Case study from Riga (Latvia) – campaigns within the project «Different people. Different experience. One Latvia» Alda Sebre Society Integration Foundation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Local Integration of Refugees in Belarus, Moldova and Ukraine March 2009 – February 2011 EU-funded project Implemented by UNHCR.
Advertisements

Community based HIV treatment COBASYS WORKPLAN 3 REACH Trust.
New opportunities for regional development through cross-border cooperation Ministry of Environmental Protection and Regional Development November 16,
PUBLIC AWARENESS AND COMMUNICATION ACTIVITIES LOCAL INTEGRATION OF REFUGEES IN BELARUS, MOLDOVA AND UKRAINE.
Karolis Žibas Centre of Ethnic Studies
Consensus Building Workshop for an Advocacy Strategy on Population Issues in Lebanon 3 – 4 April 2006 Experiences in Advocacy: Presented by: Ms. Seta Hadeshian.
CHILD WELFARE REFORM PROJECT COMMUNICATION STRATEGY.
1. A first look at the EYD2015 campaign Our red thread: storytelling 3 Co-Communication Co-branding Co-creation of content.
Developing Capacity on Water Integrity WATER INTEGRITY NETWORK Delft 31st May 2013 Francoise Nicole Ndoume Regional Coordinator Water Integrity Network,
Communication programme for informing the Montenegrin public on the integration into the EU Republic of Montenegro Ministry for International Economic.
Swiss - Latvian Cooperation Programme NGO Fund Evaluation of the Grant Scheme Sandra Rieksta Deputy Director Society Integration Foundation
Bratislava, June 16-17, 2003 Getting Development Cooperation Work: Cooperation between the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and UNDP Inita Paulovica Assistant.
Civil society and its role in the process of EU integration Regional Conference Through Cooperation towards Integration Przno, 08 –
Incorporating Mechanisms for the Protection of Rights into Temporary Worker Programmes: Experiences, Lessons Learned, Challenges, and Possibilities Luis.
Go beyond prejudice, discover the Roma Presentation of the Awareness raising campaign:
Latvian NGDO Platform Success and problems in advocacy and policy dialogue of the Platform/country during 2005 The main issues for advocacy and policy.
WTD project implementation in Latvia Strasbourg 5 June,
LATIN AMERICAN CHILDREN´S VOICES Reccomendations for States, Schools, Families and Commitments as Digital Citizens.
REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA Access of persons with disabilities to the electoral process Achievements and perspectives CENTRAL ELECTORAL COMMISSION.
Use of CDCynergy Model in Kazakhstan Raimbek Sissemaliev CARK Programme Communication Workhshop, 9-13 August 2004 Tashkent, Uzbekistan.
Donor Coordination Forum 16 October, key challenges Poverty Social exclusion Functional gaps and system weaknesses in social services.
A Roma Women Empowerment Campaign in Bulgaria. The challenges:  Empowerment of (grassroots) Roma women  Raising the awareness about the Roma women place,
Interreligious Dialogue … is a positive way of communication and cooperation between people with different ideologies* desiring to share ideas respectfully.
The European Year for Development Key facts about EU development co-operation The 28 Member States and the European Union are together responsible.
Stacey Vickers – Team Leader, Media and Social Media International Cooperation & Development European Year for Development 2015: Strategy, Results and.
Education of Roma children in Latvia Deniss Kretalovs Secretariat of the Special Assignment Minister for Social Integration European Anti-Discrimination.
Project Manager – MCESD Project Partner - MEUSAC “ Closer to Europe ” Operational Programme 2 Cohesion Policy Empowering People for More Jobs.
Shornokishoree: An Innovative Approach to Promote Adolescent Girl’s Health & Development in Bangladesh Dr. Nizam Uddin Ahmed Executive Director & General.
The Social Integration of Migrants of the City of Athens.
Building national capacity for the implementation of safer sex mass media campaigns in Eastern Europe and Central Asia Mexico, 2008.
Klik om het opmaakprofiel van de modelondertitel te bewerken I AM ROMA.
On the Project Budget Literacy for High School Students
Specific objective „To increase support for general education institutions to develop students’ individual competences” Measure No „Support.
The situation of men and women with disabilities seeking asylum in Sweden Arvid Lindén, international disability policy coordinator 3rd meeting on Monitoring.
NatRisk WP-6: Dissemination
Day 2 Opening Re-cap on day 1 by Mr. Pant Tap-Raji
Addressing statelessness in Europe
The Sure Start Programme – Practical Model of an Integrated Policy for Early Childhood Development in Europe Maria Petkova Tulip Foundation.
European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights
The third International Meeting in Warshaw
Project ACTIVE.ALL Rights, Equality and Citizenship Programme
Tackling biodiversity challenges through innovative e-learning
Towards child and family oriented and preventive services
Building Coalitions for Change Information, Consultation and Public Participation in Policy-making Experience from OECD countries Directorate for Public.
Part 2: How to ensure good project management?
“Setting Up a CIL” - FD2017 Status Quo in Greece
Statutory participatory mechanisms
Message in a bottle: how to communicate macro-regional strategies -
Ministry of Population, Social Protection and Advancement of Women
INFORMING THE PUBLIC ABOUT THE ESF Juris Vigulis Department of communication, Ministry of Welfare LATVIA.
Macro-Fiscal Policy Unit/ Ministry of Finance Egypt
LLI-313 Four Seasons Exciting Journey in Manor Parks/ 4SeasonsParks
DIGITAL INCLUSION PROJECT
LLI-313 “Four Seasons Exciting Journey in Manor Parks” / “4SeasonsParks” Kick-off Zemgale Planning region (PP2) activities Anna Builo-Hoļme
EU CSF FUND II Project Launching Workshop
The role of cities in promoting Active Inclusion
DIRECT – DIsaster REsilient Communities and Towns
Shaping and Debating Future of EU
Universal Periodic Review
Communication challenges faced in the organisation of the 2011 Population and Housing Census Anne Nuka Head of the Marketing and Dissemination Department.
PEOPLE’S VOICE (Ukraine)
ESF SUPPORT TO CAPACITY BUILDING IN LATVIA
Menedék’s Approach in Budapest – Let’s involve the private sector
Procurement Hub Partners
National Confederation of Disabled People –N.C.D.P.
State support for creative arts and organizations of art creators in Lithuania. Presentation of the system of state pensions for artists and the program.
Germany’s Refugee Crisis
The Active Citizens Fund in Bulgaria Programme Priorities and Measures for Support Short version of the presentation delivered at the Official Launch.
POPULATION AND HOUSING CENSUS ROUND 2021
Empowering Young People – Connecting Europe
Presentation transcript:

Case study from Riga (Latvia) – campaigns within the project «Different people. Different experience. One Latvia» Alda Sebre Society Integration Foundation Ilona Stalidzāne Municipality of Riga Dresden, September 21-23

Population (01.01.2016) Number Latvians Russians Belarusians Population of Latvia Ethnic group  Number Percent Latvians 1 284 767 59.9 Russians 566 681 26.4 Belarusians 70 803 3.3 Ukrainians 51 576 2.4 Poles 46453 2.2 Lithuanians 27 000 1.3 Jews 8 679 0.4 Other ethnic groups 88 804 4.1 Total in Latvia 2 144 763   Population of Riga   Number Percent Latvians 302688 45.5 Russians 269849 40.6 Belarusians 26571 4.0 Ukrainians 25864 3.9 Poles 13020 2.0 Other ethnic groups 26975 4.1 Total in Riga 664967

Increase of foreign nationals in Latvia 01.01.2012 01.01.2016 60 285 foreign residents in Latvia   44 328 with permanent residence permits 4 271 - EU/EEZ citizens, 40 057 - third country nationals Representatives of 56 countries 15 957 with temporary residence permits. 6 591 - EU/EEZ citizens, 9 366 - third country nationals Representatives of 79 countries 88 576 foreign residents in Latvia 52 001 with permanent residence permits 4 398 - EU/EEZ citizens, 47 603 - third country nationals Representatives of 98 countries 36 575 with temporary residence permits. 10 814 - EU/EEZ citizens, 25 761 - third country nationals Representatives of 120 countries

Asylum seekers 1998 - the asylum procedure started 1946 persons applied for asylum in Latvia (data on August 2016) in total, 106 person received refugee and 183 persons received alternative status (subsidiary protection) by August 2016. asylum seekers in the last years mainly come from Georgia, Ukraine, Syria, Afghanistan and Iraq. 531 asylum seekers to be accepted within the next two years under EU resettlement scheme (Latvia was ready for 776). 69 persons arrived (data on August 2016)

Lack of knowledge of Latvian language Newcomer integration-challenges Lack of knowledge of Latvian language Limited access to social protection (including health, education and employment etc.) Reserved attitude towards newcomers (visually different, religion, etc.) Limited awareness raising activities and examples of good practices

TASK WHAT IS THE MAIN MESSAGE OF THIS VIDEO? HOW COULD YOU TITLE THIS VIDEO ?

http://ej.uz/tar9

Projects "Different people, various experiences, one Latvia" I and II The aim of the projects was identification of innovative approaches and dissemination of good practice to promote anti-discrimination and equality principles in Latvia.

Projects "Different people, various experiences, one Latvia" I and II Core activities Capacity strengthening of core actors on non-discrimination, equality issues and diversity management. Trainings were organised for more than 300 specialists from different sectors (journalists, PR and communication specialists, high level officials, judges, lawyers, NGO and public sector representatives etc.) Awareness raising campaigns Surveys on diversity management in companies, Roma situation in Latvia Supporting activities to raise awareness of Roma and support their integration

Projects "Different people, various experiences, one Latvia" I and II Target group(s) Public institutions Civil society organizations (NGOs) High level public officials Journalists, PR and communication specialists School teachers Judges, lawyers, prosecutors and advocates Schoolchildren and young people People experiencing discrimination Society in general

Projects "Different people, various experiences, one Latvia" I and II Partners Public institutions – ministries Civil society organizations (NGOs) Time frame 2 years Financial resources ~500 000 EUR

The activity “Awareness raising of general public I” was foreseen with an objective to increase public awareness of discrimination issues and to promote equality. The following activities were organised in order to address society to explain equality issues and disseminate knowledge on non-discriminative attitude: outdoor advertisement campaign; publications on national, regional and internet media; TV broadcasts; thematic days; creative and interactive events in schools; Ambassadors of Good Will and Diversity award. As the result of the activities the issue of equality and non-discrimination issues has been raised and awareness of general public about 6 discrimination grounds has increased.

The following activities and events were conducted within the communication campaign: outdoor advertisements (posters) campaign on 6 grounds of discrimination (6 different posters; 1000 copies; in 7 cities conducted, 87 100 persons reached); regular thematic articles for national, regional newspapers, as well as for internet media on discrimination and equality issues (157 publication initiated); competition of publication and TV broadcasts “Diversity equalise” (11 competitors – journalists and publishers for 3 different categories); TV broadcast about discrimination and equality issues in national television (48 000 persons reached)

4 thematic days: 8 April - International Roma day and Roma holocaust memory day; 10 May - World Day for Cultural Diversity for Dialogue and Development (the organisation of the event included flash mob); 1 June - International Day for Protection of Children; 1 July - Equality and diversity movie night (all together 1140 people attended the thematic days, 80 publications initiated); 5 interactive and creative activities for children and young people on tolerance and non-discrimination (150 children involved); competition of children creative works on tolerance and non-discrimination (135 competitors in 3 different categories)

Activity – Roma Day

Activity – diversity mainstreaming

The activity “Awareness rising of general public II” Awareness-raising activities targeted at the general public by demonstration of cases of discrimination through digital storytelling. 7 video stories were produced on 6 grounds of discrimination by giving a voice to the representatives of discriminated groups. Video stories were broadcasted in social media, internet media, televisions, cinemas and had initiated intensive public discussions.

Results Video stories broadcasting in social media has attracted more than 350 000 viewers in Latvia and abroad and in several TV channels (4 TV channels were used) has ensured audience 20 000 – 30 000 in each. The promotional video (trailer) has been created in order to raise the interest to watch all the video stories. It was shown in 3 cinemas reaching the audience of more than 6000 people (parents with pre-school and younger school-age children (age of 12-34), as well as in different social media. The social media network focusing on young people has been used, for example, www.draugiem.lv (similar to Facebook, only Latvian version) reaching 224 viewers and 55 followers. Within the project the video stories were recorded on DVD in order to approach the young people in more tangible way, for example ensuring the video watching with open discussions during social sciences lessons in schools.

Elaboration of the script Consultations with target group Main challenges Elaboration of the script Consultations with target group New regulations/Political discussions («correct» norms of virtues of society) Attraction of the attention of the society

SEVEN STORIES ABOUT US http://ej.uz/8ac9

Questions Have you ever had a negative experience in implementing public campaign (for example, message was not properly formulated, resistance from grass roots or state/NGOs)? What was your reaction (Has the campaign been stopped? What was the crisis communication?)? Have you taken into account negative opinion makers while creating the campaign or other activities by confronting their opinions by the messages of the campaign?   What kind of methods and information channels do you use while working with grassroots in order to promote tolerance in the society?

Thank you!