1 Fire Emissions Inventories (almost) Closeout -- Ph IV Projections – Fire Emissions Joint Forum Meeting Spokane, WA Day 1 – 1015a part A Dave Randall.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Phase 1 – 2002 Fire Emissions Inventory FEJF Meeting September 8 – 9, 2004 Worley, ID – Coeur D’Alene Casino Resort Hotel Dave Randall ( x221;
Advertisements

Fire Modeling Protocol MeetingBoise, IDAugust 31 – September 1, 2010 Applying Fire Emission Inventories in Chemical Transport Models Zac Adelman
Attribution of Haze Phase 2 and Technical Support System Project Update AoH Meeting – San Francisco, CA September 14/15, 2005 Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource.
WRAP 2002 Fire Emissions Inventory Inter-RPO Fire and Smoke Technical and Policy Coordination Meeting February 9-10, 2005 – Round Rock, TX Dave Randall.
BlueSky-EM, SMOKE and Data Linkages Andy Holland Carolina Environmental Program Symposium on Climate, Forest Growth, Fire and Air Quality Interactions.
I.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=. i.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=
I.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=. i.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=
Prototyping the Emergency Smoke Response System (ESRS) Sim Larkin, Tara Strand, Robert Solomon (US Forest Service AirFire Team) Sean Raffuse, Dana Raffuse,
Western Regional Air Partnership Emissions Database Management System Presentation to Fire Emissions Joint Forum Las Vegas, Nevada December 09, 2004 E.H.
WRAP Fire Emissions Tracking System Project Update, Outline, and Timeline WRAP - Fire Emissions Joint Forum Meeting San Diego, CA 22 February p.
PHASE II PROJECT Day 1 – 3:15p PHASE II PROJECT -- Ag Burning – Integration of QC responses -- NIF Format -- Plume Characteristics Update -- Next Steps.
Red Lake Band of Chippewa’s Emissions Inventory Presented by Cody Charwood National Tribal Forum, Spokane, WA 2011 Red Lake Department of Natural Resources.
2004 Workplan WRAP Regional Modeling Center Prepared by: Gail Tonnesen, University of California Riverside Ralph Morris, ENVIRON Corporation Zac Adelman,
UC Riverside FEJF Meeting, Las Vegas, NV Dec 8, 2004 UNC/CEPENVIRON Corp. WRAP/RMC Fire Sensitivity Modeling Project Mohammad Omary, Gail Tonnesen WRAP.
WRAP/FEJF Inter RPO Report WRAP - Fire Emissions Joint Forum Meeting San Diego, CA 22 February a – Presentation (c)
Emissions Inventory Case Study Kris Ray, Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation.
February 23-24, 2005Salt Lake City, Utah1 In-house QC Semi-Automated Duplicate Checking, Large Fire Refinement Complex Fire Identification Phase 2 Fire.
WRAP/FEJF Phase III/IV Emissions Inventory Project WRAP - Fire Emissions Joint Forum Meeting San Diego, CA 22 February a – Presentation (a)
PHASE II PROJECT Day 1 – 1:15p PHASE II PROJECT -- Technical Refinements Large Fires Complex Identification Duplicates -- WF and Rx Fire QC Packets States,
Center for Environmental Research and Technology/Environmental Modeling University of California at Riverside Fire Plume Rise WRAP (FEJF) Method vs. SMOKE.
November 2, 2005 (Afternoon Revision) San Diego, California1.
WRAP Emission Inventory EI’s traditionally consider 4 sectors : – Stationary Point Sources – Area Sources – Mobile Sources – Biogenic Sources.
PHASE I WRAP-UP Day 1 – 10:00a PHASE I WRAP-UP -- Rangeland Burning on Private Lands – Technical Approach and EI Development.
February 23-24, 2005Salt Lake City, Utah1 Rangeland Burning (Non-Federal Lands) Methodology Phase 2 Fire Emission Inventory WRAP – FEJF.
Development of Wildland Fire Emission Inventories with the BlueSky Smoke Modeling Framework Sean Raffuse, Erin Gilliland, Dana Sullivan, Neil Wheeler,
Technical Projects Update WRAP Board Meeting Salt Lake City, UT November 10, 2004.
Fire Effects Tradeoff Model (FETM) Mark D. Schaaf, Air Sciences Inc. Portland, Oregon.
November 2, 2005San Diego, California1 Calculation Tool for Estimating Projected Emissions - Methods Roll Out – (Day 2 – ) Phase III/IV Project.
AoH Conference Call August 10, 2004 Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
