Stop of 500GeV Search for Heavy Stable Charged Particles  Properties  Very Heavy : O(100 GeV/c²) or more → In general non-relativistic (See Section 3)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Bruce Kennedy, RAL PPD Particle Physics 2 Bruce Kennedy RAL PPD.
Advertisements

Comments on the First Year (2010) of the LHC Matthew Strassler Rutgers University Work in progress (special thank you to M. Cacciari, G. Salam)
Guoming CHEN The Capability of CMS Detector Chen Guoming IHEP, CAS , Beijing.
Fourth Generation Leptons Linda Carpenter UC Irvine Dec 2010.
14 Sept 2004 D.Dedovich Tau041 Measurement of Tau hadronic branching ratios in DELPHI experiment at LEP Dima Dedovich (Dubna) DELPHI Collaboration E.Phys.J.
The ATLAS B physics trigger
30 March Global Mice Particle Identification Steve Kahn 30 March 2004 Mice Collaboration Meeting.
1 Measurement of f D + via D +   + Sheldon Stone, Syracuse University  D o D o, D o  K -  + K-K- K+K+ ++  K-K- K+K+ “I charm you, by my once-commended.
Susy05, Durham 21 st July1 Split SUSY at Colliders Peter Richardson Durham University Work done in collaboration with W. Kilian, T. Plehn and E. Schmidt,
The new Silicon detector at RunIIb Tevatron II: the world’s highest energy collider What’s new?  Data will be collected from 5 to 15 fb -1 at  s=1.96.
Basic Measurements: What do we want to measure? Prof. Robin D. Erbacher University of California, Davis References: R. Fernow, Introduction to Experimental.
1 Hadronic In-Situ Calibration of the ATLAS Detector N. Davidson The University of Melbourne.
Measurement of B (D + →μ + ν μ ) and the Pseudoscalar Decay Constant f D at CLEO István Dankó Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute representing the CLEO Collaboration.
The SLHC and the Challenges of the CMS Upgrade William Ferguson First year seminar March 2 nd
Tau Jet Identification in Charged Higgs Search Monoranjan Guchait TIFR, Mumbai India-CMS collaboration meeting th March,2009 University of Delhi.
W properties AT CDF J. E. Garcia INFN Pisa. Outline Corfu Summer Institute Corfu Summer Institute September 10 th 2 1.CDF detector 2.W cross section measurements.
Charged Higgs Results from Tevatron Sudeshna Banerjee Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Mumbai, India For CDF and DØ Collaborations Fermilab, Chicago.
Jet Studies at CMS and ATLAS 1 Konstantinos Kousouris Fermilab Moriond QCD and High Energy Interactions Wednesday, 18 March 2009 (on behalf of the CMS.
D 0 Measurement in Cu+Cu Collisions at √s=200GeV at STAR using the Silicon Inner Tracker (SVT+SSD) Sarah LaPointe Wayne State University For the STAR Collaboration.
Large Magnetic Calorimeters Anselmo Cervera Villanueva University of Geneva (Switzerland) in a Nufact Nufact04 (Osaka, 1/8/2004)
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Joel Goldstein, RAL 1.Introduction & Accelerators 2.Particle Interactions and Detectors (2/2) 3.Collider Experiments.
Search for long-lived particles at ATLAS
Possibility of tan  measurement with in CMS Majid Hashemi CERN, CMS IPM,Tehran,Iran QCD and Hadronic Interactions, March 2005, La Thuile, Italy.
P ARTICLE D ETECTORS Mojtaba Mohammadi IPM-CMPP- February
25 sep Reconstruction and Identification of Hadronic Decays of Taus using the CMS Detector Michele Pioppi – CERN On behalf.
1 Methods of Experimental Particle Physics Alexei Safonov Lecture #15.
Electroweak and Related Physics at CDF Tim Nelson Fermilab on behalf of the CDF Collaboration DIS 2003 St. Petersburg April 2003.
Particle Detectors for Colliders Robert S. Orr University of Toronto.
SUSY08 Seoul 17 June 081 Daniel Teyssier RWTH Aachen University Searches for non-standard SUSY signatures in CMS on behalf of the CMS collaboration.
Search for charged heavy particles in the ATLAS detector C. Gemme 1, G.Gagliardi 1, E. Guido 1, A. Haas 2, S. Mehlhase 3, S. Passaggio 1, L. Rossi 1, C.
Inclusive Measurements of inelastic electron/positron scattering on unpolarized H and D targets at Lara De Nardo for the HERMES COLLABORATION.
G Watts/UW Seattle2 SM Hidden Sector Phenomenology as complex as you wish Decay back to SM particles Scalar.
Abstract Several models of elementary particle physics beyond the Standard Model, predict the existence of neutral particles that can decay in jets of.
Julia Thom, FNALEPS 2003 Aachen Rare Charm and B decays at CDF Julia Thom FNAL EPS 7/18/2003 Tevatron/CDF Experiment Decay Rate Ratios and CP Asymmetries.
1 Arnold Pompoš, SUSY03, Tucson, Arizona, June 5-10, 2003.
First results from SND at VEPP-2000 S. Serednyakov On behalf of SND group VIII International Workshop on e + e - Collisions from Phi to Psi, PHIPSI11,
Régis Lefèvre (LPC Clermont-Ferrand - France)ATLAS Physics Workshop - Lund - September 2001 In situ jet energy calibration General considerations The different.
Background Shape Study for the ttH, H  bb Channel Catrin Bernius First year talk 15th June 2007 Background Shape Study for the ttH 0, H 0  bb Channel.
A New Upper Limit for the Tau-Neutrino Magnetic Moment Reinhard Schwienhorst      ee ee
Rasmus Mackeprang R-hadrons Simulation and discovery in ATLAS Participants: R. Mackeprang, D. Milstead, S. Hellman & M. Johansen.
Search for Anomalous Production of Multi-lepton Events at CDF Alon Attal Outline  Motivation  R p V SUSY  CDF & lepton detection  Analysis  Results.
Non-Prompt J/ψ Measurements at STAR Zaochen Ye for the STAR Collaboration University of Illinois at Chicago The STAR Collaboration:
Jieun Kim ( CMS Collaboration ) APCTP 2012 LHC Physics Workshop at Korea (Aug. 7-9, 2012) 1.
Simon Dean UCL Christmas Meeting 15/12/2008 "A bit of fast simulation and ttH"
XLIX International Winter Meeting on Nuclear Physics January 2011 Bormio, Italy G. Cattani, on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration Measurement of.
Andy Haas SLAC ATLAS Meeting - 10/1/2016 Slide 1 Long-lived Particles Decaying in the Calorimeter: From D0 to ATLAS Andy Haas Columbia University D0 /
Search for heavy stable charged particles Loïc Quertenmont Université Catholique de Louvain & FNRS Center for Particle Physics and Phenomenology BSM -
Lecture 18 - Detectors Detector systems
Electromagnetic Physics Working Group discussion
ATLAS Upgrade Program Sarah Demers, US ATLAS Fellow with BNL
Report from SUSY working group
Searching for CHAMPs at CDF
Particle detection and reconstruction at the LHC (IV)
Venkat Kaushik, Jae Yu University of Texas at Arlington
How a Particle Detector works
Experimental Particle Physics
Status of ATLAS and CMS and prospects for the run
Plans for checking hadronic energy
Project Presentations August 5th, 2004
Jessica Leonard Oct. 23, 2006 Physics 835
The KL reconstruction for the Belle experiment at KEK B-factory
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Putting it all together Lecture 4 6th May 2009 Fergus Wilson, RAL.
Searches at LHC for Physics Beyond the Standard Model
Study of e+e- pp process using initial state radiation with BaBar
Prospects for quarkonium studies at LHCb
Contents First section: pion and proton misidentification probabilities as Loose or Tight Muons. Measurements using Jet-triggered data (from run).
SUSY SEARCHES WITH ATLAS
Experimental Particle Physics
Installation, Commissioning and Startup of ATLAS & CMS Experiments
Particles going through matter
Presentation transcript:

Stop of 500GeV Search for Heavy Stable Charged Particles  Properties  Very Heavy : O(100 GeV/c²) or more → In general non-relativistic (See Section 3)  cτ ~ O(m) or larger → Usually, do not decay in a detector  Electric and/or strong charge  Allowed by many models beyond SM (mGMSB, Split SUSY, MSSM, and UED)  In general, long lifetime is a consequence of a quantum number conservation → e.g. : SUSY with R-parity or UED with KK-parity → Heavier states could also be quasi stable if decay phase space is small  If colored, HSCP will hadronize and form an “R-Hadron” → Fraction of gluino-balls is a relevant unknown parameter from the experimental point of view.  Main scenarios considered by the CMS collaboration are listed in this table Properties Baryons gqqq, t 1 qq Mesons gqqbar, t 1 qbar Gluino-balls gg ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ (pure neutral state)  Lepton-like HSCPs, behave like heavy muons  Cross easily the whole detector  Non-relativistic→ large ionization energy loss → long time of flight  R-Hadrons, do nuclear interactions in addition  heavy parton acts as spectator (interaction will be similar to a low energy hadron-hadron scattering)  R-Hadron does not shower in the calorimeters  Conversion to a different R-Hadron is possible → charge flipping HSCP → Non-relativistic track with High Momentum  Methods : 1.The Momentum p can be measured from track bending in inner tracker/muon system 2. The velocity β can be extracted from  The Energy loss (dE/dx) in inner tracking systems (ionization and transition radiation)  The Time of Flight in muon systems 3.The mass m can be computed from p / (βγc) 4.If m is heavier than any stable SM particle It is a candidate HSCP  Issues :  Charge flipping  Deviation from expected muon trajectory, unmatched inner tracker/muon tracks and incompatible/missing track stubs in the muon system  Neutral R-Hadronswill give no signals in the tracker/muon detectors  Neutral R-Hadrons will give no signals in the tracker/muon detectors  Main backgrounds are prompt or cosmic muons  Principle: Use muon wire detectors to measure time of flight Resistive Plate Chambers are only useful to confirm track and reject background.  Challenges : β of R-Hadron in muon system is generally lower than β at production due to energy loss. Minimum β to have inner Tracker readout in same bunch crossing is : β min ~ 0.65 Charge flipping introduce some complications Lower reconstruction efficiency than for muons Momentum measured by Stand alone Muon system is biased upward (good for triggering) Background : Cosmic muons Badly measured muons Non Relativistic Particle  Principles : HSCP id based on dE/dx estimate of a track various estimators considered including an unbinned Landau fit use Z  μμ as control sample Mass reco: β -2 ≈ k dE/dx in 0.1<βγ<0.9 region obtain k from proton sample  Challenges : Few measurements per track (~ 10 for CMS) Electronics response : saturation/cut-offs effects, readout timing  Background : Overlapping tracks SM particles in the tail of the dE/dx distribution Heavy ions from nuclear interactions  Samples : Signal : g, t 1, mGMSB τ 1, KK τ 1 : mass from 130 to 1500 GeV/c ², generated with (MadGraph), Pythia+R-hadron hadronization routines Backgrounds : all SM processes (QCD, W/Z, ttbar, bbbar + jets)  Simulation : Full Geant4 + specific routines for R-Hadron hadronic interactions  Selection : Muon Systems : p T >30 GeV Tracker : β tk 8, χ²/ndof < 5 Combined : β DT 100GeV  Mass Reconstruction : β = average (β tk,β DT ) and p = p tk  Discovery :  ~100pb -1 : mGMSB stau and low mass R-Hadron  ~ 1fb -1: gluino masses above 1TeV and for KK tau g ~ t1t1t1t1 ~ KK τ 1 ~ 1fb -1 R Mackeprang & A Rizzi : Eur.Phys.J.C50: ,2007 SM Muons 1fb -1 t 1 500GeV 4.6fb -1 Global  Muon trigger : Useful for most models Efficiency depends on the HSCP mass and model Very robust with respect to the P T threshold (can be increased up to ~50 GeV) mGMSB τ 1 ~ 99% UED KK τ 1 ~ 80% MSSM t 1 ~ 40% to 70% Split SUSY g ~ 60% to 95% ~ ~ ~ ~ 1. Interaction with the CMS Detector 2. Detection Techniques 4. dE/dx Techniques in Inner Tracking Detectors 5. Trigger Strategies 7. Time of Flight in Muon System 6. Offline Analysis 8. Signatures3.  Charge flipping is also a unique signature that can be used in offline analysis to confirm signal.  Jet / Missing E T : Useful for certain models (in particular for mGMSB) Less sensitive to timing/β issues Recover a part of HSCP not detected by muon system. Complementary to the muon trigger. dE/dx seeded by muon trigger :  dE/dx seeded by muon trigger : To be Investigated Background Rejection June 2008 Loïc Quertenmont Background  Tracker Calibration : estimators make the assumption that all dE/dx measurements of a tracks come from the same Landau distribution. This is not the case if the detector is not calibrated. Different response is also caused by the non linear dependence of the ionization energy loss from the path length, effects coming from saturation of the electronics, etc. A calibration procedure has been designed to equalize the response of all tracker modules. Ideal Detector 10% Miscalibrated Detector Distribution of the Most Probable Value as a function of the module thickness for an Ideal and Miscalibrated detector. The MPV comes from the fit of a Landau fit to the charge distribution normalised to the path length for each tracker module. Representation of two back to back muons with the Fast and Realistic OpenGl Displayer (FROG). All the tracker layers are well visible. CMS AN-2007/049