Annual Air Monitoring Data Certification and Concurrence Process 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THE IMPACT OF THE NEW AIR MONITORING REGULATIONS ON TRIBAL AIR MONITORING A First Look.
Advertisements

Welcome to the AQS Monitor Metadata Webinar Dec. 13, 2013 You are connected to the on-line portion of the webinar. The audio is being hosted via a phone.
1 Proposed Rule: Amendments to the Protocol Gas Verification Program and Minimum Competency Requirements for Air Emission Testing Presented at May 12,
Exceptional Events Elements of an Effective Demonstration Darren Palmer US EPA Region 4.
AQS Data Handling (Under the Hood) AQS Conference August 23, 2012 Robert Coats.
AQS & Monitoring. In This Section We Will Talk About Monitoring & AQS 2 In the field Before Monitoring QAPP – quality assurance project plan Annual monitoring.
Lewis Weinstock Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Ambient Monitoring Update 1.
PM-2.5 FEM Requirements for Met One BAM Glenn Gehring, Technology Specialist Tribal Air Monitoring Support (TAMS) Center
Why do we lose analyzer data? Monitor malfunction DAS malfunction Power outages Environmental problems Wildlife damage Vandalism Operator error.
Louisiana Department of EnvironmentalQuality LDEQ CAM Plan Overview LDEQ’s 27 th Annual Conference on the Environment Cajundome Convention Center Lafayette,
Maricopa County Air Quality Department 1001 North Central Ave. Phoenix, Arizona Maricopa County Air Quality Department Protecting and improving our.
AMTAC April 12 th, 2011 Meredith Kurpius EPA R9 1.
Working together for clean air Approved Regional Method (ARM) Demonstration Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Mike Gilroy, Erik Saganic Puget Sound Clean Air.
Title V Site Operating Permits (SOPs)
AQS Concepts. In This Section We Will Talk About AQS Concepts 2 AQS Background History AQS as part of a monitoring program Types of Information in AQS.
1 AQS Ambient Monitoring Topics AQS Conference August 20, 2008 David Lutz.
1 Guest Speaker: Bill Frietsche US EPA.  April 7: QA Systems, EPA definitions, PQAOs and common sense – Mike Papp  April 14: Routine Quality Control.
Guest Speaker: Jeremy Howe Little River Band Of Ottawa Indians The Measuring Sticks of Air Monitoring.
What to compare against the validation templates (see templates in course webpage: Resources/Validation%20Templates%20from%20Red.
Determination of System Equivalency – Starting note for WLTP IWG Meeting #8 in Pune, India Audi, EA-52, V2.0 WLTP-08-09e.
EPA Update- Bob Judge Maine Air Quality Monitoring Committee April 18, ) NAAQS schedule 2) Budget 3) Technical Systems Audit.
EPA Precursor Gas Training Workshop Precursor Gas Quality Assurance Implementation Dennis K. Mikel EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
Quality Assurance/ Quality Control
AMP255 – Precision and Bias Data Report 2008 AQS Conference The AMP255 Precision and Bias Data Report August 22, 2008 Presented by Jonathan Miller EPA.
AQS Development and Enhancement Plans AQS Development and Enhancement Plans AQS CONFERENCE Jake Summers June 9, 2010.
Introduction to Standard Reports. Standard Reports 2 How to get information out of AQS Standard Reports Site / Monitor Metadata Detail Data Reports “
Melinda Ronca-Battista, ITEP, TAMS Center Tribal Air Monitoring and QA Requirements for NAAQS- Comparable Data.
1 Guest Speaker: Brandy Toft Leech Lake Ojibwe.  Overview of FRM/FEM/ARM status, requirements, and reporting  QC (routine checks, audits, and method-
