IERS Combination WG and CPP Meeting, April 27, 2005, TU of Vienna, Austria Strategies for Weekly Routine Generation of Combined IERS Products Markus Rothacher.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dennis D. McCarthy Elements of Prediction. Why are we here? IERS Working Group on Predictions IERS Working Group on Predictions Definitive user requirements.
Advertisements

Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 19 Prof. Thomas Herring Room A;
Reference Frames for GPS Applications and Research
IAG Sub-Commission 1.3c Regional Reference Frames for North America 1 Regional Reference Frames for North America Current Status & Future Plans of Regional.
VieVS User Workshop 7 – 9 September, 2010 Vienna Vie_LSM Kamil Teke and Johannes Böhm.
On the alternative approaches to ITRF formulation. A theoretical comparison. Department of Geodesy and Surveying Aristotle University of Thessaloniki Athanasios.
2-3 November 2009NASA Sea Level Workshop1 The Terrestrial Reference Frame and its Impact on Sea Level Change Studies GPS VLBI John Ries Center for Space.
OLG LAC Reprocessing EPN 2006 G. Stangl 1, C. Aichhorn 2, S. Krauss 2 (1) Federal Office of Metrology and Surveying (BEV)‏ (2) Space Research Institute,
International Terrestrial Reference Frame - Latest Developments Horst Müller 16th International Workshop on Laser Ranging, Poznan, Poland, October
VieVS User Workshop 14 – 21 September, 2011 Vienna Reprocessing the complete history of VLBI observations with VieVS Sigrid Böhm.
ILRS Workshop, Poznan, Poland, October Status of ITRF Development and SLR Contribution Zuheir Altamimi Xavier Collilieux David Coulot IGN France.
VieVS User Workshop 7 – 9 September, 2010 Vienna High frequency EOP estimated from the CONT campaigns Tobias Nilsson.
Laser Ranging Contributions to Earth Rotation Studies Richard S. Gross Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, CA 91109–8099,
The IGS contribution to ITRF2014 Paul Rebischung, Bruno Garayt, Zuheir Altamimi, Xavier Collilieux 26th IUGG General Assembly, Prague, 28 June.
Workshop, Miami, June 2008 ITRF2005 residuals and co-location tie issues Zuheir Altamimi IGN, France Some features of ITRF2005 residuals ITRF2005 vs IGS05.
Recent IERS Site Survey of Multiple Co-located Geodetic Techniques by NGS Kendall Fancher, Dru Smith, Steve Breidenbach, Jeff Olsen, Nagendra Paudel NOAA’s.
IGS Analysis Center Workshop, Miami Beach, June 2008 Comparison of GMF/GPT with VMF1/ECMWF and Implications for Atmospheric Loading Peter Steigenberger.
GNSS Observations of Earth Orientation Jim Ray, NOAA/NGS 1. Polar motion observability using GNSS – concepts, complications, & error sources – subdaily.
1 North American Reference Frame (NAREF) Working Group Mike Craymer Geodetic Survey Division, Natural Resources Canada 2nd SNARF Workshop Montreal, May.
Linking GPS to Tide Gauges and Tide Gauge Benchmarks Tilo Schöne GeoForschungsZentrum Potsdam Understanding Sea-level Rise and Variability, WCRP Workshop,
Future IGS & inter-technique SINEX combinations: Issues and challenges D. Lavallée (aka Peter Clarke), R. Ferland, D. Thaller, T. Herring, R. Biancale.
SRI Seminar 2005 Time series of GPS stations For reference, monitoring and geophysics Günter Stangl Federal Office of Metrology and Surveying.
October 8, session 2REFAG2010 Paris1 Distributed processing systems for large geodetic solutions IAG WG “Comparison and combination of precise.
ILRS WorkshopEastbourne, UK October 3 -7, 2005 Global Geodetic Observing System (GGOS) A project of the IAG.
1/17 REFAG Symposium 6 October 2010 – Marne-la-Vallée, France Recent Results from the IGS Terrestrial Frame Combinations __________________________________________________________________________________________________.
Space Geodesy (1/3) Geodesy provides a foundation for all Earth observations Space geodesy is the use of precise measurements between space objects (e.g.,
IGS Analysis Center Workshop, 2-6 June 2008, Florida, USA GPS in the ITRF Combination D. Angermann, H. Drewes, M. Krügel, B. Meisel Deutsches Geodätisches.
Geodetic Networks: The Supporting Framework Terrestrial Reference Frame is ‘Critical Infrastructure’ for all Earth science research and applications. Global.
