WIDE RANGE ACHIEVEMENT TEST 4 (WRAT4) and Standardized Administration of the Woodcock-Johnson III Claudette Ward-Konovalov.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Scoring Terminology Used in Assessment in Special Education
Advertisements

Wide Range Achievement Test
Achievement Tests Designed to measure the skills and abilities acquired through direct instruction or intervention. Can measure both lower order and high.
General Administration
Woodcock Reading Mastery Test-Revised
TerraNova School Test Coordinators Training September 10, 2014 Roger Traynham Office of Achievement and Accountability.
Wide Range Achievement Test WRAT4 Authors: Gary S. Wilkinson, PhD Gary J. Robertson, PhD.
PLS-5 Training.
Woodcock-Muñoz Language Survey
OTELA Training Grades 3-12 General Information for Test Administrators Columbus City Schools
By: Michele Leslie B. David MAE-IM WIDE USAGE To identify students who may be eligible to receive special services To monitor student performance from.
UNDERSTANDING, PLANNING AND PREPARING FOR THE SCHOOL-WIDE EVALUATION TOOL (SET)
By: Allan & Nadeen Kaufman Published by: American Guidance Service.
Assessment Procedures for Counselors and Helping Professionals, 7e © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 9 Assessment of Achievement.
Formative and Summative Assessment
Sped 576: Internship in Assessment Cindy L Collado University of Illinois at Chicago.
Working Together for Student Success 8/15/
How to Interpret Test Scores. 1. What are standardized tests?  A standardized test is one that is administered under standardized or controlled conditions.
Language Assessment Skills Training preLAS©
Classroom Assessments Checklists, Rating Scales, and Rubrics
TACL-3 Test for Auditory Comprehension of Language
Woodcock Johnson Results Before the WJIII test results are discussed, a brief explanation of scores is offered. In order to find out what scores are high,
Wechsler Individual Achievement Test-II Overview.
Diagnostics Mathematics Assessments: Main Ideas  Now typically assess the knowledge and skill on the subsets of the 10 standards specified by the National.
Bankson-Bernthal Test of Phonology
BDI Training. Agenda General Information about BDI Administering the BDI Scoring the BDI Watch BDI on 2 year old – score protocol.
Chapter 2 ~~~~~ Standardized Assessment: Types, Scores, Reporting.
PreK CIRCLE Progress Monitoring Training September 2015 Midland ISD.
Informal Reading Inventory Dr. Melissa Comer Tennessee Tech University.
Assessment and Testing
Assessing Learners with Special Needs: An Applied Approach, 6e © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 5: Introduction to Norm- Referenced.
Woodcock-Johnson® III
Appropriate Testing Administration
Test of Early Reading Ability-3 (TERA-3) By: Jenna Ferrara.
Math Assessments Math Journals When students write in journals, they examine, they express, and they keep track of their reasoning. Reading their journals.
The Normal Distribution and Norm-Referenced Testing Norm-referenced tests compare students with their age or grade peers. Scores on these tests are compared.
Standardized Testing EDUC 307. Standardized test a test in which all the questions, format, instructions, scoring, and reporting of scores are the same.
 The introduction of the new assessment framework in line with the new curriculum now that levels have gone.  Help parents understand how their children.
Woodcock-Muñoz.
Energy Express Administrating the Woodcock Johnson Test for Achievement Allison Nichols, Ed.D. WVU Extension Specialist.
San Luis Valley Gifted Education Network Meeting October 17, 2013.
Assessment of Students with Special Education Needs.
Key Stage 1 National Curriculum Assessments. In 2014/15 a new national curriculum framework was introduced by the Government for Years 1, 3, 4 and 5.
PARENTS’ INFORMATION SESSION -YEAR 6 SATS 2017
Classroom Assessments Checklists, Rating Scales, and Rubrics
Wechsler Individual Achievement Test-II
An Information Evening for Parents
Charlton Kings Junior School
Chapter 6: Checklists, Rating Scales & Rubrics
CCMH 535 RANK Career Begins/cchm535rank.com
Information and Guidance on the Changes and Expectations for 2016/17
Classroom Assessments Checklists, Rating Scales, and Rubrics
Hambrough Primary School
Math-Curriculum Based Measurement (M-CBM)
Woodcock Johnson Tests of Achievement - III
PARENTS’ INFORMATION SESSION -YEAR 6 SATS 2017
Made for individuals ages 6-0 and years
Information for Parents on Key Stage 2 SATs
Cognitive Abilities Test (CogAT)
Observing Behavior: Formal Observational Systems
Weschler Individual Achievement Test
Analysing your pat data
Key Stage 1 National Curriculum Assessments
Key Stage 2 SATs Monday 13th May – Thursday 16th May 2019.
Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing-Second Edition CTOPP-2
Wide Range Achievement Test 4 (WRAT 4)
Chapter 4 Standardized Tests.
Differential Ability Scales (DAS-II)
Chapter 8 VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY
What Do All These Numbers Mean? Interpreting Gifted Test Scores
Presentation transcript:

WIDE RANGE ACHIEVEMENT TEST 4 (WRAT4) and Standardized Administration of the Woodcock-Johnson III Claudette Ward-Konovalov

Description of WRAT4  Norm-referenced achievement test that measures the basic academic skills of word reading, sentence comprehension, spelling, and math computation  Also called a “quick and dirty” test of achievement

WRAT-4: Brief History  Since first published, there have been several revisions  WRAT  WRAT-4 – 2006  Over these years, it’s popularity among users is attributed to its ease of administration, scoring, and provision of a significant amount of information gained through a brief investment of testing time.

