Efi.uchicago.edu ci.uchicago.edu Federating ATLAS storage using XrootD (FAX) Rob Gardner on behalf of the atlas-adc-federated-xrootd working group Computation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Outline Network related issues and thinking for FAX Cost among sites, who has problems Analytics of FAX meta data, what are the problems  The main object.
Advertisements

Efi.uchicago.edu ci.uchicago.edu FAX update Rob Gardner Computation and Enrico Fermi Institutes University of Chicago Sep 9, 2013.
Efi.uchicago.edu ci.uchicago.edu FAX status report Ilija Vukotic Computation and Enrico Fermi Institutes University of Chicago US ATLAS Computing Integration.
LHC Experiment Dashboard Main areas covered by the Experiment Dashboard: Data processing monitoring (job monitoring) Data transfer monitoring Site/service.
Pilots 2.0: DIRAC pilots for all the skies Federico Stagni, A.McNab, C.Luzzi, A.Tsaregorodtsev On behalf of the DIRAC consortium and the LHCb collaboration.
Experiences Deploying Xrootd at RAL Chris Brew (RAL)
CERN - IT Department CH-1211 Genève 23 Switzerland t Monitoring the ATLAS Distributed Data Management System Ricardo Rocha (CERN) on behalf.
ATLAS Off-Grid sites (Tier-3) monitoring A. Petrosyan on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration GRID’2012, , JINR, Dubna.
ATLAS federated xrootd monitoring requirements Rob Gardner July 26, 2012.
Integration Program Update Rob Gardner US ATLAS Tier 3 Workshop OSG All LIGO.
Take on messages from Lecture 1 LHC Computing has been well sized to handle the production and analysis needs of LHC (very high data rates and throughputs)
Tier 3 Data Management, Tier 3 Rucio Caches Doug Benjamin Duke University.
Monitoring the Grid at local, national, and Global levels Pete Gronbech GridPP Project Manager ACAT - Brunel Sept 2011.
PanDA Multi-User Pilot Jobs Maxim Potekhin Brookhaven National Laboratory Open Science Grid WLCG GDB Meeting CERN March 11, 2009.
1 st December 2003 JIM for CDF 1 JIM and SAMGrid for CDF Mòrag Burgon-Lyon University of Glasgow.
Storage Wahid Bhimji DPM Collaboration : Tasks. Xrootd: Status; Using for Tier2 reading from “Tier3”; Server data mining.
FAX UPDATE 1 ST JULY Discussion points: FAX failover summary and issues Mailing issues Panda re-brokering to sites using FAX cost and access Issue.
FAX UPDATE 26 TH AUGUST Running issues FAX failover Moving to new AMQ server Informing on endpoint status Monitoring developments Monitoring validation.
DDM-Panda Issues Kaushik De University of Texas At Arlington DDM Workshop, BNL September 29, 2006.
Efi.uchicago.edu ci.uchicago.edu Towards FAX usability Rob Gardner, Ilija Vukotic Computation and Enrico Fermi Institutes University of Chicago US ATLAS.
Efi.uchicago.edu ci.uchicago.edu FAX meeting intro and news Rob Gardner Computation and Enrico Fermi Institutes University of Chicago ATLAS Federated Xrootd.
Wahid, Sam, Alastair. Now installed on production storage Edinburgh: srm.glite.ecdf.ed.ac.uk  Local and global redir work (port open) e.g. root://srm.glite.ecdf.ed.ac.uk//atlas/dq2/mc12_8TeV/NTUP_SMWZ/e1242_a159_a165_r3549_p1067/mc1.
And Tier 3 monitoring Tier 3 Ivan Kadochnikov LIT JINR
Status & Plan of the Xrootd Federation Wei Yang 13/19/12 US ATLAS Computing Facility Meeting at 2012 OSG AHM, University of Nebraska, Lincoln.
Experiment Support ANALYSIS FUNCTIONAL AND STRESS TESTING Dan van der Ster, CERN IT-ES-DAS for the HC team: Johannes Elmsheuser, Federica Legger, Mario.
Efi.uchicago.edu ci.uchicago.edu FAX Dress Rehearsal Status Report Ilija Vukotic on behalf of the atlas-adc-federated-xrootd working group Computation.
PanDA Update Kaushik De Univ. of Texas at Arlington XRootD Workshop, UCSD January 27, 2015.
EGI-InSPIRE RI EGI-InSPIRE EGI-InSPIRE RI Direct gLExec integration with PanDA Fernando H. Barreiro Megino CERN IT-ES-VOS.
Efi.uchicago.edu ci.uchicago.edu Using FAX to test intra-US links Ilija Vukotic on behalf of the atlas-adc-federated-xrootd working group Computing Integration.
Efi.uchicago.edu ci.uchicago.edu FAX status developments performance future Rob Gardner Yang Wei Andrew Hanushevsky Ilija Vukotic.
Storage Federations and FAX (the ATLAS Federation) Wahid Bhimji University of Edinburgh.
Efi.uchicago.edu ci.uchicago.edu Status of the FAX federation Rob Gardner Computation and Enrico Fermi Institutes University of Chicago ATLAS Tier 1 /
