City of Portland Bureau of Development Services Staff Presentation to the Portland Design Commission Design Review Hearing LU 12-186554 DZM AD – Grant.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
12/16/2010 LINC KENTWOOD 52 nd STREET PLANNING 52 nd Street and Kalamazoo Concept #1 Two plazas at intersection of 52 nd and Kalamazoo fronted with curved.
Advertisements

The Liberty District Workshop Sacred Cowshands off! Significant historic structures Mildred Terry Library The Liberty Theater Places of Worship Ma Rainey.
Planning & Community Development Department East Green Street Predevelopment Plan Review City Council Meeting November 4, 2013.
The Rivage Site corner of Ridge, Kelly and Calumet at the Falls Bridge.
Vineland Commercial Site Address: 7626 N. Vineland Ave. (A.P.N ) 7634 N. Vineland Ave. (A.P.N ) 7630 N. Vineland Ave. (A.P.N )
CATEGORIES OF COMMENTS REGARDING THE DOWNTOWN MOTOR APARTMENTS From October 28 th meeting.
Planning & Community Development Department 245 South Los Robles Avenue Predevelopment Plan Review City Council December 8, 2014.
Planning & Community Development Department Villa Esperanza Services Master Plan September 29, 2014 City Council.
PALM COAST COMMERCIAL & INDUSTRIAL CENTER – PHASE Application No. SP-MAJ
MISSOULA DESIGN REVIEW BOARD La Quinta Inn 5059 N. Reserve Street Case Planner: Ana Aronofsky Public Hearing Date: April 8, 2009 Applicant: Jeff Anderson.
City Council 2642 Second Street Appeal of Landmarks Commission Approval of Certificate of Appropriateness 07CA-009 February 12, 2008.
Draft Zoning Code Residential Focus Neighborhood Meeting May 8, 2007.
City of New Brighton Planning Commission Meeting October 18, 2005 Agenda Item: 6A (Public Hearing) Special Use Permit for Detached Garage Exceeding 624.
Planning & Community Development Department Hillsides Residential Care and Educational Center Master Plan City Council July 20, 2015.
Planning & Community Development Department 277 North El Molino Avenue Predevelopment Plan Review City Council Meeting May 5, 2014.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING Lake Avalon Rural Settlement Commercial Design Overlay District March 10, 2009 Board of County Commissioners.
ZOM Newberry/122 nd St. PD. Applicant Request Applicant is requesting a rezoning from RE-1 (single-family residential) to PD (non-residential planned.
Preliminary Development Plan – Continuation of August 28, 2012 BoCC Hearing Board of County Commissioners September 18, 2012.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING Village Planned Development Code (Horizon West) April 28, 2009 Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING.
Subcommittee on Heights, Massing, and Alternate Standards    Third Report – January 20, 2009 Planning & Zoning Commission.
Planning & Community Development Department 1336 and 1347 East Colorado Blvd. Pre Development Plan Review City Council Meeting January 28, 2013.
New Brighton Planning Commission Meeting March 21, 2006 Public Hearing: Special Use Permit (06-004) for a porch addition at th Avenue NW.
Northwest Quadrant Draft Zoning Ordinance NWQ Draft Zoning Ordinance Planning Commission Review February 21, 2006 Phil Carlson, AICP DSU Planning Consultant.
Board of County Commissioners Lake Avalon Rural Settlement Commercial Design Overlay District February 24, 2009 Board of County Commissioners Lake Avalon.
Planning Commission Public Hearing: SUB Proposed 6-lot Subdivision at Bland Circle December 2, 2015.
Design Standards in Saint Paul Proposed Design Standards Zoning Amendments December 16, 2009 Department of Safety & Inspections / Department of Planning.
Design Standards in Saint Paul Proposed Design Standards Zoning Amendments October 16, 2009 Department of Safety & Inspections / Department of Planning.
The Three Levels of Development Planning 1 Small Area Plan Zone / CDD DSP / DSUP.
SITE. ZOM CPA ZOM R-1B R-1A PD A A.
CITY OF TEHACHAPI DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN IMPLEMENTATION October 2, 2008.
