SEBE Ethics Information Rod Gameson & Richard Hall.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The School Research Ethics Committee Welsh School of Architecture.
Advertisements

Navigating the PhD – The Research Degrees Office.
An Introduction to the Ethics Review Procedure Lindsay Unwin: Research & Innovation Services, UREC Secretary.
IRB SUBMISSION PROCESS FOR SHB STUDIES Version 9/18/2013.
Fundamentals of IRB Review. Regulatory Role of the IRB Authority to approve, require modifications in (to secure approval), or disapprove all research.
Use of Children as Research Subjects What information should be provided for an FP7 ethical review?
PROF. CHRISTINE MILLIGAN SCHOOL OF HEALTH AND MEDICINE LANCASTER UNIVERSITY Ethics and Ethical Practice in Research.
Is this Research? Exempt? Expedited?
How to Obtain Institutional Review Board (IRB) Approval Richard Wagner Associate Director UCSF Human Research Protection Program August 14, 2008.
Lisa Denney, MPH HRPP Assistant Director Melanie Mace, MA HRPP Education and Training Coordinator Bill Woods, PhD CAPS Policy and Ethics Core November.
Human Research Ethics and Obtaining Ethics Approval
Introducing Research Ethics: Policy and Procedure
The IRB Approval Process Michael Bingham, JD Assistant Director, University of Wisconsin-Madison Education IRB
The work of the Research Ethics Committee Dr Carol Chu.
School of Arts and Social Sciences 28 April 2010.
Teaching Research Methods (Classroom Protocols) Boston University Charles River Campus Boston University Medical Center Mary A. Banks BS, BSN IRB Director.
Research Ethics Board (REB)
SUNY Oswego Human Subjects Committee Last Revised 10/28/2011.
How to Successfully Apply to the IRB Richard Gordin, IRB Chair True Rubal, Administrator / Director For the Protection of Human Participants in Research.
The Linguistics Department Institutional Review Board Committee Silvina Montrul, chair Fred Davidson Irene Koshik Ryan Shosted September 22, 2008.
IWK Research Ethics - Workshop Series Session #2 REB Review Procedures How to submit … October 24, 2013 Bev White, Manager, Research Ethics Research Services,
Human Subject Research View from the IRB Anthony J. Filipovitch Minnesota State University Mankato.
SUNY Oswego Human Subjects Committee Last Revised 10/28/2011.
Humanities and Social Sciences Research Ethics Committee (HSSREC) April 2014.
Institutional Review Board Procedures and Implications After the applied dissertation committee has approved the proposal and the IRB package, the student.
Marian University is sponsored by the Sisters of St. Francis, Oldenburg. Human Subjects Research and the Marian University Institutional Review Board (IRB)
Western Oregon University INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD.
PhD Registration and Assessment procedures There are 3 stages of internal assessment during the PhD: Research Plan 8 weeks after registration date Early.
Human Research Ethics: Issues and Procedures Dr. Constance Jones Chair, Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects.
WELCOME to the TULANE UNIVERSITY HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION OFFICE WORKSHOP for SOCIAL/BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH (March 2, 2010) Tulane University HRPO Uptown.
Paul Kelly Facility Research Compliance Officer for the Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center.
Institutional Review Board Procedures and Implications After the applied dissertation committee has approved the proposal and the IRB package, the student.
 What is an IRB and why do we need one at Western?  Who needs to submit proposals to the IRB?  If approved, how long is your proposal good for?  Is.
8 th November 2007 Research: ethics and research governance Rossana Dowsett Research and Regional Development Division [Pre Award Support] University of.
THE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD. WHAT IS AN IRB? An IRB is committee set up by an institution to review, approve, and regulate research conducted under.
Application for Ethics Approval for BEd/BSSc Honours Projects Tianyuan Li, Chairperson of the PS Departmental Ethics Committee (June 2015)
Application for Ethics Approval for MSocScP(SCS) Research Projects Tianyuan Li, Chairperson of the PS Departmental Ethics Committee (May 2015)
Tips for Success in Navigating the Human Subjects Protection System
Conditional IRB Approval
Decision Tree for eIRB Submission Revised: 01/25/2016
Brief Overview of IRB and Human Subject Protections Issues at the University of Richmond Dr. R. Kirk Jonas Chair, University of Richmond Institutional.
Brief Overview of IRB and Human Subject Protections Issues at the University of Richmond Dr. R. Kirk Jonas Chair, University of Richmond Institutional.
University of Central Florida Office of Research & Commercialization
Procedures for Taught Degree students seeking YSJU Research Ethics Approval Does the research involve living human participants, their tissue or their.
Research with human participants at Carnegie Mellon University
Decision Tree for eIRB Submission Revised: 01/12/2016
Registration and Assessment
Postgraduate Research Student Supervision
Decision Tree for eIRB Submission Revised: 01/25/2016
Research Ethics Matthew Billington
University of Central Florida Office of Research & Commercialization
Section 3: Sweep implementation
Introduction to the Institutional Review Board
QRM, IRB, and QRF Differences Explained
Research Ethics and Integrity Officer
What Every Harvard LMA Student Investigator Should Know
Institutional Review Board
This takes approximately 5 minutes or less from start to finish
What Every Harvard LMA Student Investigator Should Know
WHAT TO EXPECT: A CROWN CORPORATION’S GUIDE TO A SPECIAL EXAMINATION
Jeffrey M. Cohen, Ph.D. Associate Dean,
Dr. Sarah Quinton, UREC Chair,
GSBM Presentation Updated
Overview of Process for GSEP Students
IRB Educational Session - IRB Regulations on Expedited Review
Progression and Advancement
Human Participants Research
GPS IRB SIX STEPS Updated
Valdosta State University
PhD Registration and Assessment procedures
Presentation transcript:

SEBE Ethics Information Rod Gameson & Richard Hall

Terms of Reference The School Ethics Committee (SEC) is responsible for ensuring, maintaining and enhancing appropriate ethical standards for the conduct of research (including consultancy and professional practice) undertaken by staff and/or students, within all subject areas of SEBE.

SEBE Ethics Committee SEBE Ethics Committee CHAIR Prof Richard Hall Rod Gameson COIN Bob Sarsby COIN Kevin Kibble EAT Anthony Felton (APD) Secretary Patricia Osborne Each Dept hosts its own ethics sub-committee, providing provisional approval

Who Needs Ethics? Who Needs Ethics? n BSc, BEng, BDes Undergraduate students (e.g. dissertation studies) n MSc Postgraduate students n MPhil, PhD Postgraduate students n SEBE academic & research staff (funded & unfunded research)

ALL projects need to be considered for Ethical Approval! Members of the Ethics Committee determine which category (as defined by the University) the proposed research falls into: Members of the Ethics Committee determine which category (as defined by the University) the proposed research falls into: - Category 0 - Category A - Category B

Examples of research for each category Category 0 Examples: desk-top research (literature-based), use of publicly available government reports / data, computer software development Category A Examples: questionnaire surveys, interviews, focus groups, case studies involving data collection by questionnaire / interviews Category B Examples: medical engineering which involves either human or animal subjects

Category 0 Category 0 Category 0 projects are non-hazardous, do not employ participants and use only existing material publicly and legally available in the UK (and overseas?). They do not meet the criteria for Category A or B. Category 0 projects are non-hazardous, do not employ participants and use only existing material publicly and legally available in the UK (and overseas?). They do not meet the criteria for Category A or B.

Category A Category A Category A projects usually involve the participation of people, rather than secondary data sources such as published memoirs etc., but are not deemed hazardous to the physical or psychological welfare of the participant or the investigator. They do not employ vulnerable individuals, in the context of the specific research, or investigate issues likely to give grounds for offence. If a project appears to be a borderline case of category B it should be deemed to be category B in the first instance. A school ethics committee may subsequently determine it to be category A and set precedent for future usage. Category A projects may be carried out by undergraduates and students, with appropriate training, on other courses below degree level. Category A projects usually involve the participation of people, rather than secondary data sources such as published memoirs etc., but are not deemed hazardous to the physical or psychological welfare of the participant or the investigator. They do not employ vulnerable individuals, in the context of the specific research, or investigate issues likely to give grounds for offence. If a project appears to be a borderline case of category B it should be deemed to be category B in the first instance. A school ethics committee may subsequently determine it to be category A and set precedent for future usage. Category A projects may be carried out by undergraduates and students, with appropriate training, on other courses below degree level.

Category B Category B nCATEGORY B projects involve any of the following: nAny research involving covert procedures. nThe use of any procedure that may be considered likely to be physically or psychologically harmful unless the procedure is widely used in practice and potential hazards have been minimized. For example, blood sampling and collection of other bodily fluids may be category A procedures provided there is strict adherence to established safety protocols and appropriate supervision. nResearch that may be offensive, for example, research into pornography, drug abuse etc. Also, research that is contentious in the sense that it may bring the university into disrepute. For example, investigations into some racial differences will need to shown to be ethically defensible. nA first degree in an appropriate subject, or other relevant professional recognition, is a minimum requirement for carrying out category B projects. CONT…. CONT….

Category B (cont.) Category B (cont.) nResearch that requires access to, or creates, data about individuals of a highly confidential nature. nResearch involving participants who, within the context of the study to be undertaken, are considered to be vulnerable. Projects with vulnerable individuals may be designated category A if it is clear that the vulnerability of the individual is likely to be unaffected by participation in the study. nResearch that requires the administration of substances (legal or otherwise). nResearch that requires the approval of another ethics committee, for example an LREC, will usually be designated category B. Similarly, research requiring data collection abroad, especially if the supervisor remains in the UK, will usually require scrutiny by a school ethics committee.

Data Collection Data Collection nFor Category A and B Projects data collection CANNOT commence before approval from the School Ethics Committee has been received. nFinal versions of the questionnaires and interview questions will need to be submitted through PebblePad to supervisor for confirmation of fitness for purpose BEFORE any data is collected.

SEBE Application Form: Availability SEBE Application Form: Availability All students to complete application which is based on PebblePad (for more details see Webfolio page “Ethics Application”)

Covering Letter Covering Letter Every primary data request (e.g. questionnaire / interview) should be accompanied by a covering letter Every primary data request (e.g. questionnaire / interview) should be accompanied by a covering letter nIt should: –Explain the purpose of the survey / interview to encourage a high response –Identify the persons conducting the study –Explain why it is important that the respondent answer the questions –Assure the respondent that the information provided will be held in strict confidence

Covering Letter Template Covering Letter Template Copy available on the Webfolio Page “Ethics Application”

Consent Form (Interviews) Template Consent Form (Interviews) Template Copy available on the Webfolio Page “Ethics Application”

Submitting an application This applies to: BSc, BEng, BDes Undergraduate students (e.g. dissertation studies); MSc Postgraduate students (dissertations); MPhil, PhD Postgraduate students: BSc, BEng, BDes Undergraduate students (e.g. dissertation studies); MSc Postgraduate students (dissertations); MPhil, PhD Postgraduate students: Please follow guidance on the Webfolio page “Ethics Application” A series of submission deadlines, linked to committee meetings, will be set throughout the year (to be confirmed)

Questions? Questions? If you have any queries, please contact the SEBE School Office on