kerala went down in terms of ranking. Andhra Pradesh, West Bengal, Rajasthan and Maharashtra have achieved top ranking in terms of growth performance Madhya Pradesh, Haryana, Assam and Bihar have failed in terms of growth performance. Rank correlation analysis of power generation levels and growth indicates a strong correlation (Cr = 0.75), implying that larger capacity addition leads to higher growth. The correlation analysis between levels indicates that both of them are not related positively and significantly (Cr=-0.06) implying the importance of capacity addition. State Level Rank (1990/91) (2005/06) Growth rank Andhra Pradesh 15 3 1 Assam 9 14 Bihar 10 Gujarat 2 8 Haryana 6 12 Karnataka Kerala 13 Madhya Pradesh 4 11 Maharashtra 7 5 Orissa Punjab Rajasthan Tamil Nadu Uttar Pradesh West Bengal

Performance Ranking of the States and Correlation Analysis Summary Roads sector Maharashtra and Uttar Pradesh maintained top rankings, AndhraPradesh, Orissa, Gujarat, Karnataka and West Bengal have improved their ranking. Bihar, Haryana and Punjab went down in terms of ranking (with Assam remaining at same rank) as they appear to have not focused on this sector Gujarat, Andhra Pradesh, West Bengal, Assam and Uttar Pradesh have achieved top rankings in terms of growth performance in roads sector. Kerala, Rajasthan, Haryana, Bihar and Tamil Nadu have failed in terms of growth performance. Rank correlation analysis of road length levels and growth indicate a strong correlation between them (Cr = 0.73), implying that larger network creation leads to higher growth. The correlation analysis of levels indicates that both of them are related positively but not significantly (Cr=0.27), implying again the importance of new projects State Level Rank (1990/91) (2005/06) Growth rank Andhra Pradesh 7 4 3 Assam 12 Bihar 10 13 14 Gujarat 11 9 1 Haryana 15 Karnataka 8 Kerala 6 Madhya Pradesh 5 Maharashtra Orissa Punjab Rajasthan Tamil Nadu Uttar Pradesh 2 West Bengal

Performance Ranking of the States and Correlation Analysis Summary Railways Sector Uttar Pradesh, Rajasthan, Maharashtra and Gujarat maintained their top rankings, West Bengal and Andhra Pradesh improved ranking. Punjab, Orissa, Kerala and Haryana remained at bottom in terms of ranking and appear to have lost opportunity to create better connectivity. Gujarat, West Bengal, Andhra Pradesh, Assam and Uttar Pradesh have achieved top rankings in terms of growth performance in railways sector. Kerala, Rajasthan, Haryana, Bihar and Tamil Nadu have failed in terms of growth performance. Rank correlation analysis of railway length levels and growth indicate negative and weak relation between them (Cr=-0.33), implying that larger network is a barrier to higher growth (via a lower bargain/lobbying power to States). The correlation analysis between levels indicates that both of them are related positively and strongly correlated (Cr = 0.92), implying ‘legacy’ rather than new projects holds key to performance State Level Rank (1990/91) (2005/06) Growth rank Andhra Pradesh 7 4 3 Assam 12 Bihar 10 13 14 Gujarat 11 9 1 Haryana 15 Karnataka 8 Kerala 6 Madhya Pradesh 5 Maharashtra Orissa Punjab Rajasthan Tamil Nadu Uttar Pradesh 2 West Bengal

Performance Ranking of the States and Correlation Analysis Postal Sector Summary Orissa, Andhra Pradesh, Tamil Nadu and Karnataka have maintained their top rankings, the States of Bihar and Madhya Pradesh have improved their ranking. Haryana, Maharashtra, Uttar Pradesh and West Bengal remained at bottom in terms of ranking Madhya Pradesh and Bihar achieved top rankings in terms of growth performance. Uttar Pradesh, Gujarat, Rajasthan and Haryana failed in terms of growth to remain at bottom. Rank correlation analysis of post office levels and growth indicate positive and weak relation between them (Cr=0.29), implying that larger network may or may not lead to higher growth, which is the case of postal services that faces competition from private. The correlation analysis indicates that both of them are related positively and strongly (Cr = 0.9). It implies that ‘stagnation’ or ‘decline’ in postal services that is barrier to performance. State Level Rank (1990/91) (2005/06) Growth rank Andhra Pradesh 1 2 8 Assam 9 7 Bihar 14 11 Gujarat 6 13 Haryana 15 Karnataka 5 4 Kerala 3 Madhya Pradesh Maharashtra 12 10 Orissa Punjab Rajasthan Tamil Nadu Uttar Pradesh West Bengal

