 have a working knowledge of all available data reports;  have a working knowledge of how to interpret data available from the PMRN; and  be able to.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Progress Monitoring And RtI System
Advertisements

FL Assessments for Instruction in Reading
Fluency Assessment Bryan Karazia.
Chapter 9 - Fluency Assessment
1 The Florida Assessments for Instruction in Reading Overview.
A3 Getting Out What You Put In R T I Data School Leadership Team Training Pamela Shannon, School Psychologist
Instructional Implications Grades 6-12 Florida Assessments for Instruction in Reading.
Florida Assessments for Instruction in Reading (FAIR) : An Overview and Application within a Response to Intervention (RTI) Model Liz Crawford, MS, CCC-SLP.
Chapter 9: Fluency Assessment
Academic Data for Instructional Decisions: Elementary Level Dr. Amy Lingo, Dr. Nicole Fenty, and Regina Hirn Project ABRI University of Louisville Project.
Fluency. What is Fluency? The ability to read a text _______, _________, and with proper __________ –_________: ease of reading –_________: ability to.
Dr. Kelley. Share LiveText Assignment Discuss at table (rubric, typed AIP, student assessments):  The assessment tools you used.  What you learned.
1 FL Assessments for Instruction in Reading Just Read, Florida! & Florida Center for Reading Research.
3-12 Web-Based Assessment Module (WAM)
Assessment for Instruction in Reading in Grades 3-12 Joseph Torgesen and Yaacov Petscher Florida Center for Reading Research International Dyslexia Association,
Office of Curriculum and Instruction Division of Language Arts/Reading.
Dr. Barbara Foorman Florida Center for Reading Research (FCRR)
1 The Florida Assessments for Instruction in Reading Overview.
 “Fluency assessment consists of listening to students read aloud and collecting information about their oral reading accuracy, rate, and prosody.” (Page.
Reading First Assessment Faculty Presentation. Fundamental Discoveries About How Children Learn to Read 1.Children who enter first grade weak in phonemic.
Introduction to GREAT for ELs Office of Student Assessment Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction (608)
Interpreting Assessment & Intervention Data in Reading North Area Profession ​ al Seminar: January 27, 2012.
1 Florida Assessments for Instruction in Reading Just Read, Florida! & Florida Center for Reading Research.
Florida Assessments for Instruction in Reading (F.A.I.R.) District Advisory Committee Presentation February 24, 2014.
Lisa J. Mails Elementary PRO Series (Parents ‘R Onboard) Topic #1: Universal Screening, Intervention, and Goal Setting.
1 The Background and an Overview of…. Florida Assessments for Instruction in Reading (FAIR)
Determining Informative Student Growth on the Florida Assessments for Instruction in Reading Yaacov Petscher, Ph.D. Director of Research Florida Center.
Florida Assessments for Instruction in Reading Grades 3-12 Part 1 How to Administer Assessments.
Florida Assessments for Instruction in Reading- Overview of the K-2 System Barbara R. Foorman, Ph.D. Florida Center for Reading Research Florida State.
RDG 567 & RDG 568 (East Lyme Cohort) Session 3.
DIBELS: Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills 6 th Edition A guide for Parents.
Istation’s 4 components Immediate, Reliable, Individualized Assessments Unrivaled Instruction That Fuels Student Learning Insightful Real-Time Reports.
The Challenge of Assessing Reading for Understanding to Inform Instruction Barbara Foorman, Ph.D. Florida Center for Reading Research Florida State University.
Aligning Interventions with Core How to meet student needs without creating curricular chaos.
“Working hand in hand to improve
Diagnostics Mathematics Assessments: Main Ideas  Now typically assess the knowledge and skill on the subsets of the 10 standards specified by the National.
LAS LINKS DATA ANALYSIS. Objectives 1.Analyze the 4 sub-tests in order to understand which academic skills are being tested. 2.Use sample tests to practice.
1 FL Assessments for Instruction in Reading Just Read, Florida! & Florida Center for Reading Research.
Response to Instruction: Using Data to Make Decisions PRESENTER: Lexie Domaradzki.
Guide to Test Interpretation Using DC CAS Score Reports to Guide Decisions and Planning District of Columbia Office of the State Superintendent of Education.
Class Action Research: Treatment for the Nonresponsive Student IL510 Kim Vivanco July 15, 2009
Assessing Learners with Special Needs: An Applied Approach, 6e © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 5: Introduction to Norm- Referenced.
Florida Assessments for Instruction in Reading Florida Assessments for Instruction in Reading Developed in partnership with Florida Department of Education.
WORKING TOGETHER TO HELP CHILDREN SUCCEED. *providing high-quality instruction/intervention matched to individual student needs *using a researched-based.
Easy Curriculum Based Measurement (CBM). What is Easy CBM? EasyCBM® was designed by researchers at the University of Oregon as an integral part of an.
Mobile County School District SPED 6-9 End of Year Consultative Session
The State of Our School Fall, Goals What do we want all children to know and be able to do with text in our school? K – 90% of students will reach.
 Students in grades Kindergarten through twelfth  Classroom teacher, reading specialist, interventionist  Can be administered individually, some assessments.
Florida Assessments for Instruction in Reading Florida Assessments for Instruction in Reading Developed in partnership with Florida Department of Education.
JANUARY 2015 RTI PLC. SKILLS AND STANDARDS: HOW TO LINK THE TWO DURING SYSTEMATIC OBSERVATIONS Skills vs. Standards Video Skill breakdown tables.
Diagnostic Assessments of Reading (DAR) Fairlawn Elementary Community School.
©2009 Florida Department of Education Coming to a computer near you… FAIR.
Essentials for Teachers Getting Started with Benchmark Screening.
Spring Into Reading Literacy Night
1st Grade Curriculum Night
Mobile County School District At-Risk/SPED 2-5
Getting Started with Welcome/Intro Melissa Arellano, OAR August 2017.
Chapel Hill ISD Reading First Initiative
Literably 101.
Data Usage Response to Intervention
Woodcock Johnson Tests of Achievement - III
Milwee Middle School Math Night
Vision 20/20: Checks and Balances
Overview: Understanding and Building a Schoolwide Assessment Plan
Ace it!SM Tutoring Teacher Training
Teacher Tutorial Welcome to the TUNEin to READING
Brooks Elementary School SUCCESS AND NOTHING LESS!
P ! A L S Interpreting Student Data to
Variability in the skills measured by tests of “reading comprehension across tests and across grade levels Dr. Joseph Torgesen Florida State University.
Relationship between Standardized and Classroom-based Assessment
Presentation transcript:

 have a working knowledge of all available data reports;  have a working knowledge of how to interpret data available from the PMRN; and  be able to assist classroom teachers in making informed decisions regarding reading instruction based on PMRN/FAIR data. 2

Name of TestSpecific Subtests Broad Screen/Progress Monitoring Tool (BS/PMT) “All Students” Letter Naming Fluency Phonemic Awareness Word Reading Broad Diagnostic Inventory (BDI) “All” Students “Some” Students for Vocabulary Listening Comprehension -or- Reading Comprehension Vocabulary (not every AP) Spelling (2 nd grade only) Targeted Diagnostic Inventory (TDI) “Some” Students K = 9 tasks ( one optional) 1 st = 8 tasks 2 nd = 6 tasks 3

KINDERGARTEN  Print Awareness*  Letter Naming (UC)  Letter Naming (LC)  Phoneme Blending  Phoneme Deletion  Letter /Sound Completion – Initial  Letter /Sound Completion – Final  Word Building – Initial  Word Building- Final  Word Building – Medial Vowel GRADE 1  Letter Sound Knowledge  Phoneme Blending  Phoneme Deletion – Initial  Phoneme Deletion – Final  Word Building – Consonant  Word Building - Vowel  Word Building CVC / CVCe  Word Building - Blends GRADE 2  Word Building (4)  Multisyllabic Word Reading (2) 4

©2009 Florida Department of Education Type of AssessmentName of Assessment Broad Screen/Progress Monitoring Tool (BS/PMT) – Appropriate for ‘All’ students Reading Comprehension (RC) Targeted Diagnostic Inventory (TDI) – “Some” students Maze Word Analysis (WA) 5

K-2  Vocabulary  Spelling (grade 2 only)  Target Passage  Reading or Listening Comprehension Questions correct 3-12  RC = Reading Comprehension  Maze  Word Analysis 6