12/14/20151 Fire Emissions Tracking System Development & Implementation Workshop on Regional Emissions & Air Quality Modeling Studies Biogenics, Ammonia,
September 28, 2005Ph III/IV Project Team1 Phase III/IV Planning EIs Update and Status Report.
Introduction Session (Day 1 – ) Phase III/IV Project Technical Workshop #2 November 1-2, 2005 – San Diego, CA.
February 23-24, 2005Salt Lake City, Utah1 National Inventory Format NIF3 Methodology & Visual Display Phase 2 Fire Emission Inventory WRAP – FEJF.
Overview of WRAP FEJF Work Products WRAP Workshop on Fire, Carbon, and Dust May 23-24, 2006 Sacramento, CA Darla Potter (WDEQ) & Mark Fitch (USFS)
1/13/20161 FETS: State of the System Providers, Features, Lessons Learned August 31, 2009 FETS Project Meeting Boise, ID.
Wyoming WISE Agricultural Burning EI Development Day 1 – 2:45p Wyoming WISE Agricultural Burning EI Development.
Western Regional Air Partnership Regional Modeling Center 2004 Draft Workplan Prepared by: Gail Tonnesen, University of California Riverside Ralph Morris,
1 Incorporating Smoke Management Plans into SIPs: THE OREGON 309 SIP Brian Finneran Oregon Department of Environmental Quality Smoke Management Planning.
The West is different August 14, 2013 OAQPS. Aerosols causing Worst Visibility Days – East vs. West 2.
Denver 2004 TGP1 PM2.5 Emissions Inventory Workshop Denver, CO March 2004 Thompson G. Pace USEPA Emissions Estimation for Wildland Fires.
Fire Emissions Joint Forum Technical & Policy Products Overview June 16, 2004 Portland, OR.
Uncertainties in Wildfire Emission Estimates Workshop on Regional Emissions & Air Quality Modeling July 30, 2008 Shawn Urbanski, Wei Min Hao, Bryce Nordgren.
Wildfire Emissions Updated Methodology Neva Sotolongo Emission Inventory Branch.
309/308 Technical & Policy Overview Fire Emissions Joint Forum March 10-11, 2004 San Diego, CA.
Application of Fuel Characteristic Classification System to Ph II EI (add-on task to Inter RPO project) Fire Emissions Joint Forum Meeting Spokane, WA.
September 28, 2005Missoula, Montana1 Inter-RPO 2002 National Wildfire Emission Inventory - Results - by Air Sciences Inc. and EC/R, Inc. for the Inter-RPO.
November 2, 2005San Diego, California1 Strawman Projection Activity Targets (Day 1 – ) Phase III/IV Project Technical Workshop #2 November 1-2,
NW-AIRQUEST projects on Agricultural and Wildfire Smoke in the Inland Northwest: ClearSky and AIRPACT-3 presented by: Joe Vaughan WSU-LAR contributors:
Attribution of Haze Project Update Fire Emissions Joint Forum Meeting September 8-9, 2004 Worley, ID.
WRAP Workshop on Fire, Carbon, & Dust Emissions of Carbon from Fire Fire Emissions Joint Forum Presented by – Dave Randall, Air Sciences Inc. May 23, 2006.
Incorporating Smoke Management Plans into Regional Haze SIPs (Arizona Perspective) Smoke Management Planning Workshop WRAP 308 Planning Committee & Fire.
MANE-VU 2002 Fire Emissions Inventory Megan Schuster Inter-RPO Fire and Smoke Technical and Policy Coordination Meeting Austin, TX February 2005.
Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation
Phase 1 – 2002 Fire Emissions Inventory
AoH Conference Call August 24, 2004
Phase 1 – 2002 Fire Emissions Inventory
July 11, 2006 / 3p Phase IV Projection Emission Inventories
Phase 2 – 2002 Fire Emissions Inventory
Emissions reduction techniques (ERTs) Whither FEJF?
Fire Emissions Joint Forum
Inter-RPO 2002 Fire Emissions Inventory
AoH Conference Call September 7, 2004
FEJF Meeting Day 1, 845a – Seattle, WA
Fire Emissions and Smoke Management Plans
Summary of RH-LTS Requirements (d)(3)
Fire Emissions Joint Forum February 9, 2005
Fire/Carbon/Dust Workshop Report
AoH Conference Call August 24, 2004
Smoke Management in Alaska
Emissions Reduction Techniques (ERTs)
Presentation transcript:

1 Fire Emissions Inventories (almost) Closeout -- Ph IV Projections – Fire Emissions Joint Forum Meeting Spokane, WA Day 1 – 1015a part A Dave Randall Air Sciences Inc.

2 Outline Update on where we are in the project. Viewing the data with air quality planning in mind. –Which suite(s) should the FEJF put in the queue for modeling?