WRAT-4: Updates  To increase strength and usefulness in the areas of assessment and assistance in these categories (grades K-12), the WRAT-4 is enhanced by the addition of grade-based norms.  Thus, the age range of the WRAT-4 is 5-94 years of age.  Furthermore, theres a new measure of reading achievement:  Sentence Comprehension (subtest)

WRAT-4: Administration  Alternate forms of the test, designated blue form and green form  Can be used interchangeably with comparable results, allowing for retesting within a short period of time to prevent the potential practice effects of repeating the same items.  The alternative forms can be administered together in a single examination.

WRAT-4: Administration/Time  Administration - Time 1. Approximately minutes for individuals 5-7 years old. 2. Approximately minutes for those 8 years or older  Administration of test usually done individually; specific subtests can be administered in groups  Math computation and Spelling

WRAT-4: Four Subtests  Word Reading  Sentence Completion  Spelling  Math Computation  WRAT also yields a Reading Composite score, obtained by combining the Word Reading and Sentence Comprehension standard scores

Word Reading  Measures letter and word decoding  Made up of two sections  Part 1: Letter Reading, which consists of 15 letters  Part 2: Word Reading, which consists of 55 words

Word Reading  Administration Procedures  Ages 7 or younger: Administer Part 1 first, followed by Part 2 Discontinue testing after 10 consecutive incorrect responses  Ages 8 or older: Administer Part 2 first. Discontinue after 10 consecutive incorrect responses (10 Rule). If the participant has correctly answered 5+ items on the Word Reading section before meeting discontinue criterion, do not administer Letter Reading Section. If the participant did not answer at least 5 items correct on the Word Reading, then administer Letter Reading. (5 Rule)

Sentence Comprehension  Measures an individual’s ability to gain meaning form words and to comprehend ideas and information contained in sentences through the use of a modified cloze technique.  Contains 50 items

Sentence Comprehension  Administration Procedure  Determining the Starting Point: a table on the front page of the test form lists the ranges of Part 2 (Word Reading) raw scores, the starting point corresponding to each range, and the sample items to be administered. Should only be administered to those who obtained a score of 5+ on Part 2 Participant must be at least 6 years old or in Grade 1  Alternate procedure: start at item 1 and continue until he/she responds incorrectly to 7 consecutive items.  Single word responses are highly encouraged

Sentence Comprehension  Administration Procedures  If the participant does not answer the first 5 items correctly, test backwards from the starting item until s/he obtains 5 consecutive correct answers  Then return to the last item administered before starting to test backwards and administer the next item. Continue testing until the participant answers 7 consecutive items incorrectly or completes item 50.

Sentence Comprehension  Administration of Sample Items  Although there are a given amount of sample items for each starting point, you can give more if the participant needs more practice.  Sample items may be given as many times as the participant needs until they understand the task.

Spelling  Measures an individual’s ability to encode sounds into written form through the use of a dictated spelling format containing both letters and words  Two parts  Part 1: Letter Writing, which consists of name writing and 13 dictated letters  Part 2: Spelling, which consists of 42 words.  Administration Issues  Pronunciation of word before administered item  Ask the participant to clarify any illegible words

Spelling  Administration Procedures  Ages 7 or younger: Administer Part 1 first then Part 2 Discontinue Part 2 after 10 consecutive spelling errors.  Ages 8 or older: Administer Part 2 first Discontinue after 10 consecutive misspelled words. If the participant correctly spelled 5+ items on the spelling section before meeting the discontinue criterion, skip the letter writing section.

Math Computations  Measures an individual’s ability to perform basic mathematics computations through counting, identifying numbers, solving simple oral problems, and calculating written mathematics problems.  Two Sections:  Part 1: Oral Math, which consists of 15 items  Part 2: Math Computation, which consists of 40 items  No calculators allowed!

Math Computation  Administration Procedures  Ages 7 or younger: Administer Part 1 followed by Part 2. Allow the participant 15 minutes to complete Part 2.  Ages 8 or older: Administer Part 2 first. After 15 minutes, check the participants responses. If the participant does not have at least 5 correct responses, then administer Part 1.

