Student Growth 2.0 NCESD Fellows November 17 th,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SLG Goals, Summative Evaluations, and Assessment Guidance Training LCSD#7 10/10/14.
Advertisements

Professional Learning
Student Growth Goals Sorting it out. Over- arching Goal 2.
STUDENT GROWTH PART 3 10/16/14 ASSESSMENTS. REVIEW 1.Who are we going to target? 9 th grade 2.How much do they need to grow? Based on MAPS testing 1.5.
The Marzano School Leadership Evaluation Model Webinar for Washington State Teacher/Principal Evaluation Project.
WELCOME – RIG 2 - Session 1 September, 2012 OESD 114 RIG 2 - Session 1.
Student Growth Measures in Teacher Evaluation
Evidence: First… 1. Assemble your district team to include teachers, administrators, association representatives 2. Research and select an instructional.
Welcome SESC ISLN January. Domain 1: Planning & Preparation Domain 2: Classroom Environment Domain 3: Instruction Domain 4: Professional Responsibilities.
Connections to the TPGES Framework for Teaching Domains Student Growth Peer Observation Professional Growth Planning Reflection.
Student Growth Developing Quality Growth Goals II 1 Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System (TPGES) Facilitators: Effectiveness Coaches, Rebecca.
Student Growth Developing Quality Growth Goals STEP 1 1 Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System (TPGES)
Student Growth Developing Quality Growth Goals II
PROPOSED MULTIPLE MEASURES FOR TEACHER EFFECTIVENESS
Learning Teaching Enhancing Supporting Sharing. Agenda  Student Growth  Alignment  Student Growth Revisited.
Tracy Unified School District Leadership Institute – “Leading the Transformation” Breakout Session Authentic Data Driven Decision Making July/August 2014.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Conducting High-Quality Self-Assessments.
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
Session Materials  Wiki
Session Materials Wireless Wiki
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
Student Growth 2.0 Fall, 2014 Note to Facilitator – See Facilitator Directions on Agenda Document.
June 19 th – PLC Day June 19 th – PLC Day Year In Review – Year In Preview District Road Map District Road Map TPEP Early Release Collaboration Early Release.
Student Growth 2.0 Fall,  Face-to-Face Sessions  Student Growth 2.0  Rater Agreement Practices  TPEP/ Washington State Learning Standards.
TPEP November 2, 2012 RIG 1 & TPEP Districts Session 1,
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 1.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing Educators for Rater Agreement and Sustainability: Planning for Professional Learning.
Including Student Growth in Educator Evaluation Day 3 Monitoring and Adjusting February,
ISLN January Domain 1: Planning & Preparation Domain 2: Classroom Environment Domain 3: Instruction Domain 4: Professional Responsibilities Domain.
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
Student Growth 2.0 Fall,  Face-to-Face Sessions  Student Growth 2.0  TPEP/ Washington State Learning Standards Connections  District Agreement.
Including Student Growth in Educator Evaluation Day 3 Monitoring and Adjusting January, 2014.
Educator Growth and Professional Development. Objectives for this session The SLT will…  Have a thorough understanding of High Quality Standard 5: Educator.
Teacher and Principal Evaluation A new frontier….
Student Growth in the Washington State Teacher Evaluation System Michelle Lewis Puget Sound ESD
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Designing Local Curriculum Module 5. Objective To assist district leadership facilitate the development of local curricula.
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
STUDENT GROWTH UPDATE LEARNING GOALS FOR TODAY - Teachers will be able to clearly delineate between the 4 levels of expectations on student.
Student Growth Developing Quality Growth Goals STEP 1 1 Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System (TPGES) Facilitators: Effectiveness coaches.
After lunch - Mix it up! Arrange your tables so that everyone else seated at your table represents another district. 1.
Student Growth Focus on… PROCESS NOT CONTENT.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Update 11/29/12.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Introduction to Teacher Evaluation in Washington 1 June 2015.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Blaine and Mount Vernon TWSSP Workshop September 21, 2013.
A Closer Look Quality Goals Appropriate Assessments.
Student Learning Objectives. Introductions Training Norms Be present Actively participate in activities Respect time boundaries Use electronics respectfully.
EVAL Self Assessment (Adapted from LaConner School Improvement Presentation) Your Name Your District Your Date.
Student Growth within the Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System (TPGES) Overview 1.
Changes in Professional licensure Teacher evaluation system Training at Coastal Carolina University.
Inquiry Team and Student Growth. “Best” Practices Think about some best practices within the last 20 years in the field of science. In the field of education,
Data Teams. Data Teams in Action Medical/Education connections Double Entry Journal MVP – Most Valuable Point Explain one MVP with a partner and then.
Student Growth Goals Professional Learning Jenny Ray, PGES Consultant (KDE) 1.
Goal Setting in Educator Evaluation Sept. 11 th,
Inquiry Team and Student Growth. “Best” Practices Think about some best practices within the last 20 years in the field of science. In the field of education,
Auburn School District Student Growth Goals June
PLCs Professional Learning Communities Staff PD. Professional Learning Committees The purpose of our PLCs includes but is not limited to: teacher collaborationNOT-
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
Lakeland Middle School Professional Learning Communities (PLC)
Why bother – is this not the English Department’s job?
Guest WIFI Password: Back to school!
Evaluation Updates.
Targets I can identify elements that need to be revised in SGG drafts.
Evaluating the Quality of Student Achievement Objectives
Welcome to the session on Student Growth
PLCs Professional Learning Communities Staff PD
Student Growth Developing Quality Growth Goals STEP 1
SUPPORTING THE Progress Report in MATH
Presentation transcript:

Student Growth 2.0 NCESD Fellows November 17 th,

 Pausing  Paraphrasing  Posing Questions  Putting Ideas on the Table  Providing Data  Paying Attention to Self and Others  Presuming Positive Intentions 2 Session Norms

 This session on Student Growth provides 1. A brief review of the legislative requirements for using student growth 2. A brief review of the Student Growth Goal Rubric language and vocabulary 3. Considerations for Aligning Standards, Instruction and Assessment 4. An analysis of the 2014 state-identified sound Student Growth Goal Examples 5. Information on determining an appropriate goal area based on context 6. The opportunity to write one or more Student Growth Goals (3.1, 6.1, 8.1) 7. Considerations for Monitoring, Collecting Evidence and Reporting on Student Growth Goals 3 Session Learning Objectives

2 The Student Growth Rubrics A Review 4

 Student Achievement: The status of subject-matter knowledge, skills, understanding or performance at a given point in time.  Student Growth: The change in student achievement between two points in time. 5 Reviewing Key Terms It is student growth, not student achievement, that is relevant in demonstrating impacts teachers and principals have on students.

6 Student Growth Rubric for use in Student Growth Criterion 3: Recognizing individual student learning needs and developing strategies to address those needs. Student Growth 3.1: Establish Student Growth Goal(s) Unsatisfactory – 1Basic – 2Proficient – 3Distinguished – 4 Does not establish student growth goal(s) or establishes inappropriate goal(s) for subgroups of students not reaching full learning potential. Goal(s) do not identify multiple, high-quality sources of data to monitor, adjust, and evaluate achievement of goal(s). Establishes appropriate student growth goal(s) for subgroups of students not reaching full learning potential. Goal(s) do not identify multiple, high-quality sources of data to monitor, adjust, and evaluate achievement of goal(s). Establishes appropriate student growth goal(s) for subgroups of students not reaching full learning potential. Goal(s) identify multiple, high-quality sources of data to monitor, adjust, and evaluate achievement of goal(s). Establishes appropriate student growth goal(s) for subgroups of students not reaching full potential in collaboration with students, parents, and other school staff. Goal(s) identify multiple, high-quality sources of data to monitor, adjust, and evaluate achievement of goal(s). Student Growth 3.2: Achievement of Student Growth Goal(s) Unsatisfactory – 1Basic – 2Proficient – 3Distinguished – 4 Growth or achievement data from at least two points in time shows no evidence of growth for most students. Multiple sources of growth or achievement data from at least two points in time show some evidence of growth for some students. Multiple sources of growth or achievement data from at least two points in time show clear evidence of growth for most students. Multiple sources of growth or achievement data from at least two points in time show evidence of high growth for all or nearly all students.

 Five Student Growth Criteria  3.1 Establish Student Growth Goals Re: individual or subgroups of students (achievement/opportunity gap)  3.2 Achievement of Student Growth Goals Re: individual or subgroups of students (achievement/opportunity gap)  6.1Establish Student Growth Goals using Multiple Student Data Elements Re: whole class based on grade-level standards and aligned to school goals  6.2 Achievement of Student Growth Goals Re: whole class based on grade-level standards and aligned to school goals  8.1 Establish Team Student Growth Goals Re: Teacher as part of a grade-level, content area, or other school/district team 7 Using District, School, and Classroom-Based Data (Teachers)

3 Aligning Standards (Goals), Instruction and Assessment The Standards, Instruction, Assessment Connection 8

The Standards, Instruction and Assessment Connection in the Student Growth Process Step 1: Determine needs Step 2: Create specific learning goals based on state standards, local emphasis and student needs Step 3: Create and implement teaching and learning strategies Step 4: Monitor student progress through ongoing formative assessment Step 5: Determine whether students achieved the goals 9 Standards Instruction Assessment

