R.A. Chavez | G.O. Brown LRGV Stormwater– South Padre Island May 18, 2016 The Impact of Variable Hydraulic Conductivity on Bioretention Cell Performance.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Optimum Allocation of Discharged Pollutant Loads from Nonpoint Sources in a Watershed using GIS Alok Kumar Laboratory of Water Resources Engineering Division.
Advertisements

A Model for Evaluating the Impacts of Spatial and Temporal Land Use Changes on Water Quality at Watershed Scale Jae-Pil Cho and Saied Mostaghimi 07/29/2003.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development Rain Garden Research at EPA’s Urban Watershed Research Facility Emilie K. Stander,
The Effects of Soil Properties on Rain-garden Bioretention and Soil Processes in a Semi-arid City Melissa Mckinley 1, Jordan Brown 2, and Mitch Pavao-Zuckerman.
WATER DEPTH, VEGETATION, AND POLLUTANT REMOVAL IN A CONSTRUCTED WETLAND TREATING AQUACULTURE EFFLUENT Brian E. Dyson, Kim D. Jones, Ron Rosati* Department.
SESSION: DEICER MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS Salt Management Research in Virginia Jimmy White, Virginia Center for Transportation Innovation & Research The Virginia.
Permeable Heavy Use Area for Livestock Farms Presentation for Kitsap County DCD, September 28 th, 2006, Lab Test Findings and Calculated Storm Water Performance.
z = -50 cm, ψ = -100 cm, h = z + ψ = -50cm cm = -150 cm Which direction will water flow? 25 cm define z = 0 at soil surface h = z + ψ = cm.
Mike Isensee, CPESC Watershed Specialist Describe your project (in a nutshell) What was innovative about this project? (ie. process,
UW LID Workshop Bioretention Flow Control Modeling May 2008
Anne Arundel County Department of Public Works. OBJECTIVE MINIMIZE OR ELIMIINATE FLOODING FROM FREQUENT SMALL STORMS Storms of 1- to 2-year frequency.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Transport of Agricultural Chemicals: Tile Drains to Surface Water Wesley W. Stone.
Constructed Wetlands for Feedlot Runoff Treatment MSAA Workshop February 2001.
Attached Growth Biological WW treatment Systems
By Saleh A. Al-Hassoun Associate Professor Department of Civil Engineering College of Engineering King Saud University Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Enhancement of Pollutant Removal in Bioretention Cells by Soil Amendment Glenn O. Brown, Professor, PE, Ph.D., D.WRE Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering.
Vegetative Treatment Area Performance and Design Recommendations Joshua W. Faulkner Biological and Environmental Engineering Cornell University.
HYDRUS_1D Sensitivity Analysis Limin Yang Department of Biological Engineering Sciences Washington State University.
Surface Mining Remediation Utilizing Vertical Flow Wetlands and Engineered Soils Matthew Gloe, Christian Bongard, Gil Brown Biological Systems Engineering,
Low Impact Development Training Module 4: Bioretention Design Exercise Neil Weinstein.
Evaluating Scour Potential in Stormwater Catchbasin Sumps Using a Full-Scale Physical Model and CFD Modeling Humberto Avila Universidad del Norte, Department.
Garey A. Fox, Ph.D., P.E., Derek M. Heeren, Michael A. Kizer, Ph.D. Oklahoma State University Evaluation of Alluvial Well Depletion Analytical Solutions.
