Leader slts PRIOR TO : Principal set a minimum of two goals, which express an expectation of student growth. SPS available for use.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 R-2 Report: Read and write at the end of third grade Review of Progress and Approval of Targets A presentation to the Board by Vince.
Advertisements

DPAS II: Component V The Process: Step 1: MUST use a minimum of two (2) measures MUST use Measure A for all students assessed by DCAS in reading and/or.
Compass: Module 3 Student Growth.
Student Learning Targets (SLT)
Student Learning Targets in the CCSS Classroom: Mathematics.
Accountability preview Major Mindshift Out with the Old – In with the New TEPSA - May 2013 (Part 2) Ervin Knezek John Fessenden
Burton Secondary EOC/STAAR Data INDEX 1 STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT STARR SATISFACTORY PERFORMANCE All Students=3-8 grades spring administration.
2 EOC Graduation Policy High Stakes Policy District Test Coordinator Spring 2010 Pretest Workshop.
Student Learning Targets (SLT) You Can Do This! Getting Ready for the School Year.
Compass: Louisiana’s path to educator excellence
Student Learning Objectives NYS District-Wide Growth Goal Setting Process December 1, 2011 EVOLVING.
2015 Goals and Targets for State Accountability Date: 10/01/2014 Presenter: Carla Stevens Assistant Superintendent, Research and Accountability.
TPSS Leader & Teacher SLTs School Year.
Leader & Teacher SLTs 2014 – ComponentEvaluation for TeachersEvaluation for School Leaders Setting GoalsTeachers set two SLTs in collaboration with.
Student Learning targets
2012 Secondary Curriculum Teacher In-Service
LOUISIANA STATE SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION JOHN WHITE Tracking Readiness: Measuring High School Effectiveness in Louisiana National Conference on Student.
Fall Testing Update David Abrams Assistant Commissioner for Standards, Assessment, & Reporting Middle Level Liaisons & Support Schools Network November.
Principal Professional Learning Team August 2012.
Information for school leaders and teachers regarding the process of creating Student Learning Targets. Student Learning targets.
School Accountability
What are the STAAR Performance Standards? Copyright 2013 by Region 7 Education Service Center. All rights reserved.
Grades 6-8 MONITORING REPORT HIGHLIGHTS DECEMBER 2013.
ACCOUNTABILITY UPDATE Accountability Services.
Release of PARCC Student Results. By the end of this presentation, parents will be able to: Identify components of the PARCC English.
Compass Framework & Goal Setting for Principals: Work Session St. James Parish August 25, Compass Framework & Goal Setting for.
Assigns one of three ratings:  Met Standard – indicates campus/district met the targets in all required indexes. All campuses must meet Index 1 or 2.
Teacher SLTs General Format for Teacher SLTs with a District-wide Common Assessment The percent of students scoring proficient 1 in my 8 th.
Educator Effectiveness Summit School District’s Recommendation for the School Year.
2009 Report Card and TVAAS Update Recalibration 2009 October 26, 2009.
Student Learning Objectives NYS District-Wide Growth Goal Setting Process December 1, 2011 EVOLVING.
Updates from the Office of Human Resources/Accountability September 13, 2011.
There Should be an App for That EOC Cumulative Scoring Texas Assessment Conference 11/28/2012.
TEACHNJ Proposed Regulations. TEACHNJ Regulations Proposal  Two Terms that are very important to know: SGO – Student Growth Objective (Created in District)
Franklin Public Schools MCAS and PARCC Results Spring 2015 Joyce Edwards Assistant Superintendent for Teaching and Learning December 8, 2015.
A-F Report Card Law, Reporting Phases, and Indicator Descriptors.
2017 Report Card Updates Marianne Mottley – Director Office of Accountability.
New Teacher Induction.
Value-Added Calculation
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) Accountability
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
WorkKeys February 19 – 21, 2013 Online
Completion of Evaluation Progress
Teacher SLTs
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) State Plan: Update
Compass Information System (CIS)
Overview Page Report Card Updates Marianne Mottley – Director Office of Accountability.
Teacher SLTs
Student Growth Measurements and Accountability
Release of PARCC Student Results
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Growth Models Oklahoma
Framework for a Next-Generation Accountability System
Specifications Used for School Identification Under ESSA in
Framework for a Next-Generation Accountability System
IFs and Nested IFs =IF(R3<60,”F”,”P”)
Danvers Public Schools: Our Story
Framework for a Next-Generation Accountability System
Teacher SLTs
Framework for a Next-Generation Accountability System
EOCT BACKGROUND SPRING 2012
Leader SLTs
Leader SLTs
Jayhawkville Central High School
Teacher SLTs
WAO Elementary School and the New Accountability System
Presented by Joseph P. Stern
2019 Report Card Update Marianne Mottley Report Card Project Director
Teacher SLTs
English Learner Accountability Component
Presentation transcript:

Leader slts

PRIOR TO : Principal set a minimum of two goals, which express an expectation of student growth. SPS available for use as the measure of student growth. BEGINNING : Principals will set goals where two are based in SPS with: One goal based on overall SPS improvement One goal aligned to components of school performance improvement Louisiana Believes. 3 Compass Improvements: Principal Goal Setting Sample Principal Goals: PRIOR to Goal 1: 80% of students in grade 3 will meet or exceed 80% proficiency on the end of year teacher administered math fluency assessment. Goal 2: 80% of my teachers will score a 3 or higher on their end of year Compass ratings. Sample Principal Goals: BEGINNING Goal 1: Current year student achievement, as measured by SPS, will meet or exceed which is an increase of points in overall SPS. Goal 2: Current year student achievement, as measured by the Math Assessment Index, will meet or exceed.

Set Goals LDOE Recommended Targets Student Achievement Data Component State Average Our School Recommended Target Insufficient Attainment Partial Attainment Full Attainment Exceeds SCHOOL PERFORMANCE SCORE (SPS): with grade ≤ 0.0^ ^ > 3.5 SCHOOL PERFORMANCE SCORE (SPS): w/out grade ≤ 0.0^ ^ > 3.1 Assessment Index Overall69.7 ≤ 0.0^ ^ > 1.9 ELA Assessment Index76.6 ≤ 0.0^ > 7.6 Math Assessment Index*66.0 < 0.0* * *> 8.2* Science Assessment Index65.3 ≤ 0.0^ ^ > 3.5 Social Studies Assessment Index67.5 ≤ 0.0^ ^ > 3.5 Dropout/CreditDCAI Index131.2 ≤ 0.0^ > 5.7 Progress Points Math: % of non-proficient students exceeding their target 51.8% ≤ 0.0^ ^ > 10.5 ELA: % of non-proficient students exceeding their target 51.8% ≤ 0.0^ ^ > 4.3 C LETTER GRADE K-8 SCHOOLS Recommended Targets:

Goal 1: Improvement in Overall SPS Student Achievement Data Component State Average Our School Insufficient Attainment Partial Attainment Full Attainment Exceeds SCHOOL PERFORMANCE SCORE (SPS): with grade ≤ 0.0^ ^ > 3.5 SCHOOL PERFORMANCE SCORE (SPS): w/out grade ≤ 0.0^ ^ > 3.1 Goal #1: Improve Math Performance – B School Target Statement (based on full attainment) My School Performance Score will increase by 1.9 points from 68 to Insufficient Attainment of Target (1 point) Partial Attainment of Target (2 points) Full Attainment of Target (3 points) Exceptional Attainment of Target (4 points) Achievement Range: SPS did not increase. Achievement Range: SPS increased from 0.1 to 1.8 points. Achievement Range: Index increased from 1.9 to 3.5 points. Achievement Range: Index increased more than 3.5 points.

