Last Updated: 5/12/2016 Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System (T-TESS) End-of-Year Conference.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chad Allison May 2013  1-2 Formal Classroom Evaluations  Drop-in Visits.
Advertisements

North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.
PORTFOLIO.
C OLLABORATIVE A SSESSMENT S YSTEM FOR T EACHERS CAST
Purpose of Evaluation  Make decisions concerning continuing employment, assignment and advancement  Improve services for students  Appraise the educator’s.
Texas Evaluation and Support System
August 2014 The Oregon Matrix Model was submitted to USED on May 1, 2014 and is pending approval* as of 8/8/14 *Please note content may change Oregon’s.
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Teacher Evaluation Ashley Greene 10/29/13.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY13-14 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 1.
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
An Effective Teacher Evaluation System – Our Journey to a Teaching Framework Corvallis School District.
 In Cluster, all teachers will write a clear goal for their IGP (Reflective Journal) that is aligned to the cluster and school goal.
The New Massachusetts Principal Evaluation
Session Materials  Wiki
BY COURTNEY N. SPEER TECHNOLOGY AS A TOOL SPRING Professional Growth & Self- Reflection.
DPASII Criterion Rubrics for Teachers. Component 1: Planning and Preparation Criterion 1a: Selecting Instructional Goals ELEMENT Value, sequence and alignment.
BISD Update Teacher & Principal Evaluation Update Board of Directors October 27,
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation AUTEC School 4-8 March 2012.
Curriculum and Instruction: Management of the Learning Environment
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Sugar Grove Elementary September 29, 2010.
Overview of Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) for
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
Overview of Student Growth and T-TESS. Keys of Appraisal Student growth is a part of the appraisal process: Formative Ongoing and Timely Formalize what.
Overview of the Texas Teacher and Principal Evaluation Systems.
An Overview of Revisions to the Rhode Island Model
Setting Your Goals For TTESS Memorial HS Training September 11, 2015.
UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.
Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System (T-TESS)
1 OBSERVATION CYCLE: CONNECTING DOMAINS 1, 2, AND 3.
Implementing the Professional Growth Process Session 3 Observing Teaching and Professional Conversations American International School-Riyadh Saturday,
EISD Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System T-TESS
Last Updated: 5/12/2016 Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System (T-TESS) Teacher Overview.
MOVING TO T-TESS Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System Copyright 2016.
Last Updated: 5/12/2016 Goal Setting and Professional Development Plan Teacher Overview.
Last Updated: 5/12/2016 Goal Setting and Professional Development Plan Teacher Overview.
CAEP Standard 4 Program Impact Case Study
An Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Advancing Student and Educator Growth through Peer Feedback
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
IMPLEMENTATION - JANUARY 2013
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Changes to the Educator Evaluation System
The School Mentor 9/19/2018.
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Fall 2017 Data Summit Welcome!.
Domain 6: Community Linkages and Professional Engagement
Align Combine Design.
Personal Growth and Professional Development
PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT Jay Barrett, GED 621.
Teacher Evaluation Process School Year
Overview of Implementation and Local Decisions
Introduction to Core Professionalism
Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System (T-TESS)
Administrator Evaluation Orientation
Auxiliary Rubrics Module 6 Activity Overview
Clinical Educator and Teacher Candidate Training Chapter for the Candidate Preservice Assessment for Student Teachers (CPAST) Form Developed by the VARI-EPP*
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND APPRAISAL SYSTEM (PDAS) TEACHER ORIENTATION This orientation provides an overview of the elements of the PDAS system and.
February 21-22, 2018.
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Staff Finalization Using Thoughtful Classroom
Colorado Department of Education
Assessment Day Strategy
Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13
Educator Evaluation Self-Reflection and Evidence Webinar February 28th, 2013 [LISA / ROBERT] Thank you for joining us for the second in a series of webinars.
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Cooperating Teacher and Student Teacher Training Chapter for the Candidate Preservice Assessment for Student Teachers (CPAST) Form Developed by the VARI-EPP*
Presentation transcript:

Last Updated: 5/12/2016 Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System (T-TESS) End-of-Year Conference

2 The teachers will: Obtain an understanding of the T-TESS End of Year Conference process and its purpose. Learn what to expect during the End of Year Conference. Learn how to prepare for the End of Year Conference. Success Criteria:

3 The EOY (End of Year) conference provides for the appraiser and the teacher to summarize the year and to collect information that will provide evidence to score Domain 4 of the T-TESS rubric and to discuss next year’s goal(s) and professional development plan. Purpose

4 The End of Year Conference allows the teacher to share their thoughts on the year’s progress and plan forward Teachers should celebrate accomplishments and acknowledge areas of growth The End of Year Conference may not be waived EOY Conferences

5 Unlike Domains 1-3, Domain 4: Professional Practices and Responsibilities, is not scored in summative form by the evaluator until after the teacher has been afforded the opportunity to present evidence related to the four dimensions during the EOY Conference. Dimension 4.1 Professional Demeanor and Ethics Dimension 4.2 Goal Setting Dimension 4.3 Professional Development Dimension 4.4 School/Community Involvement Domain 4: Professional Practices and Responsibilities

6 Effective End of Year Conferences can be structured in may different ways. The following is an example of one way an End of Year Conference can be structured. Teachers share evidence and artifact for Domain 4 Brief and Review of final observation scores for Domains 1, 2, & 3 Acknowledge professional progress and area of reinforcement Discuss area of refinement Determine Goals and plan for next school year What to Expect in EOY Conferences?

7 Advanced Preparation Review Domain 4 and its respective Dimensions in light of current performance Prepare in advance and organize Evidence Artifacts Data

8 Professional Practices and Responsibilities Domain 4 Professional Demeanor and Ethics (Dimension 4.1) The teacher meets district expectations for attendance, professional appearance, decorum, procedural, ethical, legal and statutory responsibilities. Goal Setting (Dimension 4.2) The teacher reflects on his/her practice. Professional Development (Dimension 4.3) The teacher enhances the professional community. School Community Involvement (Dimension 4.4) The teacher demonstrates leadership with students, colleagues, and community members in the school, district and community through effective communication and outreach. Evidence and Artifacts Activity

9 The teachers will: Obtain an understanding of the T-TESS End of Year Conference process and its purpose. Learn what to expect during the End of Year Conference Learn how to prepare for the End of Year Conference Success Criteria:

10 T-TESS Thoughts… "Great teaching is at the core of every quality education system.“ "Research shows that there is no greater in-school factor than having an outstanding education in the classroom.“ The 'Proficient' performance level is representative of a 'Rock Solid' teacher. There will be some necessary culture shifts to establish a new mind set for the relationship with appraisals and supporting teachers. Everyone in the school community is a public learner. The ultimate outcome is improved student achievement.

11 T-TESS Thoughts… T-TESS was developed by educators for educators. T-TESS is aligned to research-based, best practices for teaching and learning. The T-TESS Rubric aligns directly with the new Texas Teacher Standards. The T-TESS process provides for actionable, timely feedback, allowing teachers set goals and identify professional development that will lead to refinement in knowledge and skills.

12 Thanks for Your Participation! For more resources please visit our website: TeachforTexas.org