Deschutes county road department otta seal gravel road conversion pilot project December 7, 2016 oaces chip seal workshop.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DAY ONE - STEP ONE - Preparation Pure Crete is added to a water truck with a spray bar located at the rear of the truck at a ratio of one gallon to 2000.
Advertisements

2014 Chip Seal Training Contract Administration Issues.
Sub-Grade Preparation-Equipment Caterpillar Paving Products
Wyoming County Paved Roads Management and Monitoring Khaled Ksaibati, Ph.D., P.E. STIC June, 2014.
Comal County Chip Sealing June 26, 2007.
2014 Chip Seal Training ODOT Specifications
1 Preserving Municipality Roadways Federal = 3% State = 20% Local = 77% 94% of paved roads have an Asphalt surface FHWA Source: Stephen R. Mueller,
Highway Engineering Pavement Types
Module 4-2 : Joint Sealing
Pavements. Concrete –Rigid pavement Used where strength is an issue Runways, interstates and major roads –Continuous reinforcing Must have a good base.
Chipseal Construction Section 37.2 Seal Coats.  Proper surface preparation  Use of right asphalt binder, asphaltic/polymer modified emulsion and clean.
22 nd Conference Roads and Works Asphalt Trial – Outcomes so far Rod Ellis Board Member IPWEA SA.
Chapter 6 Chip Seals From… Maintenance Technical Advisory Guide (MTAG)
Concrete & Asphalt. Concrete –Batching – process of proportioning cement, water, aggregates and additives prior to mixing concrete –Concrete specs usually.
Conversion of Petroleum Contaminated Soil into Asphalt-Treated Road Base U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Alaska District.
TOPIC OF THE DAY Flexible Pavement Distresses/Failure Of Structure.
City of Auburn Hills Road Asset Management Program February 21, 2014 SEMCOG University.
To Pave or Not to Pave? Making Informed Decisions on When to Upgrade a Gravel Road.
Pavement Design Terms and Concepts
Bituminous Street Recertification Initiatives. Initiative Items n Stone Matrix Asphalt (SMA) n Longitudinal Joint Spec and other methods for longitudinal.
PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE II Part 1b: Chip Seal Construction Idaho Roads Scholar Program.
US Highway 17 (Center Street) Sidewalk Feasibility Study Town of Pierson, Florida.
NEW MEXICO-CHIHUAHUA RURAL TASK FORCE Technical Workshop: Dust Control for Improved Particulate Matter Air Quality in Columbus-Palomas December 2, 2008.
Fog Seals, Sand Seals, Scrub Seals, and Rejuvenators.
Pavement Maintenance II Part 1a: SurfaceTreatments Idaho Roads Scholar Program.
Surface Rehabilitation Treatments
Magnesium Chloride Dust Control Application Warm Springs Indian Reservation Road Maintenance 2004.
Success with Alternatives to Paving Mr. Chuck Fromelt Day County Highway Superintendent Webster, South Dakota.
Pavement Maintenance II
Presented by: Ken Skorseth, Program Manager
Washington County Chip Seal Program Review Fall, 2011.
Dr. Wa'el M. Albawwab ECGD4228 Transportation Engineering II Summer 2008 Sat. 15:30-18:30 PM K004.
Pavement Preservation Preventive Maintenance
PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE 1 Part 3: Potholes and Cracks Idaho Roads Scholar Program.
AAPA 2011 Study Tour – Surface Treatments #1 Surface Treatments #1.
Surface Treatment Multi Agencies Collaboration. Participating Agencies Oregon Department of Transportation Ona Beach Maintenance Section Rose Lodge Maintenance.
Webinar Texas Department of Transportation : Costs Associated with Conversion of Surfaced to Un-Surfaced Roads August 30, 2012.
Paving & Surfacing Module #6 Prepared by Dr. Randy R. Rapp July 2005.
Pavement Types Dr. TALEB M. Al-ROUSAN.
MODULE 3-3 Patching With Bituminous Mixtures. Learning Objectives  Describe the conditions that require patching  Distinguish between hot-, cold-, and.
Ultra Thin Bonded Wearing Coarse Sponsored by: Minnesota LTAP Center Presented by: Michael Marti, P.E. SRF Consulting Group, Inc. Dan Wegman, P.E. SemMaterials.
Surface Treatments #2.
WORKING TOGETHER TO ACHIEVE A COMMON GOAL 2013 CHIP SEAL PROJECT COOPERATION THE KEY TO SUCCESS.
Chip Seal Design Chapter 2. North America (ranked by prevalence) Empirical / Past Experience No Design Method Own Method McLeod (1960’s) - Asphalt Institute.
Aggregates for Chip and Seal Pavement Andrew Gauck Harrison Sand and Gravel Co.
Presented by Brian Malmberg, P.E.. INTRODUCTION  375 miles of limerock roads  Low volume local roads are not cost effective to pave with permanent surface.
Chip Seal Best Practices by: Larry Galehouse, P.E., P.S., Director National Center for Pavement Preservation.
3rd International Road Surface Friction Conference
Extending Performance with Proper Asphalt Compaction
Alabama Asphalt Pavement Association
Town Road Survey - What You Should Know 1_24_17
2016 RAC Annual Meeting Sweet Sixteen
Pavement Preservation Techniques Used in Virginia
Thin Hot Mix Asphalt Overlays PennDOT Research Findings
COMPACTION BY EQUIPMENTS
General Road Construction Information
HIGHWAY MAINTENANCE Failures in flexible pavement.
QC Document Update Todd Shields, INDOT.
20th National Trails Symposium
2018 Pavement Workshop May 23-24, 2018
Oregon Mileage County Mileage
Chip Seal Quality Assurance Guide
CONSTRUCTION METHODS & TECHNOLOGY
WORKING TOGETHER TO ACHIEVE A COMMON GOAL 2013 CHIP SEAL PROJECT
Surface Treatments #2.
UTILIZING GRINDINGS ON RURAL ROADS:
Surface Treatments #1.
NRRA Pavement Workshop 2019
Light Compaction Equipment
Asphalt Rubber Chip Seals
Presentation transcript:

