NORTH AMERICAN PANEL OCTOBER 22, 2007 REDUCING AIR EMISSIONS FROM SHIPS JOSEPH ANGELO DEPUTY MANAGING DIRECTOR.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Air Emissions Regulations Update Tripartite meeting 15/16 September 2006; Seoul
Advertisements

Overview MARPOL Annex VI Non- MARPOL Actions
Air Emissions from Ships
How will the regulation work? How to follow up the regulation?
MARPOL Annex VI – IMO Regulations for the prevention of air pollution from ships Requirements for control of emissions from ships - Ozone Depleting Substances.
Framework Analysis International European Spain – Barcelona Italy – Genoa, Venice France – Marseille Greece - Thessaloniki 2.
Hellenic Forum Athens 6 March 2007 Peter M. Swift.
Freight by Water Conference Teesside 7 September 2012 Sulphur Directive Impacts.
Hellenic Forum Athens 6 March 2007 Peter M. Swift.
EU-MOP FINAL WORKSHOP Madrid, 24 January 2008 Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros Navales Miguel Palomares Director, Marine Environment Division International.
USE OF MDO BY SHIPS PART OF A HOLISTIC APPROACH BUNKER SUMMIT – GREECE 2007
Environmental Bunker legislation and the Potential Impact on the Vancouver Market May 2014 May
Page 1 Emission Controls for Marine Vessels Presentation for The 1999 International WorkBoat Show Jean Marie Revelt Alan Stout US-EPA-OMS December 2, 1999.
UPDATE ON THE REVISION OF MARPOL ANNEX VI LATIN AMERICAN PANEL March 12-13, 2008 Miami Beach, Florida.
UPDATE ON THE REVISION OF MARPOL ANNEX VI NORTH AMERICAN PANEL March 17, 2008 Stamford, CT.
AIR EMISSIONS FROM SHIPPING Revision of MARPOL Annex VI: The Distillate Option Paris 24 May 2007 Peter M. Swift.
Asian Regional Panel 6 March 2008 Singapore Peter M. Swift.
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS AND CURRENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHALLENGES FOR IMO
| 1 | 1 REDUCING THE IMPACT OF SHIPPING ON THE ENVIRONMENT DECARBONISATION.
Air Emissions from Ships. Society is driving the requirement for ships to reduce harmful air emissions from engine exhausts.
1 MARPOL – Annex VI Control of Air Pollution from Ships from Ships and its Current Revision process Dr. Tim Gunner, Technical Consultant, Intertanko.
NAMEPA 2014 Annual Conference New York City Canada and North American Emission Control Area RDIMS #
NAMEPA 2014 World Maritime Day Observance Cozumel, Mexico Canada's Experience with the North American Emission Control Area RDIMS #
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NORTH AMERICAN EMISSION CONTROL AREA IN THE UNITED STATES Walker B. Smith, Director Angela Bandemehr, Project Manager U.S. EPA Office.
INTERTANKO Asian Panel Tokyo 18 September 2007
AIR EMISSIONS from OCEANGOING VESSELS INTERTANKO Houston Tanker Event 2007 AIR EMISSIONS from OCEANGOING VESSELS INTERTANKO Houston Tanker Event 2007 Keith.
IMO requirements to reduce emission to air from ships by Manager Research and Projects Gdansk April 2008 ‘
Air pollution from ships: recent developments by Lex Burgel by Lex Burgel.
MARITIME TALKS 2007 Ship Air Emission Controls – Onboard or Overboard? –
Study on future fuels for cargo vessels in the Baltic Sea
“ Revision of Marpol Annex VI and its implications for the Gulf region ” Peter M. Swift, MD, INTERTANKO 15 December 2008, Dubai.
Leading the way; making a difference Latin American Panel November 6, 2013 BALLAST WATER MANAGEMENT JOSEPH ANGELO DEPUTY MANAGING DIRECTOR.
Marine Environment Division International Maritime Organization
Maritime Law Association Spring Meeting April 28-30, 2015
