January 23,  Balance state’s higher education long range plan and agency operations in the required strategic plan;  Involve agency staff in.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
UNDERSTANDING THE AANN FUTURE OF NURSING WHITE PAPER: CHANGES TO THE AANNs FUTURE A white paper is an authoritative report or guide that helps members.
Advertisements

Welcome to Site Management Amy Thompson. Agenda I.Foundation Introductions Setting the Session Agenda II.Site Management Principles III.Site Management.
STRATEGIC PLAN Community Unit School District 300 7/29/
A relentless commitment to academic achievement and personal growth for every student. Redmond School District Graduates are fully prepared for the demands.
A Commitment to Excellence: SUNY Cortland Update on Strategic Planning.
Facilities Management 2013 Manager Enrichment Program U.Va.’s Strategic Planning Initiatives Colette Sheehy Vice President for Management and Budget December.
California Child Welfare Co-Investment Partnership Children’s Conference Monterey, California May 29, 2008.
Chair, Department of Management & Marketing
Purpose of the Standards
Leadership for Student Achievement National School Boards Association.
Organization Mission Organizations That Use Evaluative Thinking Will Develop mission statements specific enough to provide a basis for goals and.
EMU Strategic Planning Strategic Planning Material Mission/Vision/Values Goals and Objectives January 10, 2014.
Haldimand County Public Library Board 2001 Municipal amalgamation Why do a Strategic Plan? concentration of resources on key areas ability to deal with.
STRATEGIC PLANS An Overview of Plans Within Maricopa.
WELCOME Strategic Directions Finale May 1, SETTING THE STAGE Planning for BC’s Future 2015—2018.
Strategic Planning A Tool for “Charting our Future” Strategic Planning Team May 24-25, 2012.
Orientation to the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board Glenda O. Barron July 31, 2006.
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY BOARD TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD TRB’s Vision for Transportation Research.
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
DRAFT STRATEGIC PLAN 2015 FOR ADULT EDUCATION AND LITERACY Anson Green Director Adult Education and Literacy Texas Workforce Commission.
Lincoln Trail District Health Department Strategic Plan Our Foundation Strategic Goals & Objectives Measures of Success Mission: The Lincoln Trail District.
PERKINS IV AND THE WORKFORCE INNOVATION AND OPPORTUNITY ACT (WIOA): INTERSECTIONS AND OPPORTUNITIES.
Time to answer critical and inter-related questions: Whom will we serve? What will we offer? How will we serve them?
Promoting the Vision & Mission of the School Governing Board Online Training Module.
Student success is the highest priority of every community college in Texas and our legislative priorities reflect this core principle. The member colleges.
UTPA 2012: A STRATEGIC PLAN FOR THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS-PAN AMERICAN Approved by President Cárdenas November 21, 2005 Goals reordered January 31, 2006.
Long Range Technology Plan, Student Device Standards Secondary Device Recommendation.
Strategic Plan: Goals, Objectives & Success Measures Administrative Forum, South Campus June 17,
External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.
ACUI TRAINING Core Competency Module. Purpose Overview of the 11 core competencies Introduction to the resources offered by ACUI regarding the core competencies.
Evidence2Success Session 2. 2 As a result of this session, you will be able to: Explain the strategic financing process and aims Identify common goals.
Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board THECB 10/2013.
Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s Future” gadoe.org Quality Comprehensive Improvement System Key School Performance Standards.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
 Julie Bruno, Sierra College  Roberta Eisel, Citrus College  Fred Hochstaedter, Monterey Peninsula College.
Welcome To University Shared Services
JMFIP Financial Management Conference
New Hanover County Schools
Kentucky college & career connection coalition
Leadership and Strategic Planning
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
New Faculty Orientation Provost’s Report August 22, 2016
GOVERNANCE COUNCILS AND HARTNELL’S GOVERNANCE MODEL
SSHRC’s VISION FOR Canada sustains and enhances its position as a global leader in humanities and social sciences research and research training,
Strategic Planning Council (SPC)Update
Annual Plan Earlier this week, the SNA Board reviewed the progress we have made to date on the new Strategic Plan that was introduced last year.
Continuous Improvement through Accreditation AdvancED ESA Accreditation MAISA Conference January 27, 2016.
APS Strategic Plan Steering Committee
TSMO Program Plan Development
“Where Learners Become Leaders!”
One ODOT: Positioned for the Future
Overview Daneen Calvin, Director
Research Program Strategic Plan
How does the Branding fit into ECC Excels???
Support for the AASHTO Committee on Planning (COP) and its Subcommittees in Responding to the AASHTO Strategic Plan Prepared for NCHRP 8-36, TASK 138.
Introduction to CPD Quality Assurance
Implementation Guide for Linking Adults to Opportunity
Strategic Plan Implementation July 18, 2018
Strategic Boards Toolkit
Identifying Data Needs:
Key Stakeholders are aware of the Coalitions activities
DEVELOPING A HIGH PERFORMING FEDERAL WORKFORCE THROUGH INTERAGENCY COLLABORATION Randy Bergquist Chair, Interagency Chief Learning Officer Council.
February 21-22, 2018.
Troy School District External Review Exit Report April 21-24, 2013.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13
Title I Document Training, Revision, Input Meeting
2019 Alumni Leadership Conference
Presentation transcript:

January 23,

 Balance state’s higher education long range plan and agency operations in the required strategic plan;  Involve agency staff in the development of the next strategic plan;  Lay out agency-specific goals, objectives and outcomes. 2

3 Vision Mission Values Analyze Strengths Weaknesses Opportunities Threats Develop Agency Goals Develop Objectives related to Goals Develop Strategies related to Objectives and Goals Develop Action Plans related to Strategies, Objectives, and Goals Review Performance Measures and Results

The Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board promotes access, affordability, quality, success and cost efficiency in the state’s institutions of higher education. Our mission is to enhance higher education opportunities through the development of a statewide strategic plan and policy recommendations that inspire and advance student success, resulting in a globally competent workforce that positions Texas as an international leader in an increasingly complex world economy. 4

The THECB will promote access to and success in quality higher education across the state with the conviction that access and success without quality is mediocrity and that quality without access and success is unacceptable. The Coordinating Board’s core values are: Accountability: We hold ourselves responsible for our actions and welcome every opportunity to educate stakeholders about our policies, decisions, and aspirations. Efficiency: We accomplish our work using resources in the most effective manner. Collaboration: We develop partnerships that result in student success and a highly qualified, globally competent workforce. Excellence: We strive for preeminence in all our endeavors. 5

The THECB will be recognized as an international leader in developing and implementing forward-looking higher education policy to accomplish our mission. 6

COLLABORATION  Develop collaborative partnerships with stakeholders designed to increase access, success, and quality in higher education as measured by consensus on legislative priorities and other policies. Objective 1: Develop legislative recommendations and policies through shared interests and consensus as measured by adoption of recommendations, introduction of joint legislative initiatives, and stakeholder involvement. Strategy 1: Train staff in consensus building processes and practices appropriate to their duties. Strategy 2: Develop internal and external processes for identifying legislative priorities and recommendations. Strategy 3: Conduct negotiated rulemaking as statutorily required and on other higher education issues. Strategy 4: Present at system governing boards meetings. Objective 2: Message shared interests, policies, and legislative recommendations as measured by media analytics, number and variety of messengers, and number of joint statements with stakeholders as signatories. Strategy 1: Have regular staff face-to-face and virtual interaction with stakeholders. Strategy 2: Develop and allocate staff and resources to define and disseminate messaging. Strategy 3: Collect institutional input and feedback for the purpose of issuing white papers. 7

FUNDING  Define and obtain funding by communicating the need and establishing relationships with key stakeholders as measured by percent of state financial aid funds appropriated and external funding received. Objective 1: Increase state financial aid funding as measured by percent of state financial aid funds appropriated. Strategy 1: Communicate need and establish relationships with key stakeholders. Objective 2: Communicate resource needs for joint legislative priorities and maintain state’s primary data and policy resource. Strategy 1: Improve technology tools to keep stakeholders’ and funders informed and maximize input. Strategy 2: Engage stakeholders in formula funding needs. Strategy 3: Engage stakeholders in alternative funding models. Objective 3: Obtain funding to market and support access and success programs for students and to support necessary infrastructure as measured by increased funds obtained. Strategy 1: Conduct a landscape analysis of potential funding opportunities both locally and nationally. Strategy 2: Increase development opportunities to improve access and success to scale current projects. 8

POLICY  Serve as the primary resource for data and policy analysis as measured by data and reports requested by stakeholders and THECB data citations by others. Objective 1: Develop focused reports that impact critical topics as measured by number of focused reports published. Strategy 1: Develop a process to identify needed and unneeded reports. Objective 2: Assure data quality and effective processes as measured by documentation of processes and data quality review activities. Strategy 1: Form an internal task force to develop and implement data governance. Strategy 2: Provide cross training for compliance monitors and staff with overlapping responsibility to ensure consistency and accuracy. Strategy 3: Document processes and regularly update and disseminate written policies. 9

POLICY  Serve as the primary resource for data and policy analysis as measured by data and reports requested by stakeholders and THECB data citations by others. Objective 3: Use data for analysis targeted to mission and goals as measured by the data produced and used for the development and support of agency goals. Strategy 1: Develop internal fellows program that allows policy makers in agency to better understand data collection and analysis. Objective 4: Improve communication, data accessibility, and ease of use and understanding of data as measured by participation in training on accessing and using data and data requests. Strategy 1: Hold regular data use sessions for internal and external groups. Strategy 2: Improve the design of web-based applications which provide end-user a better experience. Strategy 3: Develop a systematic way to obtain customer feedback about data products and services. Strategy 4: Make formal presentations to stakeholders and at national conferences. 10

SUCCESS  Support and empower students to succeed as measured by college going rates, number of graduates, and workforce participation. Objective 1: Analyze and publicize promising practices regarding tools, resources, and services that can be used to improve student access and success as measured by number of institutions that have adopted promising practices. Strategy 1: Provide tools, resources and services to students to better access and complete higher education. Strategy 2: Improve communication with institutional administrators through meetings on promising practices. Strategy 3: Obtain K-12 input on student needs. Strategy 4: Collect institutional input and feedback for the purpose of issuing focused reports. Objective 2: Provide tools, resources and services to institutions of higher education and K-12 to achieve students’ postsecondary and workforce success as measured by college going rates, number of graduates, and workforce participation. Strategy 1: Increase development opportunities to improve access and success to scale current projects. Strategy 2: Re-engage P-16 Councils, local chambers, and other local service organizations to improve access, success, and quality policies. 11

 Integrate Survey of Employee Engagement results  Town Hall meetings with CB staff  Align with LBB Strategic Planning Instructions  Agenda item for April meeting: Contingent on LBB Instruction publication 12