Enhanced Employment Lands for Simcoe County A Rationale to Expand Innisfil Heights 1 John Skorobohacz, CAO Andy Campbell, Director Infrastructure 15 August.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Challenges in Finding and Connecting New Water Sources J. Tupling, P.Eng. June 22, 2009.
Advertisements

Berkeley Charleston Dorchester Water Quality Management (208) Program Vonie Gilreath, Regional Planner, BCDCOG Coastal Community Workshop February 7, 2006.
Copyright 2009 Northumberland County Council Northumberland Local Plan Core Strategy Update Riding Mill Parish Council 28 April.
Growth Management & Draft Land Budget June 24 th, 2013 Planning Services Department.
TOWNSHIP OF BECKWITH OFFICIAL PLAN REVIEW OFFICIAL PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE: AUGUST 24, 2010 OPEN HOUSE NO. 3 AGENDA  What is an Official Plan?  The Official.
+ Proposed Lockwood Targeted Economic Development District 2015 Yellowstone County.
QEW Central Corridor ‘Securing our Prosperity” Council Workshop.
CITY OF TIGARD Respect and Care | Do the Right Thing | Get it Done City of Tigard Economic Opportunities Analysis May 10, 2011City Council Public Hearing.
Proposed CBS Municipal Plan and Development Regulations Amendments for Backlot Development Municipal Plan Amendment No. 9, 2015 Development Regulations.
The Urban Infrastructure Challenge in Canada: Focusing on Housing Affordability and Choice Presentation by CHBA – [Name] to The Municipal Council of [Name]
A Sustainable Action Plan for TORONTO. Location & History Previous Planning Efforts Current Planning Efforts Growth Future Needs A New Plan for Toronto.
Area C and the Future of the Palestinian Economy Orhan Niksic, Senior Economist The World Bank.
Collingwood Planning Services November 30, Discussion Items Land-use Planning Communication Tools Review of O.P. policy Review of site development.
3/27/031 The City of Toronto’s New Official Plan - A Land Use Strategy © Prepared by: Stephen Fagyas, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. Tel:
ENVISION TOMORROW UPDATES AND INDICATORS. What is Envision Tomorrow?  Suite of planning tools:  GIS Analysis Tools  Prototype Builder  Return on Investment.
TOWN OF CALEDON Identifying Strategic Employment Lands along the GTA West Corridor – an OPPORTUNITY Open House Presentation June 29, 2015.
Partnership for Urban South Hampshire Sustainable Growth.
TOWARDS THE CITY OF CAPE TOWN INTEGRATED SUSTAINABLE HUMAN SETTLEMENT WESTERN CAPE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE: 21 JUNE 2005 DIRECTOR: HUMAN SETTLEMENTS:
Seminar "Imovinski standard", 29. i 30. lipnja Spatial Planning in Ireland Farannán Tannam, MRICS, Dip.A&F.
Planning for Growth Standing Conference 12 June 2015.
CPA-14-08: Transfer of Development Rights Large Scale Text Amendment Adoption Hearing Board of County Commissioners September 23, 2008.
Miami-Dade County Department of Planning and Zoning - pg 1 Evaluation and Appraisal Report 2010.
BRAZIL: WORKSHOP ON WATER & WASTEWATER OPPORTUNITIES Ontario Investment and Trade Centre December 12, 2012.
FREIGHTSUPPORTIVE LAND USE PLANNINGGUIDELINESFREIGHTSUPPORTIVE PLANNINGGUIDELINES FHWA Talking Freight Series May 18/05 Video Seminar on Context Sensitive.
The SSMP Process 1. The Servicing and Settlement Master Plan A plan to encompass the community’s visions and ideas, while approaching planning and servicing.
Planning for the future of our district Core strategy options Presentation to C4B Associates February 2010.
Review of Data Model.  Major Office  Employment occurring in office buildings of 1,860 square metres (20,000 sq. ft.) or larger  Population Related.
OAKVILLE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ALLIANCE CCIM West Economic Forum Presentation by: Rob Milligan, CEO.
Community Redevelopment for Eastside Report on Advisory Committee Input and Request for Board Direction June 26, 2012.
Planes, Trains & Automobiles Oil & Gas Conference Fort Nelson, BC 2011.
CarolloTemplateWaterWave.pptx City of Bainbridge Island Water System Plan Policy Discussion April 21, 2015.
Herefordshire Local Plan Members’ Seminar 9 October 2015.
Official Plan Amendment – O’Brien & Giles – 2769 Lockhart Road Public Meeting Presentation – July 11, 2012 Note: This document is for presentation purposes.
HAVE YOUR SAY! Six week consultation period 15th February - 28th March 2016 DRAFT UTTOXETER NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN.
MHPP Forum James Shuttleworth Planning and Infrastructure Manager, MCC 9 December 2015 Greater Manchester Spatial Framework.
City Council – Project Update September 14, 2015.
STAMFORD CAPACITY AND LIMITS TO GROWTH STUDY SOUTH KESTEVEN DISTRICT COUNCIL FINAL REPORT PRESENTATION PRESENTERS: UNA McGAUGHRIN JESSE HONEY 14 TH DECEMBER.
Community Development Department MADISON GREEN AND TUSCAN RESERVE MASTER PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT APPLICATION #2616.
OFFICIAL PLAN 5-YEAR REVIEW & TAKE ACTION FOR SUSTAINABLE HURON.
Development Permit System. Development Permit System 2 Disclaimer  The information presented is provided as background information to facilitate understanding.
Item 3 South East Plan and recent policy statements…
19th November 2015 Wealden Local Plan – Issues, Options and Recommendations East Hoathly with Halland Parish Council.
Sixth Amendment to the Orange County / City of Winter Garden Joint Planning Area Agreement and Utilities Territorial Agreement April 17, 2007 Sixth Amendment.
Great ideas from five innovative Ontario municipal-ities
OPA 15 – What is it? OPA 15 – “Hwy 400 Strategic Industrial Employment Area secondary plan” secondary plan prescribes the nature of development within.
Land Use Urban Service Boundary is the framework for managing growth.
New Economy Breakfast Briefing 6 December 2016
Progressing a Single Water Utility Approach
Rural Community Development
2014 Adjustment Appropriation
Meeting Standards and Expectations in the Water Industry
New Brighton Planning Commission Meeting March 20, 2007
Greeley’s TIF Toolbox EDCC Overview 2017: Oct 3.
Aim of Economic Development
Municipality of Central Elgin
Wvbadbuildings.org.
Regional & City of Becker Feasibility Studies
PRESENTATION TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON
  FRAMEWORK FOR THE IDENTIFICATION & ACQUISITION OF LAND FOR HUMAN SETTLEMENTS DEVELOPMENT 4 AUGUST 2015.
Planning Commission Meeting: August 3, 2016
Who is Hold the Line? Currently over 130 organizations, municipalities, businesses, and homeowner groups opposing expansion of the current Urban Development.
A Sustainable Action Plan for TORONTO
An Environmental Impact Assessment for the City of TORONTO
Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application
BTB Real Estate Investment Trust
Preliminary Draft 2019 Operating and Capital Budgets
Hamilton’s Growth Plan Experience:
Joint City Council / Planning Commission
Planning Advisory Committee Orientation
AMCTO Zone 2: Bill Analysis of Proposed CBC
Presentation transcript:

Enhanced Employment Lands for Simcoe County A Rationale to Expand Innisfil Heights 1 John Skorobohacz, CAO Andy Campbell, Director Infrastructure 15 August 2012

Innisfil Heights

Current Issue The County approved Innisfil’s OPA No.1 to extend the Innisfil Heights Employment area to the 5 th Line The Ministry of Infrastructure and the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing are not supportive of the expansion beyond the existing boundaries Innisfil Heights holds the prospect of becoming a strategic County and Town economic business hub 3

 Growth Plan amended & came into in force Jan. 19, 2012  New Section (Section 6) deals with South Simcoe  Province sought input from County and local municipal staff respecting intensification, densities and employment land boundaries for Innisfil Heights Strategic Settlement Employment Area The Town is seeking the County to reaffirm its support to expand the boundaries of Innisfil Heights 4 Policy Context

 Growth Plan forecast for employment requires a boundary expansion of Innisfil Heights  Today, based strictly on future job and current growth/density assumptions, a mid-block expansion is warranted between the 6 th and 7 th Lines along Hwy 400  Density of future employment may be lower than overall density target thus requiring more land to accommodate the forecast  Full public consultation was undertaken in support of OPA No. 1  There were no objections based solely on proposed expanded boundaries 5 Planning Rationale

Planning Rationale (cont.)  Expansion of these lands to 5 th Line is already justified and was approved by the Town and County under Town’s OPA No.1  Settlement boundary expansion to the south is appropriate and can be subject to staging and development controls to provide orderly sustainable growth  Gaining agreement will:  Speed the resolution of current appeals of OPA No.1 before the OMB  Assist timely adoption of the County’s new Official Plan 6

Servicing Rationale  Servicing costs:  Waste water infrastructure is approx. $30 million (not including WWTP upgrades)  Water from Lakeshore WTP is approx. $35 million  Preferred WW servicing alignment along the 6 th Line  Extension of full urban servicing to these lands supports the expansion of gaming site at Georgian Downs  Expanding the employment base of the Town provides economies of scale to address future downstream improvements to protect the quality of groundwater and wastewater effluent 7

Market Realities  The current supply of vacant land in Innisfil Heights is not sufficient or contiguous to create a cluster of targeted employment types  Parcel sizes of vacant lands within current boundary insufficient size to accommodate uses envisioned by Town, County and Province  Location along Highway 400 is attractive to new industries  Innisfil Heights currently served by rail  Need diversity of size and configuration of parcels 8

Market Realities (cont.)  A southerly expansion:  Can accommodate larger parcels and transportation- related employment  Expanded lands could better utilize rail as an efficient goods movement mode We are experiencing requests for servicing 9

Fiscal Responsibility  Recovering the investment to extend water and wastewater services requires additional land areas over which to collect DC’s and property tax assessment  Benefits to Innisfil/County in terms of employment activity - ratio jobs/population  Expanding local employment lands brings provides fiscal benefits to all levels of government than just adding more residential population/subdivisions The County benefits from assessment growth 10

Potential Property Tax – Innisfil Heights County Base Property Tax as determined by current assessment values –Current area$114 K –Expansion area $2.4 K Assumed County Tax increases based on full services –Current area $508 K –Expansion area $622 K 11

Summary  Expansion of Innisfil Heights is a pre- requisite to meeting the Growth Plan targets for Simcoe County  There are compelling planning, market, infrastructure and fiscal rationale for the boundary expansion of Innisfil Heights  The support of County Council of this request provides long term social, environmental and economic benefits not only for Innisfil but the entire County of Simcoe 12

Next Steps Innisfil Council has requested the assistance of the Ontario Provincial Development Facilitator (OPDF) Request the County reaffirm its support of the expanded employment lands and work with the OPDF Site servicing needs to commence in 2013 to meet growing development needs 13

Questions 14