Encast Global forecasting.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Slide 1ECMWF forecast products users meeting – Reading, June 2005 Verification of weather parameters Anna Ghelli, ECMWF.
Advertisements

Report of the Q2 Short Range QPF Discussion Group Jon Ahlquist Curtis Marshall John McGinley - lead Dan Petersen D. J. Seo Jean Vieux.
KMA will extend medium Range forecast from 7day to 10 day on Oct A post processing technique, Ensemble Model Output Statistics (EMOS), was developed.
WPC Winter Weather Desk Operations and Verification Dan Petersen Winter weather focal point Keith Brill, David Novak, Wallace Hogsett, and Mark.
2012: Hurricane Sandy 125 dead, 60+ billion dollars damage.
Satellite Use in the NWS Eastern Region Frank Alsheimer and Jon Jelsema NOAA/National Weather Service Charleston, SC Dave Radell NOAA/National Weather.
NATS 101 Lecture 3 Climate and Weather. Climate and Weather “Climate is what you expect. Weather is what you get.” -Robert A. Heinlein.
The Collaborative Effort Between Stony Brook University and the National Weather Service Part 3 – Integration of Mesoscale Models in Operational Weather.
Hydrometeorological Prediction Center HPC Medium Range Grid Improvements Mike Schichtel, Chris Bailey, Keith Brill, and David Novak.
National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) Hydrometeorlogical Prediction Center (HPC) Forecast Operations Branch Winter Weather Desk Dan Petersen.
Supplemental Topic Weather Analysis and Forecasting.
MOS Performance MOS significantly improves on the skill of model output. National Weather Service verification statistics have shown a narrowing gap between.
Ensemble Post-Processing and it’s Potential Benefits for the Operational Forecaster Michael Erickson and Brian A. Colle School of Marine and Atmospheric.
Chapter 13 – Weather Analysis and Forecasting. The National Weather Service The National Weather Service (NWS) is responsible for forecasts several times.
Weather Forecasting - II. Review The forecasting of weather by high-speed computers is known as numerical weather prediction. Mathematical models that.
Direct observations and measurements, weather maps, satellites, and radar 6.4.6: Predict weather conditions and patterns based upon weather data collected.
MDSS Challenges, Research, and Managing User Expectations - Weather Issues - Bill Mahoney & Kevin Petty National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR)
World Renewable Energy Forum May 15-17, 2012 Dr. James Hall.
Lecture 10 (11/11) Numerical Models. Numerical Weather Prediction Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) uses the power of computers and equations to make.
Forecasting and Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) NOWcasting Description of atmospheric models Specific Models Types of variables and how to determine.
Chapter 9: Weather Forecasting
A Statistical Comparison of Weather Stations in Carberry, Manitoba, Canada.
June 19, 2007 GRIDDED MOS STARTS WITH POINT (STATION) MOS STARTS WITH POINT (STATION) MOS –Essentially the same MOS that is in text bulletins –Number and.
Advanced Nowcasting Capabilities Richard L. Carpenter, Jr., Ph.D., CCM Weather Decision Technologies, Inc. MDSS Stakeholder Meeting – October 2005, Boulder,
Chapter 9: Weather Forecasting Acquisition of weather information Acquisition of weather information Weather forecasting tools Weather forecasting tools.
OUTLINE Current state of Ensemble MOS
A Thunderstorm Nowcasting System for the Beijing 2008 Olympics: A U.S./China Collaboration by James Wilson 1 and Mingxuan Chen 2 1. National Center for.
Short-Range Ensemble Prediction System at INM José A. García-Moya SMNT – INM 27th EWGLAM & 12th SRNWP Meetings Ljubljana, October 2005.
Model Post Processing. Model Output Can Usually Be Improved with Post Processing Can remove systematic bias Can produce probabilistic information from.
Application of Numerical Weather Prediction Prognoses to Operational Weather Forecasting in Hong Kong Pre-CAS Technical Conference on "Environmental Prediction.
Weather Forecasting & Maps -Meteorologists make forecasts based on models that are produced by supercomputers which perform a large amount of calculations.
GII to RII to CII in South Africa Estelle de Coning South African Weather Service Senior Scientist.
Kris Shrestha James Belanger Judith Curry Jake Mittelman Phillippe Beaucage Jeff Freedman John Zack Medium Range Wind Power Forecasts for Texas.
Verification of ensemble precipitation forecasts using the TIGGE dataset Laurence J. Wilson Environment Canada Anna Ghelli ECMWF GIFS-TIGGE Meeting, Feb.
Judith Curry James Belanger Mark Jelinek Violeta Toma Peter Webster 1
JMA Japan Meteorological Agency QPE/QPF of JMA Application of Radar Data Masashi KUNITSUGU Head, National Typhoon Center Japan Meteorological Agency TYPHOON.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Combining GOES Observations with Other Data to Improve Severe Weather Forecasts.
Aneroid Barometer  Advantages: l No liquid l Easily portable l Low weight l Adaptable to recording  Disadvantages: l Less precise or accurate as a mercury.
Figures from “The ECMWF Ensemble Prediction System”
Atmospheric Sciences 370 Observing Systems January 2010.
Outdoor alerting system
Introducing sferic maps & Mobile
Atmospheric Sciences 370 Observing Systems January 2009
Cloud & Visibility Improving Aviation Services Together
Rapid Update Cycle-RUC
New Unit! Climate Change.
Aircraft weather observations: Impacts for regional NWP models
Dan Petersen Bruce Veenhuis Greg Carbin Mark Klein Mike Bodner
COPE: The COnvective Precipitation Experiment. Met Office interests
The art of weather forecasting
Better Forecasting Bureau
IMPROVING HURRICANE INTENSITY FORECASTS IN A MESOSCALE MODEL VIA MICROPHYSICAL PARAMETERIZATION METHODS By Cerese Albers & Dr. TN Krishnamurti- FSU Dept.
Model Post Processing.
Forecasting Weather.
CAPS Mission Statement
Aviation Forecast Guidance from the RUC
MOS Developed by and Run at the NWS Meteorological Development Lab (MDL) Full range of products available at:
Post Processing.
Challenge: High resolution models need high resolution observations
Your Name METR 104 Today’s date
WMO NWP Wokshop: Blending Breakout
University of Washington Center for Science in the Earth System
New Developments in Aviation Forecast Guidance from the RUC
WEATHER Unit 1b.
NATS 101 Lecture 3 Climate and Weather
NATS 101 Lecture 3 Climate and Weather
An Analysis of Possibilities of Forecasting the AVISO Agrometeorological Model Input   Münster P. Chuchma F.
Monitoring the Weather
Rapid Adjustment of Forecast Trajectories: Improving short-term forecast skill through statistical post-processing Nina Schuhen, Thordis L. Thorarinsdottir.
NATS 101 Lecture 3 Climate and Weather
Presentation transcript:

Encast Global forecasting

ENcast What it is: Extremely accurate weather forecasting solution available globally How is works: ENcast infuses localized, real-time weather information into numerical weather predictions to improve the accuracy of short-term forecasts. It uses the highest-resolution models and updates the forecast frequently with the latest observations. ENcast addresses the biggest numerical weather prediction challenges that inhibit increasing forecast accuracy and sets a new standard for accurate hourly weather forecasts from 0 to 15 days by combining: Earth Networks Weather & Lightning Observations Government and Proprietary Weather Observations High-Resolution Models including ECMWF Hourly Updates High-Speed Computing Products Usage Formats: Hosted web tool, data feeds EN.Mktg.Int_MM20_10122015

ENcast Solution Advantages Global: Coverage for entire World Hyper-Local: Existing Network and Flexible Siting for new stations Fastest Updates: Hourly; uses proprietary EN real-time data Lowest Forecast Error: Accuracy and Nowcast Advantage Turnkey Solution: All forecasting needs in one solution NCAR Solution: Proprietary forecast benefits from NCAR research and development EN.Mktg.Int_MM20_10122015

ENcast Global Forecasts EN.Mktg.Int_MM20_10122015

Global Weather Forecast Consumer Applications ENcast Engine Forecast Inputs ENcast Engine Hi-Res Weather Network ECMWF and Ensembles Earth Networks Lightning and DTA Polygons Hourly Updates Real-time Validation for Model Improvements Global Forecast Deterministic Global Forecast Ensemble Avg. Canada Global Multiscale Canada Met Center Ensemble ECMWF Deterministic ECMWF Ensemble Prediction Global Weather Forecast Consumer Applications Enterprise Applications Result: Forecasts that is 25% more accurate Predicted vs. Actual RMSE

1. 2. 3. ENcast Forecasts Consumer Forecast Enterprise Forecast City Level: Forecast based on City Location Forecast Period: 10-Day Day/Night Updating: 2x per Day or Premium Hourly out 6 Days Spatial Resolution: 4km CONUS/Europe 12.5km Global Consumer Forecast 1. Sensor Level: A Forecast for any Sensor Location Earth Networks, METAR, SYNOP Forecast Period: 15-Day Hourly Updating: 2x per Day or Premium Hourly out 6 Days Spatial Resolution: Data directly from a Point! Enterprise Forecast 3.5% RMSE Improvement over Location! 2. Same as Sensor, only from a Lat/Lon location and not utilizing sensor data from the site Spatial Resolution: 4km CONUS/Europe 12.5km Global Enterprise Forecast 3.