3 Phases of Fire EIs Phase II (historical 2002) Baseline (Phase III) (nominal ) Projections (Phase IV) (nominal 2018) Activity Scenarios for each fire type Less Likely More Note: The PLANNING inventories (Phase III & IV) are unique EI’s…unique from each other AND unique from Phase II

4 Anticipated 2018 Activity Levels (Acres) Fire-typeLessLikelyMore WF + WFU 4.7 MM 7.0 MM Rx (broadcast + piles) 1.0 MM2.0 MM3.7 MM Ag1.7 MM NFR1.3 MM

5 Air Quality Planning Fire EI Suites

6 Where are we on the project? Base-Case Planning Fire Files (Ph III) delivered (PT files for modeling). Projection Planning Fire Files (Ph IV) generated and ready for posting (PT files for modeling). Projection Tool developed and tested in- house. Finalizing documentation.

7 What still remains to be done? Decision on NIF format for projection files. –Recommend NOT preparing these files at this point. Decision on what Fire/Air Quality Planning suites to put in queue for RMC modeling. Final Postings and Documentation. Post Projection Tool.

8 2 Mistakes NAT/ANTH assignment method –Ph III files delivered with “old” method (NFDRS based). Alternative method (that we put through the Strawman process) was to use FCCS and FRCC to categorize events. –To keep Ph III and Ph IV comparable, we’ve prepared Ph IV using the “old” method.

9 Nat/Anth Assignment (Based on PH II [2002] Fire Data) FCCS-method Total acres (Phase II Prescribed data) of FCCS fuel models assigned ANTH: 323K –214K acres > 7 tons/acre –30.7K Tons of PM2.5 Total acres (Phase II Prescribed data) of FCCS fuel models assigned NAT: 326K –240K acres < 15 tons/acre –50.1K Tons of PM2.5 NFDRS-method Total acres (Phase II Prescribed data) of NFDRS fuel models assigned ANTH: 301K –235K acres > 7 tons/acre –39.7K Tons of PM2.5 Total acres (Phase II Prescribed data) of NFDRS fuel models assigned NAT: 348K –243K acres < 15 tons/acre –41.0K Tons of PM2.5

10 2 Mistakes (continued) –This issue involved Baseline (Ph III) events that were missing emissions because they were missing smoldering records. SAME MISTAKE made in the Baseline and Baseline Control EI files. Approximate Impact to EIs: Wildfire PM2.5 Tons: 19,147 (4% of total WF emissions) WFU PM2.5 Tons: (2% of total WFU emissions) –Recommended Remedy – Document the issue; Fix the problems in the Projections (Ph IV); Leave Baseline (Ph III) as is.

11 Ph IV Data Review with Air Qualty Planning in Mind Devise a couple of Threshold Questions we’d like to have answered by RMC Modeling. Review the data to determine which Air Quality Planning Suite(s) best answer that question. The best focus appears to be on the difference between Base-Case and Max- App of RX fire.

12 WRAP Phase IV 2018 Fire Projection EI Treated Acres Prescribed Burning, Base Case

13 WRAP Phase IV 2018 Fire Projection EI Treated Acres Prescribed Burning, Max Case

14 WRAP Phase IV 2018 Fire Projection EI Treated Acres Prescribed Burning, Net Difference (Max minus Base)

15

16 WRAP Phase IV 2018 Fire Projection EI Tons of PM 2.5 Prescribed Burning, Base Case

17 WRAP Phase IV 2018 Fire Projection EI Tons of PM 2.5 Prescribed Burning, Max Case

18 WRAP Phase IV 2018 Fire Projection EI Tons of PM 2.5 Prescribed Burning, Net Difference (Max minus Base)

19 Baseline Emission Inventory – Wildfire and Prescribed Fire Occurrence

20 Base-Case Planning Suite – Wildfire and Prescribed Fire Occurrence

21 Base-Case Planning Suite – Prescribed Fire Occurrence

22 Max Application of Rx Fire Planning Suite – Prescribed Fire Occurrence

23 Baseline Annual PM 2.5 Emissions by County Case Study Area: Sawtooth Wilderness

24 Baseline Control Case Annual PM 2.5 Emissions by County Case Study Area: Sawtooth Wilderness

25 Basecase Annual PM 2.5 Emissions by County Case Study Area: Sawtooth Wilderness

26 Climate Conditions / Resource Limited Annual PM 2.5 Emissions by County Case Study Area: Sawtooth Wilderness

27 Max Application of Prescribed Fire Annual PM 2.5 Emissions by County Case Study Area: Sawtooth Wilderness