Pb-Parity and Septum Update Presented by: Luis Mercado UMass - Amherst 12/05/2008 Thanks to Robert Michaels, Kent Pachke, Krishna Kumar, Dustin McNulty.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Robert Michaels PREX at Trento PREX Workshop 09 Physics Interpretation of PREX 208 Pb E = 1 GeV, electrons on lead Elastic Scattering Parity Violating.
Advertisements

Robert Michaels HAMC Hall A Analysis Workshop 09 C HAMC = Hall A Monte Carlo ROOT / C++ Design Somewhat like SAMC & genercone For HRS only. Uses LeRose.
Lead ( 208 Pb) Radius Experiment : PREX E = 1 GeV, Elastic Scattering Parity-Violating Asymmetry PREX : precise measurement of the density -dependence.
Measuring the Neutron and 3 He Spin Structure at Low Q 2 Vincent Sulkosky College of William and Mary, Williamsburg VA Experimental Overview The.
Lead ( 208 Pb) Radius Experiment : PREX E = 1 GeV, Elastic Scattering Parity-Violating Asymmetry PREX : density -dependence of the symmetry energy. Nuclear.
Measuring the Neutron and 3 He Spin Structure at Low Q 2 Vincent Sulkosky for the JLab Hall A Collaboration College of William and Mary, Williamsburg VA.
The Spin Structure of 3 He and the Neutron at Low Q 2 : A Measurement of the Extended GDH Integral Vincent Sulkosky (for the JLab Hall A Collaboration)
NDVCS measurement with BoNuS RTPC M. Osipenko December 2, 2009, CLAS12 Central Detector Collaboration meeting.
Lumi Analysis for HAPPEx III / PREX Presented by: Luis Mercado UMass - Amherst 5/18/2007.
1/22 MOLLER Juliette M. Mammei. 2/22 Working Groups Polarized Source Hydrogen Target Spectrometer Integrating Detectors Tracking Detectors Polarized Beam.
Lead ( Pb) Radius Experiment : PREX Pb E = 1 GeV, electrons on lead Elastic Scattering Parity Violating Asymmetry Spokespersons Paul Souder Krishna.
1 Electron Beam Polarimetry for EIC/eRHIC W. Lorenzon (Michigan) Introduction Polarimetry at HERA Lessons learned from HERA Polarimetry at EIC.
Noise Analysis for PREx - Pb Radius Experiment Presented by: Luis Mercado UMass - Amherst 6/20/2008.
Upcoming Review of the Hall D Photon Beam and Tagger Richard Jones, University of Connecticut, for the GlueX collaboration GlueX Collaboration Meeting.
Recent Electroweak Results from the Tevatron Weak Interactions and Neutrinos Workshop Delphi, Greece, 6-11 June, 2005 Dhiman Chakraborty Northern Illinois.
Cultural Interlude Emlyn Hughes Caltech DOE HEP Review July 21, 2004 Final Results from SLAC Experiment E158 “Measurement of the Electroweak Mixing Angle”
Parity Violation in Electron Scattering Emlyn Hughes SLAC DOE Review June 2, 2004 *SLAC E122 *SLAC E158 *FUTURE.
PN12 Workshop JLab, Nov 2004 R. Michaels Jefferson Lab Parity Violating Neutron Densities Z of Weak Interaction : Clean Probe Couples Mainly to Neutrons.
PREX PAVI06 May 2006 R. Michaels Jefferson Lab Lead ( Pb) Radius Experiment : PREX Z of Weak Interaction : Clean Probe Couples Mainly to Neutrons ( T.W.
Proton polarization measurements in π° photo-production --On behalf of the Jefferson Lab Hall C GEp-III and GEp-2γ collaboration Wei Luo Lanzhou University.
M. Woods (SLAC) Beam Diagnostics for test facilities of i)  ii) polarized e+ source January 9 –11, 2002.
The PEPPo e - & e + polarization measurements E. Fanchini On behalf of the PEPPo collaboration POSIPOL 2012 Zeuthen 4-6 September E. Fanchini -Posipol.
Status of the Beamline Simulation A.Somov Jefferson Lab Collaboration Meeting, May 11, 2010.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 IPR October 18-20, 2011 John J. LeRose Independent Project Review of 12 GeV Upgrade Jefferson Lab.
Collimator June 1-19, 2015HUGS The collimator is placed about 85 cm from the target and intercepts scattered electrons from 0.78° to 3.8° Water cooled.
Opportunities for Precision Measurements, New Physics Searches & Low Energy Fixed Target Expts at a Modified “FEL” Accelerator Complex R. D. Carlini 12/7/2011.
High Precision Measurement of the Proton Charge Radius A. Gasparian NC A&T State University, Greensboro, NC Outline  Previous experiments and proton size.
A study of systematic uncertainties of Compton e-detector at JLab, Hall C and its cross calibration against Moller polarimeter APS April Meeting 2014 Amrendra.
Z AND W PHYSICS AT CEPC Haijun Yang, Hengne Li, Qiang Li, Jun Guo, Manqi Ruan, Yusheng Wu, Zhijun Liang 1.