Making Connections  Does the goal identify a specific area of need within the content? (Standard)  Is it based on student need?  Is the teacher thinking about teaching and learning strategies? (Instruction)  What is the assessment plan? (Assessment)  Have you identified pre- & post-assessments?  What are your multiple measures? Are they formative? 10

Protocol for Analyzing the State’s Examples of Sound Student Growth Goals STEP 1:  Work with a partner to explore some of these tools:  Review the examples of Student Growth Goal Rubrics/ checklists provided to you.  Review: Capturing the Learning Points; Measuring Student Growth (3)  Review Critical attributes, Student Growth Goals Rubrics, Proficient

Student Growth Examples: STEP 2:  Read through the SGG examples in your packet (also posted on OSPI’s TPEP website).  Use the list of qualities of Sound Student Growth Goals to review examples.  Select one or two to revise, if needed.  Consider how this activity has impacted your thinking about writing Student Growth Goals.

5 Determining an Appropriate Goal What is an appropriate goal for your students in your setting? 13

Determine the academic needs for the pertinent group (all-grade, one class, sub-group) Determine which of those needs are enduring or transferable knowledge or skills Determine which of those are in your control 14 Follow a Sequence:

 What assessment data do you have?  What are your noticings and wonderings?  Where are the learning gaps? 15 Step 1: What does assessment data reveal about student learning needs?

 For any subject taught in school, we might ask if it’s something an adult would need to know AND whether knowing it makes someone a more ‘Career and College Ready’ adult.  If something is ‘enduring’ it is worthy of transfer – the learner should be able to use what is have learned in new and sometimes confusing settings.  (Wiggins & McTighe) 16 Step 2: What do we mean by ‘Enduring’?

17  Is found in student achievement data  Is relevant to 3.1, 6.1, or 8.1  Is enduring  Is within the instructional control of the teacher Step 3: The General Goal Area

You have a scenario for a teacher who went through the process of setting a student growth goal.  Facilitator  Recorder Read the scenario and highlight process steps you think are important for your District to consider. When done, discuss: What worked? What might you replicate to inform your folks?  Share out 18 Scenario Protocol: minutes

6 Writing Student Growth Goals Your turn 19

SMART Goal Process for Student Growth S Specific- The goal addresses student needs within the content. The goal is focused on a specific area of need. M Measurable- An appropriate instrument or measure is selected to assess the goal. The goal is measurable and uses an appropriate instrument. A Appropriate- The goal is clearly related to the role and responsibilities of the teacher. The goal is standards-based and directly related to the subject and students that the teacher teaches. R Realistic- The goal is attainable. The goal is doable, but rigorous and stretches the outer bounds of what is attainable. T Time-bound- The goal is contained to a single school year/course. The goal is bound by a timeline that is definitive and allows for determining goal attainment. 20

SPECIFIC  Does the goal identify a specific area of need within the content, based on a learning standard?  Is the goal necessary for the next level of instruction?  Is the goal clearly written? 21

MEASURABLE  Does the goal identify the sources of evidence/measures that will be used to show student growth?  Are the sources of evidence/measures appropriate for demonstrating growth for the identified area of need?  Are there two or more points in time indicated? 22

APPROPRIATE  Is the goal standards-based and directly related to the subject and students taught?  Does the content selected represent enduring skills, concepts or processes? 23

REALISTIC  Is the goal doable, but rigorous enough to stretch the outer bounds of what is attainable?  Is there a good match between the goal and the level of rigor expected in the standards addressed? 24

TIME-BOUND  Is there sufficient time within the interval of instruction to determine goal attainment? 25 The goal is bound by a timeline that is definitive and allows for determining goal attainment.

 Using what you have learned and reviewed today, write a goal for  3.1 and/ or  6.1 and/ or  Writing your Goal

 Pass the goals around the table  Each participant provides specific feedback to the writer on how to improve the goal  Keep passing until the goal returns to the writer  Once the goals are back with the author, he/she rewrites them based on feedback.  Shares with a partner  All participants select their best goal, write it on a Post-it and put in on the appropriate chart. 27 Getting Feedback

28 Additional Regional Professional Learning Opportunities TopicDateLocation Student Growth Supports To be Arranged with Districts Regionally Wa. State Learning Standards/ TPEP Connection 12/10/14NCESD Rater Agreement Practices 02/03/15NCESD Resource Sharing TBDWebinar

29 Team Time