“The Matching Game” Session 44 Tuesday, May 22, 2012 National Extension and Research Administrative Officer’s Conference Morgantown, West Virginia.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Business and Fiscal Officers Meeting - 4/20/10 Presented by: Glen Jones, Director Post-Award Research and Sponsored Programs.
Advertisements

Office of Sponsored Projects Administration COST ACCOUNTING STANDARDS.
Solving the Matching Dilemma Rochelle McCrea Team Leader and Towana DeShazo Grants and Agreements Specialist Awards Management Branch Office of Extramural.
PLENARY SESSION Financial Management and Accountability Accountability and Grants Management: Connecting the Dots U.S. Department of Labor, ETA, Region.
Cost Share Fundamentals. Learning Objectives Todays presentation will focus on: Cost share – The What and Why The different types of cost sharing Sponsor.
Types of Cost Sharing Mandatory: When the sponsor stipulates that cost sharing or matching funds are required as a condition of receiving an award. Specifically.
Financial Requirements Child Nutrition Programs Oregon Department of Education By Chris Facha, SNS.
Documentation, Cash & In-Kind Match. Session Objectives Gather information on proper documentation Allowable, allocable & reasonable costs Gain knowledge.
Documenting Expenses & In-Kind Contributions. 2 Donations that Aren ’ t Dollars: In-Kind Contributions Session Objectives: Have participants understand:
2011 National Extension and Research Administrative Officers’ Conference Session #33, May 24, :30 p.m. – 2:45 p.m. Anchorage,Alaska Federal Audits.
PAD Seminar – October, 2012 Gail L. Ryan, Assistant Vice President Sponsored Program Administration.
What You Need to Know To Ensure Compliance October 2014.
More Than You Ever Wanted to Know About Administrative Costs Leveraged Resources Accrued Expenditures & Unliquidated Obligations MoHealthWINs.
Cost Sharing Date Presenter Name Presenter Phone Number Presenter .
Award Review Process Presenter: Kadija Baffoe-Harding.
Prepared by the Office of Grants and Contracts1 COST SHARING.
Documenting Cash and In-Kind Match Project Director Training & Annual Meeting.
Indirect Cost Presented by Bonita Brown HMEP Grant Program
Circular A-110 Everything You Didn’t Want to Know.
Head Start Non-Federal Share Training
OMB A-133 Audits and Issues NCURA Region VI & VII Spring Meeting April 17-20, 2005 Maureen Rhea, Internal Audit University of Washington.
1 COST SHARING CReATE ver. 04/13 © 2013 Florida State University. All rights reserved Objective: To understand the requirements related to cost sharing.
Developing the Budget for an EPA Environmental Education Grant EPA ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION GRANT PROGRAM TUTORIAL 1 This tutorial is a general overview.
If the funder provides specific guidelines related to format or contents of your budget… FOLLOW THEM! Otherwise, your proposal may not make it out of.
Financial Management How Can I Spend Award Dollars.
PROGRAM INCOME / IN-KIND ASSISTANCE / IN-KIND CONTRIBUTION
Match & Leveraged Resources. Non-Federal Share AKA Match.
The Budget Linda Mason Recipient of $millions in grants!
“Grants Boot Camp” Workshop Series January 9, 2014 Creighton University Sponsored Programs Administration 2500 California Plaza, Omaha, NE  Phone:
Solving the Matching Dilemma Session 32 Tuesday, May 24, 2011 National Extension and Research Officers Administrative Conference Anchorage, Alaska.
Cost Principles – 2 CFR Part 200 Subpart E U.S. Department of Education.
Washington University Washington University School of Medicine Research Administrators Forum May 2002.
Fishery Management Councils Executive Director Session Grants Rimas T. Liogys Director, Grants Management Division February 25, 2009.
Grant Financial Management U.S. Department of Commerce Officer of the Inspector General 1.
Time with Office of Sponsored Programs April 4, 2011 Topic: Cost Share.