Timely Policy-Related Monitoring Issues 2013 NACAA Spring Meeting May 6-8, 2013 Richard A. “Chet” Wayland Air Quality Assessment Division U.S. EPA OAQPS.
 April 7: QA Systems, EPA definitions, PQAOs and common sense – Mike Papp  April 14: Routine Quality Control and Data Management (1-pt QC, flow rate,
Proposed Revisions to Ambient Air Monitoring Regulations, and Proposed FY2007 Air Monitoring Guidance WESTAR Spring Business Meeting March 28, 2006.
EPA Region 9 Meredith Kurpius August 19, Status of Tribal Air Monitoring Value of tribal monitoring Used to protect public health on tribal land.
Appendix A: Calculations for Data Quality Assessment QC check statistics Precision calcs Bias calcs PM stats Reporting: quarterly and annual.
NAAQS Altitude Effects Ozone Transport Commission Annual Meeting June 11, 2014 Baltimore, MD Will Ollison 1220 L Street, NW Washington, DC
CDM Project Cycle & Project Design Document Project Design Document First Extended & Regional Workshops CD4CDM Project Siem Reap, Cambodia March.
PM 2.5 Continuous FEMs; Update and Assessments For AMTAC April 12, 2011 Kate Hoag – US EPA, Region 9.
An Overview of EPA’s Quality Assurance Guidance for Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Data Data Analysis and Interpretation February 12 – 14, 2008, Tempe,
Dirk Felton RTP, NC February 12-13, 2008 Air Quality Data Summit: Session: Inventory of Data Systems Data provider perspectives.
Update on Methane Regulations Affecting Landfills Pat Sullivan Senior Vice President SCS Engineers Nov. 10, 2015.
LEADS/EMS DATA VALIDATION IPS MeteoStar December 11, 2006 WHAT IS VALIDATION? From The Dictionary: 1a. To Make Legally Valid 1b. To Grant Official.
Measurement Quality Objectives = Data Validation Requirements Excerpted from EPA QA Handbook Volume II (aka “Redbook”)
PM 2.5 Continuous FEMs; Update and Assessments For NESCAUM Monitoring Meeting April 29, 2011 Tim Hanley – US EPA, OAQPS 1.
WHAT IS THE CHEROKEE NATION? Cherokee Nation Air Quality Data Management Concepts for Quality Data Collection Ryan Callison.
1 Ambient Monitoring Program PM 2.5 Data Lean 6 Sigma Air Director’s Meeting May 2015.
1 National Monitoring Committee Report Bruce Louks WESTAR Fall Meeting Portland, OR September 28, 2010.
Ozone and Lead Monitoring Issues Under Revised NAAQS Monitoring Steering Committee June 21-22, 2007 Washington, DC Phil Lorang, OAQPS.
QUALITY ASSURANCE MODULE 3. Definitions Quality Assurance - A process/effort that ensures that processes are followed, that the processes of doing right.
Credentialing Requirements
Inspector's Role and Responsibilities
CHANGE CONTROL.
Structural Funds Financial Management and Control, Romania
Control Chart Methodology for Evaluating CEMS Data
INSPECTION POLICIES AND, PROCEDURES CLASS A CERTIFICATION REQUIREMNTS
Inspector's Role and Responsibilities
Flooding Walkdown Guidance
Inspector's Role and Responsibilities
Region 4 Air Sensor Projects
ISO 9001:2015 Auditor / Registration Decision Lessons Learned
Preparing A Useful 5-Year Network Assessment
WAQS Monitoring Network Assessment
Entering Data into AQS:
Proposed Ozone Monitoring Revisions Ozone Season and Methods
Department of Environmental Quality
PMcoarse , Monitoring Budgets, and AQI
Enforcing the NAAQS Case Study Sean Taylor
A New Tool for Evaluating Candidate PM FEM and PM2.5 ARM Monitors
Sulfur Dioxide 1-Hour NAAQS Implementation
Precision, Bias, and Total Error (Accuracy)
Approving Time in Kronos Manager/Supervisor Reference Guide
Presentation transcript:

Annual Air Monitoring Data Certification and Concurrence Process 1

The Actual Requirement in CFR Language § Annual air monitoring data certification. (a) The State, or where appropriate local, agency shall submit to the EPA Regional Administrator an annual air monitoring data certification letter to certify data collected by FRM, FEM, and ARM monitors at SLAMS and SPM sites that meet criteria in appendix A to this part from January 1 to December 31 of the previous year.... The annual data certification letter is due by May 1 of each year.“ (b) Along with each certification letter, the state shall submit to the Regional Administrator an annual summary report of all the ambient air quality data collected by FRM, FEM, and ARM monitors at SLAMS and SPM sites. …” (c) Along with each certification letter, the State shall submit to the Regional Administrator a summary of the precision and accuracy data for all ambient air quality data collected by FRM, FEM, and ARM monitors at SLAMS and SPM sites. …” URL for AMTIC Cert & Validation: 2

3 Data Certification Information On AMTIC

4 Data Certification Qualifier Values

5 Criteria that Generate Green (Acceptable) Warning (Yellow) and “N” Qualifiers (Red)

1.Blue shaded rows are evaluations that will be reported (when data is available) but not used in certification flag settings 2.One Red for any monitor will elicit an AQS recommended “N” flag 3.Three warnings for any monitor will elicit an AQS recommended “N” flag 6 Criteria that Generate Green (Acceptable) Warning (Yellow) and “N” Qualifiers (Red)

Preliminaries: What should a certifying agency do? 1.Review the Certifying Agency role assignments: a)Run the AQS Monitor Description Report – Will show all Agency Roles for each monitor. b)Compare against Monitoring Network Plan 2.Use AQS (Batch MD transaction or Maintain Monitor) to correct any discrepancies. a)Assumption: The monitor belongs to the certifying agency or an agency that is subordinate to them. 7

The Procedure: What does an agency do? 8 1.Conduct and complete ambient air quality monitoring and QA as per 40 CFR Part 58 and submit all relevant data to AQS. 2.Run the Data Certification Report (AMP600) for your Certifying Agency. a)This will calculate a recommended certification flag for each monitor-year based on Part 58 criteria and display the results for all monitors and PQAOs associated with the Certifying Agency.

Requesting a Data Certification Report 9

Request Criteria 10

11 Before Certifying Agency Certification AMP600 Summary Report

12 AMP600- Ozone Before Certification No valuesNo values

The Procedure – Part 2: Data Review 3.Review the certification report. For ‘N’ recommendations: a)Has any ambient monitoring data not yet been submitted? b)Has any QA/QC data (e.g. Precision and Accuracy transactions) not been submitted? c)Should any ambient monitoring data be invalidated and removed from AQS based on QA/QC results? 4.Make corrections to AQS data as needed. 5.Rerun certification report and verify results are final. 13

14 Certification Form for Certifying Agency If certifying this data, we’d really like a Certifying Agency qualifier

15 AMP600 After Certifying Agency Certification

16 After Certifying Agency Certification AMP600 Summary

17 AMP600 After EPA Regional Concurrence

18 Comment required if Cert Agency changes AQS Recommended Flag AMP600 After EPA Regional Concurrence Data changed after certification

19 Certification Form Since the only qualifier that shows up in AQS is the EPA concurrence qualifier, any change in data by the Monitoring Organization will show up as “M” for modified

20 AMP 450 Report

How the AMP600 Works Found On AMTIC PQAO Level Flags For Collocation and PEP, AQS Recommended flags are generated at the PQAO level and then “transfered” back to each site See “additional Information Related to AMP600 Certification Process” at PEP PQAO Critera based on Bias estimate, not completeness PQAO Criteria Met for Collocation based on CV not completeness

What Monitoring Data must Monitoring Agencies Certify by May 1, 2016? Only data collected by FRM, FEM, and ARM monitors at SLAMS and SPM monitoring stations that meet Appendix A must be certified 1. In practice this refers to monitoring data for CO, NO 2, SO 2 (hourly and 5-minute average data), Ozone, Lead, PM 10, PM , and PM Data certification requirements may also be included in auxiliary agreements such as MOA’s between states and operators of industrial networks, for example, SO 2 monitors being installed to comply with the Data Requirements Rule.

Certification Process: Thoughts and Steps Forward Use it often –Don’t wait till May to run the report –It can run on a partial year based on the date the report is run. This may not be perfect but can help. By the time data is in AQS it may be to late –Internal QC is critical Will eventually add outlier statistics. 23