Performance Ranking of the States and Correlation Analysis SUMMARY Telecom Sector Karnataka, Rajasthan and Madhya Pradesh maintained top rankings, while Orissa, Kerala, Andhra Pradesh, Gujarat and Tamil Nadu improved Assam, Bihar, Haryana and Punjab remained at bottom Assam, Orissa, Kerala, Bihar and Punjab achieved top rankings in terms of growth performance West Bengal, Karnataka Madhya Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh and Maharashtra failed to grow to be at bottom Rank correlation analysis of telephone exchange levels and growth indicate positive but weak relation between them (Cr=0.17), implying that larger exchange base may or not lead to higher growth, which is the case of telecom services facing competition from mobile telephony The levels correlation analysis indicates that both of them are related positive but weak (Cr = 0.03). It implies that expansion of telecom service is not dependent upon/ constrained by ‘level at begin’. State Level Rank (1990/91) (2005/06) Growth rank Andhra Pradesh 5 2 Assam 15 3 Bihar 11 12 13 Gujarat 8 1 Haryana 14 Karnataka 4 6 Kerala Madhya Pradesh Maharashtra Orissa 7 Punjab 9 10 Rajasthan Tamil Nadu Uttar Pradesh West Bengal

Performance Ranking of the States and Correlation Analysis SUMMARY Banking Sector Punjab, Kerala, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu and Haryana have maintained their top rankings, Andhra Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh and West Bengal have improved their ranking during the period. Assam, Bihar, Uttar Pradesh and West Bengal remained at the bottom in terms of ranking. Kerala, Haryana, Punjab, Tamil Nadu and Andhra Pradesh achieved top rankings in terms of growth performance by registering lower decline Assam, Bihar, Gujarat and Madhya Pradesh have registered a greater decline in bank branches thereby remained at the bottom. Rank correlation analysis of banking levels and growth indicate strong and positive relation between them (Cr=0.82), which implies that larger network leads to higher growth (or, lower decline), which appears to be due to the effect of presence reinforcing more patronage. The levels correlation analysis indicates that both of them are indeed related positively and strongly correlated (Cr = 0.94). It implies that there has been an onset of ‘stagnation’ in banking services due to the restructuring among them State Level Rank (1990/91) (2005/06) Growth rank Andhra Pradesh 7 6 2 Assam 15 14 12 Bihar Gujarat 4 13 Haryana 5 Karnataka 3 Kerala 1 Madhya Pradesh 11 Maharashtra 8 Orissa Punjab Rajasthan Tamil Nadu Uttar Pradesh 10 West Bengal

Overall Ranking and Conclusions State Level Rank (1990/91) (2005/06) Growth rank Andhra Pradesh 8 1 Assam 15 9 Bihar 13 14 Gujarat 4 7 Haryana Karnataka 2 5 11 Kerala Madhya Pradesh Maharashtra 3 6 Orissa Punjab 10 Rajasthan Tamil Nadu Uttar Pradesh West Bengal 12

Conclusions Karnataka, Tamil Nadu and Gujarat have maintained their top rankings at two different time periods, while Andhra Pradesh and Orissa have improved their rankings significantly to reach top positions. Andhra Pradesh, in particular, has moved up by 7 ranks to become overall ranked 1 on infrastructure, which is a big achievement. Rajasthan Kerala and Punjab have performed modestly with their rankings remaining more or less constant during the period. Further, the States of Maharashtra and Uttar Pradesh, which were good in rankings at begin, slipped down to become the States of modest performance.

Conclusions The States of Assam, Bihar, Haryana and West Bengal remained at the bottom in terms of ranking.  It can also be seen that Andhra Pradesh and Orissa have top ranked in terms of growth performance, followed by Kerala, Tamil Nadu and West Bengal. Modest growth performance on overall infrastructure has been shown by the States of Punjab, Assam, Maharashtra, Gujarat, Haryana and Rajasthan. The States of Karnataka, Madhya Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh and Bihar have achieved bottom rankings by showing lower growth performance.

References Bae, Suho., 2012, The Effects of Economic Performance on Infrastructure Spending at the State and Local Levels, World Political Science Review, Volume 8, Issue 1, pp 330-349 Bibek Debroy and Laveesh Bhandari (2013), The State of States: The Best Performing States of India, India Today, December 30, 2013 (p 38-62) Bibek Debroy and Laveesh Bhandari (2012), The State of States: The Best Performing States of India, India Today, December , 2012 Claderon, C and L Serven, 2004, The Effects of Infrastructure Development on Growth and Income Distribution, Working Paper No. 270, Central Bank of Chile, Chile Dash, L. N., 2007, Economics of Infrastructure: Growth and Development, Regal Publications, New Delhi De, Prabir, 2012, Does Governance Matter for Infrastructure Development? Empirical Evidence from Asia, Journal of Infrastructure Development, Volume 4, No. 2, pp 153-180 Estache, A. and G Garsous, 2012, The impact of infrastructure on economic growth in developing countries, IFC Economic Notes No. 1, International Finance Corporation, Washington DC Kim, Byongyuki, 2006, Infrastructure Development for Economic Development in Developing Countries: Lessons from Korea and Japan, GSICS Working Paper 11, Kobe University, Japan Mundle, S., P. Chakrabaorty, S. Chowdhury and S Sikdar, 2012, The Quality of Governance: How have Indian States Performed, Economic and Political Weekly of India, Vol XLVII, No. 49, pp 41-51 Purie, Arun 2012, India Today: State of the States 2012, India Today, New Delhi