Resolution Concerning Scholarly Publishing Alternatives and Authors’ Rights Passed by the UW Faculty Senate, April 2009. WHEREAS, the primary mission of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Partnering with Faculty / researchers to Enhance Scholarly Communication Caroline Mutwiri.
Advertisements

ACHS State of the Association Mission To build a visibly cohesive community of national and international honor societies, individually and collaboratively.
ARL Authors’ Rights and the Library’s Role Karla Hahn Director, Office of Scholarly Communication Association of Research Libraries
Throwing Open the Doors: Strategies and Implications for Open Access Heather Joseph Executive Director, SPARC October 23, 2009 Educause Live 1.
Leading from the Middle: Open Access at KU ARL Membership Meeting October 15, 2009 lorraine j. haricombe.
OPEN ACCESS PUBLISHING Sally Scholfield UTS Library.
Scholarly publishing distribution models In traditional model, libraries/others serve as mediators between information and researchers by buying books.
PubMed Central ANCHASL Spring Meeting April 1, 2005 Robert James Associate Director of Public Services Duke University.
Electronic publishing: issues and future trends Anne Bell.
Februrary 2005UCSF Library & Center for Knowledge Management Scholarly Communication.
Learn more about Open Access Breakfast meeting at BMC March 30th 2010 Aina Svensson and Karin Meyer Lundén Electronic Publishing Centre, Uppsala University.
IT Task Force Report Recommendation 4.b Create Open Access models and policies for CSU scholarship and other information. The Libraries should: –Work with.
Open Access and Scholarly Communications Tyler Walters Julie G. Speer Library Faculty Advisory Board November 20, 2009.
Implementing an Institutional Repository Pre-Conference 16 th North Carolina Serials Conference March 29, 2007 by Carol Hixson University Librarian, University.
If We Build It, Will They Come (Eventually)? : Scholarly Communication and Institutional Repositories A Presentation to the NASIG 2005 Conference May 20.
Copyright, Authors Agreements and Institutional Repositories Angela Riggio Digital Collection Management and Licensing, UCLA Libraries Institutional Repositories.
Federal Research Public Access Act of 2006 Cornyn/Lieberman Open Access Bill Senate Bill 2695.
Verbal comments to slide presentation. The slides contain (a) tables comparing what the University of Chicago pays for JACM, SICOMP, and JCSS, and the.
Introduction to Implementing an Institutional Repository Delivered to Technical Services Staff Dr. John Archer Library University of Regina September 21,
Committee Charges Identify and implement local actions in response to the scholarly communications issues raised by the committee. Consider actions that.
ScholarSpace and Scholarly Communication: A Needs Assessment Beth Tillinghast.
Open Access: a Biomedical Science Perspective Gerald M. Kidder, Ph.D. Associate Vice-President (Research) and Professor of Physiology Schulich School of.
Scholarly communication in Japan: Open access etc as of 2005 Yuko Nagai (The Zoological Society of Japan)
Daniela Nastasie, PhD BEng(Hons) AALIA Senior Metadata Librarian Repository and Archive Metadata Services UniSA Library Open Access Publishing and UniSA.
Presented by Ansie van der Westhuizen Unisa Institutional Repository: Sharing knowledge to advance research
SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATION Kay Vyhnanek WSU Libraries Learning Break December 14, 2006 Issues and Actions and Alphabet Soup.
Complying with the NIH Public Access Policy: Depositing manuscripts in PubMed Central Julie Speer, Lori Critz, Michelle Powell Office of Organizational.
Encouraging Scholarly Communication OSU Oregon Library Association Conference, April 6, 2006 ******************************* Michael Boock.
Libraries and the Communication of Scholarship: Changing Times, Changing Roles David Ruddy.
Scholarly Communications Through Open Access Graduate Student Orientation 2012 Presented by Isabel Silver, Academic and Scholarly Outreach George A. Smathers.
Open Access Scholarly Publications An Overview Russell Palmer LYRASIS ©2013.
SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATION Kay Vyhnanek Faculty Senate Library Committee Presentation April 5, 2007 The Ongoing Transformation.
Amy Jackson UNM Technology Days July 22,  An institutional repository (IR) is a web-based database of scholarly material which is institutionally.
1 1 SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING & ACADEMIC RESOURCES COALITION An initiative of the Association of Research Libraries Gaining Independence through.