The IGS contribution to ITRF2013 – Preliminary results from the IGS repro2 SINEX combinations Paul Rebischung, Bruno Garayt, Xavier Collilieux, Zuheir.
Honeywell Technology Solutions Inc AWG Meeting, Washington DC, Oct 3-4, 2002 Comparison of ILRS Station Positions (“AA” & “A” Series, i.e. 1999) Van Husson.
AGU Fall meeting Quality assessment of GPS reprocessed Terrestrial Reference Frame 1 IGN/LAREG and GRGS 2 University of Luxembourg X Collilieux.
Workshops for Establishing a Stable North American Reference Frame (SNARF) to Enable Geophysical and Geodetic Studies with EarthScope: Annual Report
Assessment of Reference Frame Stability trough offset detection in GPS coordinate time series Dragan Blagojević 1), Goran Todorović 2), Violeta Vasilić.
Geocenter Variations Derived from GRACE Data Z. Kang, B. Tapley, J. Chen, J. Ries, S. Bettadpur Joint International GSTM and SPP Symposium GFZ Potsdam,
1/16 ITRF2008-P: Some evaluation elements and impact on IGS RF products Paul Rebischung, Bruno Garayt, 16 April 2010 ITRF2008-P: SOME EVALUATION ELEMENTS.
Unified Analysis Workshop, December 5-7, 2007, Beach Resort Monterey, CA GG S Proposals for Extended Parameterization in SINEX Markus Rothacher GeoForschungsZentrum.
International Workshop on Laser Ranging, October 2008, Poznań (Poland) Quality assessment of the ILRS EOP „Daily” Product G. Bianco Agenzia Spaziale.
IGS Analysis Center Workshop, Miami Beach, June 2008 Current Status of the IGS Reprocessing Peter Steigenberger Technische Universität München Gerd.
EGS Nice 2003 G17 Deficits of CEGRN Solutions and Time Series G. Stangl.
Geodetic Networks: The Supporting Framework Terrestrial Reference Frame is ‘Critical Infrastructure’ for all Earth science research and applications. Global.
Workshop, Miami, June 2008 IGS Contribution to ITRF Zuheir Altamimi & Xavier Collilieux IGN, France.
12/12/01Fall AGU Vertical Reference Frames for Sea Level Monitoring Thomas Herring Department of Earth, Atmosphere and Planetary Sciences
Armasuisse Swiss Federal Office of Topography swisstopo Determination of Tectonic Movements in the Swiss Alps using GNSS and Levelling E. Brockmann, D.
1/16 35th IGS Governing Board Meeting December 13, 2009 – San Francisco TRANSITION OF THE IGS REFERENCE FRAME COORDINATION FROM NRCAN TO IGN - STATUS AND.
NAPEOS: The ESA/ESOC Tool for Space Geodesy
Importance of SLR in the Determination of the ITRF Zuheir Altamimi IGN, France Geoscience Australia, Canberra, August 29, 2005 SLR Strength: its contribution.
Jason-1 POD reprocessing at CNES Current status and further developments L. Cerri, S. Houry, P. Perrachon, F. Mercier. J.P. Berthias with entries from.
Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue | Cambridge MA V F
IERS Combination WG and CPP Meeting, April 27, 2005, TU of Vienna, Austria Status and Future of the IERS Combination Efforts Markus Rothacher GeoForschungsZentrum.
Giovanni Sella CORS Program Manager NOAA-National Geodetic Survey CORS’s New Revised Coordinates GLRHMP – Columbus, OH 13 October, 2011.
IERS Directing Board Meeting No.39, BIPM Paris, September 23, 2004 IERS2005: Plan “Integrated Earth orientation parameters, Radio sources, and Site coordinates.
Thomas Herring, IERS ACC, MIT
Reference Frame Representations: The ITRF from the user perspective
Unified Analysis Workshop, July 2017, Paris
CMP Model Effects on ILRS Products
Space Geodesy Branch Highlights, August 2002 CONT02 VLBI Campaign
Analysis Center + Reference Frame Working Group
Reference Frame Working Group
IVS contribution to the ITRF2014
Kamil Teke and Johannes Böhm
ESOC IGS Reprocessing T. Springer, F. Dilssner, E. Schoenemann,
IDS workshop, Venice, Italy, September 2012
X SERBIAN-BULGARIAN ASTRONOMICAL CONFERENCE 30 MAY - 3 JUNE, 2016, BELGRADE, SERBIA EARTH ORIENTATION PARAMETERS AND GRAVITY VARIATIONS DETERMINED FROM.
WHY DOES THE IGS CARE ABOUT EOPs?
Stable North America Reference Frame Working Group
Agenda Background and Motivation
Suggested Guidance for OPUS Projects Processing
CNES-CLS Dynamical modelling of GPS orbits
Motivation Time Series Analysis Spectra and Results Conclusions
Combination of reprocessed orbit, clock and ERP products
Presentation transcript:

IERS Combination WG and CPP Meeting, April 27, 2005, TU of Vienna, Austria Strategies for Weekly Routine Generation of Combined IERS Products Markus Rothacher GeoForschungsZentrum Potsdam IERS Combination WG and CPP Meeting April 27, 2004 Technical University of Vienna Vienna, Austria

IERS Combination WG and CPP Meeting, April 27, 2005, TU of Vienna, Austria General Considerations Two Weekly Routine Solution Strategies UT1/LOD (Nutation) Combination Strategies Schedule Content

IERS Combination WG and CPP Meeting, April 27, 2005, TU of Vienna, Austria General Strategy Considerations The following strategies should be discussed and, to the extent possible, tested with the SINEX files of the IERS CPP and the long time series Once a year a new IERS200x is computed based on a consensus of new standards (models, parameterization, processing strategies, etc.) and based on complete reprocessed and recombined solutions of all techniques Routine weekly intra-technique combined solutions should be produced with exactly the standards used for the most recent ITRF200x (in future IERS200x) realization Latency envisaged: ca. 2-3 weeks (after the combination of the intra- technique solutions); i.e. reduction of the latency necessary Each new weekly solution has to be validated carefully concerning station problems Will several Combination Centers produce these inter-technique solutions? Will there be a combination of the combination of the combination?

IERS Combination WG and CPP Meeting, April 27, 2005, TU of Vienna, Austria Strategy 1: Complete and Rigorous (1) Every week a full “ITRF/EOP” solution is produced including the new weekly intra-technique combined SINEX files (~ cumulative solution of the IGS) Fully correct and rigorous combination using all available information Estimation of site coordinates, velocities, geocenter, annual signals, jumps, EOPs as in ITRF2004; detection and monitoring of site problems necessary. Week 3 Week 1 Week 2 Wk n-1 Week n ……………. Week 3 Week 1 Week 2 Wk n-1 Week n ……………. Week 3 Week 1 Week 2 Wk n-1 Week n ……………. Week 3 Week 1 Week 2 Wk n-1 Week n ……………. GPS VLBI SLR DORIS Week 3 Week 1 Week 2 Wk n-1 Week n ……………. Week 3 Week 1 Week 2 Wk n-1 Week n ……………. Week 3 Week 1 Week 2 Wk n-1 Week n ……………. Week 3 Week 1 Week 2 Wk n-1 Week n ……………. GPS VLBI SLR DORIS Wk n+1 Local Ties + EOPs Station Coord. Local Ties + EOPs Station Coord.

IERS Combination WG and CPP Meeting, April 27, 2005, TU of Vienna, Austria Strategy 1: Complete and Rigorous (2) Variance component estimation possible, or weights taken from ITRF2004 Local ties may be introduced with their variance-covariance information Demanding in computer resources (memory, CPU time) Can be realized with the strategy developed for ITRF2004 Weights of local ties may have to be adjusted when the number of weekly solutions increases significantly IERS product: fully updated time series of EOPs and up-to-date set of site coordinates and velocities (new sites …), etc. on a weekly basis Even if full weekly “ITRF/EOP” solutions will be produced with this strategy, official IERS200x releases should only happen about once a year.