deschutes county road department otta seal gravel road conversion pilot project December 7, 2016 oaces chip seal workshop

Existing gravel road maintenance program System Data: 200 miles of gravel road Maintenance demand/service levels: Activity/Data High Medium Low Grading frequency 2 or 3 times per year Annually or every other year Infrequent/upon request Dust palliative Annual None Material add 8+/- years 12+/- years >20 years $/Mile/Year $5,000/$7,500 $2,500/$3,500 <$1,500 # of miles +/- 50 70 80 Local/Residential road annual surface maintenance (paved): $6,000/$8,000/mi/yr.

Road treated with Magnesium Chloride freeze/thaw

Road treated with magnesium chloride tree kill

Road treated with magnesium chloride potholing

Typical gravel road washboarding

The goal Find an improved low-cost surface treatment with annual surface maintenance costs that are at or near that of a high maintenance gravel road ($5,000/$7,500/mi/yr.) Target low-volume Local/Residential facilities. Evaluate/estimate long-term maintenance costs and strategies. Potentially develop/evaluate partnership opportunities with adjacent property owners (ie, a “maintenance LID”) to fund the upgrade.

Pilot project treatment: otta seal Developed in Norway (Otta Valley) in 1960s. Relatively new to USA. Not an “Auto Seal” Aggregate (1”-minus) rolled into a layer of high-float liquid asphalt. Life Expectancy: 8-12 yrs. A poor-man’s oil mat.

Otta seal materials Binder: High Float Medium Set Oil: HFMS-2 Aggregate: Gradation varies based on traffic loading Low quality, non-paving spec rock 0.5” to 1” Max Up to 10% fines Dirty! Again…..A Poor Mans Oil Mat

Otta seal: research Various webinars, conferences and seminars introduced concept. Various publications: Minnesota DOT Internet searches, etc. E. Washington Agencies Vendor experience with similar seals Bituminous surface treated (BST)

Otta seal equipment Asphalt Distributor Chip Spreader Pneumatic-tired roller Steel roller Broom Water Truck

Some gradation spec examples Washington vendor presentation International Focus Group Dense = Higher than 100 ADT

Deschutes county otta seal rock Dense Specification: (19 mm = ¾” and 0.075mm = #200 sieve)

Pre-installation (typical of post grading, Plainview Road)

HFMS-2 Application (0.48-50 Gal/sy) (road pre-wet, 1-hour prior, Plainview Road)

Single pass with chip spreader (1”–minus “dirty” Material, Ward Road)

Immediate Post agg application ready to roll (and roll and roll and roll)

Surface integrity (very dirty appearance)

Plainview Road: 1-month (included sand seal)

Ward Road: 2 months (Some shoving on grades and intersection approach)

Plainview Road: 7 months

Some flaws (Plainview Road)

Chip seal finished product (Ward Road – emulsion, uncoated rock) Before After

Otta seal installation cost Hypothetical break-even point: 6.7 years Notes: Personnel Rate Multiplier: 3.15 (fully loaded, with overhead) Equipment rates include depreciation.

Otta seal: lessons learned in application Segregation in chip spreader – especially in center. Will seal one lane at a time to narrow width of spread. Fewer fines will help alleviate some segregation – maybe? Test run? Lighter rollers preferred. Will not use 10-ton double-drum roller again. Too much vibe or weight promoted “sticking” to drums. Smooth base surface – not necessarily a good thing. A little texture to promote adhesion, interlocking. Wet the base to promote some infiltration of the high-float oil. No need to wet the finished surface when rolling.

Otta seal: lessons learned in design Consider grades and intersections. Deceleration leads to shoving Apply two-layers of Otta Seal on initial installation. Extended construction speed zone: 25 mph Gravel Road Conversion Issues: Signage Drainage Other design issues that are overlooked with gravel roads. Is it a good chip seal alternative? Use care in selecting roads – customer expectation issues.

Next steps – otta seal 1. Evaluation of Treatments 2. Cost Analysis Monitor initial degradation and estimate near-term and long-term maintenance needs. Is this a product we can chip seal and roll into our Pavement Management Program? If so, at what interval for first chip seal and what is the subsequent frequency of treatments? If not, what alternative maintenance treatments or strategies are necessary? 2. Cost Analysis How do the initial and projected maintenance investment levels compare to the annual average maintenance investment for gravel roads? 3. Refine the Process What refinements can we make to our application technique to reduce the initial application cost of the Pilot Projects? Plainview: $3.88 (Otta only) Ward Road: $3.54 (Otta and chip)