Exemplar Dynamics VOT of stops varies in languages VOT of stops varies in languages So people learn language specific VOT So people learn language specific.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Working Memory Model Baddeley and Hitch (1974) developed an alternative model of short-term memorywhich they called working memory.
Advertisements

Speech perception 2 Perceptual organization of speech.
1 Language and kids Linguistics lecture #8 November 21, 2006.
Knowing Semantic memory.
COGNITION AND LANGUAGE Pertemuan 6 Matakuliah: O0072 / Pengantar Psikologi Tahun: 2008.
Language: Nature and Acquisition
Usage vs Acquisition in Language Change Andrew Wedel and Clay Beckner Language as a Complex System Workshop University of Arizona, 2008.
Psycholinguistics 05 Internal Lexicon.
Chapter7 Phonemic Analysis PHONOLOGY (Lane 335). What is Phonology? It’s a field of linguistics which studies the distribution of sounds in a language.
Generative Grammar(Part ii)
A Complex Systems Approach to Language Patterning Andrew Wedel University of Arizona April 10, 2008.
Speech Perception 4/6/00 Acoustic-Perceptual Invariance in Speech Perceptual Constancy or Perceptual Invariance: –Perpetual constancy is necessary, however,
Infant Speech Perception & Language Processing. Languages of the World Similar and Different on many features Similarities –Arbitrary mapping of sound.
Statistical learning, cross- constraints, and the acquisition of speech categories: a computational approach. Joseph Toscano & Bob McMurray Psychology.
1 Speech Perception 3/30/00. 2 Speech Perception How do we perceive speech? –Multifaceted process –Not fully understood –Models & theories attempt to.
Reading. How do you think we read? -memorizing words on the page -extracting just the meanings of the words -playing a mental movie in our heads of what.
Language The model for cognition.. Properties of Language. 1.Communicative: language permits us to communicate with one or more people. 2.Arbitrarily.
The Working Model of Memory
Applied Linguistics 665 English Phonology 3. Phonetics Relevance to Classroom Teachers Pass standardized tests – RICA (Reading Instruction Competency.
A problem with linguistic explanations  A problem with linguistic explanations  Controlling articulatory movements  Memory for speech  The balance.
Craik and Lockhart: Levels of processing Mandy, Samantha & Jessica.
The Goals of Phonology: to note and describe the sound patterns in language(s) to detect and taxonomize (classify) general patterns to explain these patterns.
LIN 1101 TOPIC 1. Major Sub-fields of Linguistics Phonetics: nature of speech sounds –How they are articulated (articulatory phonetics) –Their physical.
Acoustic Continua and Phonetic Categories Frequency - Tones.
Copyright © 2010, Pearson Education Inc., All rights reserved.  Prepared by Katherine E. L. Norris, Ed.D.  West Chester University of Pennsylvania This.
Chapter II phonology II. Classification of English speech sounds Vowels and Consonants The basic difference between these two classes is that in the production.
Computer Simulations. Decision Trees 1. Decision trees (classification trees) Designed to find the combination of variables that accounts for most of.
Exemplar Theory, part 2 April 15, 2013.
Levels of Linguistic Analysis
Language I: Structure Defining language: symbolic, rule-based system of communication shared by a community Linguistics: study of language Psycholinguistics:
Language Perception.
Against formal phonology (Port and Leary).  Generative phonology assumes:  Units (phones) are discrete (not continuous, not variable)  Phonetic space.
Verbal Representation of Knowledge
Usage-based phonology Why are lines in grocery store about equal?
Author: Flege, J. (1986) Presenter: Shu-ping Chuang (Erin) Advisor: Rung-fu, Chung Date: March 1 st, 2012.
Consumer guide to phonological evidence (Oostendorp)  What is used as evidence in phonology?
VISUAL WORD RECOGNITION. What is Word Recognition? Features, letters & word interactions Interactive Activation Model Lexical and Sublexical Approach.
The Scientific Method. Scientifically Solving a Problem Observe Define a Problem Review the Literature Observe some More Develop a Theoretical Framework.
Usage-Based Phonology Anna Nordenskjöld Bergman. Usage-Based Phonology overall approach What is the overall approach taken by this theory? summarize How.
Usage-based phonology. High frequency words are shorter than low frequency words High frequency words are shorter than low frequency words time (hi) time.
Phonetics Unit 1.
- Different picture of the three sounds [s], [z], [ʃ] in Korean and English: Korean: The three sounds are allophones of one and the same phoneme. English:
Working Memory Model Baddeley and Hitch (1974) developed an alternative model of short-term memory which they called working memory.
Step 1: Memorize IPA - practice quiz today - real quiz on Tuesday (over consonants)! Phonology is about looking for patterns and arguing your assessment.
Cognition and Language
Language and Cognitive Science
Phonological Variation
Typical Person :^) Fall 2002 CS/PSY 6750.
Levels of Processing Memory Model (LoP)
Map Scale.
Human Memory Keywords:
Ch. 8 Individual differences in L2A
Copyright © American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
CHAPTER 5 This chapter introduces students to the study of linguistics. It discusses the basic categories and definitions used to study language, and the.
Influence of native-language phonology
AP Review Session 6: Cognition and Language:
Qualitative Data Analysis
Abstraction versus exemplars
What is Linguistics? The scientific study of human language
Influence of native-language phonology
The Cognitive Approach
Qualitative Data Analysis
Information Processing Model
Levels of Linguistic Analysis
Typical Person :^) Fall 2002 CS/PSY 6750.
Motor theory.
Introducing SLA of phonology research:
Markedness Unmarked categories, language, and identities:
Bruce & Young’s model of face recognition (1986)
Qualitative Data Analysis
Presentation transcript:

Exemplar Dynamics VOT of stops varies in languages VOT of stops varies in languages So people learn language specific VOT So people learn language specific VOT It's not a phonetic universal or associated with innate category It's not a phonetic universal or associated with innate category

Exemplar Dynamics Exemplar theory Exemplar theory Phonological patterns arise from language use/experience Phonological patterns arise from language use/experience Words stored with phonetic details Words stored with phonetic details  This explains frequency effects

Exemplar Dynamics In formal theories a rule applies when context is met In formal theories a rule applies when context is met There is no way to fit frequency There is no way to fit frequency Phonetic details shouldn't influence processing Phonetic details shouldn't influence processing

Exemplar Dynamics In formal theories the mental lexicon (storage) is separate from processing In formal theories the mental lexicon (storage) is separate from processing In formal theories words stored with small inventory of phonemes In formal theories words stored with small inventory of phonemes Phonemes are identical in all words Phonemes are identical in all words

Exemplar Dynamics In formal theories the mental lexicon (storage) is separate from processing In formal theories the mental lexicon (storage) is separate from processing In formal theories words stored with small inventory of phonemes In formal theories words stored with small inventory of phonemes Phonemes are identical in all words Phonemes are identical in all words Fact that rules can apply to new words is “evidence” for existence of rule Fact that rules can apply to new words is “evidence” for existence of rule

Exemplar Dynamics In formal theories sound changes apply to all words with same phonemes In formal theories sound changes apply to all words with same phonemes So, all words must be comprised of same units So, all words must be comprised of same units

Exemplar Dynamics In exemplar theory words stored in surface form In exemplar theory words stored in surface form

Exemplar Dynamics In exemplar theory words stored in surface form In exemplar theory words stored in surface form The mental lexicon (UR) and processing (rules) are not separate but interrelated The mental lexicon (UR) and processing (rules) are not separate but interrelated

Exemplar Dynamics In exemplar theory words stored in surface form In exemplar theory words stored in surface form The mental lexicon (UR) and processing (rules) are not separate but interrelated The mental lexicon (UR) and processing (rules) are not separate but interrelated A word or phone or morpheme is a category A word or phone or morpheme is a category

Exemplar Dynamics In exemplar theory words stored in surface form In exemplar theory words stored in surface form The mental lexicon (UR) and processing (rules) are not separate but interrelated The mental lexicon (UR) and processing (rules) are not separate but interrelated A word or phone or morpheme is a category A word or phone or morpheme is a category Members of the category are stored in a cloud of related exemplars Members of the category are stored in a cloud of related exemplars

Exemplar Dynamics In exemplar theory words stored in surface form In exemplar theory words stored in surface form The mental lexicon (UR) and processing (rules) are not separate but interrelated The mental lexicon (UR) and processing (rules) are not separate but interrelated A word or phone or morpheme is a category A word or phone or morpheme is a category Members of the category are stored in a cloud of related exemplars Members of the category are stored in a cloud of related exemplars More similar exemplar are stored “closer” to each other (or with stronger connections) More similar exemplar are stored “closer” to each other (or with stronger connections)

Exemplar Dynamics Exemplar are related/belong to same cloud/category because they are perceived to be the same thing Exemplar are related/belong to same cloud/category because they are perceived to be the same thing A form can belong to different categories A form can belong to different categories e.g. shoot e.g. shoot  stored under different meanings  stored with relationships to frustration  stored with voice of person who says it a lot

Exemplar Dynamics Can you store everything you've ever said/heard? Can you store everything you've ever said/heard? Possibilities Possibilities  Older memories decay  Many exemplars are so similar they fuse into the same thing

Exemplar Dynamics Exemplars are stored with other exemplar most similar to it Exemplars are stored with other exemplar most similar to it The more similar, the stronger the relationship The more similar, the stronger the relationship More recently activated (used) exemplars are stronger More recently activated (used) exemplars are stronger

Exemplar Dynamics Exemplar: a memory trace of an experience Exemplar: a memory trace of an experience

Exemplar Dynamics Is exemplar “x” [I] or [ ɛ ]? Is exemplar “x” [I] or [ ɛ ]?

Prototype Theory Prototype: Prototype: Most central member of category Most central member of category

Prototype Theory Prototype: Prototype: Most central member of category Most central member of category The one new exemplars are compared with to determine what category it belongs to The one new exemplars are compared with to determine what category it belongs to

Exemplar Theory No real single prototype, Instead No real single prototype, Instead Densely populated part of cloud Densely populated part of cloud Many exemplars Many exemplars High frequency exemplar High frequency exemplar Lots of connections between exemplar Lots of connections between exemplar

Exemplar Theory No real single prototype, Instead No real single prototype, Instead Densely populated part of cloud Densely populated part of cloud Many exemplars Many exemplars High frequency exemplar High frequency exemplar Lots of connections between exemplar Lots of connections between exemplar

Exemplar Theory There is competition between clouds of exemplars There is competition between clouds of exemplars “the probability for a label is influenced both by the activation of exemplars having that label, and by competition from other labels having exemplars in the same area of the cognitive map.” “the probability for a label is influenced both by the activation of exemplars having that label, and by competition from other labels having exemplars in the same area of the cognitive map.”

Exemplar Theory “In perception, the encoded phonetic character of an incoming stimulus locates it in the parameter space. Activation of exemplars in the neighborhood is passed upwards to the labels, with the most probable label winning in competition with alternatives. Production proceeds in the opposite direction.”

Exemplar Theory “The likelihood that a particular exemplar will be selected is proportionate to its strength. Production is taken to be sensitive to strength in exactly the same way that perceptual classification is.”