1 City of Portland Bureau of Development Services Staff Presentation to the Design Commission Design Advice Request #2 – 2/27/14 EA DAR Goat.
1 City of Portland Bureau of Development Services Staff Presentation to the Design Commission EA DA Front 17.
1 City of Portland Bureau of Development Services Staff Presentation to the Historic Landmarks Commission Type II Appeal of Approval LU HDZ –
Planning and Zoning Division Jefferson County Green Gables Official Development Plan Case RZ Presenter: Alan Tiefenbach.
City of Portland Bureau of Development Services Staff Presentation to the Portland Design Commission LU DZ Glisan Commons May 17, 2012.
Planning & Community Development Department Olivewood Village Project (530, 535 E. Union St., 95, 99, 119 N. Madison Ave. and 585 E. Colorado Blvd.) Predevelopment.
1 City of Portland City Council Public Hearing on an Appeal of the Land Use Hearings Officer’s Decision Presentation by BDS Staff: Mark Walhood, City Planner.
City of Portland Bureau of Development Services Staff Presentation to the Portland Design Commission Design Recommendation LU MS Conway’s NW.
Block 37 Zoning & Design Guideline Evaluation May 15, 2014.
1 Gables Gateway. 2 1.Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment 2.Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment 3.Zoning Code Text Amendment 4.Change in Zoning 5.MXD3 Mixed.
City of Portland Bureau of Development Services Staff Presentation to the Portland Design Commission LU DZM The Parker Apartments July 12, 2012.
City of Portland Bureau of Development Services Staff Presentation to the Portland Design Commission EA DA New NE MLK & Multnomah.
Staff Presentation to the Portland Design Commission June 2, 2016 DAR #1: April 14, 2016 CITY OF PORTLAND, OREGON Design Review Hearing EA DAR.
Staff Presentation to the Portland Design Commission June 2, 2016 CITY OF PORTLAND, OREGON 1st Design Review Hearing DZM Block 20 Residential.
Community Input Meeting #4 July 8 & 9, Agenda City Staff & Project Team Why we are here Project overview Summary of previous community meetings.
Planning & Community Development Department 180 South Euclid Avenue Demolition of Existing Structure Consolidated Design Review (Appeal) City Council June.
206 THIRD STREET DR/TRP Appeal of. Planning Commission Hearing March 12, 2014, P/C approved a Design Review Permit: - Demolition of the existing.
City of Portland Bureau of Development Services Staff Presentation to the Portland Design Commission Type III Design Review LU DZ SW Yamhill,
CISD Elementary School No. 5 Elevations Discuss the site plan elevation changes to the new CISD Elementary School located at 2520 and 2530 N. White Chapel.
1 City of Portland Bureau of Development Services Staff Presentation to the Design Commission Land Use Review LU DZ Arthouse.
South Waterfront Greenway Design Guidelines Portland Design Commission Briefing April 3, 2008.
Planning & Community Development Interim Development Process to Implement the General Plan Land Use Element City Council July 11, 2016.
TLZM Crescent Parke December 3, 2015 Planning Commission Work Session.
PUD Mike Awe for Sanctuary Mission. SUBJECT PROPERTY S S S S S S S M M M M C C C C C C C.
1 Villa Laguna MXD3 Site Plan Review. 2 Request: The applicant is requesting site plan review of a proposed mixed-use project pursuant to the recently.
253 South Los Robles Avenue Predevelopment Plan Review
CFT Gateway Center ( E. Foothill Blvd
Residential Building Height Standards
Jefferson County Planning Commission Hearing April 10, 2013
City Council September 18, 2017
Washoe County Board of Adjustment
Washoe County Board of Adjustment February 2, 2017
83 North Lake Avenue Predevelopment Plan Review
Please fill out the index card and we will answer questions at the end!
City Council Meeting February 26, 2018
995 South Fair Oaks Avenue Predevelopment Plan Review
254 East Union Street Pre Development Plan Review
Article XIII – Form Districts Community Meeting
Article XIII – Form Districts Community Meeting
115-Unit Mixed-Use Project (711 E
Presentation transcript:

City of Portland Bureau of Development Services Staff Presentation to the Portland Design Commission Design Review Hearing LU DZM AD – Grant Park Village DAR’s 7/12/12 & 8/16/12 December 6, 2012

Zoning CSd: Commercial Storefront with Design Overlay –3:1 FAR –45’ height limit RXd: Central Residential with Design Overlay –4:1 FAR –100’ height limit Existing Condition of zone change limits total site to 319 dwelling units.

Vicinity I-84 Banfield

Proposal Summary 4-6 Story Mixed-Use Development 211 dwelling units 5 structures built on top of one parking podium 261 parking spaces Mix of retail and residential uses Central green space with future trail connection Rebuilt streets and drives around and through site Landscaped roof decks and street level entries between buildings Adjustments requested include Density – reduce the number of dwelling units on the three RXd-zoned parcels from 129 required units to 105 units. The remaining 106 of the total 211 proposed units are in the CS zoned project area.

Proposal Summary Modifications requested include C.2, Table Building Height – To increase portions of the building’s height in the CS zone from 45 feet to as tall as 49’-2” above grade along NE Broadway and to allow the stair tower between Buildings 1 & 2 and on Building 4 to be within 15 feet of the street-facing parapets in the RX zone. Building 3 will be 46’-2” tall along NE Broadway and Building 5 will be 49’-2” tall at its highest point F Loading – To allow trucks to enter the loading area off of NE Weidler with rearward rather than forward motion B.2 & B.2 Ground Floor Windows – To reduce the amount of ground floor windows to below the required standards for non-residential development walls in the RX zone that face NE Weidler, Arntson Yard, I-84, and NE 33 rd Avenue. 4.Title 32 Projecting Sign Size – To allow signs projecting into the right- of-way to be larger than 30 SF each. Two projecting signs at SF each are proposed. Also, to allow one internally illuminated parapet sign in the RX zone to be greater than 50 SF at SF.

Existing Conditions Looking SW toward I-84 Looking south down NE 33rd Looking NW across I-84 Businesses across Broadway

Site Plan Retail spaces Central parking Arntson Yard Stormwater facilties Retail loading Townhouses Central Greenspace NE Broadway NE 33 rd Ave NE Halsey I-84 NE Weidler NE 32 nd Ave driveway CSd zone RXd zone

Ground Floor Plans Modification #2 – Loading movement NE Weidler drive aisle

Upper Floors & Roof Plan Residential Floor Plans Roof Plan Modification #1 – Stair Towers closer than 15 feet from roof edge Adjustment – Minimum RX density of 105 units reduced from 129 required; remaining 106 in the CS zone CSd zone RXd zone

Landscape Plans East Deck West Deck

Elevations Broadway (North) Elevation Modification #1 – Height & Stair Towers. Increase 45’ CS zone height up to 49’-2” and allow two stair towers at RX zone roof edges Weidler/Freeway (South) Elevation 49’-2” 46’-2” 42’ NE 32 nd (West) Elevation

Elevations Modification #3 – Ground Floor Windows reductions on 3 facades Weidler/Freeway (South) Elevation NE 33 rd (East) Elevation

Materials

Renderings Distinctive corner with accent lighting at NE 33 rd. Display cases and glazing at Weidler (Modification #3) Central entry off of Broadway Façade along I-84 and Sullivan’s Gulch Trail with frames and windows (Modification #3)

July 2012 DAR Images

Signs Modification #4 – Two 98.78sf signs (larger than 30sf) over sidewalks. Corner “Grant Park Village” is not considered a sign as it is carved into the façade.

Area of Concern #1 Signs – SF Central City Fundamental Design Guidelines Not Met by the Proposal P1. Plan Area Character. P3. Gateways. D7. Blending into the Neighborhood. D8. Interest, Quality, and Composition. Title 32 Sign Area. Could be better met: 1. Reducing to 32 SF and exempting it from DZ; and 3.No internal illumination to not adversely effect residences on NE Weidler.

Area of Concern #1 Signs – SF (RX allows 50 SF) Central City Fundamental Design Guidelines Not Met by the Proposal P1. Plan Area Character. P3. Gateways. D7. Blending into the Neighborhood. D8. Interest, Quality, and Composition. Title 32 Sign Area. Could be better met: 1. Reducing to 50 SF and redesigning it to integrate with building; 2. Reduce to 32 SF and exempting it from DZ Illuminated “Grant Park Village” identity sign at SF facing the freeway (up to 200 SF allowed)

Area of Concern #2 Vinyl Chain Link Fence Central City Fundamental Design Guidelines Not Met by the Proposal D7 Blending into the Neighborhood D8 Interest, Quality, and Composition Could be better met by: 1. Changing to a designed fence that works with other metal site elements; or 2. Removing the fence from the proposal. Fencing

Summary Staff Recommendation: Partial approval/partial denial as outlined in the Staff Report. Commission input requested for: Areas of Concern – two signs and chain link fence.

end of staff presentation