IERS Combination WG and CPP Meeting, April 27, 2005, TU of Vienna, Austria Strategy 2: Minimal and Weekly Every week only the new weekly intra-technique combined SINEX files are processed to obtain the results for this new week All informations necessary for the combination (relative weights, local ties, datum, annual signals, …) are taken from the ITRF2004 (IERS200x) solution and are fixed (compatibility requirement) Not a fully correct combination, but fast and efficient GPS VLBI SLR DORIS Wk n+1 GPS VLBI SLR DORIS „Local Ties“ from ITRF2004 fixed + EOPs Station Coord. for Week n Week n + Weights from ITRF2004 fixed „Local Ties“ from ITRF2004 fixed + EOPs Station Coord. for Week n+1 + Weights from ITRF2004 fixed

IERS Combination WG and CPP Meeting, April 27, 2005, TU of Vienna, Austria Strategy 2: Minimal and Weekly Estimation of site velocities, annual signals not possible Coordinates of more recent sites will start to deviate after one year (quality of the velocities) Because of the fixed local ties, the reference frame might be more stable (??) Almost no computer resources required (memory, CPU time) Can be realized as soon as all the ITRF2004 products are available Combination strategy rather is simple IERS product: most recent week of EOPs and site coordinates (resulting SINEX files are not to be used for further combinations) This strategy might be the way to go for rapid daily inter-technique combinations, but is probably sub-optimal for the weekly update cycle

IERS Combination WG and CPP Meeting, April 27, 2005, TU of Vienna, Austria Intermediate Strategies Between the extremes of strategy 1 and 2 there are many intermediate possibilities: –Use only a gliding window of SINEX files as input (e.g. the last year), and take velocities and annual signals from ITRF200x –Take weights from ITRF200x or do the re-estimation each week –Take local ties from ITRF200x as fixed or re-introduce local ties with variance- covariance information –…

IERS Combination WG and CPP Meeting, April 27, 2005, TU of Vienna, Austria General remark: no principle difference between UT1/LOD and nutation offsets/rates Combination: UT1 from VLBI, LOD from satellite techniques LOD from satellite techniques shows systematic effects from orbit modeling problems Combination strategy tested with daily, highly consistent CONT’02 solutions: GPS(/SLR) from TU Munich, VLBI from DGFI Any constraints on the orbit parameters can destroy the combination of UT1 (VLBI) and LOD (GPS/SLR/DORIS) Formal Errors: –Formal errors of UT1 integrated from LOD grow rapidly with time –Formal errors of UT1 from VLBI stay almost constant Initial results: combination possible without special handling of LOD Combination UT1/LOD (and Nutation)

IERS Combination WG and CPP Meeting, April 27, 2005, TU of Vienna, Austria CONT’02: Combination of UT1/LOD

IERS Combination WG and CPP Meeting, April 27, 2005, TU of Vienna, Austria CONT’02: Nutation Combination VLBI: 1 offset and 1 drift over 14 days GPS/SLR:1 drift over 14 days

IERS Combination WG and CPP Meeting, April 27, 2005, TU of Vienna, Austria CONT’02: Formal Nutation Errors Combination is possible due to the rapidly increasing formal errors of GPS/SLR estimates

IERS Combination WG and CPP Meeting, April 27, 2005, TU of Vienna, Austria If the outlined strategy does not work for the weekly SINEX solutions, more difficult procedures have to be considered and tested First, the question of possible constraints should then be clarified Systematic effects in LOD too large: –LOD biases resulting from orbit modeling deficiencies would have to be determined for each individual AC –This could not be done on the level of intra-technique combined solutions –VLBI is a crucial element in the combination: satellite techniques alone will not be sufficient  Task of the technique centers doing the intra-technique combination ?  But support from VLBI and IERS needed ? Combination UT1/LOD (and Nutation)

IERS Combination WG and CPP Meeting, April 27, 2005, TU of Vienna, Austria Validation of the Weekly Routine Solutions Validation procedures have o be developed for the weekly routine generation of IERS products Quality checks: each combination center should have its checks for the quality of the weekly solutions: –Comparison with previous solutions –Detection of station/antenna etc. problems –Monitoring of transformation parameters –… Validation tools: –Repeatability of site coordinates over longer time spans –Stability of the reference frame (datum) over longer time spans –Validation of EOPs with geophysical fluid information –Comparison of troposphere zenith delays from co-located sites

IERS Combination WG and CPP Meeting, April 27, 2005, TU of Vienna, Austria IERS CPP: Schedule April 27, 2005:IERS CPP Meeting at the EGU Meeting in Vienna; Discussion of the next steps (inter-technique combination and validation) May-July 2005:Test of strategies for weekly routine generation of products and for their validation August 2005: Results to be presented at the IAG Scientific Assembly (Cairns, Australia) August-October 2005:Set up routine generation of products and their routine validation October 2005:IERS Workshop 2005: Evaluation of the CPP and discussions concerning the transitions to new IERS products