Barrow County SPLOST 2018 Citizen Committee Meeting October 17, 2016

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Capital Improvement Funding. State of the District Facilities 50% of Aiken County Public Schools are between 40 and 60 years old Leavelle McCampbell Middle.
Advertisements

The unpopularity of property taxes and the simplicity and perceived fairness of sales taxes have made the Local Option Sales Tax for Education a popular.
2014 Election Ballot Bond Question #3B For the Elizabeth School District Explained.
ACMA Conference February 8, 2007 Evaluating Investments in Infrastructure Panel Overview of Public Infrastructure Financing in the City of Phoenix.
GFOAz May 11, 2007 The ABC’s of Municipal Financing.
Flow of Funding Through Local Governments PWB Southwest Regional Academy November 28, 2012 Municipal Budgeting and Management August 16,2012.
Horizon Council PresentationHorizon Council Presentation April 22, 2015April 22, 2015.
City of Houston Long Range Financial Management Task Force City Financial Overview Part I August 29,
Budget Committee Workshop February16, Oregon’s local budget law is a group of statutes that require local governments to prepare and adopt annual.
2012 LOST Presentation May 21,  To provide property tax rollback equal to the distribution of the LOST O.C.G.A. §  Is the Condition Precedent.
Charter School Facilities Funding 2010 Florida Charter School Conference November 9, 2010 William E. Fontaine Office of Educational Facilities.
First Budget Hearing (Final Hearing For Non-Ad Valorem Assessments) Board of County Commissioners September 06, 2007.
Budget Focus To prepare a structurally balanced general operating budget with recurring revenues supporting recurring expenditures. To provide a budget,
October 8,  Regular operating levy for current expenses ◦ Continuous period or limited period 1- 5 years ◦ Limited may be renewed or replaced 
Tourist Development Tax June 9, 2009 Orange County.
FEBRUARY 22, 2016 FY 2017 County Administrator’s Recommended Budget.
SPLOST VII. I.Purpose of Meeting II.What is a SPLOST III.What can SPLOST funds be used for? IV. Benefits of SPLOST V.Hall County SPLOST History VI.SPLOST.
1. FY Proposed Budget Jamie Justice, Town Manager & Piet Swart, Finance Director April 26, 2016 Fiscal Year Proposed Budget 2.
Goodhue School District 2015 Payable 2016 Truth In Taxation Public Meeting Time: 6:30pm Date: December 21, 2015 at the Goodhue School District Board Room.
City of Woodstock Proposed Budget FY 2014 Presented May 20, 2013.
2008 PROPERTY TAX LEVY RICHFIELD PUBLIC SCHOOLS LEVY INFORMATION.
1 New Territory Municipal Utility Districts Strategic Partnership Agreement Discussions With the City of Sugar Land.
Proposed Budget Fiscal Year 2017 Presentation to the County Commission May 4, 2016 FY16 Proposed Budget Presentation.
SALES TAX/CAPITAL REVENUE DISCUSSION July 2, 2012.
Information for Public Hearing July 22, TAX DIGEST AND MILLAGE RATE 2015 What is a Digest?  The total Net Assessed Value of Real, Personal Property,
FY 2016 Budget Workshop June 11, 2015 Brian Maxwell, City Manager Dan Buckley, Deputy City Manager Mike Loftin, Finance Director 1.
Pasco County “Budget 101” OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT & BUDGET.
S.P.L.O.S.T. Building the Future … One Penny at a time “Building the future for the children of Crisp County…one penny at a time!”
REVENUE OVERVIEW FY2016 PROPOSED BUDGET July 28,
Presented By: Budget & Research Department FY STATUS REPORT & THREE-YEAR FINANCIAL FORECAST SUMMARY (FY )
BUDGET PROCESS & REVENUE & EXPENSE INFORMATION For FISCAL YEAR 2011.
FY 2017 BudgetHearing September 8, 2016 Mike Loftin, Assistant City Manager - Finance 1.
37 schools 21 elementary, 10 middle and 6 high 4,700 staff members 7 th largest district of 180 school districts in Georgia 15 Year Student Enrollment.
Madison County Schools Facility Sales Tax April 2017
Town meeting handout Article 3
Wakefield’s Financial Picture Finance Committee
Community Improvement Districts County Counselors Association of Kansas Annual Meeting November 15, 2010 Janet S. Garms
Proposed School Bond Referendum September 26, 2017
CITY SERVICES INSTITUTE
League of Wisconsin Municipalities Urban Policy Forum June 8, 2017
Overview of property tax levies for Idaho Schools
Branches/Leaders/Responsibilities
Montgomery County Capital & Operating Budget Process Briefing
Tax Budget – Putting the puzzle pieces together
Pre-Budget Consultation
Tax Abatement Bonds Presentation City of Marshall, Minnesota
CRESTWOOD LOCAL SCHOOL DISTRICT FIVE YEAR FORECAST
Presented by: Deborah Early Icenogle Seaver Pogue, P.C.
WGFOA Spring Conference Egg Harbor, WI April 20, 2017
Kitsap County 2019 Annual Budget
Unified Government of Wyandotte County & Kansas City, Kansas
Financial Audit Presentation Year Ended June 30, 2017
FY 2019 Proposed Budget Hall County Board of Commissioners
Board of County Commissioners
Truth in Taxation Report December 18, 2014
Morton District 709 Schools
Overview of City Budget
2019 TRUTH IN TAXATION HEARING
City Revenues and Expenditures
Property Tax Levy – Taxes Payable 2019
Delta Water Supply Project
Regional Transportation Sales Tax Transportation Investment Act of 2010 and Transportation Funding Act of 2015 as of April 5, 2017.
Town Council Strategic Planning Session
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT #883
Funding the Town’s Transportation Infrastructure Improvement Plan (IIP) – An Initial Discussion of Impact Fees Town Council Meeting March 1, 2017.
E-SPLOST V On May 20, 2014 the voters of Paulding County will be asked to extend the penny sales tax that is helping build classrooms, improve current.
Budget work session may 20,2019
Budget office overview
Agenda FYE June 30, 2020 Operating Budget
Agenda FYE June 30, 2020 Operating Budget
Presentation transcript:

Barrow County SPLOST 2018 Citizen Committee Meeting October 17, 2016 Partnership and Collaboration for a Prosperous Community

Why Are We Here? “Meet & Confer” meeting with city officials held on June 29th County intended to call for SPLOST referendum this November. County unable to gain City of Winder’s approval for terms of an Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) for 2018 SPLOST. IGA was necessary to continue the voter approved funding of 2005 General Obligation debt using SPLOST revenue. Citizen involvement and input is CRITICAL.

SPLOST 101 1% optional county sales tax used to fund capital outlay projects proposed by county and qualified city governments. Levied throughout the entire county and shared with participating cities. Tax collected on items subject to sales and use tax as well as on sale of food and nonalcoholic beverages which are not subject to State sales tax. In general, SPLOST can be levied for 5 year period (6 if county and cities enter into an agreement). Research indicates that approximately 25-30% of SPLOST receipts due to non-resident spending.

Capital Outlay Defined Major projects which are of a permanent, long-lived nature (i.e. land and structures). Chargeable to a capital asset account as distinguished from current expenditures and ordinary maintenance expenses. Includes without limitation roads, streets, bridges, police cars, fire trucks, ambulances, garbage trucks, and other major equipment Roads, Streets, and Bridges Category Acquisition of rights of way Construction of roads, streets, bridges Renovation and improvement of roads, streets, bridges Improvement of surface-water drainage Major equipment

SPLOST Historical Overview In 2005, County issued General Obligation (GO) Bonds in conjunction with voter approved 2005 SPLOST to fund the following projects: Criminal Justice Facility ($46,400,000)- Level One Courthouse Renovation ($4,250,000)- Level One E911 Facility ($1,500,000) Fire Station & Training Center ($2,500,000) Total GO bond debt service obligation at time of issue was $93,857,171 ($58 million in principal and $35,857,171 in interest). $43,165,544 has been paid as of 9/30/2016 ($22,135,00 in principal and $21,030,544 in interest). Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) was reached resulting in 6-year collection period (July 2006-June 2012). Of $50,045,000 collected, $29 million was dedicated for the GO bond debt service.

SPLOST Historical Overview On March 15, 2011 the citizens of Barrow County approved the continuation of SPLOST. IGA executed in November 2010, resulting in 6 year collection of a projected $60,000,000. Among the projects approved by voters was payment of debt service of 2005 SPLOST General Obligation bonds (principal and interest) in amount of $27,900,000. SPLOST 2012 expires June 30, 2018. Outstanding 2005 GO Bond debt service on June 30, 2018 will be $41,093,163. Of this amount, $27,402,340 represents outstanding debt service for six year period July 2018-June 2024.

State Law: County SPLOST O.C.G.A. 48-8-110 to 48-8-122 Capital outlay project Qualified municipality (provide 3 of 12 specific services) Intergovernmental agreement (IGA) Formula for allocation of proceeds between County and Cities Referendum language State Department of Revenue’s fee (1% of receipts) Use of proceeds Reporting

“In addition to using the SPLOST to retire existing general obligation debt, a city or county may issue general obligation debt in conjunction with the SPLOST. Doing so will enable a local government to commence funding projects in anticipation of receiving SPLOST proceeds to pay the debt.” Source: SPLOST: Building for the Future, GMA Legal Report August 2012

Benefits of Intergovernmental Agreements (IGA) Collaboration and negotiation allows county and municipalities the opportunity to work on joint projects and those projects that will best serve the needs of all citizens. SPLOST can be imposed for a maximum of six years rather than five years, resulting in more revenue available for capital expenses and more projects being funded. Tax may be collected for full six years, regardless of when/if specific projects are fully funded at an earlier time. Excess funds could then be used to retire county debt or placed in County General Fund to roll back property taxes.

Legal Requirements for IGA County must reach a consensus with one or more municipalities within the county representing at least 50 percent of the county’s municipal population. Objective of the agreement is to specify how the SPLOST proceeds would be disbursed among the parties of the agreement and in what priority. O.C.G.A § 48-8-115 requires that the agreement address, at a minimum: Specific capital outlay project or projects to be funded. Estimated dollar amount allocated for each project from the SPLOST proceeds. Procedures for distributing SPLOST proceeds to municipalities. Schedule for distributing proceeds to cities that includes order or priority in which projects will be fully or partially funded. Provision that proceeds from the tax will be kept in separate accounts and used exclusively for the specified purposes.

No IGA: Population Distribution If no consensus reached, Method 2 is authorized by law. BOC may allocate SPLOST proceeds for the construction of county-wide projects “off the top” using 3-step process: “LEVEL ONE” Countywide project (courthouse, administrative building, county or regional jail, health department facility). Collectively may consume up to 100 percent of the total estimated SPLOST revenues. Allows for renovations to existing facilities, debt repayment on existing facilities. If no LEVEL ONE projects are selected, select LEVEL TWO Countywide project(s). No more than 20 percent of total estimated SPLOST revenues may be allocated Allocate remaining proceeds based on population. Pro rata based on population, county share = ratio of unincorporated relative to total county population

Level Two Projects Capital projects which provide benefit to entire county (other than Level 1). Maximum of 20% “off the top.” May also be used for renovating existing facilities, debt service on existing facilities, and furnishing/equipping existing facilities. Examples: Recreational facilities/athletic fields Civic/cultural arts centers

Prorated Population Calculations Based upon most recent U.S. Census (2010) County Allocation Unincorporated population of 44,241 Total Barrow County population of 69,367 County allocation is 44,241/69,367 or 63.78% Municipal Allocation Auburn 6,678/69,367 or 9.63% Braselton 1,085/69,367 or 1.56% Bethlehem 601/69,367 or .87% Carl 255/69,367 or .38% Statham 2,408/69,367 or 3.47% Winder 14,099/69,367 or 20.33%

SPLOST’s Community Impact Property tax avoidance SPLOST funds critical capital needs otherwise funded via Ad Valorem taxation. Road construction/improvement/maintenance Sheriff/Fire/EMS vehicles and equipment Water and sewer infrastructure Reduction of debt obligation 25-30% of SPLOST receipts result of non-resident spending Quality of Life projects Valuable amenities enjoyed by entire community Recreational facilities Cultural Arts Economic benefits Business recruitment and retention Tourism revenue (retail spending, hotel occupancy, etc.)

2005 GO Bond: Millage Impact Annual GO Bond Payment Total Debt Service Mills Required ($1,657,306 per mill Fiscal Year Principal Interest 2019 $3,725,000 $826,671 $4,551,671 2.7464 2020 $3,835,000 $737,841 $4,572,841 2.7592 2021 $3,925,000 $646,661 $4,571,661 2.7585 2022 $4,020,000 $553,307 $4,573,307 2.7595 2023 $4,110,000 $457,780 $4,567,780 2.7561 2024 $4,205,000 $360,079 $4,565,079 2.7545 2025 $4,305,000 $260,086 $4,565,086 2026 $4,405,000 $157,744 $4,562,744 2.7531 2027 $4,510,000 $52,994 $4,562,994 2.7533 $37,040,000 $4,053,163 $41,093,163

SPLOST 2018 Revenue Estimate National GDP growth (2016 to 2018) projections of 2.2% to 2.3% and Terry College of Business projection of Georgia’s GDP being 0.8% higher in 2016: $66 million over six year collection period (IGA) After the GO bond debt requirement ($27,402,340) is met, SPLOST funding for other projects is projected to be $38,597,660 $56.6 million over five year collection period (no IGA)