A Survey of the Capabilities of the Upgraded TeV BPMs Rob Kutschke, CD/EXP Run II Meeting March 24, 2005 Beams-doc-1752-v2.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Coherent Synchro-Betatron Resonance in the FNAL Booster A. Burov, V. Lebedev HB 2008.
Advertisements

Development of a Chromaticity measurement application using Head-Tail phase shift technique.
Note: most of the slides shown here are picked from CERN accelerator workshops. Please refer to those workshop for further understanding of the accelerator.
Latest Results from Digital Tune Monitor Vsevolod Kamerdzhiev (APD) Alexei Semenov (Instrumentation) Tevatron Dept. meeting, March 16, 2007.
E+ Tune Measurements for 4-ns Spaced Bunches Tune Measurements of 4-ns spaced bunches: An update of the strides made using the digital BPM system to measure.
“AC” Dispersion Measurement David Rubin Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education.
Low Emittance Program David Rubin Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education CesrTA.
Paul Derwent 30 Nov 00 1 The Fermilab Accelerator Complex o Series of presentations  Overview of FNAL Accelerator Complex  Antiprotons: Stochastic Cooling.
Feed forward orbit corrections for the CLIC RTML R. Apsimon, A. Latina.
Analysis of ATF EXT/FF Orbit Jitter and extrapolation to IP (Data of ) ATF2 Project Meeting K. Kubo.
F Tevatron Software Digital Receiver Beam Line Tuner Vic Scarpine Instrumentation Instrumentation Meeting July 13, 2005.
Searching for Quantum LOVE at the Australian Synchrotron Light Source Eugene Tan On behalf of Rohan Dowd 120/10/2010Eugene Tan – IWLC 2010, Genega ASLS.
APEX Report: March 31 – April 1, 2009 Fulvia Pilat Time Meeting, April 7, 2009.
Key Specifications for Tevatron BPM Hardware Architecture Choices Jim Steimel.
Technical Board ATF2 GM FF progress report A.Jeremie ATF2 GM System team: K.Artoos, C.Charrondière, A.Jeremie, J.Pfingstner (a lot of figures from him),
Feed forward orbit corrections for the CLIC RTML R. Apsimon, A. Latina.
INTRODUCTION  RECYCLER BPM – Original system not adequate to measure beam position precisely. It is being upgraded to meet the required physics precision.
Tevatron BPM System Upgrade Technical Update Bob Webber Run II Luminosity Upgrade Review February 2004.
F Antiproton Source Apertures Steve Werkema DOE Tevatron Operations Review March 22, 2006.
Basic BPM Hardware Theory Jim Steimel. Wall Current Charge in a cylindrical perfectly conducting pipe produces an equal and opposite image charge at the.
Figure 2 gives an overview of the hardware components of the upgraded Main Injector BPM system. The figure shows 2 signal channels which produce one position.
AAC February 4-6, 2003 Protons on Target Ioanis Kourbanis MI/Beams.
Proposal for Low frequency damping system in Tevatron Why do we need it? Maybe not? Can our current correctors handle the job? How should the system look?
#3191, 14 Oct 2012 Cabling installed to allow fast BPM electronics on injector BPMs System is flexible enough to allow different INJ-BPMs to be used (not.
ION COMMISSIONING REVISITED 1 Thanks to: John Jowett, Walter Venturini. Matteo Solfaroli.
BPM Signal Processing: A Cartoon View Rob Kutschke Oct 13, 2003.
#1 Energy matching It is observed that the orbit of an injected proton beam is horizontally displaced towards the outside of the ring, by about  x~1 mm.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.
R. Assmann - LHCCWG Two Beam Operation R.W. Aßmann LHCCWG Acknowledgements to W. Herr, V. Previtali, A. Butterworth, P. Baudrenghien, J. Uythoven,
The ATF Damping Ring BPM Upgrade Nathan Eddy, Eliana Gianfelice-Wendt Fermilab for the ATF Damping Ring BPM Team.
BPM Upgrade Projects Status & Technical Update Bob Webber DOE Review of Tevatron Operations March 2005.
F Beam Line Tuners Vic Scarpine Instrumentation DoE Review Oct 28-31, 2002.
S. Pordes - to part of CD 09/10/031 Introduction to some Beams Division jargon in some order…see how far we get:
Chromaticity dependence of the vertical effective impedance in the PS Chromaticity dependence of the vertical effective impedance in the PS S. Persichelli.
J. Pfingstner, LCWS13 Jitter and ground motion studies November 13, 2013 Beam jitter at ATF2: A. Source localisation and B. Ground motion correlation Jürgen.
CLIC Decelerator Instrumentation - Ideas and outlooks – non exhaustive - Erik Adli, July 9, 2008.
Multibunch beam stability in damping ring (Proposal of multibunch operation week in October) K. Kubo.
Beam stability in damping ring - for stable extracted beam for ATF K. Kubo.
F All Experimenters' Mtg - 2 Jun 03 Weeks in Review: 05/19/03 –06/02/03 Keith Gollwitzer – FNAL Stores and Operations Summary Standard Plots.
Recent Work Towards Increasing the AP2 & Debuncher Aperture – Keith Gollwitzer – May 9, Recent Work Towards Increasing the AP2 & Debuncher Aperture.
Updated Overview of Run II Upgrade Plan Beam Instrumentation Bob Webber Run II Luminosity Upgrade Review February 2004.
Simultaneous Position Measurements of Protons and Anti-Protons in the Tevatron R. K. Kutschke †, J. Steimel, R.Webber, S. Wolbers, Fermilab*, Batavia,
Andreas Jansson, "Quadrupole Pick-ups", LHC BI-Review, November 19-20, Quadrupole Pick-ups  What is a quadrupole pick-up?  PS pick-ups and experimental.
TeV BPM Review 12/16/2003 Summary Status, Motivation, and Directions.
RECYCLER REQUIREMENTS FOR THE RECYCLER RING & ASSOCIATED TRANSFER LINES BPMs Brajesh Choudhary for the MI Dept.
Specifications of Tevatron BPM Upgrade Jim Steimel.
Advanced Optics Control, CERN, Masamitsu Aiba, PSI Recent optics measurements at SLS M. Aiba, M. Böge, Á. Saá Hernández, D. Mayilyan and.
Main Injector Beam Position Monitor Upgrade: Status and Plans Rob Kutschke All Experimenters’ Meeting April 3, 2006 Beams-doc-2217-v3.
Craig Drennan Linac and 400 MeV BPMs January 7, 2011.
9/2/2003Tev BPM requirements1 Tevatron BPM and BLM requirements Mike Martens.
9/25/2006All experimenters meetingA. Jansson 1 Tevatron Ionization Profile Monitors Andreas Jansson.
High Intensity Booster Operations William Pellico PIP II collaboration Nov. 9 th 2015.
12/06/2006 MFW. 12/06/2006 P-Bar Injection 12/06/2006 MFW Latest problems stem from RFT Module loosing phase lock. Greg Vogel informs us that the “real.
Ground motion studies at ATF2 June 11, 2014 Orbit jitter source identification via ground motion studies at ATF2 (Results of the June run) Marcin Patecki,
Robert R. Wilson Prize Talk John Peoples April APS Meeting: February 14,
Beam time structures 1 At any particular instance of time there will be only one kind of beam in the MI. It will be either protons or anti-protons. The.
12/16/03Tev BPM requirements1 Tevatron BPM requirements Mike Martens.
BPM Signal Processing: A Cartoon View Rob Kutschke Oct 13, 2003.
FJPPL-FKPPL ATF2 Workshop Jitter studies March 18, 2014 Beam jitter localization and identification at ATF2 Marcin Patecki Jürgen Pfingstner 18 th of March.
Tevatron Beam Position Monitor Upgrade Stephen Wolbers (for the Tevatron BPM Upgrade Project) PAC05, Knoxville, TN May 16-20, 2005.
Lecture 4 Longitudinal Dynamics I Professor Emmanuel Tsesmelis Directorate Office, CERN Department of Physics, University of Oxford ACAS School for Accelerator.
Beam Diagnostics Seminar, Nov.05, 2009 Das Tune-Meßverfahren für das neue POSI am SIS-18 U. Rauch GSI - Strahldiagnose.
Aug On Pbar Losses - P. Lebrun1 f On Pbar Losses up the TeV Ramp Paul Lebrun Aug
A Survey of TBT Capabilities of the Upgraded TeV BPMs Rob Kutschke, CD/EXP Tevatron Department Meeting February 18, 2005 Beams-doc-1583-v2.
Ultra-low Emittance Coupling, method and results from the Australian Synchrotron Light Source Rohan Dowd Accelerator Physicist Australian Synchrotron.
SDA- Shot Data Analysis Jean Slaughter DOE Review July 21, 2003.
Jim Crittenden CHESS Simulation Working Group 30 March 2015
Emittance growth AT PS injection
March Trip Plan Mikey Davis 01 March /7.
Monday February 28th 8h00: Injection
Presentation transcript:

A Survey of the Capabilities of the Upgraded TeV BPMs Rob Kutschke, CD/EXP Run II Meeting March 24, 2005 Beams-doc-1752-v2

3/24/2005Rob Kutschke, TeV BPM2 This Talk Will Show: Closed orbit. –Average of all bunches over many turns. –Can see both protons and anti-protons. Injection TBT –Triggered by injection. –Either single bunch or uncoalesced beam. –Can see: synchrotron motion, betatron motion, quadrupole oscillations of bunch in the bucket, HV coupling, plus some instrumental artifacts. TBT –Triggered by request. –Will show 36x36 during normal HEP store. Do NOT ping beam. Can see the “15 Hz” motion. Using data taken at A3 in early January and February.

3/24/2005Rob Kutschke, TeV BPM3

3/24/2005Rob Kutschke, TeV BPM4 Detail during proton injection and anti- proton injection. Can see injection bumps during proton injection. During pbar injection can see injections, cogging and a small instrumental effects.

3/24/2005Rob Kutschke, TeV BPM5 Cancellation of proton contamination on Pbar cables: a,b,c,d determined empricially using the opening of the helix. Using corrected values, compute sum and position as for protons.

3/24/2005Rob Kutschke, TeV BPM6

3/24/2005Rob Kutschke, TeV BPM7

3/24/2005Rob Kutschke, TeV BPM8

3/24/2005Rob Kutschke, TeV BPM9

3/24/2005Rob Kutschke, TeV BPM10 Injection TBT Triggered by injection. Either single bunch or uncoalesced beam. Check that it gives same answer as closed orbit. Can see: synchrotron motion, betatron motion, quadrupole oscillations of bunch in the bucket, HV coupling, plus some instrumental artifacts

3/24/2005Rob Kutschke, TeV BPM11

3/24/2005Rob Kutschke, TeV BPM mm full vertical scale0.6 mm full vertical scale Injection TBT; 150 GeV; 8192 turns. One coalesced bunch. HEP shot after all tuning.

3/24/2005Rob Kutschke, TeV BPM13 Synchrotron Line Betatron Lines Bin Size: ~3 Hz Resolution: 0.3  m/sqrt(Hz) 1113 / 5 Artifacts

3/24/2005Rob Kutschke, TeV BPM14 Synchroton line present in H but not V. 150 GeV expected sync frequency: 80 Hz. 80 Hz

3/24/2005Rob Kutschke, TeV BPM / 5 ArtifactsBetatron Lines (  m)

3/24/2005Rob Kutschke, TeV BPM16 Injection TBT; 150 GeV; 8192 turns. Uncoalesced beam. Tuneup shot with large injection mismatches.

3/24/2005Rob Kutschke, TeV BPM17 Synchrotron Line 1113 / 5 Artifacts Bin Size: ~3 Hz Betatron Lines

3/24/2005Rob Kutschke, TeV BPM / 5 Artifacts Betatron Lines (  m)

3/24/2005Rob Kutschke, TeV BPM19 HV Coupling Frequency HV coupling is clear. Frequency of envelope is about 260 Hz.

3/24/2005Rob Kutschke, TeV BPM20

3/24/2005Rob Kutschke, TeV BPM21 Injection TBT. Sum signal (A+B) Same data as for positions. –Uncoalesced. –150 GeV. Dominant frequency is different than in position data!

3/24/2005Rob Kutschke, TeV BPM22 Detail of Fourier transform. 150 GeV –f sync ~80 Hz. Main structure at ~160 Hz is quadrupole oscillation of bunches in their buckets.

3/24/2005Rob Kutschke, TeV BPM23 TBT middle of HEP 36x36 store. 980 GeV; f sync ~37 Hz. Similar features on other BPMs. Closed orbit resolution correlates with size of 15 Hz oscillations.

3/24/2005Rob Kutschke, TeV BPM24 Can observed TBT motion explain the variation in RMS of closed orbit measurements? In broad strokes yes. Still working on a quantitative model.

3/24/2005Rob Kutschke, TeV BPM25 Not sure why line at Hz is at the same frequency in both horizontal and vertical? 1113 / 5 Artifacts

3/24/2005Rob Kutschke, TeV BPM26 Conclusions TBT and Injection TBT are working. We can cleanly see: –Synchrotron lines –Betatron lines –Quadrupole oscillations –HV Coupling –15 Hz noise. Can make quantitative measurements of these in 8192 turns. 1113/5 artifacts are present in safe places.

3/24/2005Rob Kutschke, TeV BPM27 Backup Slides

3/24/2005Rob Kutschke, TeV BPM28 Further Details on TBT Documents earlier than 1565 discuss debugging the instrument. Beams-doc-1565 –HEP Shot. One coalesced bunch. –Synchrotron, betatron motion. Beams-doc-1566 –Tune up shot. Uncoalesced. –Synchrotron, betatron motion –Quadrupole oscillation of bunch in bucket. –Resolution. Beams-doc-1571 –HV Coupling Beams-doc-1577 –15 Hz noise. Watch DocDb for latest developments.

3/24/2005Rob Kutschke, TeV BPM29 Fourier Transform F(f), defined by: N is number of data points. P n, t n are position and time on turn n. C(f) is a normalization factor. P is mean position of all data. –Subtracted to remove alias at 0 Hz. ~

3/24/2005Rob Kutschke, TeV BPM / 5 Artifacts Digitizer is clocked at 7/5 f RF. After 7 cycles of this clock, and 5 cycles of RF, the 7/5 RF clock is back in sync with the RF. After one full turn of 1113 RF cycles, the 7/5 clock has not gone through a full cycle of 7 states. When first bunch of second turn arrives, the 7/5 clock has a different phase than it did when the first bunch of the first turn arrived. After 5 turns, the two clocks are back in sync. Beams-doc-1066

3/24/2005Rob Kutschke, TeV BPM31 All 8 plots on same scale.