Compton polarimetry for EIC Jefferson Lab Compton Polarimeters.
1/33CREX Workshop Jefferson Lab March 16-19, 2013 NASA/CXC/SAO.
PVDIS at JLab 6 GeV Robert Michaels Jefferson Lab On Behalf of the HAPPEX Collaboration Acknowledgement: Talk prepared by Kai Pan (MIT graduate student)
PrimEx collaboration meeting Energy calibration of the Hall B bremsstrahlung tagging system using magnetic pair spectrometer S. Stepanyan (JLAB)
Pb Electroweak Asymmetry in Elastic Electron-Nucleus Scattering : A measure of the neutron distribution PREX and CREX 48 Ca Neutron Skin Horowitz.
May 17, 2006Sebastian Baunack, PAVI06 The Parity Violation A4 Experiment at forward and backward angles Strange Form Factors The Mainz A4 Experiment Result.
1 Overview of Polarimetry Outline of Talk Polarized Physics Machine-Detector Interface Issues Upstream Polarimeter Downstream Polarimeter Ken Moffeit,
PREX Mtg, July 2008R. Michaels, JLab Hall A Monte Carlo -- HAMC Similar to A. Deur’s ``Single Arm Monte Carlo’’ “Fast” Monte Carlo -- not Geant ROOT /
Neutral Current Deep Inelastic Scattering in ZEUS The HERA collider NC Deep Inelastic Scattering at HERA The ZEUS detector Neutral current cross section.
SLAC, September 25, 2009 Searching for a U -boson with a positron beam Bogdan Wojtsekhowski Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility  The light.
MOLLER Collaboration Meeting May 2014 Hall A Update Thia Keppel 1.
Measuring the Spin Structure of 3 He and the Neutron at Low Q 2 Timothy Holmstrom College of William and Mary For the Jefferson Lab Hall A Collaboration.
Compton polarimetry for EIC. Outline Polarized electron beam Compton process Compton polarimeters at Jefferson Laboratory – Parity experiments at Jlab.
Detectors for PREx Collaboration Meeting, April 17-18, 2009 Piotr Decowski, Smith College Krishna Kumar. UMass.
PREX Mtg, July 2008R. Michaels, JLAB Warm Septum : Status Septum Team: Kees deJager, Paul Brindza, Javier Gomez, John Lerose, Al Gavalya, & me New Design.
HAPPEX DAQ / ADC Tests Luis Mercado UMASS 4/17/09.
PREX Issues. Outline New issue: souce systematics and Aug. 07 run. Update on old issues. Progress at SU.
Moller Polarimeter Q-weak: First direct measurement of the weak charge of the proton Nuruzzaman (
 0 life time analysis updates, preliminary results from Primex experiment 08/13/2007 I.Larin, Hall-B meeting.
Run Time, Mott-Schwinger, Systematics, Run plan David Bowman NPDGamma Collaboration Meeting 10/15/2010.
Deuteron polarimetry from 1.0 to 1.5 GeV/c Ed Stephenson, IUCF EDM discussion April 14, 2006 Based on work from: France:POMME B. Bonin et al. Nucl. Inst.
HAPPEX/Lumi PMT Studies Luis Mercado UMASS 7/10/09.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Depart. Of Energy The Department.
LUIS MERCADO UMASS 7/10/09 HAPPEX DAQ / 18-bit ADCs.
Hall A Collab. Mtg, 6/ 2010R. Michaels, JLAB Lead ( 208 Pb) Radius Experiment : PREX E = 1 GeV, Elastic Scattering Parity-Violating Asymmetry PREX : precise.
Understanding the 3 He Nuclei: Asymmetry Measurements in Quasi- Elastic Ge Jin University of Virginia For the E Collaboration.
R. Michaels, JLab PREX Mtg, July 2008 Recent Cavity Monitor Tests Credit: John Musson, Anna Boehle, Vince Sulkosky Good position & current for 10 nA to.
Status of Polarimeters and Polarized Targets: what are the plans for development of polarized targets to meet the needs of the Day 1 and future experimental.
Parity Quality Beam (PQB) B-Team Meeting September 10, 2008.
Electroweak physics at CEPC
Electroweak Physics Towards the CDR
A.P. Potylitsyn, I.S. Tropin Tomsk Polytechnic University,
Sanghwa Park (Stony Brook) for the PREX/CREX Collaboration
SBS Magnet, Optics, and Spin Transport
Noise Analysis for PREx - Pb Radius Experiment
A. Gasparian NC A&T State University, Greensboro, NC
Precision Measurement of η Radiative Decay Width via Primakoff Effect
Physics Interpretation of PREX
Wei Luo Lanzhou University 2011 Hall C User Meeting January 14, 2011
Hall “12 GeV” May 27, 2003 NAPP 2003: J.J. LeRose.
PREX / CREX Collaboration Meeting and Status
Presentation transcript:

Pb-Parity and Septum Update Presented by: Luis Mercado UMass - Amherst 12/05/2008 Thanks to Robert Michaels, Kent Pachke, Krishna Kumar, Dustin McNulty (UMASS) and the rest of the HAPPEx/PREx Collaboration for contributions to this talk.