Goal 2: Improvement in a Component of the SPS Assessment Index Overall69.7 ≤ 0.0^ ^ > 1.9 ELA Assessment Index76.6 ≤ 0.0^ > 7.6 Math Assessment Index < > 8.2 Science Assessment Index65.3 ≤ 0.0^ ^ > 3.5 Social Studies Assessment Index67.5 ≤ 0.0^ ^ > 3.5 Student Achievement Data Component State Average Our School Insufficient Attainment Partial Attainment Full Attainment Exceeds Goal #1: Improve Math Performance – B School Target Statement (based on full attainment) My school will increase our math assessment index by 4.2 points from 60 to 64.2 points. Insufficient Attainment of Target (1 point) Partial Attainment of Target (2 points) Full Attainment of Target (3 points) Exceptional Attainment of Target (4 points) Achievement Range: Index did not increase. Achievement Range: Index increased from 0.1 to 4.1 points. Achievement Range: Index increased from 4.2 to 8.2 points. Achievement Range: Index increased more than 8.2 points.

Reconfigured Schools Since reconfigured schools do not have an SPS based on their current grade configuration, school leaders will need to compute an assessment index only SPS to use when setting their SPS and assessment index goals. Using the SPS calculator, enter the number for each of the students that you currently have in grades 4 – 8 (you will not have state testing data for 3 rd grade students from last year). This information is found in Student Stats. For Social Studies, use the data for the students in grades 5 – 8. Leave 4 th grade SS blank – because you will not have any data. This should give you an SPS based on the assessment indexes. This SPS will not include any progress points or DCAI. Those will not be used to evaluate you with the SPS goal for this transitional year. Once you receive the test data (this summer) you will need to compute your own assessment index only SPS and not include any 3 rd grade assessment results or 4 th grade SS results – to make this comparable to the assessment index only SPS you computed. If you have any questions, contact your Network Leader.

Goal 3: Progress Points Rational: Use a scale that is consistent for all schools and is based on actual progress points earned. Goal #1: Improve Math Performance – B School Target Statement (based on full attainment) My school will earn at least 5 bonus points for the school year. Insufficient Attainment of Target (1 point) Partial Attainment of Target (2 points) Full Attainment of Target (3 points) Exceptional Attainment of Target (4 points) Achievement Range: 0 bonus points Achievement Range: 1 – 4 bonus points Achievement Range: 5 – 9 bonus points Achievement Range: 10 bonus points

TPSS Leader SLT Requirement All assessment components of the School Performance score must be covered by the administrative team at the school. Growth rate will be determined by grade level of school and LDOE charts. Team approach – we are all in this together.

K-8 Example Principal: Goal 1: SPS growth Goal 2: Growth in lowest assessment index from previous year Goal 3: Progress Points Assistant Principals/AA Goal 1: assessment index growth by grade and/or subject based on areas of responsibility. Goal 2: assessment index growth by grade and/or subject based on areas of responsibility. All grades and assessment indexes should be covered by the administrative team.

High School Example Principals Goal 1: SPS growth Goal 2: Growth in lowest assessment index (EOC or ACT) Goal 3: Progress Points Assistant Principals/AA/Counselors Possible Goals depending on areas of responsibilities: Growth in an assessment index (EOC or ACT) all or parts depending on area of responsibility. (i.e. An assistant who observes and provides support to all of the English teachers could do SLTs on the English II and III EOC.) Graduation Index Graduation Cohort rate Progress Points

Sample Leader Goals Goal 1: The School Performance Score will increase by ______ points from current SPS to goal SPS. Goal 2: The Math Assessment Index will increase by __ points from current index to goal index. Goal 3: My school will earn at least 5 progress points this year.

Timeline November 18: SLT's discussed and approved by evaluators December 2: SLT's posted and accepted in CIS by evaluators

Resources District SLT website (C&I Webpage): Progress Monitoring Information: District End of Year Test Information: