Study Plan Development & Approach May 5, 2010 Conference Call & Webinar “To ensure efficient, effective, coordinated use & expansion of the members’

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Allocating Capacity and Costs of New Transmission November 7, 2007 Portland, OR.
Advertisements

WECC/TEPPC Response to DOE Funding Opportunity Status Update June 29, 2009 Bradley Nickell Renewable Integration and Planning Director.
Strategic Planning Update For Board Meeting December 5, 2007.
WECC - Addressing Commercial Practices Ed Beck Chair, Market Interface Committee.
WESTERN ELECTRICITY COORDINATING COUNCIL OPERATIONS COMMITTEE June 18, 2009 Salt Lake City, UT Base Case Coordination System (BCCS) Request For Information.
1 ColumbiaGrid Update June 27, Activities Planning OASIS Redispatch 2.
Northern Tier Transmission Group SPG Report to TEPPC June 17, 2010 Denver To ensure efficient, effective, coordinated use & expansion of the members transmission.
Reliability Subcommittee Report Vishal C. Patel Chair – Reliability Subcommittee March 2014.
Transmission Planning in the West pocket guide This reference guide is intended to assist individuals new to transmission planning in the Western Interconnection.
March 26, 2014 Transmission Coordination and Planning Committee 2014 Q1 Stakeholder Meeting.
CREPC Meeting November 5-6, 2007 Snapshot of Major Transmission Proposals and Status of Transmission Planning Presenters: Paul Arnold and Jeff Miller.
Public Service Company of New Mexico
NTTG Economic Study and Biennial Study Update NTTG Economic Study and Biennial Study Update NTTG Study Cycle.
Montana Energy Summit Transmission Planning Process April 22, 2008.
WECC PCC Meeting Salt Lake City, UT March 26, 2014.
WECC PCC Meeting Salt Lake City, UT July 16, 2014.
Preliminary Analysis of the SEE Future Infrastructure Development Plan and REM Benefits.
1 The Effects of Integrating Wind Power on Transmission System Planning, Reliability, and Operations Phase 1 Preliminary Overall Reliability Assessment.
NTTG 0rder 1000 Stakeholder Meeting March 28, 2012 Radisson Hotel Portland, Oregon 1.
Regional Technical Forum End-use Load Shape Business Case Project Project Initiation Meeting Portland, OR March 5, 2012.
Northern California to Pacific Northwest/Canada Transmission Line Steve Metague, PG&E February 29, 2008.
2006 Reliability Study Scope Name Date. DRAFT 2 Purpose of Study Assess the PEC and Duke transmission systems’ reliability Develop a single reliability.
WestConnect Activities Charles Reinhold WestConnect Project Manager 2008 ACC BTA Workshop Phoenix, AZ May 22, 2008.
COMMON USE SYSTEM March 5, 2008 Black Hills Power Service Center Rapid City, SD TRANSMISSION COORDINATION AND PLANNING COMMITTEE.
WECC Response to DOE Funding Opportunity on Regional Planning Northwest Wind Integration Forum Steering Committee January 6, 2010 Tom Schneider Managing.
Systems Analysis and Design
Entergy AFC Stakeholder Meeting February 16, 2005 Houston, TX.
Eastern Wind Integration and Transmission Study David Corbus - Project Manager Matt Schuerger (Consultant) National Wind Technology Center NREL Golden,
SPP.org 1. Final Report: Reliability and Economic Assessments Stakeholder Meeting December 1, 2008 Austin, TX.
BC Coordinated Planning Group Development of BCCPG Charter Steering Committee Meeting – Conference Call Friday, May 27, – 2:30pm.
SPP.org 1. Status Update for Reliability and Economic Assessments Stakeholder Meeting June 20 th, 2008 Austin, TX.
Jan Strack San Diego Gas and Electric TEPPC Overview TEPPC Review Task Force January 11, 2016 Salt Lake City, UT.
Coordinated Planning Concept (For Discussion Only) revised 11/30/04 07/01/04.
Northwest Wind Integration Forum Technical Work Group Meeting October 29, 2009.
Reliability Standards Development Plan David Taylor Manager Standards Development Standards Committee Meeting June 12-13, 2008.
Update on the North Carolina Transmission Planning Collaborative January 30, 2007 For the North Carolina Utilities Commission and the North Carolina Public.
Section 4.9 Work Group Members Kris Hafner, Chair, Board Member Rob Kondziolka, MAC Chair Maury Galbraith, WIRAB Shelley Longmuir, Governance Committee.
ERCOT Transmission Planning Process Overview and Recommendations November 6, 2002.
2006 Reliability Study James Manning Bryan Guy May 12, 2006.
PG&E’s Distribution Resources Planning READ AND DELETE For best results with this template, use PowerPoint 2003 Planning the “Networked Grid“ Integrated.
Planning the Networked Grid Transmission Planning J.E.(Jeff) Billinton Manager, Regional Transmission - North Building the Networked Electricity Grid –
DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY © 2013 New York Independent System Operator, Inc. All Rights Reserved. EIPC Roll-Up Powerflow Model Zach Smith Director,
4/16/2010 Regional Planning Group Meeting Long-Term Planning Study of the ERCOT Interconnection Warren Lasher Manager, System Assessment.
CREPC/WIRAB Meeting April 27, 2016 Salt Lake City, UT Thomas Carr Western Interstate Energy Board Evolution of Grid Planning in the West.
TEPPC Review Task Force Ian McKay, Chair, TEPPC W ESTERN E LECTRICITY C OORDINATING C OUNCIL.
Northern Tier Transmission Group Report to Columbia Grid Planning Committee February 9, 2012 “To ensure efficient, effective, coordinated use & expansion.
Slide 1 B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N BPA Network Open Season 2013 Cluster Study ColumbiaGrid Planning Meeting May 2, 2013.
LNBA Subgroup: Avoided Transmission Value
CMGT 410 aid Education Begins/cmgt410aid.com
Status Update for Reliability/Market Power Mitigation Assessment
TEPPC Review Task Force Meeting February 4-5, 2016
TAS Quarterly Meeting November 2-3, 2016 Michael Bailey, P.E. WECC
Status of the Planning Working Group’s (PWG) Efforts
Reliability Assessment Committee Proposal TSS Meeting
Nick Hatton Associate Engineer March 9, 2017
SEARUC Conference Little Rock, AR June 4, 2007
Reliability Assessment Committee
Getting Started with Your Malnutrition Quality Improvement Project
Planning Tools Overview
Presenter: Peter Heidrich, FRCC – BES Drafting Team Chair
Jonathan young ColumbiaGrid
TAS Quarterly Meeting November 2-3, 2016 Michael Bailey, P.E. WECC
Reliability Standards Development Plan
Strategic Planning Process
Long Term Grid Assessment – Preparing for 2018 Studies
Strategic Planning Process
Planning Tools Overview
WECC 2019 Scenarios – Scoping
Assigned to the WEQ OASIS and WEQ OASIS/BPS Subcommittees
Assigned to the WEQ OASIS and BPS Subcommittees
Presentation transcript:

