Paul Eger, Global Minerals /Sovereign Consulting Peggy Jones, Doug Green, American Peat Technology Igor Kolomitsyn, Natural Resources Research Institute.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Arsenic/Iron Co-Precipitation and High Rate Filtration in the City of Portage Christopher Barnes, P.E., City of Portage Kendra Gwin, P.E., City of Portage.
Advertisements

CE 370 Sedimentation.
Alternatives to Aboveground Effluent Disposal Mounds Overview of the NoMound ® System Technology.
Deep Bed Denitrification Performance
Removal of Arsenic from Drinking Water using Hybrid Ion Exchangers or HIX : A Prudent approach for Rural Water Utilities Presentedby VEETech, P.C. 942.
American Water Raw Water Quality Not Textbook? Just Pilot! Iron Removal with High pH Raw Water March 27, 2008 Sandy Kutzing, P.E., CDM Eric Hahn, P.E.,
Removal of Cu(II) ions from aqueous solution effluent using Melamine-Formaldehyde-DTPA resin in a fixed-bed up-flow column By Ahmad Baraka Supervisors.
Filtration by Douglas Rittmann, Ph.D., P.E.
A Proposed Semi-Passive Treatment System At Remote AML Sites by Robert H. Lambeth, PE, PG, LHG & Gene Andrews, PE Millennium Science & Engineering, Inc.
CE 370 Filtration.
Shirley E. Clark, Ph.D., P.E., D. WRE Robert E. Pitt, Ph.D., P.E., BCEE, D. WRE.
Calcite Contactors for Corrosion Control
The Practical Application of Constructed Wetlands in the Philippines R.E. James, N. Callora, R. Inion, G. Tolentino.
You can hardly find water which has no problem with one of 5 typical contaminants: Hardness Iron Manganese Natural organic matter (NOM) Smell of ammonia.
ION EXCHANGE AND DIALYSIS THE REMOVAL OF IONS FROM SOLUTION USING RESINS.
Aeration Approaches and Activated Iron Solids (AIS) for AMD Treatment By Jon Dietz, Ph.D. Environmental Engineering & Science Iron Oxide Technologies,
Lecture 6: Water & Wastewater Treatment
An Innovative, Precise Water Treatment Process that Can Meet or Exceed Most Discharge Requirements An Innovative, Precise Water Treatment Process that.
Wetlands for remediation of acid-mine drainage Alyssa Shiel.
Acid Mine Drainage: From Formation to Remediation CE Aquatic Chemistry Julie Giardina Dominike Merle.
. All rights reserved MAR Systems Inc.
Dr. Martin T. Auer MTU Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Water Treatment.
Dr. Martin T. Auer MTU Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Water Treatment.
1 Virginia Water Treatment Plant under construction
Detection of Copper in Wastewater Seth Holm Chem4101 December 2009.
Water Purification Systems for Clinical Lab Prepared By Farid Khalaf.
Geology, Mining, and Water Quality by Matthew A. Sares.
PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL FOR LAGOON OPERATORS WHY THE CONCERN OVER P.
BIOCYANIDE DEMONSTRATION PROJECT Activity III ; Project 5.
Reclaiming the health of British rivers Optimising conditions in low-cost systems for treating diffuse water pollution Carr 1, S., Heal 1, K.V., Lumsdon.
SCI-Pak Sustainable and Cleaner production in the manufacturing industries of Pakistan FUNDED BY THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION 1 SCI-Pak Sustainable.
Selenium Removal from Mine Waters
Robert Pitt, University of Alabama Shirley Clark, Penn State - Harrisburg Brandon Steets, GeoSyntec Consultants Treatability of Stormwater Toxicants using.
Seasonal Changes in Biogeochemistry of a Natural Wetland Receiving Drainage from an Abandoned Mine Diane McKnight and Eric August – University of Colorado.
Evaluation of the removal of heavy metals using the Biosand Filter
The Drinking Water Treatment Process
