Transport of Critically Ill Patients Authors: Frank Dupont, MD, Michelle Johnson, MPH, Anne Pohlman, APN-CNS, Sam Ruokis, Team Background Evaluate and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Critical Airway Management: In a Teaching Institution Manu Malhotra & Jennifer Ritz.
Advertisements

CDCs 21 Goals. CDC Strategic Imperatives 1. Health impact focus: Align CDCs people, strategies, goals, investments & performance to maximize our impact.
Introduction Efficient intra-hospital transport of severe closed head injury and stroke patients requires maintenance of consistent ventilation and oxygenation.
Community Health Centers Implementing EHRs: Lessons Learned Oliver Droppers, M.P.H., Sherril Gelmon, Dr.P.H., Siobhan Maty, Ph.D., and Vickie Gates Portland.
Misericordia Hospital Edmonton, Alberta Delirium Collaborative.
Medication Reconciliation Networking Session Steve Rough, MS., RPh. Director of Pharmacy University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics.
Mission Bay Operations Planning Update for Clinical Affairs Committee June 22, 2011.
Standard 5: Patient Identification and Procedure Matching Nicola Dunbar, Accrediting Agencies Surveyor Workshop, 10 July 2012.
Module 3. Session DCST Clinical governance
1. Infection Control Risk Assessment Terrie B. Lee, RN, MS, MPH, CIC Director, Infection Prevention & Employee Health Charleston Area Medical Center Charleston,
Partnering with Patients and Families in the PICU and Pediatric Emergency Department Liz DuBois MS, RN NE,BC, Tuesday Cirillo RN, MA, APN, Patricia Cupka.
To remain compliant with the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME®) regulations, it is necessary to disclose to my audience that.
 Who Physicians from  Anesthesia  Medicine (on call MICU and cardiology teams)  Surgery Nursing  House supervisor  ACLS trained nurse from CCU/CTICU.
13 by 2 Pediatric Immunizations Eban Experience Session II June 17, 2011.
CLABSI Supplemental Call Series Best Practices: How Successful Units Engaged Their Senior Executive Leaders October 18, 2011 Presenters: Jonathan Kling,
Chapter Quality Network (CQN) Asthma Pilot Project Team Progress Presentation State Name: OREGON Practice Name: Doernbecher General Pediatrics Team Members:
Patient Safety Friendly Hospital Intiative Purpose Implementation of a set of patient safety standards in hospitals Implementation of a set of patient.
Northwestern Memorial Hospital American Heart Association Recommendations: AED.
1.  Describe an overall framework for project integration management ◦ RelatIion to the other project management knowledge areas and the project life.
Implementing QI Projects Title I HIV Quality Management Program Case Management Providers Meeting May 26, 2005 Presented by Lynda A. O’Hanlon Title I HIV.
South East Wales Critical Care Network Dr George Findlay, Lead Clinician Jennie Willmott, Network Manager.
FMEA: 20/20 Foresight Deirdre, RN; Kim, RN Juliana; Marija Deirdre, RN; Kim, RN Juliana; Marija.
Introduction In 2005, comparisons were made internally by word of mouth and externally with other Tenet Healthcare Corporation hospitals, Georgia Hospitals.
TREASURY REGULATIONS’ CHANGES AND POTENTIAL IMPACT
PRI 1 Introduction to Perioperative Nursing A Primer for Perioperative Education.
Data Quality Assessment of PEPFAR ART Sites In Nigeria Final Report February 17, 2006 Nigeria/Monitoring and Evaluation Management Services in collaboration.
Transforming a Culture of Patient Safety: Reducing Restraint and Seclusion Jennifer M. Brown, M.S., CTRS and Jane Le Vieux, PhD, LPC-S, RN-BC Children’s.
Context and Problem Effects of Changes Strategy for Change Aim: To reduce the length of handover by standardising the quality of information transmitted.
Innovations in Primary Care: Implementing Clinical Care Management in Primary Care Practices Judith Steinberg, MD, MPH Deputy Chief Medical Officer Jeanne.
COLORADO HOSPITAL MASS EVACUATION SUMMIT Developing a plan for evacuating your facility.
© 2016 Chapter 6 Data Management Health Information Management Technology: An Applied Approach.
Misericordia Hospital Edmonton, Alberta
TM 720: Statistical Process Control DMAIC Problem Solving
Governing Body QAPI 2013 Update for ASC
RCHC Developmental Screening and Referral project for Children 0-5 served by Sonoma County Community Health Centers.
Disaster and Emergency Planning
Introduction/Problem Results/Progress to Date
MHA Immersion Pilot Project
Safety and Quality in the Cardiothoracic Operating Room
CMS Policy & Procedures
Chapter 5 Using Huddles.
Project Initiation & Planning
MHA Immersion Pilot Project - Sepsis
MUHC Innovation Model.
PIECES: A Robust Approach to Infection Control
Tools & Strategies Summary
Information Transfer – ROP Compliance
Leaning Out the Nursing Policy and Procedure Process
Obstetrical Hemorrhage Management
Getting Started with Your Malnutrition Quality Improvement Project
Clinical Alarm Systems - NPSG Goal # 6 -
Physician Quality and Safety Academy
QI Project 2016 Anesthesia to ICU / ICU to Anesthesia Hand offs
Outline Why Focus on PN Safety? PN Safety Gap Analysis Survey Results
CURRICULUM & INSTRUCTION
Patient Safety Awareness Week 2018
Strategic Planning Year Two
Patient Safety and Quality care Movement
Action Plan Development
NICU and OR Handoff Starting 2/25/19.
