Guidance for Analyses of Pilot Interventions European Workplace and Alcohol Berlin, 9 November 2012 Jon Dawson.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to Impact Assessment
Advertisements

Unit 4 – Assignment 3 Today you will know the requirements of assignment 3. You will understand the assessment criteria for P4, M1 & D1. You will be able.
Frances Molloy (Chief Executive) Keith Gorman (Programme Manager)
RMS – a collaborative approach Presentation Lyn Dare & Stephen Larmour Authorisation & Audit Comcare.
Evaluation is a professional and ethical responsibility and is a core part of PHN professional practice Commitment to evaluation helps build the PHN intelligence.
Evaluating Physical Activity Intervention Programs Thomas Schmid, PhD Physical Activity and Health Branch CDC Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Working Group 4 - Assessment. Questionnaire employees We need to remember that the main tasks pertaining to this belong to the SARD team namely: -draft.
Impact assessment framework
Evaluation – the why’s, the what’s and the how’s 2014 Dr Basma Ellahi (PI) Cat Crum (PhD Student)
THE OECD APPROACH TO ASSESSING ORGANISATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS Frank van Tongeren Head of Division, Policies in Trade and Agriculture (OECD) ICAE pre-conference.
Measuring effects and impact: Analysis of practices in Analysis of practices in HI & partners projects Impact and evaluation seminar - 2 to 6 December,
INTERNATIONAL LABOUR ORGANIZATION Conditions of Work and Employment Programme (TRAVAIL) 2012 Module 13: Assessing Maternity Protection in practice Maternity.
Introduction to Evaluation Odette Parry & Sally-Ann Baker
The Impact of Health Coaching
Dr Alison Carter – global leader in coaching programme evaluation Dr Penny Tamkin – experienced in organisation based research providing insight into whole.
Guidance for EWA Pilot Baselines European Workplace and Alcohol Venice, 20 April 2012 Jon Dawson.
EVALUATION CHALLENGES FOR INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS SEVAL/GEN Pre-Conference for the International Year of Evaluation – 3 September 2015.
1 The project is financed from the European Union funds within the framework of Erasmus+, Key Action 2: Cooperation for innovation and the exchange of.
Fundamentals of Governance: Parliament and Government Understanding and Demonstrating Assessment Criteria Facilitator: Tony Cash.
The Starting Point Things to consider include Defining the overarching aim(s) of the event/activity Deciding the type of event you wish to undertake Defining.
PROGRESS REPORT BERLIN EWA PROJECT 8 november 2012.
Interim Pilot Workshop Guidance European Workplace and Alcohol Berlin, 8 November 2012 Jon Dawson.
Evaluation What is evaluation?
Humanitarian Principles in Evaluation: how can we move forward? Margie Buchanan-Smith on behalf of Tony Beck (team leader), Belen Diaz and Lara Ressler.
Applied Methodologies in PHI Session 5: Evaluation Kath Roberts (NOO/EMPHO)
Evaluating human rights-based interventions Prepared by Dr Alice Donald (Middlesex University)
How to evaluate the impact of CPD? 28 th April 2016.
Research Principles in VET Formulating Research Problems and Research Questions.
Benchmarks and quality management
Title of the Change Project
Evaluating the Quality and Impact of Community Benefit Programs
Embedding Positive Behavioural Support in a Social Care Organisation
Title of the Change Project
Title of the Change Project
MESAS: Evaluation of minimum unit pricing (MUP) for alcohol
Learning and Development Developing leaders and managers
Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning
European workplace and alcohol 2009 SANCO PROJECT
Evaluation Plan Akm Alamgir, PhD June 30, 2017.
Training Trainers and Educators Unit 8 – How to Evaluate
An Assessment of Psychosocial Hazards in the Workplace
RHIVA and IQ SROI Introduction
Session 1 – Study Objectives
Making Housing Matter 5 July 2016, Skainos Centre.
PowerPoint presentation
Lisa Dawson – Head of Student Systems Operations
Assess Plan Do Review Resource 1: Types of Evaluation – which type of approach should I use? There are a number of different types of evaluation, the most.
Evaluation of Information Literacy Education
Evaluating performance management
European workplace and alcohol 2009 SANCO PROJECT
Competency Based Interviews
“CareerGuide for Schools”
Multi-Sectoral Nutrition Action Planning Training Module
Training Trainers and Educators Unit 8 – How to Evaluate
MOSH Leading Practices Adoption System
Learning and Development Developing leaders and managers
Continuous Improvement Plan (CIP)
ESF Evaluations by MS Antonella Schulte-Braucks
Introduction Briefly Outline the Project. Introduction Briefly Outline the Project.
Resource 1. Evaluation Planning Template
What is a Logic Model? A depiction of a program showing what the program will do and what it is to accomplish. A series of “if-then” relationships that.
WHAT is evaluation and WHY is it important?
Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning
Nutrition Cluster Advocacy
The spirit of the CIVITAS mobility measure evaluation
Jean-Pierre Garitte Skopje 8 April 2019
IO4 – Business Intervention Approaches
Planning for Evaluation: An Introduction to Logic Models
What is a Logic Model? A depiction of a program showing what the program will do and what it is to accomplish. A series of “if-then” relationships that.
Social Inclusion and Community Activation Programme (SICAP)
Presentation transcript:

Guidance for Analyses of Pilot Interventions European Workplace and Alcohol Berlin, 9 November 2012 Jon Dawson

Broad approach Quantitative analysis of all pilots (baselines and follow-up) More in-depth and independent analyses of selection of pilot interventions (semi-structured interviews with key informants)

Aims To see whether the pilots worked as planned and whether they were delivered in the most effective way To assess the extent that the pilots achieve specific outputs (eg no. of businesses and employees engaged To assess the impacts of the pilot interventions and the changes that they have brought about To appraise effectiveness, highlight good practice and identify “success factors” or, indeed “failure factors”

Scope of evaluation Following the completion of the baseline and post- intervention follow-up (employee survey and organisational audit), a series of analyses will be carried out by the SARD team, primarily to assess changes, if any, in awareness, attitudes and behaviour (employees and organisations) At least 6 pilot partners will also be selected by the SARD team to be the focus of a detailed qualitative analysis Selection criteria: type of intervention; geographic spread; employee survey evidence; organisational audit evidence.

Qualitative Analysis: Aims Overall aim: explore and identify lessons about the process of implementing pilots and their effectiveness Specific aims: 1)qualitative interpretation of quantitative data 2)in-depth understanding of how the project was delivered 3)identify success factors and/or barriers to success.

Qualitative Analysis: Methodology Semi-structured interviews: with project leads, project workers, other stakeholders with detailed knowledge of intervention Focus of interviews:  How project was delivered  Examining the process: what worked well, “success factors” or “barriers” to success  Assess achievements (objectives reached, impact, generating change)  Good practice and policy lessons  Transferability

OUTPUT Overall pilot analysis reports that: (1) Set out findings from analysis of pilot (2) Informs toolkit (3) Informs policy recommendations