Outline Introduction to PREx Review: PREx Scientific Case and motivation. Experimental Challenges. Beam test results and ongoing developments. New Septum Magnet and FOM Changes. Summary

Introduction – What is PREx? PREx is a Parity Violation experiment to be conducted in Hall A in Will measure PV electroweak asymmetry in elastic scattering of polarized electrons from 208 Lead. Because the Z boson couples mainly to neutrons, A LR can provide a clean measurement of R n by studying the ratio of proton and neutron form factors.

Motivation Proton form factor is well known, so we can extract the neutron density distribution from the neutron form factor. Measuring R n will be a fundamental test of nuclear theory. PREx aims to achieve an accuracy of 1% or less. (C. J. Horowitz)

Experimental Challenges Precision measurement of Q 2 – Requires high accuracy of BCMs and spectrometer angle. Precision beam polarimeter – Upgrade Compton to reach 1% error. Need sub-100 ppm pulse-to-pulse electronics noise – Can achieve this with improved Luminosity Monitors and new 18-bit ADCs.

Improved Monte Carlo Uses ROOT, written in C++, based on LeRose’s model of HRS transport. Some goals of new MC: – EM corrections – Syst errors: analyzing power, backgrounds, etc – Sensitivity to position, angle, energy – Determine optimal detector geometry – Strategies for transverse asymmetries – Model dependence of R n – Target optimization

PREx Detectors Designed by UMass and Smith College. Successfully tested in January Test Run Two were tested: “Thin” and “Thick” Small 4x4 cm quartz in Focal Plane

New Detector Concept We are proposing to build a new detector pair (2 x 5 cm) – 23% and 27% RMS agreed well with simulation. – Attempt to improve resolution by replacing Alzak mirrors in light guide with anodized Al or Silver. Design and fabrication in Spring ‘09 – Monte Carlo optimization of light guides. – Detailed understanding of spectrometer optics. – Final simulation of lead target spectrum in focal plane.

Cavity Position and Current Monitors Bigbite 8.8 kHz uA deflected beam Target Cavity X,Y,Q Stripline X,Y Steering Coils

Cavity Position and Current Monitors Good position & current for 10 nA to 100 uA. – At 10 nA : Need absolute position to 0.2 mm Need resolution of ~ 0.5 mm (1-shot at 200 nsec) HRS rates ~ 200 kHz  good for Q 2 Resolution Analysis – Use 1 BPM as a measure of beam motion on the other. – Achieved 150um above 1uA and 450um at 50nA. John Musson’s group is working on electronics to reach 0.1nA and improve noise and ease of use. – Should be available Summer of 2009

Tests of Compton Integrating DAQ Upgrades to laser cavity and photon detector are required. Integration reduces possible errors. Must have good linearity with respect to photon energy. New GSO photon calorimeter studied at HIGS on October 13,2008. Data Analysis is under way.

Analysis of ’08 Test Run Used as diagnostic for experimental setup. Statistics for 4-Lumi combo is ~50 ppm When averaging Lumis, width does not scale like 1/sqrt(N). Shielding Essential. Conclusion: Excess 100ppm from BPMs. Lumi IDReg. RMS [ppm] V55.7 H62.8 D D C51.7 X241.1 Sum126.7 Ave126.3 H D1 V D2

Tests of 18-bit ADCs The latest boards showed acceptable noise floor (~8 ppm with no inputs). Need to verify these results. Qweak ADC noise levels have been verified in a realistic scenario. “In situ” tests would be highly recommended.

New Septum Magnet Designed by Paul Brindza and Al Gavalya New values for scattering angle (5°) and optimal energy (1.05 GeV with a tolerance of 50 MeV) improve figure-of-merit. Higher E b helps with Compton polarimetry. Will be built early 2009.

New Septum Magnet

New Septum Magnet (FOM)

Summary / Future Developments New detector design to be produced by Spring ’09. Cavity monitors were tested successfully and new electronics will be ready by Summer ’09. HIGS data analysis under way. Developments in reducing electronics noise have been very successful. New Septum design improves FOM

Lead/Diamond Target Beam Current in proposal is 50uA. Target successfully tested up to 100uA. Main improvement: good contact between foils.