DAEDALUS Project: Building Institutional Repositories for Glasgow William J Nixon Service Development Morag Mackie Advocacy.
1 ARRO: Anglia Ruskin Research Online Making submissions: Benefits and Process.
Smathers Libraries in Support of UF Research and Scholarship: Open Access and The Presentation to the Latin American Studies Colloquium, March 17,
AACP Annual Meeting #RxOA #PharmEd14.  What is Open Access?  Spencer D. C. Keralis Research Associate  Institutional Repositories.
Open Access Defined An Introduction by Patti McCall.
Open Access to Scholarship: Department Chairs Meeting, 29 May 2009 Brian E. C. Schottlaender & Stefan Tanaka.
Implementing NIH Deposit Policies: Institutional Strategies at the University of Minnesota CNI Spring Task Force Meeting April 7-8, 2008 Minneapolis, MN.
Leveraging the Expertise of our Staff and the Information Resources We Manage MIT Libraries Visiting Committee April 13, 2005.
BENEFITS OF AN INSTITUTIONAL REPOSITORY THE REPOSITORY AT ST. CLOUD STATE UNIVERSITY.
Open Access to Scholarly Articles: Good Policies Ensure Good Practices Jill Cirasella The Graduate Center, CUNY
Open Access and Open Access Pilot Initiative in Fp7 Marion Korres.
SPARC Europe´s Strategy The new strategy to reflect the changing landscape and the drive towards Open Scholarship (publications, data, software, educational.
Scholarly Communication Services: Repository-based Library Publishing OLA Preconference Feb. 2, 2011 Adrian K. Ho The University of Western Ontario.
Filling the Void: publishing within the digital repository Presented at ALA June 2008 Marilyn Billings Scholarly Communication Librarian University of.
TRENDS IN E-PUBLISHING
Our Digital Showcase Scholars’ Mine Annual Report from July 2015 – June 2016 Providing global access to the digital, scholarly and cultural resources.
A strategic conversation with Tim Jewell and Thom Deardorff
Author Rights Sarah A. Norris, Scholarly Communication Librarian,
Scholarly Publishing Sally Harvey, MLS
Information Resources Strategy: Continuing to Provide the Resources You Need Fall 2016.
ScholarWorks in Seven Minutes
Presented by Lisa Villa
Copyright Considerations for Institutional Repositories
Institutional Repository and Friends
Education of a scientist video
Author Rights Or The Rights of Copyright
Scholarly Communication Issues: Raising Awareness on Many Fronts
Virginia Pannabecker Health Sciences Librarian & Alexandra Humphreys
Introduction to Implementing an Institutional Repository
Access  Discovery  Compliance  Identification  Preservation
Considerations in Engineering
SFU Open Access Policy Endorsed by Senate January 9, 2017
THE UON OPEN ACCESS POLICY
OPEN ACCESS POLICY Larshan Naicker Rhodes University Library
CARL Guide to Author Rights
Presentation transcript:

Resolution Concerning Scholarly Publishing Alternatives and Authors’ Rights Passed by the UW Faculty Senate, April WHEREAS, the primary mission of the University of Washington is the advancement, dissemination and preservation of knowledge; and WHEREAS, the products of faculty scholarship are generated for the public benefit, are supported in part by nonprofit or public agencies, and are created, peer reviewed, and edited by faculty with little or no direct remuneration; and WHEREAS, scholarly journal publication, especially in the fields of science, technology, engineering, and medicine, is increasingly being dominated by and aggregated in the hands of a few large commercial publishing houses; and WHEREAS, the costs to academic libraries of journals published by these commercial publishers have risen far more rapidly than inflation, thereby limiting free and open exchange of scholarly information; and WHEREAS, the publication agreements offered by some publishers limit authors’ rights to use their own work in their teaching and research and/or to archive their work in an openly accessible repository; and WHEREAS, proprietary formats, new forms of digital protection, and new subscription models for selling “backfile” databases to libraries threaten to further restrict access to scholarly resources; and WHEREAS, the continued increases in journal costs have impaired the Libraries’ purchasing power and have forced the Libraries to conduct a serials review that will almost certainly result in widespread cancellation of journal subscriptions; and WHEREAS, the current system for production and distribution of scholarly works is increasingly dysfunctional and fiscally unsustainable and restricts rather than increases access to and dissemination of knowledge; and WHEREAS, the University of Washington Libraries has established an online, freely accessible and searchable repository, ResearchWorks at the University of Washington (ResearchWorks), for the dissemination and preservation of scholarly works published by members of the University community; therefore, BE IT RESOLVED, that 1. the University of Washington prepare for a future in which academic publications are increasingly available through open sources by encouraging faculty members to: assess the pricing practices and authors’ rights policies of journals with which they collaborate (as authors, reviewers, and editors) and advocate for improvements therein; and adopt and use an Addendum to Publication Agreement such as that