Welcome to Workforce 3 One U.S. Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration Webinar Date: July 30, 2015 Presented by: Office of Unemployment.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Georgia Department of Labor IDENTITY THEFT Presenter: Racquel Robinson.
Advertisements

NEW JERSEY’S PERSPECTIVE ON REDUCING IMPROPER BENEFIT PAYMENTS.
1. Streamlines the UI claims process for employers faced with layoffs:  Permanent or temporary  Ten or more employees at one time 2.
1 The Social Security Number Verification Service (SSNVS) National Payroll Reporting Forum June 2, 2005.
NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
October 14,  Benefit Year Earnings Root Causes Identified:  Agency Causes’  System deficiencies  Insufficient BPC staff  Oversight of issues.
UI Integrity/ Improper Payments Joint Federal/ State Task Force October 14, 2011.
October 14, 2011 State Presentation:.  Benefit Year Earnings (BYE): Root Causes Identified:  Agency Causes  Inadequately educating claimants on reporting.
October 14,  Benefit Year Earnings (BYE): Root Causes Identified:  Agency Causes  Auto cancel of some ES issues  Agency currently cross matches.
Unemployment Insurance (UI) Initial Claim Filing Guidance.
October 14, Areas of focus: Benefit Year Earnings Separation Issues The State of Delaware’s “Action Plan” to reduce the incidence of improper UI.
October 18,  Benefit Year Earnings (BYE): Root Causes Identified:  Agency Causes  Insufficient resources  Claimant Causes  Unreported/Under.
October 13, W E WILL IDENTIFY, ANALYZE, AND ACT ON THE ROOT CAUSES OF IMPROPER PAYMENTS BY BUILDING UPON AND IMPROVING PRACTICES ALREADY IN PLACE.
Equifax Confidential and Proprietary The Work Number ® Service Overview and Pilot Project – State of Wisconsin.
October 28,  Benefit Year Earnings (BYE): Root Causes Identified:  Agency Causes  Delays in processing cross match data.  Delays in stopping.
Louisiana UI Integrity Task Force October 24, 2011.
October 14,  Benefit Year Earnings (BYE): Root Causes Identified:  Agency Causes  Auto cancel of some types of ES issues  Agency currently cross.
October 28,  Benefit Year Earnings (BYE): Root Causes Identified:  Agency Causes  Internet certification process  Insufficient Staff for Benefit.
State Presentation:VIRGINIA October 14,  Separations (SEPs): Root Causes Identified:  Agency Causes  Communication Deficiencies / Internal and.
Benefit Year Earnings (BYE): Root Causes Identified:  Agency Causes  Absence of Red Flags/stop payments for NDNH hits  Failure to promptly investigate.
October 14, 2011 State Presentation: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.
UI Integrity/Improper Payments Federal/State Task Force State Presentation: South Dakota October 11, 2011.
October 21, 2011  Benefit Year Earnings (BYE): Root Causes Identified:  Agency Causes  Incomplete explanation of issues.
October 14, 2011 South Carolina Integrity Strategic Plan.
October 14,  Benefit Year Earnings (BYE): Root Causes Identified:  Agency Causes  Failure to follow-up with employers for earnings information.
October 28, 2011  KILLER APP #1:    . 2   Killer App #1: Virtual Online Interactive Claim Examiner (V.O.I.C.E)   Description of Issue  
October 28, 2011 Final Colorado.  Benefit Year Earnings (BYE): Root Causes Identified:  Agency Causes  Too few BPC staff to adequately investigate.
October 14, 2011 State Presentation: Vermont.  Benefit Year Earnings (BYE): Root Causes Identified:  Agency Causes  Manual Processes  Delinquent Wage.
October 14,  Benefit Year Earnings (BYE): Root Causes Identified:  Agency Causes  Failure to properly investigate earnings in a timely manner.
1 UI INTEGRITY/IMPROPER PAYMENTS UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR/CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF LABOR TASK FORCE October 28, 2011.
State Presentation: OCTOBER 24,2011. Overpayments by Cause* 2010 Review Description$ AmountPercentage of Total Unreported Earnings $ 27,104, %
NATIONAL DIRECTORY OF NEW HIRES Office of Child Support Enforcement Administration for Children and Families Department of Health and Human Services.
Unemployment Insurance Workshop September 2015 Leah Reeder, UI Technical Services Specialist Tyler Smith, UI Technical Services Specialist.
REAs Moving Forward: Aligning REAs with the National Vision for Reemploying UI Claimants January 25 th, :00 - 3:00 ET.
October 14, 2011 State Presentation: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.
October 28,  Benefit Year Earnings (BYE): Root Causes Identified:  Agency Causes  Wage crossmatch delays  Frequency of state new hire crossmatch.
October 14, 2011 New Hampshire. Areas of National Focus: Benefit Year Earnings (BYE): Root Causes: Agency –Manual processes to manage, investigate and.
October 14, 2011 DRAFT.  Benefit Year Earnings (BYE) 20% of BAM Improper Payments in 2010: Root Causes Identified:  Agency Causes  Too few BPC staff.
October 25,  Benefit Year Earnings (BYE): Root Causes Identified:  Agency Causes  Staff fails to follow-up with claimant at the time continued.
October 14, 2011 State Presentation: Massachusetts.
October 14,  Benefit Year Earnings (BYE): Root Causes Identified:  Agency Causes  Late posting of wages to Tax System  Wrong Last Employer 
October 14, 2011 UT.  Benefit Year Earnings (BYE): Root Causes Identified:  Agency Causes  Communication  Claimant Causes  Lack of UI Rules Knowledge.
2 Gay Gilbert U.S. Department of Labor Employment & Training Administration Administrator, Office of Unemployment Insurance.
Welcome to Workforce 3 One U.S. Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration Webinar Date: October 26, 2015 Presented by: Office of Apprenticeship.
Welcome to Workforce 3 One U.S. Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration Webinar Date: November 20, 2013 Presented by: U.S. Department.
Welcome to Workforce 3 One U.S. Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration Webinar Date: May 30, 2014 Presented by: Robert Pavosevich Division.
Welcome to Workforce 3 One U.S. Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration Webinar Date: June 2, 2014 Presented by: Office of Unemployment.
June 23,  Introduction:  We list the strategies New York has identified for each major area in order of priority.  To meet the proposed USDOL.
Welcome to Workforce 3 One U.S. Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration Webinar Date: February 25, 2014, 12pm ET Presented by: Office.
October 28,  Benefit Year Earnings (BYE): Root Causes Identified:  Agency Causes  Failure to properly investigate earnings in a timely manner.
Welcome to Workforce 3 One U.S. Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration Webinar Date: 11/14/2014 Presented by: Office of Unemployment.
Welcome to Workforce 3 One U.S. Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration Webinar Date: April 6 th, 2015 Presented by: U.S. Department.
The Annual State Quality Service Plan (SQSP) Unemployment Insurance Program Letter (UIPL) Additional Planning Guidance for the Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 Unemployment.
June 23,  Benefit Year Earnings (BYE): Errors caused by a misunderstanding of what to report and when Root Causes Identified:  Agency Causes Failure.
October 14, 2011 MAINE.  Benefit Year Earnings (BYE) 5.3% for Maine: Root Causes Identified:  Agency Causes  Lack of adequate messaging to claimants.
June 23, Strategies to address areas of national focus:  Benefit Year Earnings (BYE) Root Causes Identified 1. Fraud 2. Failure to report and/or.
Welcome to Workforce 3 One U.S. Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration Webinar Date: August 3, 2015 Presented by: U.S. Department of.
June 23, Presidential mandate for all states to take immediate actions to begin reducing UI improper payment rates through improved prevention,
Self-Employment Assistance June 13 th, :00 - 1:30 EST.
October 24,  Benefit Year Earnings (BYE):  Agency Causes  Inadequate claimant and employer education  Lack of some system edits on continued.
June 23,  Strategies to Address areas of national focus: Benefit Year Earnings (BYE) – Root Causes Identified  Claimant / Employer/Employee Integrity.
UI Integrity / Improper Payments Joint Federal/State Task Force
All States UI Integrity Webinar
Changes in the Data Validation Program
Balancing Anti-Fraud Efforts and Due Process in Indiana
(Improper Payments Prevention Initiative)
What States Should Know About UIPL 01-16
Unemployment Insurance Integrity Performance Measures
Unemployment Insurance Benefits Overview
Employment Security Advisory Committee
Presentation transcript:

Welcome to Workforce 3 One U.S. Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration Webinar Date: July 30, 2015 Presented by: Office of Unemployment Insurance U.S. Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration

2# Enter your location in the Chat window – lower left of screen

Moderator: Ericka Parker Organization: Office of Unemployment Insurance, U.S. Department of Labor 3#

Presenter: Charles Walkowiak Organization: New Jersey Department of Labor and Workforce Development 4# Presenter: Jodi Douglas Organization: Iowa Workforce Development Presenter: Josh Hawkins Organization: Utah Department of Workforce Services

5# 1.USDOL Office of Unemployment Insurance  Review of BYE Technical Assistance 2.New Jersey Department of Labor and Workforce Development  Enhanced NDNH cross-match 3.Iowa Workforce Development  Data analytics and predictive modeling 4.Utah Department of Workforce Services  Employer payroll information cross-match 5.Questions and Discussion

Gay Gilbert, Administrator Office of Unemployment Insurance Employment and Training Administration 6#

7 Earlier this year, ETA requested your state’s participation in a new technical assistance effort aimed at reducing BYE overpayments BYE errors are one of the two largest root causes of UI overpayments at 33.06% of dollars overpaid Many BYE errors are controllable and there are demonstrated effective strategies for preventing these improper payments including: Cross-matching with NDNH, including the use of recommended procedures in UIPL No Data analytics and predictive modeling tools to help prioritize hits Cross-matching with other data sources that may indicate a claimant’s return to work

States participating in today’s webinar were invited because your BYE rates are above the national average Our goal today is to reemphasize strategies that work and to request that your states consider additional steps you can take to better prevent BYE improper payments We also hope your states will help identify new and innovative BYE strategies that can be shared nationally #8

9 In advance of this webinar, you were provided state- specific BYE root cause data to assist in your strategic review of actions your state can take to address this issue Following today’s webinar, ETA’s Regional Offices are ready to work to support your efforts, including reviewing your implementation of NDNH cross-matching, as well as the use of the recommended operating procedures outlined in UIPL No You are strongly encouraged to use the SQSP process to reflect new BYE strategies

Presenter: Charles Walkowiak Organization: New Jersey Department of Labor and Workforce Development 10#

11 What is New Jersey’s New Hire Challenge? A Benefit Integrity Initiative Used to Prevent Claimants from Continuing to Collect Unemployment Insurance Benefits After The Claimant has Returned to Work

12 DATA ELEMENTS USED  State and National New Hire Data  UI Claimant Data

13 A NEW HIRE “HIT” CAUSES THE CLAIM TO BE “FLAGGED”  Return to Work date is automatically inserted in to the claim  Claimant certifies for benefits by Internet or phone system  Claimant is forced to speak with an AGENT  Agent presents specific new hire data to the claimant  Claimant will: 1. Discontinue the certification 2. Confirm he/she started a new job and is ineligible from the start date 3. Confirm that he/she started a new job but employment ended (separation issue???) 4. Indicate that he/she never started a new job (claimant will be paid but the case is referred to Benefit Payment Control for a follow-up investigation)

14 RESULTS OF NEW HIRE CHALLENGE  Addresses 100% of New Hire Hits  Discontinue Paying Improper Benefits Earlier in the Process  Reduces Administrative Costs 1. Printing, Postage, Processing 2. Investigations, Setting Up Refund, Collections 3. Agent resolves issue rather than Investigator  Process is less intrusive to Employers  Reduction to TRUST FUND = PREVENTION

15 COSTS:$106,000 (Programming Modifications Were Completed By Internal IT Staff) IMPLEMENTATION DATE: April 2011

16 ROOM TO IMPROVE? There is always ROOM TO IMPROVE  Prevent first and detect when necessary!  Develop an automated process to more quickly and effectively address these cases.  Immediate Electronic Communication to Employer  Verify New Hire Data  Electronic Response from Employer  Evaluation by BPC  New Jersey Fraud Penalty is a ONE YEAR disqualification of benefits.

17 TRUST FUND SAVINGS April 2011 – June 2015 New Hire Hits:375,776 Savings:$446.4M

18 CULTURE Integrity belongs to CHANGE everyone! Employers & Claimants Operational Staff BPC Staff

19# Presenter: Jodi Douglas Organization: Iowa Workforce Development

20 Pondera Solutions 1.Who & How 2.Results 3.Future enhancements

#21 1.What Pondera Solutions Offers Iowa 2.Improper payments 3.Fictitious Employers 4.Results 5.Experience

What Does Pondera Have to Offer? #22

#23 Why this strategy was necessary Small team of Investigators for many years Debated “buy” vs “build” vs “contract” Issued a bid for a “solution” Pondera Solutions

#24 Customized Algorithms Incarceration Wages earned Multiple claimants using one IP address Multiple claimants using one bank account Multiple claimants at same address

#25 Fictitious employer schemes Fall ’13 Iowa requires online registration and quarterly filing Multiple quarters of wages added UI claims filed within 1-2 days Discovered through returned mail

#26

#27

#28

#29

#30 Public records search Incarcerations Reports

#31 New Alerts Deceased Wage Cross Match ICERs SUTA Dumping

#32 Speaker:Jodi Douglas Title: UI Program Integrity Bureau Chief Organization: Iowa Workforce Development Telephone:

Presenter: Joshua Hawkins Title:BPC Supervisor Organization: Utah DWS 33#

Original Pilot 34 Phase I - Historical review in December 2012 All individuals with known overpayments established in 4 th quarter 2011 due to unreported work and earnings were transmitted to Equifax Equifax payroll covered 12% of said individuals

35 Approximately 16 weeks sooner than the Model Cross-match Approximately 3 weeks sooner than the State and National New Hire Directories Original Pilot

36 Phase II – Real time transmission of data Four data files of active UI and EUC filers transmitted in 1 st quarter 2013 Matches with Equifax were then investigated Original Pilot

37 Equifax hit provided a good starting point, but it wasn’t everything Additional information could be located on The Work Number website Usually necessary to request a weekly breakdown Original Pilot

38 36% of investigations resulted in overpayments 21% for New Hires and 8% for Model during same time frame Percent of fraud was less than the New Hire (62% vs. 83%) Quicker OP detection, earlier intervention and education for claimants who file while employed Original Pilot Results

39 Second Pilot Facilitated through Do Not Pay (paid by Dept. of the Treasury) Biweekly files of active claimants Nine files submitted between 9/29/14 and 1/19/15

40 Second Pilot 231 total investigations established Same process as before – investigators contacted Equifax for weekly breakdowns and utilized The Work Number website when needed

41 Second Pilot Results Overpayments were detected over 5 months faster than traditional methods (typically a 6 month delay with the Model cross-match) 50% of investigations resulted in overpayments (less cases investigated but a higher rate of return)

Speaker: Joshua Hawkins Title: BPC Supervisor Organization: Utah Department of Workforce Services Telephone: #

43#