Washington University Washington University Hilltop Campus Research Administrator’s Forum March 2002 Presented by The Research Office and Sponsored Projects.
The University Corporation Cost Sharing Sponsored Programs The University Corporation Research, Investments and Commercial Services California State University,
2 Donations that Aren’t Dollars: In Kind Contributions Session Objectives Have participants understand: Implication of in-kind contributions as related.
Cost Principles provide guidance for determining eligible costs and whether those costs are direct or indirect. Outlined in detail in OMB Circular A-21.
SBIR Budgeting Leanne Robey Chief, Special Reviews Branch, NIH.
Head Start Fiscal Training April 2009 Trainer: PhuongY Nguyen.
New NSF Awardee Checklist Requirements: WHY? November 19, 2014 joyce y. JOHNSON POST-AWARDS COORDINATOR OFFICE OF SPONSORED PROGRAMS.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION ARRA GREEN JOB AND HEALTH CARE / EMERGING INDUSTRIES NEW GRANTEE POST AWARD FORUM JUNE.
COST SHARE Neta Fernandez Director, Grants and Contracts.
Let’s Talk Cost Sharing Sherrelle Vaughn Sponsored Programs Accounting and Reporting July 17, 2012.
June 3, 2007NTIA PSIC Public Meeting1 How to Avoid Audit Problems: Matching Share and Cost Principles National Telecommunications and Information Administration.
Office of Sponsored Programs All rights reserved GTRC Budgets & submitting your proposal –To give an overview of the guidelines and fundamentals of a proposal.
Matching/Cost Share/Off Set Session 66 Wednesday, May 25, 2011 National Extension and Research Officers Administrative Conference Anchorage, Alaska.
COMMUNITY FOOD COMPETITIVE GRANTS PROGRAM Award Information Webinar Thursday, October 22, 2015 Awards Management Division Office of Grants and Financial.
MAY 10, 2011 SESSION 6 OF AAPLS – BUDGET PREPARATION & IMPLICATIONS OF COST SHARE APPLICANTS & ADMINISTRATORS PREAWARD LUNCHEON SERIES Module C: Budget.
Eta EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR eta EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR.
Office of Sponsored Programs Matching, Cost Sharing and In-kind.
Department of Community and Senior Services Jason Stempinski, CIA Compliance Manager COST ALLOCATION PLAN Presented by:
Kiev, Ukraine October 2009 Cost Share. Objectives  Understand the definition of Cost Share  Identify USAID regulations that apply to Cost Share.
OMB Circular A-122 and the Federal Cost Principles Copyright © Texas Education Agency
NRCS Grants and Agreements Overview of Grants, Cooperative and Contribution Agreements Arizona State Office October 30, 2013.
Copyright © Texas Education Agency Accounting for Grant Funds, including Documentation for Expenditures.
Copyright © Texas Education Agency Matching and Cost-Share Requirements Allowable Items and Accounting for Cost Share.
Office Of Sponsored Programs Allowable Costs. What is 2 CFR Chapter 1 and 2 parts 200 Subpart E (OMB Uniform Guidance)? A document that contains Principles.
1 On-Line Financial Management Workshops Leveraged Resources, Match & Intellectual Property June 2009.
YouthBuild Learning Exchange January 13-15, 2009 Leveraged Resources and Match.
The University of Texas at Arlington Office of Research and Office of Accounting and Business Services Brown Bag Training Session VI: Cost Share Part One.
OMB Super Circular Big Changes for Nonprofits
2015 Leadership Conference “All In: Achieving Results Together”
Federal Cost Principles & Compliance
Financial Requirements
2016 AmeriCorps Texas All-Grantee Meeting February 25-26, 2016
Time with Office of Sponsored Programs
Regional healthcare coalition match documentation
Office of Sponsored Research and Programs (OSRP)
Presentation transcript:

“The Matching Game” Session 44 Tuesday, May 22, 2012 National Extension and Research Administrative Officer’s Conference Morgantown, West Virginia

“The Matching Game” Co-Presented by: Adriene Woodin Branch Chief Awards Management Division Office of Grants and Financial Management NIFA-USDA