Study Plan Development & Approach May 5, 2010 Conference Call & Webinar “To ensure efficient, effective, coordinated use & expansion of the members’ transmission systems in the Western Interconnection to best meet the needs of customers & stakeholders.”

We are here Biennial Planning Calendar 2

Economic Study Process Study outlined by April 14 Planning Committee webinar Work to be performed by Economic Studies Team –Jamie Austin of PacifiCorp will use the GridView model –Ron Schellberg of Idaho Power will use PROMOD –Steven Wallace of CPS will coordinate, assist & report –Study requestor [NorthWestern] will provide guidance, data –Planning Committee will provide review and direction The EST has developed a proposed work plan –Very short timeline – just four weeks –Base case, three expansion cases, some sensitivities –Review, modifications and final report by June 30 th. Page 3 of (##)

Economic Study Details Base case will be WECC TEPPC’s 2019 PC1A case –Under development, to be available first week of May –Need conversion by ABB to run in GridView –Add 1,500 MW of wind-powered generation at the Townsend bus –Simulation models will provide re-dispatch for power flow models Three separate expansion cases –Increase capacity of the AMPS line (Path 18) from 337 to 401 MW –Increase rating of Montana-Northwest path (Path 8) by 600 MW –Add Mountain States Transmission Intertie (MSTI) project Proposed sensitivity case –Investigate methods to reduce any ‘excessive’ cycling of coal-fired generators caused by wind-powered generator output variability Page 4 of (##)

Economic Study Outputs Outputs to be recorded and summarized include: –Variable production costs of thermal generation –Hourly output, in MWh, for relevant plants and generator classes –Hours of congestion on NTTG-relevant paths Measured at 75%, 90% and 99% of path ratings Paths including Path C, Bridger West, Mona-Oquirhh, Idaho-Montana and others External interfaces, including Montana-Northwest, Pacific Interties, Idaho- Northwest and others A draft report describing details of cases, summarizing outputs, and providing observations and conclusions, will be provided to the Planning Committee for review. Page 5 of (##)

Economic Study Timeline May 7Obtain, install, verify TEPPC PC1A case May 14Establish and run core cases * Base case, three expansion cases May 21Extract and share model outputs May 27Draft analysis, graphics, observations and conclusions for review June 4Draft report to Planning Committee June 5-29Additional analysis, report revisions June 30Adoption by Planning Committee Page 6 of (##)

Study Plan Development From the Northern Tier Transmission Group’s Planning Committee Charter: Quarter 2: Study plan development and assumptions – The identification of the loads, resources, transmission requests, desired flows, constraints, etc. to be included and monitored during the study period. –The methodology, criteria, assumptions, databases, and identification of the analysis tools will be established and posted for comment and direction by stakeholders and Planning Committee members. 7