6/23/2005 R. GARDNER OSG Baseline Services 1 OSG Baseline Services In my talk I’d like to discuss two questions:  What capabilities are we aiming for.
Network awareness and network as a resource (and its integration with WMS) Artem Petrosyan (University of Texas at Arlington) BigPanDA Workshop, CERN,
SLACFederated Storage Workshop Summary For pre-GDB (Data Access) Meeting 5/13/14 Andrew Hanushevsky SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory.
ATLAS XRootd Demonstrator Doug Benjamin Duke University On behalf of ATLAS.
Efi.uchicago.edu ci.uchicago.edu FAX status report Ilija Vukotic on behalf of the atlas-adc-federated-xrootd working group S&C week Jun 2, 2014.
PanDA Status Report Kaushik De Univ. of Texas at Arlington ANSE Meeting, Nashville May 13, 2014.
XROOTD AND FEDERATED STORAGE MONITORING CURRENT STATUS AND ISSUES A.Petrosyan, D.Oleynik, J.Andreeva Creating federated data stores for the LHC CC-IN2P3,
FAX PERFORMANCE TIM, Tokyo May PERFORMANCE TIM, TOKYO, MAY 2013ILIJA VUKOTIC 2  Metrics  Data Coverage  Number of users.
PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS WORKFLOW ISSUES US ATLAS Distributed Facility Workshop November 2012, Santa Cruz.
FAX UPDATE 12 TH AUGUST Discussion points: Developments FAX failover monitoring and issues SSB Mailing issues Panda re-brokering to FAX Monitoring.
MND review. Main directions of work  Development and support of the Experiment Dashboard Applications - Data management monitoring - Job processing monitoring.
Efi.uchicago.edu ci.uchicago.edu Data Federation Strategies for ATLAS using XRootD Ilija Vukotic On behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration Computation and Enrico.
Efi.uchicago.edu ci.uchicago.edu Ramping up FAX and WAN direct access Rob Gardner on behalf of the atlas-adc-federated-xrootd working group Computation.
1 A Scalable Distributed Data Management System for ATLAS David Cameron CERN CHEP 2006 Mumbai, India.
Efi.uchicago.edu ci.uchicago.edu Storage federations, caches & WMS Rob Gardner Computation and Enrico Fermi Institutes University of Chicago BigPanDA Workshop.
Enabling Grids for E-sciencE INFSO-RI Enabling Grids for E-sciencE Gavin McCance GDB – 6 June 2007 FTS 2.0 deployment and testing.
Testing Infrastructure Wahid Bhimji Sam Skipsey Intro: what to test Existing testing frameworks A proposal.
CMS: T1 Disk/Tape separation Nicolò Magini, CERN IT/SDC Oliver Gutsche, FNAL November 11 th 2013.
ATLAS Off-Grid sites (Tier-3) monitoring A. Petrosyan on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration GRID’2012, , JINR, Dubna.
An Analysis of Data Access Methods within WLCG Shaun de Witt, Andrew Lahiff (STFC)
Acronyms GAS - Grid Acronym Soup, LCG - LHC Computing Project EGEE - Enabling Grids for E-sciencE.
G. Russo, D. Del Prete, S. Pardi Kick Off Meeting - Isola d'Elba, 2011 May 29th–June 01th A proposal for distributed computing monitoring for SuperB G.
New Features of Xrootd SE Wei Yang US ATLAS Tier 2/Tier 3 meeting, University of Texas, Arlington,
SLACFederated Storage Workshop Summary Andrew Hanushevsky SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory April 10-11, 2014 SLAC.
DPM in FAX (ATLAS Federation) Wahid Bhimji University of Edinburgh As well as others in the UK, IT and Elsewhere.
Efi.uchicago.edu ci.uchicago.edu FAX splinter session Rob Gardner Computation and Enrico Fermi Institutes University of Chicago ATLAS Tier 1 / Tier 2 /
Efi.uchicago.edu ci.uchicago.edu Sharing Network Resources Ilija Vukotic Computation and Enrico Fermi Institutes University of Chicago Federated Storage.
HEPiX IPv6 Working Group David Kelsey (STFC-RAL) GridPP33 Ambleside 22 Aug 2014.
Efi.uchicago.edu ci.uchicago.edu FAX status report Ilija Vukotic on behalf of the atlas-adc-federated-xrootd working group Computation and Enrico Fermi.
Efi.uchicago.edu ci.uchicago.edu FAX splinter session Rob Gardner Computation and Enrico Fermi Institutes University of Chicago ATLAS Tier 1 / Tier 2 /
Federating Data in the ALICE Experiment
WLCG IPv6 deployment strategy
Computing Operations Roadmap
Global Data Access – View from the Tier 2
PanDA in a Federated Environment
Data Federation with Xrootd Wei Yang US ATLAS Computing Facility meeting Southern Methodist University, Oct 11-12, 2011.
FDR readiness & testing plan
Brookhaven National Laboratory Storage service Group Hironori Ito
Presentation transcript:

efi.uchicago.edu ci.uchicago.edu Federating ATLAS storage using XrootD (FAX) Rob Gardner on behalf of the atlas-adc-federated-xrootd working group Computation and Enrico Fermi Institutes University of Chicago OSG All Hands Meeting March 11, 2013

efi.uchicago.edu ci.uchicago.edu 2 Data federation goals Create a common ATLAS namespace across all storage sites, accessible from anywhere Make easy to use, homogeneous access to data Identified initial use cases – Failover from stage-in problems with local storage o Now implemented, in production on several sites – Gain access to more CPUs using WAN direct read access o Allow brokering to Tier 2s with partial datasets o Opportunistic resources without local ATLAS storage – Use as caching mechanism at sites to reduce local data management tasks o Eliminate cataloging, consistency checking, deletion services WAN data access group formed in ATLAS to determine use cases & requirements on infrastructure

efi.uchicago.edu ci.uchicago.edu 3 Implications for Production & Analysis Behind the scenes in the Panda + Pilot systems: – Recover from stage-in to local disk failures – This is in production at a few sites Development coming to allow advanced brokering which includes network performance – Would mean jobs no longer require dataset to be complete at a site – Access “diskless” compute sites Ability to use non-WLCG resources – “Off-grid” analysis clusters – Opportunistic resources – Cloud resources

efi.uchicago.edu ci.uchicago.edu 4 Testing elements Starting week of January 21, we’ve been following a bottoms-up approach which builds stability in lower layers Will review progress in each of the layers in this interim report At-large users HammerCloud & WAN-FDR jobs (programmatic) HammerCloud & WAN-FDR jobs (programmatic) Network cost matrix (continuous) Basic functionality (continuous) Complexity

efi.uchicago.edu ci.uchicago.edu 5 Basic redirection functionality Direct access from clients to sites Redirection to non-local data (“upstream”) Redirection from central redirectors to the site (“downstream”) Uses a host at CERN which runs set of probes against sites

efi.uchicago.edu ci.uchicago.edu 6 Redirectors - regional and global 6 Service monitor

efi.uchicago.edu ci.uchicago.edu 7 Connectivity matrix Survey revealed complex security dependencies on various voms and xrootd clients found at sites

efi.uchicago.edu ci.uchicago.edu 8 Data federated (1) Top 100 sites used by ATLAS (bold=FAX accessible) * Includes tape, which we do not federate * *

efi.uchicago.edu ci.uchicago.edu 9 Cost matrix measurements Requires sites to install an XRootD server Redirectors for each region (“cloud”) Currently 32 sites, including EOS Redirection network touches six clouds (DE, FR, IT, RU, UK, US) plus CERN Redirectors ready for ES and Asia regions Cost-of-access: (pairwise network links, storage load, etc.)

efi.uchicago.edu ci.uchicago.edu 10 Comparing local to wide area performance Ping time (ms) read time (s) local Each site can check its connectivity and IO performance for copy and direct read

efi.uchicago.edu ci.uchicago.edu 11 Hammer Cloud testing Pre-placed, site-unique SUSY and Higgs datasets at all sites (see coverage next slide) Realistic, typical analysis templates for SUSY D3PD maker and Higgs analysis New pilot equipped for stage-in or direct access with XrootD Choose ANALY queue, and redirector Submission runs for (both modes): – Phase 1: Local performance – Phase 2: Nearby performance (e.g. within a cloud) – Phase 3: Far-away performance

efi.uchicago.edu ci.uchicago.edu 12 Test dataset distribution Both sets of test datasets distributed to most sites with small amounts of cleanup left. These datasets will be used to gather reference benchmarks for the various access configuration

efi.uchicago.edu ci.uchicago.edu 13 Queue configurations This turns out to be the hardest part Providing federated XRootD access exposes the full extent of heterogeneity of sites, in terms of schedconfig queue parameters Each site’s “copysetup” parameters seems to differ, and specific parameter settings need to be tried in the Hammer Cloud job submission scripts using –overwriteQueuedata Amazingly, in spite of this there are a good fraction of FAX-functional sites

efi.uchicago.edu ci.uchicago.edu 14 First phase of HC tests: local access HC run – – HWW code with regular SMWZ input, FAX directIO, production version pilots – This is for access to local data, but via direct access xrootd Results: – 26 sites in the test – 16 sites with job successes – 3 sites where no job started/finished during test – (CERN, ROMA1, OU_OCHEP_SWT2) – 1 site does not have input data (GLASGOW) – 1 site blacklisted (FZU) – 1 site used xrdcp instead of directIO (BNL) – 4 sites with 100% failures (EDCF, IHEP, JINR, LANCS) – 4 sites with job successes and failures – (FRASCATI, NAPOLI, LRZ, RAL) – LRZ experienced again xrootd crashes – SLAC jobs finally succeed Johannes, 3 weeks ago

efi.uchicago.edu ci.uchicago.edu 15 Systematic FDR load tests in progress Choose analysis queue & FAX server sites, #jobs, #files Choose access type: copy files or direct ROOT access (10% events, 30 MB client cache) Record timings in CERN Choose analysis queue & FAX server sites, #jobs, #files Choose access type: copy files or direct ROOT access (10% events, 30 MB client cache) Record timings in CERN Adapted WAN framework for specific FDR load tests

efi.uchicago.edu ci.uchicago.edu 16 Systematic FDR load tests in progress Individual job lists + links back to Panda logs Individual job lists + links back to Panda logs Drill down

efi.uchicago.edu ci.uchicago.edu 17 Systematic FDR load tests in progress US cloud results

efi.uchicago.edu ci.uchicago.edu 18 Controlled site “load” testing Two sites being in IT cloud read by jobs running at CERN

efi.uchicago.edu ci.uchicago.edu 19 Federated traffic seen in the WLCG dashboard

efi.uchicago.edu ci.uchicago.edu 20 FAX WLCG dashboard Thanks to dashboard team at CERN IT-ES

efi.uchicago.edu ci.uchicago.edu 21 Federation traffic Modest levels now will grow when in production Oxford and ECDF switched to xrootd for local traffic Prague users reading from EOS Co-located Tier 3 client  Tier 2 server

efi.uchicago.edu ci.uchicago.edu 22 ATLAS throughputs (from US) FAX traffic a tiny fraction of the total ATLAS throughput (for now)

efi.uchicago.edu ci.uchicago.edu 23 FAX by source cloud

efi.uchicago.edu ci.uchicago.edu 24 FAX by destination cloud

efi.uchicago.edu ci.uchicago.edu 25 Conclusions The FDR has been a good exercise in exposing a number of site & system integration issues – Site specific client differences  limited proxy check not always working – Non-uniform copysetup parameters in schedconfig for sites – Lack of fault checking in the rungen script for read failures – Tweaks necessary to brokering to allow sending jobs to sites missing datasets In spite of this, much progress: – New functionality in the pilot to handle global paths without using dq2-client & forcing python 2.6 compatibility at all sites – First phase of programmatic HC stress testing nearing completion (local site access) – Some FAX accesses from Tier 3s – Test datasets in place Next steps – Programmatic HC stress tests for regional data access (Phase 2) – Address remaining integration issues above & continue to validate sites – Recruit, acquire feedback from early-adopting users – Outsource monitoring services where possible to WLCG, including central UDP collectors, availability probes, etc. – Global and Rucio namespace mapping, dev. of new N2N module – Set a timeframe for an ATLAS requirement of federating xrootd services at sites

efi.uchicago.edu ci.uchicago.edu 26 Thanks A hearty thanks goes out to all the members of the atlas-adc-federated-xrootd group, especially site admins and providers of redirection & monitoring infrastructure Special thanks to Johannes and Federica for preparing HC FAX analysis stress test templates and detailed reporting on test results Simone & Hiro for test dataset distribution & Simone for getting involved in HC testing Paul, John, Jose for pilot and wrapper changes Ilija for FDR testing framework and site-by-site testing Wei for doggedly tracking down xrootd security issues & other site problems & Andy for getting ATLAS’ required features into xrootd releases