Topics for Discussion NIFA Programs with Required Matching Matching Regulations Definitions Do’s and Don’ts What’s Not Acceptable Matching What is Allowable as Matching Common Matching Costs and Required Information Valuing Donations Matching Commitment Documentation/Pledge Agreements Summary

Programs With Required Matching The RFA will contain details on whether or not matching is required and what those requirements are. Programs requiring a matching commitment: AFRI Equipment Awards 100% of Federal Funds Cash match only

Programs With Required Matching Beginning Farmer and Rancher Development Program 25% of Federal Funds Cash or in-kind Third party contributions

Programs With Required Matching Specialty Crop Research Initiative (SCRI) 100% of Federal funds Cash or in-kind Third Party Contributions Allows unrecovered indirect costs as matching only on grantee provided matching costs

Programs With Required Matching Biomass Research and Development Initiative 20% of total project costs for Research projects 50% of total project costs for Demonstration projects Total Project Costs consists of requested Federal funds and proposed matching Cash or in-kind Third-party contributions

Programs With Required Matching Higher Education Challenge Grants 25%* of Federal funds Cash or in-kind Third Party contributions *Reduced from 100% requirement Community Food Program 100% of Federal funds Cash or in-kind Third Party contributions

Programs With Required Matching Women and Minorities in STEM Fields 100% of Federal funds Cash or in-kind Third Party contributions Special Needs Program 100% of Federal funds Cash or in-kind contributions No Third-Party contributions permitted

Programs With Required Matching These programs require matching only when the subject area is commodity specific: Integrated Programs 100% of total Federal funds Cash or in-kind Third-party contributions Subject to NIFA National Program Leader approval

Matching Regulations Governing regulations are : Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-110 (found at 2 CFR Part 215) Sub-part C: Post Award Requirements, Financial and Program Management Section 23. Cost Sharing or matching USDA 7 CFR Part 3019 Section Cost Sharing or Matching

Matching Regulations Award document will reference 7 CFR part 3019 which is USDA’s implementing regulation for A-110 Both provide guidance on allowable matching costs and how to value services and donated items

Definitions Cash Matching: The recipient’s cash outlay, including the outlay of money contributed to the recipient by non- Federal third-parties. Examples: The recipient’s cost to purchase an item of equipment for use on the project; Salaries for staff time committed to project; purchase of supplies; travel of project staff.

Definitions In-Kind Contribution: The value of non- cash contributions of property or services. May be in the form of real property, equipment, supplies, and other non-expendable property.

Definitions Third Party Matching: Any contribution to the project by a non-Federal organization other than the recipient. Can include cash or in-kind contributions.

Do’s and Don’ts Funds used as matching for NIFA Awards: Cannot be used as matching for another Federally-assisted project or program May not be provided by another Federal award or agency unless specifically authorized by Federal Statute Entire amount of required matching must be secured at time of award No “contingencies” allowed (i.e. Pending approval, submission, or earning)

Do’s and Don’ts The sources and amounts of all matching should be summarized as part of the budget justification as a separate narrative (not combined with the Federal funds narrative) Values for recipient or third-party matching contributions of services and property shall be in accordance with the applicable cost principles

What’s Not Acceptable Matching? Funds provided from another organization for another, similar project. Can’t use funds twice The value of equipment previously purchased by, or donated to the recipient. The purchase or donation must be specifically for the project Equipment must be used specifically for this project and pro-rated to project usage

What’s Not Acceptable Matching? Income expected to be earned during the project period. All matching must be in place at time of award. The income will not have been earned by then. Indirect Costs over the allowable limit (with the exception of the SCRI Program). When indirect costs are limited by program authorization, the recipient cannot claim more than the allowable limit.

What’s Not Acceptable Matching? Some matching may be deemed unallowable during the review process requiring additional matching resources. Award may be reduced or may not be issued if required matching is not met.

