CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Compliance Monitoring, Interventions, and Sanctions (CMIS)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Title One Parent Involvement
Advertisements

Title II, Part A Allowable Expenses Middle Tennessee Federal Directors Conference September 24, 2009.
Title I Annual Parent Meeting
Newport News Public Schools Information on Title I Funding
No Child Left Behind Highly Qualified Teacher Update
JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction California Department of Education Jack O’Connell State Superintendent No Child Left Behind Act.
System Safeguards and Campus Improvement
Preparing Program Completers for Meeting NCLB (HiQ) Requirements No Child Left Behind December 2, 2009.
The Highly Qualified Teacher Provisions of the No Child Left Behind law (NCLB) “What Every Manager Needs to Know." By: Tracy Alberry, Jennifer Blum, John.
Coal City Unit District #1 Title I Parent Meeting.
JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 High Quality Teacher Requirements Equitable Distribution of.
1 Program Improvement Update Foundations for writing the LEA Addendum.
Updated Principal Training October 15, 2014 Part 3 Attestations – Section 1119 Hiring requirements & Use of Funds Part 2 GA PSC CAPS Tool Part 1 HiQ Overview.
The Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning The Status of the Teaching Profession 2005 California State University, Office of the Chancellor Policy.
WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT TITLE I PARENT MEETING PRESENTATION.
Improving Teacher Quality Title II, Part A Application Updates.
Certification and HQT Christina Linder, Director Certification and Professional Standards Teacher Quality
BO MERRITT DIRECTOR OFFICE OF FEDERAL PROGRAMS Federal Grants Planning Titles I, II, & III.
Our Children Are Our Future: No Child Left Behind No Child Left Behind Accountability and AYP A Archived Information.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Bilingual Coordinators Network November 20-21, 2008 Sacramento,
HQT TRENDS AND DEVELOPMENTS OSPA Spring Conference Newport, Oregon May 8, 2007 Pat Burk, Oregon Department of Education.
Provided by Education Service Center Region XI 1 Title I, Part A Overview Provided by Education Service Center Region XI
A Parent’s Guide to Understanding the State Accountability Workbook.
STATE CONSORTIUM ON EDUCATOR EFFECTIVENESS September 10, 2013.
TITLE II, Part A, Improving Teacher Quality PAFPC Conference April 6, 2011 Don McCrone Program Manager.
The Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning California’s Teaching Force 2004 Key Issues and Trends Research conducted by SRI International California.
KENTUCKY BOARD OF EDUCATION APRIL 1, 2015 Equitable Access To Effective Educators.
Title II Part A of NCLB IMPROVING TEACHER QUALITY GRANT PROGRAM.
Title I Schoolwide Ray Draghi and Rasha Hetata October 2014.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Special Education Advisory Committee Virginia Department of Education.
1 August 22, 2008 Jay Doolan, Ed.D, Assistant Commissioner Division of Educational Standards and Programs SURVEY RESULTS OF THE HIGHLY QUALIFIED.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE INDEX (API) ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (AYP) PROGRAM IMPROVEMENT (PI) SEPTEMBER 18, 2014 Accountability Progress Reporting Update.
No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act, Title 1 Part A and the Oakland Unified School District Presented By Wilhelmena Sims, Director Department of State and.
1 Willa Spicer, Deputy Commissioner Cathy Pine, Director Carol Albritton, Teacher Quality Coordinator Office of Professional Standards, Licensing and Higher.
Title II, Part A, Division Improvement Procedures for Compliance with Section 2141 of Title II, Part A Virginia Department of Education.
New Title I Designee Training September 17,
PAFPC CONFERENCE MAY 4, 2015 DON MCCRONE PROGRAM MANAGER TITLE II, Part A, Improving Teacher Quality 1.
Why are we here? All Title I schools are required to hold an annual meeting for Title I parents* for the purpose of informing you of: our school’s participation.
ESEA FOR LEAs Cycle 6 Monitoring Arizona Department of Education Revised October 2015.
Rowland Unified School District District Local Education Agency (LEA)Plan Update Principals Meeting November 16, 2015.
The Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning The Status of the Teaching Profession 2005 California State University, Office of the Chancellor Policy.
Federal Programs and the ESEA Flexibility Waiver Titles I, II, VI and X.
No Child Left Behind Application 1 Title I, Part A Part 1.
WE ARE Gaston County Schools Title I Annual Parent Meeting Bessemer City Primary 9/16/13 1:00 & 5:45.
The Importance of Equitable Access to Effective Educators.
1 NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND The reauthorized elementary and secondary education act.
1 Willa Spicer, Assistant Commissioner Cathy Pine, Director Carol Albritton, Teacher Quality Coordinator Office of Professional Standards, Licensing and.
Larry Fazzari Program Supervisor k12.wa.us 1 TITLE I, PART A PROGRAMS SCHOOLWIDE VS. TARGETED
Program Information for Applicants School Leadership Program U.S. Department of Education 2005.
Office of School Turnaround Center for Accountability and Improvement, Ohio Department of Education 25 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction California Mathematics and Science Partnership (CaMSP) Grant.
Cora Howe Annual Title I Meeting and Open House Understanding Title 1 Support for Schools September 12, 2013.
Community Liaison Training NCLB Parental Involvement Requirements “Creating an Audit Trail” October 19, 2007 Eduardo Elizondo, Director Federal Programs.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA 2004 Highly Qualified Teachers (HQT)
Partnering with Parents in using Federal Programs for Quality Education for all Students Federal Programs Department Parent Summit March 10, 2016.
Title I Annual Meeting Title I Program Overview for Schoolwide Program (SWP) Schools Federal and State Education Programs Branch.
Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015: Highlights and
ESEA Flexibility: An overview
Effective Educators Title II, Part A
Equitable Access to Excellent Educators
What you need to know About Title I
Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act
Excellent Educators for All Initiative
Title I Parent/Family Meeting
Overview: Every Student Succeeds Act and the Tile I, Part A Program
WELCOME TO THE TITLE I ANNUAL MEETING FOR PARENTS
The Role a Charter School Plays in its Charter Authorizer’s Submission of the Consolidated Federal Programs Application Joey Willett, Unit of Federal Programs.
Title I Annual Meeting Title I Program Overview for Schoolwide Program (SWP) Schools Federal and State Education Programs Branch.
BCCHS Annual Title I Meeting A Single-School District LEA September 10, 2015 December 3, 2015.
Title I Program Overview for SWP
Presentation transcript:

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Compliance Monitoring, Interventions, and Sanctions (CMIS) Ron Taylor, Administrator, Title II Leadership Office

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction Equity One of the fundamental principles of NCLB is that teacher quality is the single most important school-related factor in student success. Therefore, a crucial step in closing the achievement gap for all students is to ensure access to fully credentialed teachers. In order to truly meet the needs of all students, we must take the additional step of guaranteeing that every child has the same opportunity to be taught by fully credentialed, highly qualified, and experienced teachers regardless of which school in a district a child attends.

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction Equity As required by the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001 (Title I, Part A, Subpart 1, Section 1111[b][8][C]), the Local Educational Agency must ensure that poor and minority children are not taught at higher rates than other children by inexperienced, under-qualified, or out-of-field teachers. Inexperienced = less than 5 years teaching experience Under-qualified = someone teaching on a STSP, PIP, waiver, or intern credential Out-of-field = someone teaching on a supplemental authorization, local board option, or possibly someone with a multiple subject credential teaching secondary classes

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction The Quality of the Teacher Matters… An important first step in closing the achievement gap for all children is determining teacher quality on the basis of effectiveness in the classroom rather than simply on the basis of qualifications for entry into the teaching profession.

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction The Quality of the Teacher Matters… An effective teacher is an individual who both knows their subject matter and has the instructional skills to deliver that content powerfully and well. Research, as well as common sense, suggests that an effective teacher is critical in the academic develop of students.

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction 2 nd decile 3 rd decile 4 th decile lowest th decile 6 th decile 7 th decile 8 th decile Highest decile Distribution of Interns by Poverty decile Percent of interns in the state

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction Distribution of Interns by School-level API Deciles 2 nd decile3 rd decile4 th decile Lowest decile th decile6 th decile 7 th decile 8 th decile Highest decile Percent of interns in the state

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction The Quality of the District Matters… The goal, then, must be to improve so-called “hard-to- staff schools” by making all schools, including high- poverty, low-performing schools, the kinds of places where our most effective teachers and administrators will want to work. Additionally districts must develop policies, practices and procedures to ensure under-qualified, inexperienced and out-of-field teachers are not assigned to teach at high- poverty, low-performing schools.

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction Nowhere is retention more important than in the school system. For example, a school system with roughly 10,000 teachers and an estimated turnover rate of 20% would stand to save approximately $500,000.00/year by reducing turnover by just 1 percentage point. Not only would reduced turnover provide monetary savings, more importantly, it would provide savings in our children's educational future. A motivated and experienced team of teaching professionals directly correlates with an improved educational system. The Quality of the District Matters…

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction Closing the Achievement Gap Using Equity LEAs must identify the underlining reasons that poor and minority children are being taught at higher rates than other children by inexperienced, under-qualified, and out- of-field teachers; and develop practices, polices and procedures to ensure that low-performing schools serving a disproportionate number of poor and minority students are recruiting, developing, and retaining highly qualified teachers and principals.

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction The primary component of the Compliance Monitoring, Interventions, and Sanctions (CMIS) program is the development of an Equitable Distribution Plan (EDP). The focus of the EDP is the review, development, and implementation of strategies to improve recruiting, retaining, and improving the effectiveness of highly qualified teachers and administrators. Closing the Achievement Gap Using Equity

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction Level A –Failed HQT but met Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) HQT: based on October CBEDS –Submit Table A.1 Include any school site that is currently less than 100 percent compliant and include all NCLB core academic teachers at the site –Due March 9, 2009 Closing the Achievement Gap Using Equity

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction Level B –Failed Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and HQT for two consecutive years HQT: 2007/08 CBEDS-PAIF and AYP: Academic Accountability Team Development of an EDP –Collect data as required –Development of an improvement plan Due June 15, 2009 Closing the Achievement Gap Using Equity

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction Level C –Failed AYP and HQT for three consecutive years Section 2141 (c) State educational agency shall enter into an agreement with such local educational agency on the use of that agency's funds under this part –Full implementation of approved EDP plan, and –Development of Title II, Part A expenditure budget Budget must be developed in an agreement with the CDE Closing the Achievement Gap Using Equity

Equitable Distribution - Overview EDP Requirements and Benchmarks Goal: 100% highly-qualified teachers Goal: No under-qualified (less than fully-credentialed) teachers at high-poverty or low-performing schools Requirement 1 Benchmark: Action plan for all non-compliant teachers Requirement 2 Benchmark: Board policy Goal: Interns must be equitably distributed among all sites Benchmark: Board policy Requirement 3 Goal: Equitable distribution of experienced and effective teachers Benchmark: Teacher retention data, analysis, and improvement plan Requirement 4 Goal: Equitable distribution of experienced and effective administrators Benchmark: Criteria and plan for determining and developing effective site administrators

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction Requirement 2: To ensure poor underperforming students have access to experienced effective teachers, LEAs may not assign Provisional Intern Permits (PIP) or Short Term Staff Permit (STSP) to schools with 40 percent or higher poverty or have a statewide decile rank of one to three. Closing the Achievement Gap Using Equity

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction Requirement 2 continued: Additionally, LEAs must ensure that interns are not placed in high poverty, low performing schools in greater numbers than in schools with low poverty or higher academic achievement. Closing the Achievement Gap Using Equity

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction Level B EDP Plans –Due June 15, 2009 Send To: California Department of Education Attention Kelly Heffington 1430 N Street, Suite 4309 Sacramento, CA Level C Budget –Due June 15, 2009 (ConApp is Due June 30th) –CDE will sign agreement and notify districts of approval Closing the Achievement Gap Using Equity

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction Lynda Nichols, Consultant * Ron Taylor, Administrator * Closing the Achievement Gap Contacts