 Search Engines › CINAHL, PubMED, and Google Scholar  Search Words › Sepsis, Shock, CVP, Fluid Management, Efficacy, Alternatives, etc.  Results.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Hemodynamic Monitoring
Advertisements

Emergencyultrasound.org.uk The ACES scan Ultrasound in hypotension Richard Kendall Paul Atkinson.
Haemodynamic Monitoring
A Randomized Trial of Protocol-Based Care for Early Septic Shock Andrea Caballero, MD January 15, 2015 LSU Journal Club The ProCESS Investigators. N Engl.
CVP AND FLUID RESPONSIVENESS JAMES RUDGE SIMON LAING.
Hemodynamic monitoring
Fluid Resuscitation 2013 NH.  Benefits  Problems  Which fluid?  Assessing volume status  Preload/Volume Status  Contractility  Afterload/ Vascular.
MSC Confidential Take the Shock Out of Sepsis. MSC Confidential Why Use Simulation?
A REVIEW OF FUNCTIONAL HAEMODYNAMIC MONITORING AJ van den Berg.
Swan-Ganz Catheter- Balloon flotation Pulmonary Artery catheter Use for monitoring critically ill patients (mostly in the ICU) Catheterization only possible.
Set your intravascular volume right Jost Mullenheim James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough.
Pressure, Flow, and Resistance Understanding the relationship among pressure, flow and resistance can help you understand how cardiac output and vascular.
450 PRESENTATION NURSING TURNOVER.
Hemodynamic Monitoring By Nancy Jenkins RN,MSN. What is Hemodynamic Monitoring? It is measuring the pressures in the heart.
Timothy Carlson COHP 450 Ferris State University
Evidenced Based Health Practice: PICO Presentation
Monitoring Fluid Responsiveness Murat Sungur, MD Erciyes University Medical School Department of Medicine Division of Critical Care Medicine.
How Can I Measure Cardiac Output In A Patient With Shock? Jon Sevransky MD International Consensus Conference Paris France April 27, 2006.
Stuart L. Goldstein, MD Professor of Pediatrics
Use the right tool for the right job!
Echocardiography in ICU Michel Slama AmiensFrance LEVEL 1 basic LEVEL 2: advanced.
How and when should we monitor CO and SV in shock? When would I want to measure CO or SV in shock ? Alexandre Mebazaa, MD, PhD University Paris 7 Anesthesiology.
ITU Journal Club: Dr. Clinton Jones. ST4 Anaesthetics.
The New Paradigm: Goal-Directed Therapy for Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Jamie Cowan April 25, 2006 Emergency Medicine Clerkship.
COMBINED USE OF TRANSPULMONARY THERMODILUTION (TPTD) TECHNIQUE IN FLUID MANAGEMENT FOR SEPSIS PATIENTS 1 St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kanagawa,
Danielle Elore COHP 450 Ferris State University PICO PRESENTATION: FOR HOSPITALIZED PATIENTS, DOES THE USE OF HYPNOTIC AGENTS AS COMPARED WITH NON- PHARMACEUTICAL.
Left ventricle Michel Slama Amiens France. LV ventricle Ejection fraction Cardiac output Left ventricular filling pressure.
Poster Design & Printing by Genigraphics ® A Comparison of the Effects of Etomidate and Midazolam on the Duration of Vasopressor Use in.
The (Surviving) Sepsis Campaign at Cork University Hospital
Hemodynamic Monitoring John Nation RN, MSN Thanks to Nancy Jenkins.
Functional Hemodynamic Monitoring NEANA Spring Meeting April 2016 Donna Adkisson, R.N., M.S.N. Clinical Educator LiDCO, Limited.
Ultrasound to Evaluate Fluid Responsiveness: A Curriculum for 4 th year Medical Students Paul Kukulski, MD, Michael Ward, MD, Keme Carter, MD University.
Anything else? Glucose – tight control must be better NICE-SUGAR study investigators. Intensive versus conventional glucose control in critically ill.
CHEMOTHERAPY INDUCED NAUSEA & VOMITING A LOOK INTO USE OF ADJUNCTIVE THERAPY & STRATEGIES IN NAUSEA MANAGEMENT FOR CHILDREN FACED WITH CANCER Presentation.
Use of White Noise Machine in Long-Term Care Patients Jamie Wilson COHP 450.
Top 5 papers of Prehospital care Recommended by Torpong.
Hemodynamics Dalhousie Critical Care Lecture Series.
For surgical patients, will the enforcement of established patient safety goals such as surgical counting compared with no established safety goals, prevent.
Code Sepsis: Current Evidence Based Guidelines and the CMS Sepsis Core Measure Adult Patients - Abbreviated Updated May 26, 2017.
Purpose - present the new bundles that will start with Oct 1 discharges Review documentation required Review changes at GCH Resident Education.
Code Sepsis: Current Evidence Based Guidelines and the CMS Sepsis Core Measure Adult Patients - Abbreviated Updated August 30, 2017.
CALS Instructor Update July 14, 2016
Objectives Describe the cardiovascular monitoring techniques used in the care of critically ill patients and how to interpret the results of hemodynamic.
Code Sepsis: Current Evidence Based Guidelines and the CMS Sepsis Core Measure Adult Patients - Abbreviated Updated August 30, 2017.
Distraction Techniques during pediatric medical procedures
Copyright © 2018 American Academy of Pediatrics.
A, Breakdown of frailty into its underlying causes, manifestations, and clinical outcomes separated by LVAD-responsive and LVAD-independent causes of frailty.
THINK SEPSIS Lessons from the Confidential Enquiries
Laszlo Littmann, MD, PhD  The American Journal of Medicine 
Advances in Management of Perioperative Hypotension: It Takes a Team
Physical restraints vs. seclusion in hospitalized patients
PICO Power Point Presentation
CLINICAL RESEARCH: An Introduction
Nat. Rev. Cardiol. doi: /nrcardio
Improving Outcomes for Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock: Tools for Early Identification of At-Risk Patients and Treatment Protocol Implementation  Emanuel.
Susan P.Y. Wong, MD, Ann M. O'Hare, MD, MA 
Figure 2 Echocardiographic methods to estimate left atrial pressure
Laszlo Littmann, MD, PhD  The American Journal of Medicine 
Fluid responsiveness: an evolution of our understanding
Comparison of positive end-expiratory pressure–induced increase in central venous pressure and passive leg raising to predict fluid responsiveness in.
Uncalibrated pulse contour-derived stroke volume variation predicts fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients undergoing liver transplantation 
A rational approach to fluid therapy in sepsis
Comparison of area under the receiver operating characteristic curves for shock index (SI) and rate over pressure evaluation (ROPE), n=81. Comparison of.
Behnam N. Tehrani et al. JACC 2019;73:
Effects of short-term simultaneous infusion of dobutamine and terlipressin in patients with septic shock: the DOBUPRESS study†   A. Morelli, C. Ertmer,
Paul E. Marik, MD, Karthik Raghunathan, MD, MPH, Joshua Bloomstone, MD 
Impact of echocardiography on patient management in the intensive care unit: an audit of district general hospital practice  R. M. L'E. Orme, M.P. Oram,
Plasma levels of GLP-1 are increased in patients with critical illness and correlate with disease severity. Plasma levels of GLP-1 are increased in patients.
J. Renner, O. Broch, P. Duetschke, J. Scheewe, J. Höcker, M. Moseby, O
Dr Donal O’Donoghue National Clinical Director for Kidney Care
Presentation transcript:

 Search Engines › CINAHL, PubMED, and Google Scholar  Search Words › Sepsis, Shock, CVP, Fluid Management, Efficacy, Alternatives, etc.  Results › Multiple hits- same author › Not a lot of hits specific to Sepsis

Article One Reference: Sasai, T., Tomihiro, F, Mikane, T, Oku, S. Iwsaki, E., Ishii, M.,...Minami, E. (2014). Reliability of central venous pressure to assess left ventricular preload for fluid resuscitation in patients with septic shock. Journal of Intensive Care, 2, 1-7, doi: /s z Article Two Reference: Marik, P.E., & Cavallazzi, R. (2013). Does central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? an updated meta-analysis and a plea for some common sense. Journal of Critical Care Medicine, 41, doi: /CCM.0b013e31828a25fd

Addressed PICO Question P- Severe Sepsis I- Non-Invasive monitoring C- CVP-Invasive monitoring O- Improved Fluid Management

CVP monitoring Not reliable measure for fluid resuscitation Non-Invasive Monitoring More accurate measure for fluid resuscitation

(Sasaie et al., 2014) Design = Quantitative/Non-Experimental Methods = Descriptive with Retrospective Data Collection Screening of Study Patients

Study Design = Summative Methods Meta-Analysis of 43 Studies Subjects Healthy Control patients (n=1) ICU patients (n=22) Operating Room patients (n-20) Results 57% + 13% of all the patients were fluid responders AUC = 0.56 (CI 95%, ) Correlation co-efficient of baseline CVP and the delta SVI/CI = 0.18 (CI 95%, )

No subjects manipulated or harmed Subject Anonymity Confidentiality

Article #1 by Sasai et al Strength  EBP Pyramid › Level 4 Quality  Good Credibility  Authors  Journal

Article #2 by Marik & Cavallazzi Strength  EBP Pyramid › Level 1 Quality  Design/Methods › Correlate with Findings Credibility  Authors  Journal

Both Articles Contribute to EBP  Article #1 by Sasai, et al. › Not Generalizable  Article #2 by Marik & Cavallazzi › Generalizable

Means for Guiding Fluid Management Needs to be Revised CVP monitoring no longer best practice Other monitoring means should be evaluated

Communication Barriers  Physicians  Acute Health Care Staff › Change in Policies/Procedures  Physician Buy In  Revision of Policies and Procedures › Cost › Resources

P - Critically Ill Patients I - TEE Monitoring C - CVP Monitoring O - Improved Fluid Resuscitation P - Septic Shock I - Vasopressors C - Fluid Boluses O - Decrease Heart Failure

 CVP monitoring is not the best tool to guide fluid resuscitation Key CVP- Central Venous Pressure TTE- Transthoracic Echocardiography LVEDD- Left Ventricular End-Diastolic Diameter LAD- Left Atrial Diameter SVI- Stroke Volume Index CI- Cardiac Index