Canadian Experience in Implementing the North American Emission Control Area (ECA) Mexico City, Mexico May 19, 2015.
0 Office of Transportation and Air Quality Update for Air Directors: Transportation and Air Quality Christopher Grundler Deputy Director NACAA Spring Meeting.
Tanker performance and Annex VI compliance Manager Research and Projects St. Petersburg 25 November 2008 Vostoc Capital’s The.
Marine Fuels Where are we? Where are we going? How will we get there?
Håkon B. Thoresen, DNV Petroleum Services, Norway 31 Jan 2011 Fuel Quality - Update INTERTANKO Bunker Sub-committee, London.
LATIN AMERICAN PANEL OCTOBER 16, 2009 MARINE ISSUES JOSEPH ANGELO DEPUTY MANAGING DIRECTOR.
Latin American Panel Buenos Aires 31 October – 1 November 2007 Peter M. Swift.
Anti-Trust/Competition Law Compliance Statement INTERTANKO’s policy is to be firmly committed to maintaining a fair and competitive environment in the.
The INTERTANKO option to meet stricter Annex VI requirements to reduce emission to air from ships by Manager Research and Projects.
North American Panel Stamford, CT. 19 March 2007 Peter M. Swift.
The INTERTANKO option for the revision of Annex VI - IMO regulation for the Prevention of Air Pollution from ships by Manager.
Air Emissions Regulations INTERTANKO Strategy NORTH AMERICAN PANEL MEETING 24 OCTOBER 2006.
Leading the way; making a difference GHG EMISSIONS FROM SHIPS OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY STANDARDS FOR INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING LATIN AMERICAN PANEL Buenos Aires.
IBIA ANNUAL CONVENTION SEPTEMBER 11, 2007 REDUCING AIR EMISSIONS FROM SHIPS JOSEPH ANGELO DIRECTOR, REGULATORY AFFAIRS AND THE AMERICAS.
AIR EMISSIONS FROM SHIPPING Reducing Atmospheric Pollution Globally: Kristian R. Fuglesang The distillate solution.
Hellenic Forum 27 March 2008 Athens Peter M. Swift.
MARINE LOG GLOBAL GREENSHIP CONFERENCE SEPTEMBER 21, 2007 WHAT’S ON IMO’S ENVIRONMENTAL AGENDA JOSEPH ANGELO DIRECTOR, REGULATORY AFFAIRS AND THE AMERICAS.
Leading the way; making a difference North American Panel October 29, 2014 AIR EMISSIONS/ FUEL QUALITY JOSEPH ANGELO DEPUTY MANAGING DIRECTOR.
BUNKERWORLD – MARINE FUEL SUSTAINABILITY FORUM OCTOBER 25, 2007
Leading the way; making a difference NOx Tier III requirements 1. 1.The NOx Tier III enforcement date of 1 January 2016 is kept for already designated.
The INTERTANKO options to meet marine environmental challenges by Manager Research and Projects Global Forum Strategic Planning.
Leading the way; making a difference BUNKER QUALITY LATIN AMERICAN PANEL Buenos Aires 5th November 2014 Dragos Rauta INTERTANKO.
Tanker performance and Annex VI compliance Manager Research and Projects St. Petersburg 25 November 2008 Vostoc Capital’s The.
Greek Shipping Summit 2007 Athens 8 November 2007 Peter M. Swift.
What have we learned in the meantime?
EEB Clean Air Seminar 20 Nov Lisbon Air Pollution from ships Portuguese perspective.
MARPOL.
MARITIME AIR EMISSIONS Lloyd’s List events 11 December 2007 Distillates THE Solution THE holistic solution for the revision of MARPOL Annex VI Peter.
INTERTANKO PRIORITIES TECHNICAL ISSUES
NORTH AMERICAN PANEL OCTOBER 14, 2008
CONTROL OF EMISSIONS FROM SHIPS: ANALYSIS AND ENFORCEMENT OF THE REVISED MARPOL ANNEX VI Presented by capt. Evaldas Zacharevičius, director of Lithuanian.
PREVENTION OF AIR POLLUTION FROM SHIPS
“The Environmental Challenge”
Compliance with MARPOL Annex VI Convention
IMO work to address GHG emissions from ships
IMO GLOBAL SULPHUR LIMIT 2020, IMPACTS TO MAJOR FLAGS AND MEASURES TO HELP SHIPOWNERS AND OPERATORS 2019.
Presentation transcript:

NORTH AMERICAN PANEL OCTOBER 22, 2007 REDUCING AIR EMISSIONS FROM SHIPS JOSEPH ANGELO DEPUTY MANAGING DIRECTOR

AIR EMISSIONS - IMO SEPT 1997 – IMO ADOPTS ANNEX VI TO MARPOL, REGS FOR THE PREVENTION OF AIR POLLUTION FROM SHIPSSEPT 1997 – IMO ADOPTS ANNEX VI TO MARPOL, REGS FOR THE PREVENTION OF AIR POLLUTION FROM SHIPS MAY 2005 – ANNEX VI ENTERS INTO FOR INTERNATIONALLY (US AND CANADA CURRENTLY NOT PARTY)MAY 2005 – ANNEX VI ENTERS INTO FOR INTERNATIONALLY (US AND CANADA CURRENTLY NOT PARTY) JULY 2005 – MEPC 53 DECIDES ANNEX VI SHOULD BE REVISED TO REDUCE AIR EMISSIONS FROM SHIPSJULY 2005 – MEPC 53 DECIDES ANNEX VI SHOULD BE REVISED TO REDUCE AIR EMISSIONS FROM SHIPS

AIR EMISSIONS IMO ANNEX VI REVISION TIMETABLE MEPC 54 (March 2006) – Proposals for revision. The work is delegated to BLG Sub-CommitteeMEPC 54 (March 2006) – Proposals for revision. The work is delegated to BLG Sub-Committee BLG 10 (April 2006) – Initial review of the proposals and documents (over 30 documents)BLG 10 (April 2006) – Initial review of the proposals and documents (over 30 documents) Two correspondence groups (April – October 2006)Two correspondence groups (April – October 2006) INTERSESSIONAL MEETING OSLO (November 2006)INTERSESSIONAL MEETING OSLO (November 2006) BLG 11 (April 2007) – consider draft proposals for revised Annex VI, the NOx Code and GuidelinesBLG 11 (April 2007) – consider draft proposals for revised Annex VI, the NOx Code and Guidelines MEPC 56 (July 2007), BLG 12 (Feb 2008) & MEPC 57 (March 2008) – final rounds for approvalMEPC 56 (July 2007), BLG 12 (Feb 2008) & MEPC 57 (March 2008) – final rounds for approval

AIR EMISSIONS COVERED BY ANNEX VICOVERED BY ANNEX VI –Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) – create Ozone –Sulphur Oxides (SOx) – create acidification –Hydrocarbons (HC) – gas, soot and some particulates –Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) –Refrigerant Gases NOT COVERED (CURRENTLY) BY ANNEX VINOT COVERED (CURRENTLY) BY ANNEX VI –Particulate Matter –Carbon Dioxide (CO 2 ) –Carbon Monoxide (CO)

AIR EMISSIONS PROPOSALS FOR AMENDMENTS - Lower limits for SOx & NOx emissions - SECAs with lower S cap (1.0% or 0.5%) - NOx emission limitation on existing engines - NECAs – NOx controlled areas - Restrict Particulate Matters (PM) emissions - Restrict on VOC emissions from cargo oil tanks - Restriction on CO 2 emissions

AIR EMISSIONS INTERTANKO EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE GUIDING PRINCIPLES – ENSURE A SOLID PLATFORM OF REQUIREMENTSENSURE A SOLID PLATFORM OF REQUIREMENTS BE REALISTIC AND FEASIBLEBE REALISTIC AND FEASIBLE SEEK POSITIVE REDUCTION IN AIR EMISSIONS FROM SHIPSSEEK POSITIVE REDUCTION IN AIR EMISSIONS FROM SHIPS CONTRIBUTE TO A LONG TERM AND PREDICTABLE REGULATORY REGIMECONTRIBUTE TO A LONG TERM AND PREDICTABLE REGULATORY REGIME PREVENT UNILATERAL/REGIONAL REGULATIONS – IMO STANDARDSPREVENT UNILATERAL/REGIONAL REGULATIONS – IMO STANDARDS

AIR EMISSIONS INITIAL PROPOSALS FOCUSED ON AIR EMISSIONS STANDARDS AND ABATEMENT EQUIPMENTINITIAL PROPOSALS FOCUSED ON AIR EMISSIONS STANDARDS AND ABATEMENT EQUIPMENT FUEL STANDARD WAS NOT BEING CONSIDEREDFUEL STANDARD WAS NOT BEING CONSIDERED MAIN PURPOSE OF INTERTANKO SUBMISSION WAS TO “PRESENT ISSUES THAT MERIT FURTHER DISCUSSION BY IMO WORKING GROUP WHEN CONSIDERING REVSION OF ANNEX VI OF MARPOL”MAIN PURPOSE OF INTERTANKO SUBMISSION WAS TO “PRESENT ISSUES THAT MERIT FURTHER DISCUSSION BY IMO WORKING GROUP WHEN CONSIDERING REVSION OF ANNEX VI OF MARPOL”

AIR EMISSIONS INTERTANKO SUBMISSION DISTILLATE FUELS WITH SULPHUR CAP:DISTILLATE FUELS WITH SULPHUR CAP: - FROM [2010], MAXIMUM OF 1% SULPHUR - FOR ENGINES INSTALLED AFTER [2015], MAXIMUM OF 0.5% SULPHUR GLOBAL SULPHUR EMISSION CONTROL AREAGLOBAL SULPHUR EMISSION CONTROL AREA REVISION OF CHECKING AND MONITORING OF COMPLIANCEREVISION OF CHECKING AND MONITORING OF COMPLIANCE