provided by the Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition (SPARC) in order to retain their rights to use their work in the classroom and in future publications and to archive final accepted manuscripts; and publish scholarly works in moderately priced journals, in journals published by professional societies and associations, or in peer-reviewed “open access” journals; and archive their work in the UW’s ResearchWorks or other repositories supported by research institutions, professional societies, or government agencies in order to provide the widest and most affordable access to their scholarship; and 2. UW Libraries is encouraged to: provide relevant, current information regarding journal publishers, pricing, and authors’ rights to departments and individual faculty members; and maintain and further develop ResearchWorks and related services; and allocate personnel to facilitate the deposit of faculty publications in ResearchWorks, and to obtain publishers’ permission to deposit previously published works when possible; and 3. the University of Washington administration is encouraged to: provide resources to the Libraries and to academic units to foster these efforts; and work with departments and colleges to assure that the review process for promotion, tenure and merit takes into consideration these new trends and realities in academic publication. Resolution Concerning Scholarly Publishing Alternatives and Authors’ Rights Passed by the UW Faculty Senate, April WHEREAS, the primary mission of the University of Washington is the advancement, dissemination and preservation of knowledge; and WHEREAS, the products of faculty scholarship are generated for the public benefit, are supported in part by nonprofit or public agencies, and are created, peer reviewed, and edited by faculty with little or no direct remuneration; and WHEREAS, scholarly journal publication, especially in the fields of science, technology, engineering, and medicine, is increasingly being dominated by and aggregated in the hands of a few large commercial publishing houses; and WHEREAS, the costs to academic libraries of journals published by these commercial publishers have risen far more rapidly than inflation, thereby limiting free and open exchange of scholarly information; and WHEREAS, the publication agreements offered by some publishers limit authors’ rights to use their own work in their teaching and research and/or to archive their work in an openly accessible repository; and WHEREAS, proprietary formats, new forms of digital protection, and new subscription models for selling “backfile” databases to libraries threaten to further restrict access to scholarly resources; and WHEREAS, the continued increases in journal costs have impaired the Libraries’ purchasing power and have forced the Libraries to conduct a serials review that will almost certainly result in widespread cancellation of journal subscriptions; and WHEREAS, the current system for production and distribution of scholarly works is increasingly dysfunctional and fiscally unsustainable and restricts rather than increases access to and dissemination of knowledge; and WHEREAS, the University of Washington Libraries has established an online, freely accessible and searchable repository, ResearchWorks at the University of Washington (ResearchWorks), for the dissemination and preservation of scholarly works published by members of the University community; therefore, BE IT RESOLVED, that 1. the University of Washington prepare for a future in which academic publications are increasingly available through open sources by encouraging faculty members to: assess the pricing practices and authors’ rights policies of journals with which they collaborate (as authors, reviewers, and editors) and advocate for improvements therein; and adopt and use an Addendum to Publication Agreement such as that provided by the Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition (SPARC) in order to retain their rights to use their work in the classroom and in future publications and to archive final accepted manuscripts; and publish scholarly works in moderately priced journals, in journals published by professional societies and associations, or in peer-reviewed “open access” journals; and archive their work in the UW’s ResearchWorks or other repositories supported by research institutions, professional societies, or government agencies in order to provide the widest and most affordable access to their scholarship; and 2. UW Libraries is encouraged to: provide relevant, current information regarding journal publishers, pricing, and authors’ rights to departments and individual faculty members; and maintain and further develop ResearchWorks and related services; and allocate personnel to facilitate the deposit of faculty publications in ResearchWorks, and to obtain publishers’ permission to deposit previously published works when possible; and 3. the University of Washington administration is encouraged to: provide resources to the Libraries and to academic units to foster these efforts; and work with departments and colleges to assure that the review process for promotion, tenure and merit takes into consideration these new trends and realities in academic publication.