Module 3 Part 2 Developing and Implementing a QI Plan: Planning and Execution Adapted from: The Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) Quality.
Module 3: Part 1 Developing and Implementing a QI Plan: Understanding the QI Plan Adapted from: The Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA)
Fiscal policy program Presented by Cindy Draper, Fiscal Policy Officer – Training Days 2018 Introduce myself This session is to provide an overview of.
Introduction to Fiscal Policy Program
Improving Lead Screening
Thrive by Five Collaborative
ECA Quality Control Arrangements
Practice Standards, Program Guides, and CES Operations Manual
Development and implementation of a multidisciplinary fall prevention plan within an inpatient behavioral health unit Nicole Van Kampen, BSN, RN Ferris.
Presentation transcript:

Transport of Critically Ill Patients Authors: Frank Dupont, MD, Michelle Johnson, MPH, Anne Pohlman, APN-CNS, Sam Ruokis, Team Background Evaluate and revise our policies for transport of critically ill patients (esp. A08-20 “Transporting and Monitoring Adult & Pediatric Patients within the Medical Center”) to ensure a clearly defined standard of care. Develop and implement transport workflow consistent with updated policy. Methods: Multidisciplinary team was established to review current policy. The team included: RNs from all ICUs, ICU MDs, ED, Anesthesia, Peri-Op, Transportation, Cath Lab, EP, Bronch Suite, GI, Radiology CT/IR/MRI, Respiratory Care Services, and clinical APNs. Team completed literature review and reviewed national guidelines. Team created diagram of the process for all critically ill patients: Neonatal, Peds, Adults, ED, Transfers in from Outside Hospital, Rapid Response Team, and Dr. Cart. Team determined minimum requirements for every transport and defined a process to determine stable and unstable patient status. Team received recommendations from ICU Local Practice Council and critical care services regarding consensus on flow, documentation, and implementation of policy. Team meet twice a month and reported to monthly Critical Care Committee. Team planned the implementation of recommended changes based on policy updates. Process Measures: Audit and review of new transport policy and workflow is contingent on updated documentation strategies currently pending Epic implementation. Process measures to track progress include: # of transports currently involving critically ill patients, # of transports without incident/safety events, time in which critically ill patients and staff are way from ICU, wait time to transport to test/procedure that again return to ICU, on time starts in OR and procedure areas, # successful transfer of care between ICU and procedure staff, # and type of safety events occurring while on transport. Aims Project Strategy Reason for Action: Caring for critically ill patients during transport outside the ICU is a high risk activity. We may not always have the right equipment which leads to potential safety risks or overburden/overuse of resources. Critically ill patients are transported throughout the hospital for a variety of reasons, but primarily for tests and procedures where it is important to optimize continuity of care. The transport policy in place did not reflect current practice. There was no standard of care across the 10 ICUs and other areas creating a challenging and highly stressful patient safety concern. Current practice and documentation strategies did not allow audit or review of success or failures during this frequent, challenging event. Transporting critically ill patients requires significant coordination between multidisciplinary groups and communication between these groups was poor. Alignment to UCM Strategic Priority : We must determine the right process for transport of critically ill patients to ensure that we provide highly reliable, defect-free care even when patients are travelling between clinical care areas. This is important because patients are extremely vulnerable during transport. Target Population: This will affect the transport of all critically ill patients. Changes Made Clear SOP for Transport of Critically Ill Patients with detailed responsibilities for each role created. Revised patient care policy (PC30) for critically ill patients based on administrative policy, A08-20 Transporting and Monitoring Adult & Pediatric Patients within the Medical Center. Policy was changed from administrative to patient care policy. New policy PC30 and SOP were approved by Medical Executive Committee for fall 2015 deadline. The new policy includes the transport of all patients throughout the medical center with clear attention to the high risk critically ill patients. New Transporting and Monitoring of Adult and Pediatric Patients within the Medical Center Cheat Sheet created to be used as a quick reference. Educational training checklists created for all team members involved in transporting critically ill patients. ICU to CCD 6 OR Transport Workflow flowsheets created for DACC, ICU RN, ICU Service, Pre-Op RN Function, and Surgery/EP Service. Created 24/7 pager list for all ICU services to ensure clear transfer of care and communication related to ICU transport/procedures. Lessons Learned This project serves as a great model for reviewing and assessing policies. Complex multidisciplinary projects require significant time and follow-up to assure buy-in and bring the project to completion. Workflows for ICU’s (pictured below) developed by the team are requiring a great deal of coordination from everyone on the team because too many places for system breakdown were identified. Next Steps Finalize RN Epic documentation for transport. Simulation of future state in preparation for go live. Implement process recommendations based on policy,PC30 ”Transporting and Monitoring Adult & Pediatric Patients within the Medical Center” updates. Go live pending Epic documentation completion. Educate staff on workflows for ICUs. Track/monitor. Critical Care Committee, MICU, ACC, DACC, Perfusion, Patient Transport, Neuro ICU, RCS, CTICU, PACU, QPI, SICU, EP, ICU RNs, ICU MDs, ED, Peri-Op, Cath Lab, Bronch Suite, GI, Radiology CT/IR/MRI, Respiratory Care, CCU, Burn ICU, Peds ICU, and Neonatal ICU Acknowledgements