The Paradox of Tolerance Michael Lacewing co.uk.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Our roles and responsibilities as GPs
Advertisements

Michael Lacewing Authority Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
Topics in Moral and Political Philosophy Moral Relativism.
Relativism Michael Lacewing
© Michael Lacewing Metaethics: an overview Michael Lacewing
Medical Ethics Lecturer :Noha Alaggad
Euthanasia Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
Introduction to Ethics Lecture 9 The Challenge of Cultural Relativism By David Kelsey.
© Michael Lacewing Moral motivation as natural disposition Michael Lacewing
The denial of moral truth: objections Michael Lacewing
Metaethics and ethical language Michael Lacewing Michael Lacewing
Marxism Michael Lacewing co.uk.
Mill on conscience and justice
Misconceptions of Philosophy
Two objections to non- cognitivism Michael Lacewing
© Michael Lacewing Plato and Hume on Human Understanding Michael Lacewing
Topics in Moral and Political Philosophy Democracy.
Introducing metaethics Michael Lacewing
Nov2006Theory_Diversity&Equity1 Diversity and Equity: Theoretical Perspectives.
Introduction to Ethics Lecture 19 Regan & The Case for Animal Rights By David Kelsey.
EGOISM AND CRITIQUE 8.5 Forensic Philosophy December 16, 2013.
Relativism: Cultural and Ethical
Tolerance and Nietzsche Michael Lacewing co.uk.
Justin Detmers TE 982.  The text is a collection of essays  Ch. 1: Primer for non-theorists  Ch. 2: Analyzes the idea of reciprocity  Ch. 3: “DD”
Introduction to Ethics Lecture 9 The Challenge of Cultural Relativism By David Kelsey.
Ethics, Professional Ethics, Health Care Ethics. Skip survey of moral theories, pp 1-10 (pp 1-7, 4 th ed.). Note the authors announce, on page 10 (p.
TOULMIN’S SCHEMA The form of an argument.
© Michael Lacewing Is morality objective? The state of the debate Michael Lacewing
Is there a Culture that is the Best, that all others should strive to become more like?
Mistakes in Moral Reasoning Arbitrariness Relying on gut feeling Selfishness and Partisanship Appealing to Moral Authorities –Religion –Culture.
Case Discussion Choose one of the cases that Rachels discusses in Chpt. 1 and work through the following:
“Morality is not really the doctrine of how to make ourselves happy but of how we are to be worthy of happiness.” Immanuel Kant.
Part II Pro-Life Christians Establish a Foundation for the Debate.
UNIT 1 LEGAL THEORIES AND CONCEPTS. NEED FOR LAW Read the Island ScenarioIsland Scenario Answer the following: 1)Who will be our leader? Why? 2)What are.
Religious language: cognitive or non-cognitive?
Ethics and Values for Professionals Chapter 2: Ethical Relativism
Ethical issues in psychology
Metaethics: an overview
Michael Lacewing Ethical naturalism Michael Lacewing
Political theory and law
Chapter 2 Cultural Diversity
Building and Sustaining Relationships
Michael Lacewing Relativism Michael Lacewing
What’s wrong with relativism?
Michael Lacewing Mackie’s error theory Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
What is ethics?. What is ethics? “Ethics is about my feelings” Agree or disagree?
Tom Cockburn & Cheryl Cockburn-Wootten
On a new page, miss the top two lines and list…
Religious Attitudes to Prejudice
Ethical Dilemmas in Leadership
PHI 208 RANK Education Your Life - phi208rank.com.
Classical Conservatism 17th – 19thC
to get rid of him as soon as possible." John Wesley once said: "I have no more right to object to a man holding a different opinion from mine, than.
Random Fact of the Day The estimated dollar value of volunteer time is $20.25 per hour.
Plato and Hume on Human Understanding
Ethical issues in psychology
Why Ethics? Should I bring my personal beliefs into my organisation? Should not my employer determine standards of behaviour for all employees? Should.
Conformity Social Psychology
What is philosophical ethics?
What is an ARGUMENT? An argument is a reasoned, logical way of demonstrating that the writer’s position, belief, or conclusion is valid. Arguments seek.
Michael Lacewing What is knowledge?.
2. Knowledge and relativism
MUTUAL RESPECT Thursday 19th March.
What is discrimination?
Difficulties with Strong Rights Position
The Women’s Rights Movement
Tolerance What is it?.
VicSkeptics Presentation, 20th Jan 2014
Ethical issues in psychology
Presentation transcript:

The Paradox of Tolerance Michael Lacewing co.uk

Tolerance We can only tolerate practices, values, and beliefs of other people when these differ from our own. Not minding or caring isn’t really tolerance, which involves not acting (in certain ways) on one’s opposition to the practice etc. Restraint is not out of fear or powerlessness.

Can racists be tolerant? If tolerance is just not acting on disapproval, then racists can be tolerant. One’s disapproval must not be based on ‘mere prejudice’, but e.g. on ‘responsible judgment’ or being ‘reasonable’ –But is there a neutral account of what is ‘reasonable’? Tolerance as a virtue: one’s restraint is for the right moral or political reasons

Tensions: psychological What reason can there be to tolerate what you think is wrong? If you think it is morally right to show restraint, are you still morally opposed to the other view?

Tensions: political Should a liberal society tolerate a minority culture that doesn’t respect its values? –It rejects the values of individual autonomy and tolerance in favour of the authority of tradition, and seeks to enforce its values within the cultural community. –If it were the majority culture, it would advocate legal and social sanctions against those who disagreed. Can, or should, liberals tolerate the intolerant or intolerable?

Paradox Tolerance is most needed when one view rejects tolerance. If both agree that individual autonomy must be respected, little tolerance is needed. If the reason for tolerance is to respect autonomy, why would we tolerate a view that did not respect autonomy? Don’t we increase autonomy by not tolerating views that do not respect autonomy? But if a liberal society could only tolerate cultures that accept liberal values, how would this be tolerance at all?

Defending tolerance To argue that intolerant views cannot be tolerated is not intolerance. E.g. it is quite different from the intolerance of a view that tries to impose a specific way of living on people. We cannot refuse to make any value judgment about different cultures or we lose the value judgments that favour tolerance over intolerance.

Why be tolerant? Strife Fallibility Autonomy –As happiness –As respect for equality Diversity