“In-situ” measurement of material removal during BCP Mircea Stirbet and Peter Kneisel TTC Meeting Milan, Italy 28 th Feb – 3 rd Mar 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ultrasonic Testing By: Chris Wu CEE 398 3/5/04.
Advertisements

WP-M3 Superconducting Materials PArametric COnverter Detector INFN_Genoa Renzo Parodi.
Volume I Companion Presentation Frank R. Miele Pegasus Lectures, Inc.
SOUND AND ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE Prof. Dr. Moustafa. M. Mohamed Vice Dean Faculty of Allied Medical Science Pharos University Alexandria Dr. Yasser Khedr.
Sensor Technologies Class 6.
“ULTRASONIC SYSTEM OF DISTANT DETERMINATION COORDINATES”
EE 5340/7340, SMU Electrical Engineering Department, © Carlos E. Davila, Electrical Engineering Dept. Southern Methodist University slides can be.
Basic Physics of Ultrasound
ECE 501 Introduction to BME
Chapter 16 Wave Motion.
Ultrasound Medical Imaging Imaging Science Fundamentals.
Ultrasound Imaging Atam Dhawan.
Instrumentation System  A Measuring system is required to compare a quantity with a standard or to provide an output that can be related to the quantity.
NorCal Tech 2005 Technical Conference
Level Sensors.
Method of Level Measurement
K L University 1 By G.SUNITA DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS.
IT-101 Section 001 Lecture #15 Introduction to Information Technology.
Ultrasonic Testing This technique is used for the detection of internal surface (particularly distant surface) defects in sound conducting.
Sound Waves and Ultrasound
GENERATING AND DETECTING OF ULTRASOUND
ULTRASONIC SENSORS Semih Öztürk Mechatronics
Ultrasound T1, T3, T4, T6 April 27, 2013.
Stacy Drake Bluetooth Vs. Wi-Fi. What is Bluetooth?
Ultrasonic Sensor Made By: 1.Hadeer Radwan 2.Alaa Mustafa 3.Amany Amr.
Objective To study the effect of sub surface defects in surface roughness monitoring through ultrasonic flaw detector. To study the sizing of defects.
Advanced Radio and Radar Part 1 Communicating. Introduction Communication may be defined as “the exchange of information” and as such is a two-way process.
The Pencel Pressuremeter Sunil Sundaram Foundation Design Spring 2004.
Traffic Monitoring System using Acoustic Sensors Yuping Dong May 14, 2008.
Mechanical Measurement and Instrumentation MECN 4600
Status of RFCC-Module Development Derun Li Center for Beam Physics Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE Collaboration Meeting at INFN-LNF, Frascati,
Building Three-Dimensional Images Using a Time-Reversal Chaotic Cavity
Echo Cancellation Chapter 4. Echo : Echo is the repetition of a signal back to the transmitter; either due to a coupling between the loudspeaker and microphone.
10/20/2015Copyright © 2008 Ballios, Dow, Vogtmann, Zofchak.
Presented by: David Beamish DeFelsko Corporation
Sarah Gillies Ultrasound Sarah Gillies
Ultrasound Physics Reflections & Attenuation ‘97.
University of Kurdistan Food Quality Evaluation Methods (FQEM) Lecturer: Kaveh Mollazade, Ph.D. Department of Biosystems Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture,
OCS & wireless technology
Piezoelectric Effect  Sound waves striking a PZ material produce an electrical signal  Can be used to detect sound (and echoes)!
Chapter 1. SIGNAL PROCESSING:  Signal processing is concerned with the efficient and accurate extraction of information in a signal process.  Signal.
Hydroformed Multi-Cell Cavities. Update Waldemar Singer, DESY Peter Kneisel, JLab.
 Ultrasound waves are longitudinal with high frequencies ( ≈ > 20,000 Hz, though medical Ultrasound is between 1 to 15 MHz.)  When an ultrasound reaches.
EEE 499 GRADUATION PROJECT FIRST-MIDTERM PRESENTATION By Sedat ONATLI & Akbar SHADAKOV Supervisor : Prof.Dr. Arif NACAROĞLU.
Prepared By: GUNDALE MANSI V.
LARSEN AND TOUBRO LIMITED HEAVY ENGINEERING DIVISION
Page 1 Jean Delayen Subashini De Silva Center for Accelerator Science Department of Physics, Old Dominion University and Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator.
Imaging of propagating wave fronts resulting from ultrasonic pulses incident on heel bones using refracto-vibrometry Acoustical Society of America Meeting.
1.Dimension measurement for calibration duties.
By ASST. Prof. DR. ASEEL BASIM
BCP Analysis Update Thomas Jones 22/7/16.
Reflections & Attenuation
Prof. Sajid Naeem (DOES – PC)
Ultrasonic Rangefinder
Single-element transducers properties
ULTRASONIC DISTANCE METER USING 8051
Acoustic mapping technology
Fig. 4 Block diagram of system
Ultrasound.
WALL DETECTOR ROBOT VEHICLE
Mircea Stirbet Jefferson Laboratory
Ultrasonic Testing.
Working Group 3 Summary TTC Meeting INFN Milan,March 3, 2011
Food Quality Evaluation Methods (FQEM)
Basic Physics of Ultrasound
What we will do today: Carry out calculations involving the relationship between speed, wavelength and frequency for waves.
Fig. 4 Block diagram of system
Ultrasonic Rangefinder
Sound Waves and Ultrasound
Presentation transcript:

“In-situ” measurement of material removal during BCP Mircea Stirbet and Peter Kneisel TTC Meeting Milan, Italy 28 th Feb – 3 rd Mar 2011

Principle of ultrasonic thickness measurement The transducer contains a piezoelectric element which is excited by a short electrical impulse to generate a burst of ultrasonic waves. The sound waves are coupled into the test material and travels through it until they encounter a back wall or other boundary. The reflections then travel back to the transducer, which converts the sound energy back into electrical energy. In essence, the gage listens for the echo from the opposite side. Typically this time interval is only a few millionths of a second. The gage is programmed with the speed of sound in the test material, from which it can then calculate thickness using the simple mathematical relationship T = (V) x (t/2) where T = the thickness of the part V = the velocity of sound in the test material t = the measured round-trip transit time TTC Meeting Milan, Italy 28 th Feb – 3 rd Mar 2011

Hardware at JLAB for US measurements - Panametrics 25DL (old instrument: ~2000) - Panametrics 25DL Plus (quite new but no more in production) -Temperature measurement instrumentation - Laptop and software for data acquisition (via serial port) - Wireless replacement for the serial cable (data can be transmitted over 200 ft.) - Dealing with measurement errors in ultrasonic thickness measurements… Errors related with: - US gauge dimensions - Surface shape - Surface finish - Nb fine or large grains - Instrumental errors - Operator training TTC Meeting Milan, Italy 28 th Feb – 3 rd Mar 2011

Typical NB thickness measurements done at JLAB TTC Meeting Milan, Italy 28 th Feb – 3 rd Mar 2011

Nb step standard for Ultrasonic gauge calibration TTC Meeting Milan, Italy 28 th Feb – 3 rd Mar 2011 Linear step Nb standard Cylindrical step Nb standard

Typical Nb thickness measurements done at JLAB cont TTC Meeting Milan, Italy 28 th Feb – 3 rd Mar 2011

Typical Nb thickness measurements done at JLAB cont TTC Meeting Milan, Italy 28 th Feb – 3 rd Mar 2011

Setup and data acquisition for in situ US measurements Panametrics Model 25DL Gauge calibrated against Nb standard Couplant : glycerin Initial measurements done on large grains single cell cavity (measurements affected by crystal boundaries) then test done on fine grain 1500 MHz singe cell cavity. TTC Meeting Milan, Italy 28 th Feb – 3 rd Mar 2011

Results large grains cavity (Feb 2010) TTC Meeting Milan, Italy 28 th Feb – 3 rd Mar 2011

Results fine grains cavity (June 2010) cont Nb removal rate = 5.3 μm/min Total Nb removed during 10 min of BCP = 53 μm Total Nb removed during 9 min of BCP = 47 μm TTC Meeting Milan, Italy 28 th Feb – 3 rd Mar 2011

Results fine grains cavity (June 2010) cont After BCP freq= MHz ∆ freq = = 0.45 MHz Nb removed =450 kHz/(11 kHz/μm) = 40.9 µm TTC Meeting Milan, Italy 28 th Feb – 3 rd Mar 2011

Wireless transmission of US measurements 1500 MHz single cell with probes attached for frequency measurements after BCP. TTC Meeting Milan, Italy 28 th Feb – 3 rd Mar 2011

Seamless fine grain Nb 3-cells cavity Oct 2010 In situ Nb thickness measurements with wireless data transmission during BCP. TTC Meeting Milan, Italy 28 th Feb – 3 rd Mar 2011

Spoke cavity July 2010 TTC Meeting Milan, Italy 28 th Feb – 3 rd Mar 2011 In situ Nb thickness measurements on a spoke cavity during BCP.

Seamless 3-cells cavity Nov 2010 Seamless 3 cell cavity with ultrasonic probe for thickness measurements during BCP. TTC Meeting Milan, Italy 28 th Feb – 3 rd Mar 2011

Still to be done Data acquisition program (LabView). Multichannel ultrasonic measurement instrumentation (8 channels?). Fixture for the US gauge on the multicell cavity. Water proof box for instrument and wireless transmitter and fixture of the box on the cavity stand. Ultrasonic Nb thickness measurements during PCB on a multicell cavity. Study of Nb removal rate as function of acid strength and temperature. TTC Meeting Milan, Italy 28 th Feb – 3 rd Mar 2011

Multi gauge setup 3-cell seamless cavity with probes attached for simultaneously thickness measurements. TTC Meeting Milan, Italy 28 th Feb – 3 rd Mar 2011

Conclusions -In situ ultrasonic Niobium thickness measurements during BCP - can be DONE – consistent results were obtained for Nb removal as measured with the ultrasonic device or estimated from frequency shift measurements. -It is an efficient direct method for in situ Nb thickness measurements. Saving in measurement time. -Wireless transmission of facilitates data acquisition in controlled environment. TTC Meeting Milan, Italy 28 th Feb – 3 rd Mar 2011 Acknowledgements: Tony Reilly, James Davenport and Teena Harris