Math Computation  Example  Solve for n 5n + 7 = 42 N = _____  24% of 97 = _____

Scoring of WRAT-4  Scoring done electronically with WRAT-4 Scoring Program (WRAT4- SP).  Generates reports after hand-entry of raw subset scores from the WRAT4 Blue, Green, and Combined forms

WRAT-4: Strengths  Ease of administration and scoring; takes very little time.  Psychometrically sound  Has excellent standardization  Correlates well with other achievement and cognitive tests  In clinical studies, separates people with learning or cognitive deficits from people without

WRAT-4: Weaknesses  Only screens for strengths and weaknesses  Does not measure other important achievement abilities.  In later adolescent and adult years, WRAT-4 does not adequately measure skills of readers that are above- average or advanced.  Only a small number of appropriate items for younger children being tested.

Woodcock-Johnson III  Reminders:  Do not assist students with prompts. Did you mean….?  Repeats are not allowed.  No accommodations are allowed as this negates the standardization of the administration. Exception: Large print test format

 Arrange the setting:  Quiet and comfortable room with good ventilation and lighting  Table or flat surface with two comfortable chairs  Examiner and subject must sit diagonally across from each other  Setting up Testing Materials:  Test Book and accompanying Test Record Booklet with Subject Response Booklet, sharpened pencils and erasers  For tests requiring an audio presentation you will need an audio player, the audio recording and headphones  For timed tests you will need a stopwatch or a digital watch Preparation for Testing

 Establishing Rapport:  Make sure the examinee feels at ease. If the person is not feeling well or is not responding appropriately, do not begin testing  Begin testing session with a short period of conversation while completing the “identifying information” in the Test Record  Call the person by name and smile frequently throughout testing  Acknowledge effort by using comments like “good” or “fine”  Encourage response even for items that are difficult E.g., Would you like to take a guess on that one?  Be careful not to reveal whether a response is correct or incorrect. Preparation for Testing

 Order of Administration:  Best practice: In most cases, administer the test in the order that they appear in the easel test books beginning with the Standard Battery. You may begin with the Extended Battery. An examiner may also administer the tests in any order.  The tests have been organized to alternate between different formats (e.g., timed versus untimed) to facilitate optimal attention and interest  Time Requirements:  Experienced examiners may take 45 to 60 minutes for tests in the Standard Battery and about 1.5 to 2 hours for tests in the Extended Battery  Allow a reasonable amount of time for a person to respond, then suggest moving on to the next item  Allow more time for an item if instructions allow it Administration and Scoring

 Suggested Starting Points (SSP)  Table from the Test Book and first page after tab provide special instructions/procedures and indicates where to begin  SSP are determined by an estimate of the subject’s present ability level rather than by age or grade placement  Using SSP with basal and ceiling levels helps to reduce unnecessary testing time  Basal and Ceilings:  Several tests require the establishment of a basal and a ceiling  By not administering items that are extremely easy or difficult, the number of administered items is minimized and the subject’s tolerance for the testing situation is maximized  The purpose of Basal and Ceiling is to limit the number of items administered Administration and Scoring

 Meeting Basal and Ceiling Criteria:  When required, criteria included in each test at the top of the Test Record (review criteria, not all are the same)  Tests: Basal and Ceiling rules apply to each subtest (Tests: 1 – 11) Basal is item 1, ceiling is determined by cutoffs (Tests: 2,3,13 and 15) Basal is item 1, ceiling is 6 consecutive incorrect (Tests: 4,8, and 14) Basal is item 1, stop testing at limit (Tests: 6,12,16,18, and 20) Basal and ceiling rules apply to groups of items (Tests: 7,9, and 17) Basal is line 1, ceiling is line 25 (Test 10) Begin with intro, ceiling is determined by cutoffs or continuation instructions (Test 19) Administration and Scoring

Basal and Ceiling  Testing should always be completed in units of completed pages. Administration should never begin and end in the middle of the page.  Basal and Criteria are six or more consecutive items either passed or failed.  Basal is the six lowest-numbered items correct.  Ceiling is the six highest-numbered items established that are incorrect.

 Subject Requests for Information  Occasionally subjects will request other information, however, even after testing has been completed, never tell the person whether the specific answers are correct or incorrect  If the subject requests information that cannot be supplied, answer: “I’m not supposed to help you with that”  Examiner Queries:  For certain responses, the Query Keys in the Test Book provide prompts designed to elicit another answer from the subject  The examiner can tell the subject: E.g., “Tell me more about that” Administration and Scoring

Scoring Errors Although there are 6 correct here, the baseline is your lowest 6 consecutive correct.

Scoring Errors 31 Correct Administration

Scoring Errors Correct Administration.

 One disadvantage of grade scores is that do not reflect the student’s ability.  The grade score may cause problems when interpreting it. For example if a third grader receives a score of 6.0, this does not mean that they will be successful with sixth grade material. It shows us that this third grade student answered correctly a high percentage of items on a third grade test, that an average sixth grade student answered correctly on the third grade test as well. Grade Equivalent Continued

 The subject’s percentile rank indicates the percentage of subjects in the selected segment of the norming sample who had scores the same as or lower than the subject’s score.  Percentile ranks are useful for showing a person’s standing in the sample population.  For example if a subject’s score percentile rank is 99.8, this means that the person’s performance was as good or better than that of 998 persons out of 1,000 in the reference group, or only 2 out of 1000 people would have a score as high or higher. Percentile Rank