What’s Allowable as Matching Costs? Any costs which would normally be allowable under the applicable cost principles (OMB A-21 or A-122) for Federal funds would be allowable as matching Except for unrecovered indirect costs (with one exception) Costs must be specifically identifiable and directly benefiting the project.

Common Matching Costs and Required Information Note: the same level of details required for justifying Federal funds is required for justifying matching funds. Salaries/wages for project personnel -provide the annual or hourly rate of pay, time commitment (number of hours, percentage of effort) and the task to be completed Salary rates deemed excessive may need to be justified

Common Matching Costs and Required Information Materials or Supplies – provide a list of materials or supplies expected to be purchased and an estimated cost for the item(s). Note – no “miscellaneous” items Travel costs – provide the purpose and destination (if known), number of trips, number of travelers, and the cost per trip.

Common Matching Costs and Required Information Office Rent - when there is a need for an office away from the main campus, office rent may be charged as a direct cost to the award. Facility must not be owned by the recipient organization and rent can not be included as a part of the indirect cost pool. Rent must be pro-rated to the project if space is shared. Provide monthly rental cost, square footage, and usage information.

Common Matching Costs and Required Information Equipment costs – provide details of the type of equipment and how it will be used. For an equipment purchase – include the purchase price. For donated used equipment – the value should not exceed the fair market value for equipment the same age and condition Provide details of how the value was determined

Common Matching Costs and Required Information Equipment costs (cont’d): For donated new equipment – full purchase value of newly purchased equipment if purchased specifically for the project. For loaned equipment - the value may not exceed the fair rental value. Provide details on how the value was determined and the amount of time it will be used.

Common Matching Costs and Required Information Volunteer staff time – same information as for salaries. Rate of volunteer labor should be consistent with that paid for similar work within the recipient’s organization or with that paid for similar work in the labor market. Excessive rates of pay for volunteer labor may need to be justified.

Valuing Donations Value of donated property (transfer of property ownership) should be based on fair market value at time of donation. Value should be established by an independent appraisal –Provide documentation referencing he valuation process

Valuing Donations Value of donated space (usage) should not exceed the fair rental value of comparable space as established by an independent appraisal of similar space in the same area. Value is not based on purchase price Value of donated supplies or materials shall not exceed the item’s fair market value at time of donation

Matching Commitment Documentation Recipient Matching Documentation: Letter of Commitment signed by the Authorized Representative (AR) Must include the dollar amount of the commitment and the dates of involvement (project period) Budget justification should include required detail information on matching costs How are matching funds being spent?

Matching Commitment Documentation Third-Party Cash and In-Kind Contributions: Recipient organization should show third-party contributions in “Other Direct Cost” section of the budget and budget narrative. If recipient organization is using the third-party cash match to pay for own expenses, the costs would be distributed in the applicable budget categories (i.e.travel, salaries, etc.) where they will be spent. Details on how funds are being spent must be provided. Same level of details required as for Federal funds.

Matching Commitment Documentation Third-Party Cash and In-Kind Contributions: Cost-sharing commitments by a Third-Party must include Pledge Agreement from the contributing organization’s AR, counter-signed by the recipient organization’s AR. Counter-signature not required if submitted with the proposal Pledge agreement should also state whether the matching is cash or in-kind

Pledge Agreements Separate pledge agreement required for each donor. Submitted on donor letterhead with the name, address and telephone of organization Signed by AR of donor organization with title of person signing listed

Pledge Agreements Pledge agreements must include: Title of project for which the donation is being made The dollar amount or good faith estimate of the donation or contribution At statement the donation will be made during the grant period (dates)

Pledge Agreements Third-Party Cash Contributions: Project costs to be incurred and paid by the Third Party Include information on how the funds will be spent (i.e. salary, travel, materials and supplies – provide details on costs)

Summary It is important that all matching is documented with letters of commitment and cost justifications for both recipient and Third-party donors. An award with required matching cannot be issued until all matching has been verified as allowable, reasonable and secured.

Questions? For any questions regarding matching costs or any other grant issues, contact:  Awards Management Division –  Adriene Woodin, Branch Chief – or