The Orange County Water District Riverbed Filtration Pilot Project Jason Keller 1, Michael Milczarek 1, Greg Woodside 2, Adam Hutchinson 2, Adam MP Canfield.
1 Calorimeter Thermal Analysis with Increased Heat Loads September 28, 2009.
Background and Overview Stormwater NPDES Compliance For New Developments.
Subsurface drainage – Investigations
VOLUME CONTROL using Inter-Event Dry Periods by Marty Wanielista, Josh Spence, and Ewoud Hulstein Stormwater Management Academy UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA.
EWRI - Kansas City Construction and Performance of Bioretention Cells G.O. Brown, R.A. Chavez, D.E. Storm, and M.D. Smolen.
Scenarios 1.Tidal influence 2.Extreme storm surge (wave overtopping, max. limit 200 l/s/m, period 2 h) Outlook calibration and validation of 3D model transfer.
Surface Water Hydrology: Infiltration – Green and Ampt Method
Stormwater Water Quality Treatment Options Alvin Shoblom, P.E. Hydraulics Engineer.
Variably Saturated Flow and Transport: Sorbing Solute.
Low Impact Development (LID)
Photo Placeholder Bloedel Donovan Park Stormwater Retrofit Alternatives and Analysis May 31 st 2013.
Estimating Groundwater Recharge in Porous Media Aquifers in Texas Bridget Scanlon Kelley Keese Robert Reedy Bureau of Economic Geology Jackson School of.
1 Blend Times in Stirred Tanks Reacting Flows - Lecture 9 Instructor: André Bakker © André Bakker (2006)
Presented by David C. Nyman, P.E. Comprehensive Environmental Inc. Annual Nonpoint Source Conference April 29, 2014.
Non-point Pollution Control: Relating Wetland Functions to Stormwater Nitrogen Load Removal in Bioretention Areas Sharkey 2001 NC STATE UNIVERSITY.
From Storm water Runoff
Redahegn Sileshi1, Robert Pitt2 and Shirley Clark3
Groundwater Pilot Treatment System Update May 2017
Redahegn Sileshi1, Robert Pitt2 , and Shirley Clark3
Attached Growth Biological WW treatment Systems
BAE 5333 Applied Water Resources Statistics
The Institute of Hydrology of the Slovak Academy of Sciences,
Cudworth Professor of Urban Water Systems
Infiltration and unsaturated flow (Mays p )
Sanitary Engineering Lecture 2
Interactions between the phosphorus content of animal manures
Infiltration and unsaturated flow (Mays p )
Storm Water Storage and Treatment
Impact of Flowing Formation Water on Residual CO2 Saturations
John Murnane, Mark Healy, Owen Fenton
MIDS calculator Quantifies reductions in runoff volume for a given BMP or group of BMPs Quantifies reductions in phosphorus (P) and TSS runoff for a given.
Data Analysis.
Redahegn Sileshi1, Robert Pitt2, and Shirley Clark3
Infiltration and unsaturated flow
Applied Hydrology Infiltration
Redahegn Sileshi1, Robert Pitt2, Shirley Clark3, and Chad Christian4
Lesson Comparing Two Means.
Mathematical modeling techniques in the engineering of landfill sites.
Applied Hydrology Infiltration
Northern California LID Hydrology and Hydraulics
Mohr Separations Research, Inc.
Wastewater Treatment Secondary Treatment.
Infiltration.
Kickoff example Create a new file
Intro MIDS Calculator Use
Chapter 9: One- and Two-Sample Estimation Problems:
Space Coast TPO State Road (S.R.) 528 Update
Presentation transcript:

R.A. Chavez | G.O. Brown LRGV Stormwater– South Padre Island May 18, 2016 The Impact of Variable Hydraulic Conductivity on Bioretention Cell Performance and the Implications for Design Innovations and Practices PARTNERS FOR A BETTER QUALITY OF LIFE

10 full-scale bioretention cells were constructed in Oklahoma to demonstrate P reduction efficiency. PROJECT

3% to 5% of area. Sized for runoff: —½” in pool —½” in filter 1’ topsoil. Bottom drain to atmosphere. Filter media a blend of sand and 5% fly ash. Sand plugs on 25% of surface for infiltration. GENERAL DESIGN

SAND PLUGS MINIMIZE STANDING WATER Designed to only pond water for 24 hr. Addition of sand plugs on surface compensate for lower conductivity of top soil. 25% of surface layer are sand plugs with a specification that none touch. Proved to be easy to construct and effective.

MaterialK d (ml/g) Sand2 Fly Ash2200 Sand & 5% fly ash 300 FLY ASH REDUCES P IN EFFLUENT AND EXPONENTIALLY REDUCES HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY

MIXING FLY ASH ON SITE PROVED DIFFICULT

WIDE DISTRIBUTION IN FLY ASH

QUESTIONS (after the fact) How do sand plugs interact with the filter media? How does the variability in fly ash content impact the flow and phosphorous transport through the filter? How does mixing effort impact performance? Degree and scale of variation? How does the construction design impact P transport? How does variability of fly ash impact the expected BRC life span? How can we use this information to improve cell design and construction practices? What does this mean in terms of long term planning?

6 plug model FLOW MODEL Bioretention Cell modeled in COMSOL Multiphysics, Earth Science Module, with saturated conditions. Finite element model, 7.5 x 7.5 x 1.5 m, with over 200,000 elements. 75,088 randomly varied hydraulic conductivities. 3 configurations modeled. 20 realizations for each configuration for each design option = 180 simulations.

6 plug model K distribution 3 CONFIGURATIONS, 3 OPTIONS Only filter material. 6 and 14 sand plugs. Measured and double variation in fly ash. 1 and 27 liter scale of variation.

Mean (cm/hr) Standard Deviation MinimumMedianMaximum DEFINING VARIABILITY IN K Transform X to K for 162 field samples, where X = fly ash content (%) Zhang (2006)

DEFINE K DISTRIBUTION K distribution may be fit with Johnson Transform

RESULTS OF FLOW STUDY Variability in fly ash content creates complex flow through filter, but no significant preferential flow. Sand plugs do create some flow concentration, but not dominant. Number of plugs not significant, provided area is sufficient for desired infiltration. Variation or uniformity of fly ash mixing not too critical

TRANSPORT MODEL Same geometry, scenarios, and hydraulic conductivity files as in the previous section on flow 2 configurations modeled – Filter Only and 6 Sand Plug 20 realizations for each configuration for each design option = 120 simulations Sorption modeled as a linear isotherm Distribution coefficient, K d, calculated to correspond with random K values Assumed 1.0 mg/L phosphorus influent into cell 8 m of water per nominal year

SIMULATION

RESULTS P concentration in soil solution after 20 and 144 nominal years Concentration of P in soil solution higher under sand plugs

Estimating Expected Lifespan Assumed mean concentration of P in solution at the bottom plane of the model to be effluent concentration Mean effluent concentrations calculated from model results at approximately 5 year increments from nominal years Time to Exceed mg/L Oklahoma Scenic Rivers Criteria (equivalent years) Effluent Concentration after 144 Equivalent Years

COMPARISON OF EXPECTED LIFESPAN CALCULATIONS Mean Effluent P Concentration Exceeds Expected Lifespan, yr OriginalIncreased VarianceIncreased Scale Filter Only 6 Sand Plug Filter Only 6 Sand Plug Filter Only 6 Sand Plug mg/L mg/L mg/L132>144133>144136>144

Evaluating performance through phosphorus removal efficiencies

P REMOVAL EFFICIENCY OVER TIME FILTER ONLY CONFIGURATION

P REMOVAL EFFICIENCY OVER TIME 6 SAND PLUG CONFIGURATION

CONCLUSIONS years before C mean exceeds Oklahoma criteria for scenic rivers for phosphorus in cell effluent Top soil layer increases design life of cell by years More than 144 years of some P removal Concentration P in soil solution higher under sand plugs The three distributions/ mixing efforts show similar sorption patterns/ removal efficiencies for each configuration

RELATED PUBLICATIONS AND REFERENCES Chavez, R.A., G.O. Brown, R.R.Coffman, and D.E. Storm Design, Construction and Lessons Learned from Oklahoma Bioretention Cell Demonstration Project. Applied Engineering in Agriculture. 31(1): Chavez, R.A., G.O. Brown, and D.E. Storm. July Impact of Variable Hydraulic Conductivity on Bioretention Cell Performance and Implications for Construction Standards. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering. 139(7): Zhang, W Improvement of Phosphorus and Heavy Metal Retention in Stormwater Treatment. MS thesis. Stillwater, Oklahoma: Oklahoma State University. Department of Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering.

Rebecca Chavez For more information, visit our website and click on our water resources page THANK YOU PARTNERS FOR A BETTER QUALITY OF LIFE Let’s Socialize