Lecture 6: Water & Wastewater Treatment Objectives: Objectives: Define primary, secondary, and tertiary treatment Define primary, secondary, and tertiary.
Bench-scale Acid Mine Drainage Wetland Test Cells Constructed wetlands (surface flow and vertical flow) using cattail (Typha latifolia) and two different.
LEWIS ENVIRONMENTAL Cost Effective Solutions For …. Today’s Problems UPGRADING AMD FOR FRACKING WHO’S LEWIS ENVIRONMENTAL… COMPANY HAS SEVERAL PATENTS.
E NVIRONMENTAL E NGINEERING 441 Lecture 5: Water Treatment (3) Sedimentation & filtration Philadelphia University Faculty of Engineering Department of.
PERFORMANCE OF A GRANULAR ACTIVATED CARBON BIOFILTER IN LOW STRENGTH WASTEWATER TREATMENT D. S. Chaudhary, H. H. Ngo and S. Vigneswaran Environmental Engineering.
Arsenic Treatment Technologies Christopher A. Impellitteri USEPA/ORD/WSWRD/WQMB Water Technologies for Rural Texas Tuesday, December 2, 2003.
Robert Pitt, University of Alabama Shirley Clark, Penn State - Harrisburg Brandon Steets, GeoSyntec Consultants Engineered Bioretention Media for Industrial.
Decommissioned BCR Organic Media Characterization Standard Mine Superfund Site, Crested Butte, CO Neal Gallagher, Eric Blumenstein, Tom Rutkowski, John.
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
1 A LOW-COST, GREEN TECHNOLOGY FOR ACID MINE DRAINAGE TREATMENT USING A WATER TREATMENT BY-PRODUCT: A PRELIMINARY STUDY Louis Ackah 1, Rajesh Guru 1, Meisam.
August 27, 2008 Treatment of Heavy Metals and Elimination of Sulfur with a Novel Sulfate Reducing Permeable Reactive Barrier Containing ZVI Dr. Jim Field.
SOME RECENT ADVANCES IN PASSIVE TREATMENT OF MINED DRAINAGE Arthur W. Rose Pennsylvania State University.
The Islamic University of Gaza- Environmental Engineering Department
Noboru Togawa  Ph.D Student at the University of Alabama, expected graduation, spring, 2010  Master in Environmental Engineering at the University of.
FIELD PERFORMANCE FOR UP FLOW FILTRATION DEVICE Noboru Togawa Robert Pitt Robert Andoh Kwabena Osei Richard Field Anthony Tafuri Department of Civil, Construction,
Titansorb ® Filter Media for Arsenic removal by Watch ® GmbH.
Course TEN-702 Industrial waste management unit-2 Lecture -13.
Filtration Processes Introduction
State of art solutions for mining and industrial water management TYPEN JA LIUKOISTEN METALLIEN POISTAMINEN JÄTEVESISTÄ Ympäristömittauspäivät Vuokatti.
Zeosorb - The Clean Solution. AMAZING REVOLUTION!! LATEST STATE OF THE ART 3 IN 1 SOLUTIONS Zeosorb FOR YOUR WATER FILTERATION UNITS.
Redahegn Sileshi1, Robert Pitt2 and Shirley Clark3
Amherst , MA, Drinking Water System Atkins Water Treatment Plant
RIMCON PROVIDES NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT CONSULTING TO THE MINING AND AGRICULTURAL INDUSTRIES INCLUDED ARE ZEOLITE AND OTHER INDUSTRIAL MINERAL-BASED.
Pouyan Ebrahimi, Javier Vilcáez Abstract ID: GSA
Drinking-water Treatment
Microfloc Products Adsorption Clarifier/Trident/Tri-Mite
Filtration Technologies Comparison for Tertiary Treatment
MIDS calculator Quantifies reductions in runoff volume for a given BMP or group of BMPs Quantifies reductions in phosphorus (P) and TSS runoff for a given.
Methodology and Processes for Mine Water Treatment February 25, 2015
Electrocoagulation Treatment of Heavy Metals from Mine Impacted Water
Microfloc Products Adsorption Clarifier/Trident/Tri-Mite
Ecologically Effective Metals Adsorption Sorbster® Media Wastewater, leachates, ground water, process water, and ponds.
MRU: Metal Removal Units
MRU: Metal Removal Units
Presentation transcript:

Paul Eger, Global Minerals /Sovereign Consulting Peggy Jones, Doug Green, American Peat Technology Igor Kolomitsyn, Natural Resources Research Institute

 Problem  Peat Based Sorption Media  Why should it work?  Testing  Application  On going work

 Coal mine drainage  pH 6-9  Aluminum  Maximum mg/l  Average 0.43 mg/l  Guilty until proven innocent  Limits enforced as total

PBR to the rescue! Peat Based Remediation

 Convert peat into engineered media  APTsorb TM  Patented peat based sorption media  Hardened granule  APTsorb TM Granule

 Size 0.6 to 2 mm  Large surface area  High hydraulic conductivity (~1 cm/sec)  High metal affinity (1-15% max dry wgt) APTsorb TM Granule 2000x

Why would this work?

 Dissolved  Adsorption  Ion Exchange  Complexation  Chelation  Particulate  Physical Filtration  Sorption

Fine Sand APTsorb 100 X 1000 X 1500 X

Case Study

 Closed underground iron mine  Minnesota State Park  TSS 5-10 mg/L  Mine water; ug/L Cu  Permit limit:17 ug/L  75 % is suspended 8-10 ug/L dissolved < 17 ug/L

 Treatment tank  1000 gallon  500 gallons media  Typical flow 50 gpm  Contact time 10 min  Designed to backwash

APTsorb

Average removal = 75%

 One year successful treatment  Remotely monitored  Minimal maintenance  Backwash every 4-6 weeks  Eliminated solids from media  Restored pressure drop to initial value  Cost < 25 cents / 1000 gallons

 Treated coal mine drainage  Active treatment process  Clarifier effluent  Passive system effluent  Final pond effluent  Typical water quality  pH 7-8  Al mg/L

Series filtration Clarifier Effluent Al (ppb) Percent removal Particle size No filtration µm %>25µm 8µm µm µm µm µm<86% 0.1 µm3192 pH 7.7

Series Filtration Pond effluentAl (ppb)% removalParticle Size No filtration225.70% 25µm % 8.0µm % 5.0 µm %5µ<60%<8µ 88%>5 µ 0.8 µm % 0.45 µm % 0.20 µm % 0.10 µm % pH 8.9

Column Test Diameter 1 in Length 8 in Flow Rate 10ml/min Contact Time 10 min

70-80% removal

Semi active Passive

Passive filter bed Peat based sorption media

 Peat based sorption media effectively removes suspended metals  Removes smaller particles than typical sand filter  Cost effective  Semi active: < $0.25 per 1000 gallons

 Altering media  Chemical modification  Addition of functional group  Target specific analytes

ProductsMarket niche APTsorb II Removal of heavy metals: Cd, Cu, Zn, Pb, etc. APTsorb III Removal of heavy metals: Cd, Cu, Zn, Fe. No leaching of Mn, Fe, Ca into the effluent Lower concentration of metals in the effluent APTsorb II*Na High selectivity for Cd removal in the presence of Zn. Up to 3 mg/g Cd at influent Zn > 30 ppm Still evaluation other benefits.

Sulfate granule

Global Minerals Engineering

Is this finally the end of the shameless promotions?

When will this end?

Series filtration Clarifier Effluent Al (ppb) Percent removal Particle size No filtration µm %>25µm 8µm µm µm µm <34%< µm3192 pH 7.7