Conserving Penn’s Woods Pennsylvania’s Riparian Forest Buffer Initiative DEP Citizens Advisory Council May 17, 2016.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Protecting Forests for the Long Haul Potomac Conservancys approach to improving water quality through forest conservation.
Advertisements

Stream Corridors Christine Hall Natural Resources Conservation Service North Jersey RC&D Slides 1-12.
Listed on 303(d) list Organic enrichment causing depleted oxygen levels. Not sustaining the designated use for aquatic life because of low dissolved oxygen.
USDA Conservation Programs Sorting Out the Pieces: A Conference for Women Landowners Protecting Your Farm’s Soil & Water March 1, 2013.
A Decade of Watershed Partnership Schuylkill Action Network.
Anne Hairston-Strang MD DNR Forest Service. Overall Project Components Lower nutrients and sediment; Tree planting Buffer restoration Buffer monitoring.
Assessing the Market Potential of Specialty Forest Products in Local Food Systems of Iowa --Carole Teator, Trees Forever Project Development Director A.
Protecting Forests for the Long Haul Potomac Conservancy’s approach to improving water quality through forest conservation.
Economics of Riparian Restoration on Western Washington Farms June 29, 2004 American Water Resource Association Olympic Valley, CA Carolyn J. Henri, PhD.
Most Common Conservation Practices Forestry Illinois.
Community-Based Tree Planting as a Catalyst for an Engaged Citizenry: PHS Tree Tenders.
Wallowa Whitman Forest Collaborative Nils D. Christoffersen Wallowa Resources.
Jim Edward, Deputy Director Chesapeake Bay Program (EPA) 1 CBP Program Update Citizens Advisory Committee February 27, 2014.
Update on Forest Goals and Progress in the Chesapeake Bay Partnership Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting, 8/23/13 Sally Claggett & Julie Mawhorter, US.
1 Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 (Farm Bill) Disclaimer: Provisions provided in this presentation are subject to change or interpretive differences.
Chesapeake's Future Forests: Crafting a Forest Restoration Strategy for the Bay Watershed Partners.
Forestry in the 2002 Farm Bill New Opportunities for Pennsylvania’s Forest Landowners “Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002” Forestry and the.
Minnesota Buffers Initiative September 16, 2015 Legislative-Citizen Commission on Minnesota Resources John Jaschke, BWSR Executive Director Sarah Strommen,
APPLYING CONSERVATION TO THE TEXAS LANDSCAPE Norman Bade, NRCS State Resource Conservationist Conservation Provisions of the 2002 Farm Bill (Farm Security.
Challenges… and Some Success Sally Claggett, CBP USFS Coordinator.
Chesapeake Bay Policy Committee Meeting Bay Program Water Quality Goals: Focus on Funding Presented to COG Board of Directors September 10, 2003.
THE FAMILY FOREST Jim and Jean Ballenthin & Jasmin.
20 to 100 ft. for Filter Strips 35 to 300 ft. for Hardwood Trees & Riparian Forest Buffer 35 to 750 ft. for Wetland Restoration Practice widths.
Carbon Sequestration: Michigan Forestry Carbon Project Presentation to: The USDA Forest Service Landowner Assistance Meeting Charleston, SC October 5,
Neuse River Basin Provided by Dr. D. Monreau to Dr. G
A New Currency for Conservation: Markets and Payments for Ecosystem Services from Our Nation’s Forests and Farms Featuring Special Sessions on Conservation.
KWWOA Annual Conference April 2014 Development of a Kentucky Nutrient Strategy Paulette Akers Kentucky Division of Water Frankfort, KY.
Listed on 303(d) list Organic enrichment causing depleted oxygen levels. Not sustaining the designated use for aquatic life because of low dissolved oxygen.
Takeaways from the Pheasant Summit January 16, 2014 Tom Landwehr MN DNR Commissioner.
National Fish and Wildlife Foundation Chesapeake Bay Stewardship Fund Program Update Chesapeake Bay Program Citizens Advisory Committee Thursday, February.
JULIE MAWHORTER MID-ATLANTIC URBAN & COMMUNITY FORESTRY COORDINATOR CHESAPEAKE TREE CANOPY STRATEGY & WORKPLAN UPDATE CITIZEN’S ADVISORY.
Presented by: Brenton McCloskey, MD DNR Associate Director for Restoration Financing and Policy Watershed Restoration in Maryland Helping Advance Restoration.
Boise Community Forestry 2015 Management Plan “Our Living City” Brian Jorgenson, Boise City Forester Lance Davisson, Project Manager – Ecosystem Sciences.
Nutrients and the Next Generation of Conservation Presented by: Tom Porta, P.E. Deputy Administrator Nevada Division of Environmental Protection President,
Growing Smarter Pennsylvania’s Land Use Agenda. Percent of Land Developed in Pennsylvania Source: Natural Resources Conservation Service, U.S. Department.
The Highlands Region: Partnerships to Conserve Forests & Watersheds Ramapo Mountains, NJ.
Introduction to the Regional Conservation Partnership Program (RCPP) June 10, 2016 Carol Rivera– Program Manager An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer.
Chester County Conservation District, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Stroud Water Research Center, Penn State Extension Summer 2016.
Central Valley Habitat Exchange A Voluntary Program Creating New Financial Returns for Landowners Introduction & Overview July 1, 2014.
Partners in Conservation
The Oregon Watershed Council Model, USA
Where critical areas & agriculture meet
Streamlining Integrated Infrastructure Implementation: Workshop Report
Sean D. Rafferty Research Director and Associate Director
Washington Hardwood Commission
Robin Sizemore, WVDE Science Coordinator
Texas Water Resources Institute
WIP Regional Meetings Jason Keppler
Funding from the Local Perspective
Pennsylvania Riparian Forest Buffer Progress and Challenges
Local Planning Process…
Funding from the Local Perspective
Funding from the Local Perspective
Building Capacity for Socially Disadvantaged Producers
Washington County Parks and Open Spaces
Ohio Forestry Resources
Source Water Collaboration Toolkit
What do you see? 56% Forest Forests can absorb 20 x more runoff than a parking lost and 6x as much as turf 15% N (Air): Retain 85% of atmospheric dep.
Funding from the Local Perspective
By: Emilie R. Cooper School of Forest Resources
Chesapeake Bay TMDL Milestones, Progress, Mid-point Assessment
Dolores River Restoration Partnership Meeting
Subcommittee Participants: Mark Hockley, Chair, Danielle Fitzko (VT)
White River and Richland Creek Watershed Opportunity Assessment
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)
Kirk Hanson (360)
Farm Service Agency (FSA) Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS)
CRP Snippets from the 2018 Farm Bill.
Colorado’s Forest Action Plan Mike Lester, State Forester and Director
VIRGINIA’S Phase iii watershed implementation plan
Presentation transcript:

Conserving Penn’s Woods Pennsylvania’s Riparian Forest Buffer Initiative DEP Citizens Advisory Council May 17, 2016

Outline 1.DCNR Chesapeake Bay work 2.Chesapeake Bay forest buffer goal 3.Our current ideas

DCNR/Chesapeake Bay Work 1.Recreation and public access 2.Education and outreach 3.Land conservation 4.Urban tree planting (TreeVitalize) 5.Riparian Forest Buffers

What is a riparian forest buffer?

Slide courtesy Nick DiPasquale

Slide courtesy Nick DiPasquale

Slide courtesy Nick DiPasquale

Slide courtesy Nick DiPasquale

PA Success story 54,000 acres of RFBs 24,000 acres established through CREP PA Stream ReLeaf Growing Greener Many partners Accomplished at the local level

PA RFB Accomplishments YearAcres AnnualCumulative , ,129 44, ,848 47, , ,822 54, ,61658, , ,500154,000

Slide courtesy Nick DiPasquale

Slide courtesy Nick DiPasquale

Recent Federal and State Responses 2014 RFB Leadership Summit in D.C. –State Tasks Forces –Heavy focus on CREP –Asked for State RFB Leads 2014 Chesapeake Bay Agreement –Management strategy and 2-year work plans

PA 2-Year Work Plan 1.Leadership and collaboration –RFB Advisory Committee (March 28 and June 2) 2.Funding and resources for new and innovative approaches –Complement existing programs –Flexibility and simplicity –Importance of maintenance

PA 2-Year Work Plan 3.Communication, outreach, and technical assistance –Messaging, DCNR Foresters, social science 4.Planning to prioritize efforts –Technology and partners –Improve efficiency

Conserving Penn’s Woods Multi-use Riparian Forest Buffer Program Concept DEP Citizens Advisory Council May 17, 2016

Purpose Help PA reach Bay goal of 95,000 new acres of RFBs by 2025 Complement, but not duplicate, existing programs – CREP, EQIP Hallmarks include greater flexibility in landowner eligibility, buffer designs, widths, plant species Income-producing opportunities will be explored

Funder

Partner Roles DCNR – Forestry technical assistance, grant administration The Nature Conservancy (pending) – Technical assistance on targeting, mapping, general site characterization Watershed/county partners – Landowner outreach, buffer designs, landowner agreements, oversee implementation and maintenance Penn State Ag. Extension – Social data mining to determine socio-economic and cultural attributes of landowners inclined to participate in buffer programs; also agroforestry technical assistance DEP – verification and reporting

Pilot Program DCNR developing pilot sites to test-run the program –Yellow Breeches watershed in Cumberland/York counties –Lost Creek watershed in Juniata County –3-4 State Park locations –Municipal and county parks

Multi-use Riparian Forest Buffer Design Zones 2 and 3 can be planted with different species and at expanded widths to incorporate perennial crops of fruits, nuts, and floral trees and shrubs.

Costs Covered Tree and shrub plant materials, tree tubes, stakes, trellises, etc. Site prep and buffer installation Maintenance for 3 years NO rental payments to landowners Income-producing plants based on series of approved plant materials with new or established markets 20-year MOUs to participate Separate funding for livestock fencing, if applicable

Potential Funding Sources 1. Grants – direct grants to third parties, no rental payments and no payback requirement –Current and future Growing Greener and Keystone funding –Private foundation funding 2. Revolving fund or investment funded – requires income-generating plants with payback of principal and/or interest –State revolving funds –Third-party investors –Program-related investments (PRIs) – third-party vendor guarantees payback 3. Credits – downstream neighboring states, carbon credits, nutrient credits, stormwater credits

Elderberry Berries: $3/lb retail Juice: $15-17/11 oz jar Syrup: $18/4 oz jar retail Wine: $10-13/bottle retail Cough drops: $2.50/15 retail Concentrate: $25 per 375 ml Cuttings: $ Plants: $5.00 each USDA National Agroforestry Center Farming the Woods, Ken Mudge and Steve Gabriel continuumhealing.com Fairfax County Public Schools

Woody florals Redosier dogwood, pussy willow, etc. –Cuttings: $ /stem retail, some species up to $6/stem –Wreaths: $45+ each retail Willows can generate up to $56K/acre and live 20+ years USDA National Agroforestry Center University of Kentucky gardensofgrowth.com

Pros and Cons Pros: Additional tool in the toolbox Wider landowner applicant pool Landowner motivated by plant-generated income – better care and maintenance “Designer” buffers can be shaped to landowner preference Variable widths adjust to parcel Cons: Contract is voluntary Income and results may vary Payback process may be hard

Questions? Sara Nicholas Policy Director, DCNR Matt Keefer Assistant State Forester, DCNR