AIR EMISSIONS IMO WORKING GROUP PROPOSALS – SOX A. Status Quo - No change B. Sulphur Emissions Control Area (SECA): –A global sulphur cap (unchanged or lower value) –SECA sulphur cap lowered in two tiers: 1.0% in [2010]1.0% in [2010] 0.5% in [2015]0.5% in [2015] C1. Change to distillate fuels (ref. INTERTANKO): –Use of distillate fuels for all ships –A global sulphur cap in two tiers: 1.0% in [2012]1.0% in [2012] 0.5% in [2015] 0.5% in [2015] –Include in MARPOL Annex VI the specification for the distillate fuel to be used by ships C2. Global cap – As C1 but allows use of residual fuel + scrubbers

AIR EMISSIONS IMO BULK LIQUID & GASES (BLG) SUBCOMMITTEE MET APRIL TO CONSIDER THE OUTCOME OF ITS NOVEMBER WG MEETINGIMO BULK LIQUID & GASES (BLG) SUBCOMMITTEE MET APRIL TO CONSIDER THE OUTCOME OF ITS NOVEMBER WG MEETING ADDITIONAL SUBMISSIONS MADE BY THE US, NORWAY, SWEDEN, ICS, OCIMF, BIMCO, FOEI AND OTHERSADDITIONAL SUBMISSIONS MADE BY THE US, NORWAY, SWEDEN, ICS, OCIMF, BIMCO, FOEI AND OTHERS

AIR EMISSIONS USA PROPOSAL SOx & PM – GLOBALLY, CONSIDER INTERTANKO PROPOSAL FOR MDO [BUT WITH 0.5% S CAP]SOx & PM – GLOBALLY, CONSIDER INTERTANKO PROPOSAL FOR MDO [BUT WITH 0.5% S CAP] SOx & PM – EMISSION LIMITS AT [200] NM FROM SHORE STARTING 2011 [0.1% S cap]SOx & PM – EMISSION LIMITS AT [200] NM FROM SHORE STARTING 2011 [0.1% S cap] NOx STANDARDS FOR EXISTING (pre-2000) ENGINES - 20% REDUCTIONNOx STANDARDS FOR EXISTING (pre-2000) ENGINES - 20% REDUCTION NOx FOR NEW ENGINES:NOx FOR NEW ENGINES: –Tier II - 15% – 25% as from 2011 –Tier III- 80% only in defined areas (NECAs) as from 2016

AIR EMISSIONS BIMCO PROPOSAL RETAIN THE CURRENT ANNEX VI STRUCTURE, BUT LOWER EMISSION LIMITS GLOBALLY AND IN SECAs GLOBALLY - 3% SULPHUR CAP IN % SULPHUR CAP IN USE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES IN SECAs SHIPS SHOULD USE MDO ONLY - 1% SULPHUR CAP IN % SULPHUR CAP IN ALSO USE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES

AIR EMISSIONS OUTCOME FROM BLG MEETING: RETAIN 6 OPTIONS, 4 FROM WG MTG PLUS US AND BIMCO OPTIONS; ANDRETAIN 6 OPTIONS, 4 FROM WG MTG PLUS US AND BIMCO OPTIONS; AND IMO SG WILL PROPOSE STUDY TO DETERMINE THE EFFECTS OF THE OPTIONSIMO SG WILL PROPOSE STUDY TO DETERMINE THE EFFECTS OF THE OPTIONS

AIR EMISSIONS MEPC 56 MET IN JULY 9 – 13 “NOTES” OUTCOME OF BLG 11 “NOTES” OUTCOME OF BLG 11 NEXT STEPS AT IMO: IMO SG INITIATES STUDYIMO SG INITIATES STUDY BLG WORKING GROUP MEETING IN OCTOBER IN GERMANYBLG WORKING GROUP MEETING IN OCTOBER IN GERMANY BLG MEETS FEBRUARY 2008BLG MEETS FEBRUARY 2008 MEPC 57 MEETS MARCH/APRIL 2008MEPC 57 MEETS MARCH/APRIL 2008

FINAL THOUGHTS WHO SHOULD BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFICATION AND COMPLIANCE? SHIPOWNERSHIPOWNER for: –Cost and installation of technology –Combustion process –Exhaust gas emission standards –Disposal of by-productsOR FUEL PRODUCERFUEL PRODUCER for: –Quality of fuel supplied AND ENGINE MANUFACTURERSENGINE MANUFACTURERS –Facilitate engine design that copes with a predictable rule development on lowering emissions

FINAL THOUGHTS Marine Diesel Oil ADDRESSES THE ROOT CAUSE OF THE ROOT CAUSE OF AIR POLLUTION FROM SHIPS AIR POLLUTION FROM SHIPS RATHER THAN THE EFFECTS OF RATHER THAN THE EFFECTS OF CLEANING UP THE AIR POLLUTION CLEANING UP THE AIR POLLUTION ON THE SHIP AFTER IT HAS BEEN CREATED AFTER IT HAS BEEN CREATED

THANKYOUWWW.INTERTANKO.COM