 Median percentile ranking for vocabulary & spelling with ‘n’ tested based on entire FL population  % of students reading at or above the ‘target’ (i.e. grade-level) passage with ‘n’ tested based on school  Total Question Correct = raw number of questions answered correctly given there are five comprehension questions (mixed literal & inferential) per passage 7

 RC = Reading Comprehension  Maze  Word Analysis  RC – For AP1, the receives a passage based on one of the following  Grade-level & prior FCAT (if available)  Mean FCAT score for school  No less than 1 or more than 4 passages given  For AP 2 & 3 - based on FSP  MAZE – Non-adaptive – based solely on grade level  WA – adaptive – Starts with predetermined set of 5 words based on grade level. Performance here determined next set of words – 5-30 words given at each assessment 8

 One to four passages timed with reporting categories for FCAT 2.0 and other information  Percentile Rank (PR)  Ability Score (RCAS)  Ability Range (AR)  Percentile Ranks - derived scores that are used to rank one student’s performance in relation to a specific group (i.e. students in the same grade level)… the specified group = ‘a representative sample of Florida students at the same grade level as the student’ -- NOT a percentage score identifying how many items were answered correctly. 9

 Two 3-minute (grade level) passages  Administered 3 times a year  Students respond to embedded cloze items within a piece of (grade- level) text  Assess text reading efficiency (i.e. accuracy and speed, ‘gist-level’ comprehension  When & Who Gets MAZE Tasks? AP 1 – Students with FSP 84% or lower AP2- FSP lower than 85% or took the MAZE on AP 1 AP3- Same as above AND all students grades 6-12 rostered in PMRN for FAIR 10

 Percentile Rank  Adjusted Maze  PR- A derived score allowing comparison of raw scores by putting them on a 100 pt scales – Norming population = all FL students taking test  AM – Adjusted for the amount of time and the differences in difficulty of individual passages (to allow for comparison across time) This can be used to compare a student’s performance across assessment periods 11

 A 5-15 minute computer adaptive spelling task that assesses ability to understand letter/sound correspondence  Percentile Rank  Word Analysis Ability Score (WAAS) 12

Moving ahead… 13

Instructional Implications with a 100 ft view… PRS (grades K-2) = Probability of reading success … What are the chances, that given adequate and complete instruction, the student will become successful as a reader and therefore eventually, a success at, specifically - FAIR (and FCAT 2.0)? FSP (grades 3-12) = Probability of FCAT success… What are the chances, that given adequate and complete instruction, the students will reach a level 3 (proficient) on FCAT 2.0? 14

 How can we increase the number of K students who move from low listening levels of comprehension to higher numbers?  In first grade, why are students still at the listening level when in fact, we know kindergarten instruction should have them reading?  What students are showing LC and should be RC?  What can be done to increase the rigor so that more students are in RC than LC as the year progresses? 15

 How can we increase the number of students that score at the cut-points between ‘yellow’ & ‘green’?  Are students spending sufficient time in the MAZE to account for the score? Are they being closely monitored as they take the assessments?  What other information is necessary that isn’t available from the BSD & TDI?  What can be done to increase the rigor so that more students are successful as the year progresses? What are the gaps and how do we fill them? 16

17

Elementary 18

 KG to Class By clicking on the “+” Clicking on a teacher name then brings up only that group 19

 Entire grade-level broken down by each student in the grade level with a student centered lens… You can look alpha, high to low, low to high by selecting each field  Magnifying Glass allows you to see detailed report for a student… This allows you to see what kinds of questions were asked and answered correctly, percent of words read correctly, WCPM 20

3-8 & High School 21

22

??? 23

24

 What can you get (as a teacher) from this report?  What task(s) have been mastered as second graders? What has been taught? What hasn’t been taught? In what order should it be taught? 25

 Please log on to your school’s site at the PMRN login screen located at 26 Please take a few minutes to examine all the available options for your viewing as a building administrator. Remember that you can click on a reporting category and rank from high to low score or click on the “name” and use alphabetic ordering…

 Thanks for your attention!  Let your reading coach or me know if you need/want further information regarding the FAIR test or the PMRN.  Great source of information regarding the test: regarding PMRN: