Mary Apostolico Potomac Watershed Manager. Current Authorities for TMDL Process Federal Clean Water Act, § 303(d) - TMDL List & TMDL Development §303(e)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TMDLs and the NACD TMDL Task Force TMDLs NACD TMDL Task Force TMDL Draft Policy Trading and TMDLs.
Advertisements

Water Quality Trading Claire Schary Water Quality Trading Coordinator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10, Seattle, WA Region 10, Seattle,
Shingle Creek and West Mississippi Watershed Management Commissions Third Generation Watershed Management Plan.
Final Thoughts. Special Acknowledgments Board of Water & Soil Resources Local Soil & Water Conservation Districts County Environmental Services & Planning.
IDEM TMDL 101 Everything you wanted to know about Total Maximum Daily Loads.
Restoration and Enhancement Delivery on Private Lands Lessard Outdoor Heritage Council Monday, January 26, 2009 Kevin Lines Board of Water and Soil Resources.
Montana’s 2007 Nonpoint Source Management Plan Robert Ray MT Dept Environmental Quality.
Imperial River: Water Quality Status and Basin Management Action Plan.
Chesapeake Bay Restoration An EPA Perspective Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Administrator U.S. EPA.
Chesapeake Bay and New York State Water Quality and the Potential for Future Regulations Presented by the Upper Susquehanna Coalition.
Allen Berthold Texas Water Resources Institute. Review: Clean Water Act Goal of CWA is to restore and maintain water quality suitable for the “protection.
Catoctin TMDL Project Proposal for New Initiatives to Loudoun Watershed Management Stakeholders Steering Committee Loudoun Watershed Watch Data Compilation.
Catoctin Creek: A Stream in Distress Catoctin Watershed Project A Partnership of County and Citizen Organizations.
Watershed Planning: Current Status and Next Steps
VIRGINIA’S TMDL PROCESS.
Federal Clean Water Act Monitoring and assessments completed statewide Standards not met? Section 303 (d) requires placing the water body on the “Impaired.
Sustaining Long Term Regional Coordinated Monitoring Programs Todd Running, H-GAC May 9, 2006.
Taking the Next Step: Implementing the TMDL. What IDEM Provides to Help With Implementation  Compiling all the data in one place  Data-driven recommendations.
Minnesota Buffers Initiative September 16, 2015 Legislative-Citizen Commission on Minnesota Resources John Jaschke, BWSR Executive Director Sarah Strommen,
Ohio Balanced Growth Program October 30, 2012 Sandra Kosek-Sills PhD Ohio Lake Erie Commission.
Urban BMP Incentive Study (HJR 107) And Other Interesting Legislative Items Delegate David Bulova August 10, 2007.
Anatomy of Iowa Floods: Preparing for the Future “How urban and rural Iowans work together to reduce flood impacts.” Wayne Peterson, Division of Soil Conservation.
What is the Chesapeake Bay TMDL? Total Maximum Daily Load –Amount of pollutants that a water body can receive and still support designated uses Drinking,
Restoring VA Waters the TMDL Way Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Regional Administrator U.S. EPA Region 3.
Straight to the Point – Watershed-based Plans Should: be designed to restore water quality from nonpoint source impairments using sufficiently analyzed.
Watershed Planning. Watershed Definition A watershed is a landscape surface area that surrounds and drains into a common waterbody such as a lake, small.
West Colorado River Watershed Coordinator. Purpose Coordinate Conservation Efforts Between Agencies and Organizations Projects – Moab – Price (Applicable)
Catoctin Creek TMDL Implementation Plan Development June 24, 2004.
T20-1 Soil Science and Management, 4E Chapter 20 Government Agencies and Programs.
CLEAN WATER ACT Section 319 Grant Funds Robin F. “Rob” Rung Contracts / Grants Officer Water Quality Planning Bureau Department of Environmental Quality.
Watershed Management in New Jersey Upper Navesink Water Qualtiy Meeting Robert A. Mancini, Section Chief Division of Watershed Management Bureau of Watershed.
State of the Streams Loudoun County: 2005 Loudoun Strategic Watershed Management Planning Conference February 23, 2006 Presented by: Darrell Schwalm Loudoun.
1 State Parks  Soil and Water Conservation  Natural Heritage Outdoor Recreation Planning  Land Conservation Dam Safety and Floodplain Management Chesapeake.
Fecal Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDL) in 4 Austin Watersheds Presented to the City of Austin Environmental Board November 7, 2012.
MPCA: An Agency & Legislative Update Brad Moore, Commissioner June 22, 2007.
Stream Health Outcome Biennial Workplan Neely L. Law, PhD Center for Watershed Protection Chesapeake Bay Program Sediment & Stream Coordinator Habitat.
Commonwealth of Virginia TMDL Program Update Citizen for Water Quality Annual Summit September 22, 2001.
Modeling Fecal Bacteria Fate and Transport to Address Pathogen Impairments in the United States Brian Benham Extension Specialist and Associate Professor,
Nutrients and the Next Generation of Conservation Presented by: Tom Porta, P.E. Deputy Administrator Nevada Division of Environmental Protection President,
1 Chesapeake Bay TMDL Watershed Implementation Plan – Phase II James Davis-Martin, Chesapeake Bay TMDL Coordinator Citizens Advisory Committee to the Chesapeake.
IMPLEMENTATION UPDATE Rice County Local Water Management Plan BOARD PRESENTATION JUNE 16, 2015.
Improving Local Water Quality in Pennsylvania and Restoring the Chesapeake Bay.
Ashley Wendt Texas State Soil & Water Conservation Board NPS Project Manager.
Leveraging Resources with National Estuary Programs
Partners in Conservation
VIRGINIA’S TMDL PROCESS Four Mile Run Bacteria TMDL March 25, 2002
Using RMMS to Track & Report BMP Implementation
Local Government Engagement and Communication Strategy
Local Government Engagement and Communication Strategy
Local Government Engagement and Communication Strategy
WIP Regional Meetings Jason Keppler
Water Quality Credit Trading
Creating Partnerships: EPA R8, NRCS, and States
Current VA Ag Initiatives
North Dakota’s Alternative Plans
Commonwealth of Virginia
Funding at Record Levels
Mike Bira EPA Region 6 NPS Program
Achieving the Goal of Stewardship
Achieving the Goal of Stewardship
State Agency Perspective of Estuary Program Subcommittees
Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters
Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters
Straight to the Point – Watershed-based Plans Should:
James Davis-Martin Chesapeake Bay Program Manager
Leon River Watershed Protection Plan: Addressing EPA Comments
Jon Capacasa, Director Water Protection Division U.S. EPA Region III
Expectations for Federal Agencies in Support if Chesapeake WIPs/TMDL
Upper Clark Fork Watershed Restoration and TMDLs
VIRGINIA’S Phase iii watershed implementation plan
Presentation transcript:

Mary Apostolico Potomac Watershed Manager

Current Authorities for TMDL Process Federal Clean Water Act, § 303(d) - TMDL List & TMDL Development §303(e) - Watershed Management Plans State Water Control Law, § :7 - Water Quality Monitoring, Information, and Restoration Act TMDL List & TMDL Development TMDL Implementation Plan

Implementation Plan Development DEQ is required by state legislation to develop implementation plan. DCR has lead for NPS TMDL implementation plans. DEQ, DCR, VDH and other state, federal, and local agencies will coordinate on plan development.

Timeline for Implementation Plans Load reduction strategies (e.g. BMPs) should be in place 5 years after plan is developed, if practicable. Plan should provide date by which water quality standard will be met – generally within 10 years. Plan should address revising the TMDL if progress towards cleaning up the impairment is not made.

What is Needed to Implement a TMDL? Adequate financial assistance Increased technical assistance Cooperative effort between local, state, and federal agencies to support the TMDL program. Local stakeholders involvement

Current Status of TMDL Implementation in Virginia TMDL implementation plans completed for 11 impaired stream segments in the North River, Blackwater River, and M.F. Holston River watersheds. Implementation began in fall of These three areas provide a “pilot test” to determine if a voluntary approach can meet Virginia’s water quality standard for bacteria.

Potential Funding Sources Potential funding sources for TMDL implementation: Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program Environmental Quality Incentives Program PL incremental funds* State revolving loan funds Cost-share program Tax credits

Technical Assistance Sources Soil and Water Conservation District Department of Conservation & Recreation Natural Resources Conservation Service Cooperative Extension Service Virginia Department of Health Local governments Private sector contractors