Objectives of the Study From the Planning Committee Charter: –The planning group will biennially prepare a long-term (10 year) bulk transmission expansion plan, while taking into consideration up to a twenty year planning horizon. –The plan will provide strategic transmission options (economic and reliability projects) and specific alternative plans for reinforcing the transmission system. –The plan is also intended to help coordinate the integration of new generation into the system and to reduce transmission congestion. –The work is intended to be completed primarily by the transmission owners in the footprint utilities with input from all interested stakeholders. Page 8 of (##)

Objectives of the study Specifically, the comprehensive transmission plan and/or planning process will: 1.Identify transmission needs of transmission customers (e.g., point-to-point, network, and retail native load), as they are identified and provided to the transmission provider. The transmission provider shall consolidate this information for their respective system to include in the sub-regional planning process. a.Native load needs will be incorporated by input from the various integrated resource planning (IRP) processes where they exist. Network transmission customers will be asked to submit information on their projected loads and resources on a comparable basis (e.g., planning horizon and format). The intent will be to plan for all end-use loads on a comparable basis. b.Each transmission provider’s existing point-to-point customers will be asked to submit any projections they have of a need for service over the planning horizon and at what receipt and delivery points. 2.Identify transmission congestion that is an impediment to the efficient operation of electricity markets. Congestion on the existing and planned system will be reviewed and evaluated. In addition, the impacts on congestion of potential new generation facilities or new transmission projects will be considered. This will include production simulation studies on a sub-regional and regional level, and historical use analysis as provided by the Northern Tier Use Committee and TEPPC subcommittees. 3.Work with TEPPC to include the needs of other sub-regions and support WECC transmission planning. Page 9 of (##)

Objectives of the Study The objective of the 2010 Northern Tier transmission study effort is to perform a Conceptual Study that examines, given a limited number of forecasted and assumed load and resource portfolios, what generic transmission additions are required to provide a feasible system operation at forecasted stress times, ten years in the future. In 2011, more detailed analyses will be undertaken, to determine the effectiveness of alternative sets of proposed transmission projects, suggested by the conceptual study. These analyses will contribute to a refined plan, which will be prepared, discussed and approved by the end of

General Schedule & Deliverables The broad timing of the transmission plan development process and the work products to be delivered are presented in the NTTG Planning Committee Charter. –Quarters 3 and 4: Draft plan analysis – The modeling of the system loads, resources, improvements, etc. to be considered. Technical screening studies using power flow analysis will be used to evaluate preliminary feasibility of and reliability of the system. Addition or modification of transmission elements considering past economic studies, and to meet performance and study criteria established in the study plan will be identified, resulting in a draft transmission plan for public and stakeholder comment. –Quarter 5: Draft study results (and detailed evaluation of specific projects) –Quarter 6: Economic studies (and detailed evaluation of specific projects) –Quarter 7: Final plan report –Quarter 8: Final plan approved by NTTG Steering Committee 11

Methodology Study Horizon Selected System Conditions to Study Base Scenarios Selected Expansion Alternatives Assessed 12

Methodology Time Frame a.10 years in the future –From the NTTG Planning Committee Charter (Comprehensive Transmission Plan): The planning group will biennially prepare a long-term (10 year) bulk transmission expansion plan, while taking into consideration up to a twenty year planning horizon. b.Calendar year 2019 –Align with current WECC TEPPC study horizon. c.Broad-spectrum Survey, with One ‐ hour focus –NTTG studies will examine congestion in the Northern Tier transmission footprint using production cost simulation across one year, looking for individual hours of system stress. – Identified hours of system stress will be addressed using DC power flow solvers to test conceptual solutions. Page 13 of (##)

Methodology System Conditions to Study Northern Tier Transmission Group studies will examine a limited number of defined load and resource scenarios. –Based on aggregation of local providers’ planning data –With alternatives provided through first quarter data submittals –And other agreed alternatives to test reasonable futures Page 14 of (##)

Methodology Base Cases Selected The year 2019 will be the focus of Northern Tier conceptual studies in –Allows work to be based on WECC TEPPC study foundation. –TEPPC PC1A case is based on WECC 2012 Heavy Summer, with additions for load growth and reliability in –NTTG base analysis will remove projects not currently committed. Northern Tier may shift to a 2020 focus for studies in –Depends on WECC TSS development of a 2020 Base Case, –And timely incorporation by TEPPC in 2020 cases in late Page 15 of (##)

Conceptual Planning Page 16 of (##) PowerWorld diagram of simplified network

Schedule & Milestones Q2: Develop and publish Study Plan –Specific tasks, milestones and resources Q3: Preparation, initial studies –Define load & resource scenarios, prepare model –Develop ability to export power flow cases from hourly simulation models –Use simulation models to define load, resource dispatch Q4: Develop draft Transmission Plan –Perform DC power flow analysis on scenarios –Reduce set of scenarios to those to be studied in detail in Q5 –Prove capability to export power flow cases Page 17 of (##)