15-Day Hourly Forecast and Hourly Update up to 6 Days ENcast Sensor Latitude/Longitude Hourly Forecast Updates Day 1 Day 6 Day 15 Premium Hourly Updating Service Updates twice/day 15-Day Hourly Forecast and Hourly Update up to 6 Days EN.Mktg.Int_MM20_10122015

Parameters - - Sensor Lat/Lon City Temperature 24hr High Temperature   24hr High Temperature   - 24hr Low Temperature    - Wind Direction Wind Speed/Gust Dew Point Cloud Cover Thunderstorm Probability 1hr Precipitation Probability - 1hr Accumulated Precipitation  - Precip Probability/Type Visibility    Mean Sea Level Pressure Forecasted Sfc Insolation Fog Probability Surface Pressure Rain Probability Ice Probability Snow Probability

ENcast: Hourly Point Forecasts Sensor Forecast Accuracy Point Forecast Visualización de ENcast, basado en web, para cada opción y los siguientes parámetros: City Forecast Temperature 24hr High Temperature 24hr Low Temperature Wind Direction Wind Speed Dew Point Cloud Cover Thunderstorm Probability 1hr Precipitation Probability 1hr Accumulated Precipitation Fog Probability Visibility Rain Probability Surface Pressure Surface Insolation

ENcast ENcast provides the best in forecast verification by ingesting the top models and using our proprietary Total Lightning data to reach the most accurate forecast outcomes. EN.Mktg.Int_MM20_10122015

Model Inputs Used in ENcast Global Forecast Solution EN.Mktg.Int_MM20_10122015

ENcast Improvements from Observation and Lightning Direction and Speed Vector of Cell Determined by Running Mean of Movement of Cell Centroids Lightning Cell Cell Intensity Determined by Density of Lightning in Cell Clustering Algorithm Tracks Cell Centroid Each Minute EN.Mktg.Int_MM20_10122015

ENcast Improvements from Observation and Lightning Lightning Cell Polygon Length = 45 min - Updates every 15 min EN.Mktg.Int_MM20_10122015

ENcast Improvements from Observation and Lightning EN.Mktg.Int_MM20_10122015

ENcast Improvements from Observation and Lightning Adjusted POP is used if it is higher than original ENcast T’storm POP EN.Mktg.Int_MM20_10122015

ENcast Improvements from Observation and Lightning Brier score comparisons of POTS before and after post-processing. EN.Mktg.Int_MM20_10122015

ENcast Improvements from Observation and Lightning Sparse population of high quality, high frequency METAR/SYNOP observations allows for additional mesonet observations with the same quality requirements to be added to post-processing. EN.Mktg.Int_MM20_10122015

ENcast Improvements from Observation and Lightning EN.Mktg.Int_MM20_10122015

ENcast Improvements from Observation and Lightning West Coast         173         Intermountain West 230         Northern Plains         78           Southern Plains       344         Great Lakes        349         Southeast          290         Mid-Atlantic         337         Northeast        195 Total 1996 Groupings by Region and Elevations (m) 0 – 49.5      379 50 – 99.5         151 100 – 199.5      405 200 – 299.5      394 300 – 499.5      311 500 – 999.5       140 1000 – 1999.5    169 2000 – 4000      47 Total 1996 EN.Mktg.Int_MM20_10122015

ENcast Improvements from Observation and Lightning EN.Mktg.Int_MM20_10122015

ENcast Improvements from Observation and Lightning EN.Mktg.Int_MM20_10122015

ENcast Improvements from Observation and Lightning Elevation RMSE Analysis for Temperature (C) EN.Mktg.Int_MM20_10122015

ENcast Improvements from Observation and Lightning Region RMSE Analysis for Temperature (C) Note: Dew point analysis is not included as results were similar to temperature. EN.Mktg.Int_MM20_10122015

ENcast Improvements from Observation and Lightning EN.Mktg.Int_MM20_10122015

Lowest Forecast Error Performance: Uses Best-Performing Global Models Multiple Ensembles: Factors Multiple Ensemble Groups Self Improvement: Learns from Observation Data Accuracy: Forecast Error Beats Other Models EN.Mktg.Int_MM20_10122015

Global Weighted Average RMSE Sept.-Dec. 2014 EN.Mktg.Int_MM20_10122015

Global Weighted Average RMSE Sept.-Dec. 2014 EN.Mktg.Int_MM20_10122015

RMSE Analysis per Model (0-15Hr) Sept.-Dec. 2014 EN.Mktg.Int_MM20_10122015

RMSE Analysis per Model (5-Day) Sept.-Dec. 2014 EN.Mktg.Int_MM20_10122015

RMSE Analysis per Model Sept.-Dec. 2014 EN.Mktg.Int_MM20_10122015

RMSE Percent Improvement Sept.-Dec. 2014 EN.Mktg.Int_MM20_10122015

RMSE Percent Improvement (0-15Hr) Sept.-Dec. 2014 EN.Mktg.Int_MM20_10122015

RMSE Percent Improvement Sept.-Dec. 2014 EN.Mktg.Int_MM20_10122015