RICHMOND COUNTY SCHOOL SYSTEM COMMUNITY MEETING GLENN HILLS MIDDLE SCHOOL JANUARY 7, 2015 School System Flexibility Options.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Operational Systems Decision Time Presented by Division of External Affairs and Policy Georgia Department of Education 1.
Advertisements

Roles and Responsibilities. Collaborative Efforts to Improve Student Achievement Guidelines for developing integrated planning and decision making processes.
SCHOOL SYSTEM FLEXIBILITY IN GEORGIA Overview and Comparison.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction California Department of Education Special Education Self-
The Florida College System House Bill 7135: Relating to Postsecondary Education Julie Alexander & Carrie Henderson April 20,
Campus Improvement Plans
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Parental Waivers for English Learners Carlos Rivera, Administrator.
SCHOOL SYSTEM FLEXIBILITY IN GEORGIA Overview and Comparison Presentation to Education Works Leadership Institute September 16, 2013.
IE 2, CHARTER, AND STATUS QUO SCHOOL SYSTEMS Flexibility Options Comparison F EBRUARY 26, 2015 Ken Thompson Chief Financial Officer.
GaDOE Charter School Board Training Requirements Dr. Lynn Plunkett GCCA CEO WKSP January 23, 2015 TCSG’s Office of College & Career Transition Specialized.
IE 2 and CHARTER SYSTEMS Accountability Comparison Sources of Information Governor’s Office of Student Achievement website Georgia Department of Education.
Ensuring Success For Each Student FLEXIBILITY & ACCOUNTABILITY Legislative Requirements and Options for Georgia School Systems.
Forsyth County Schools Overview of the Proposed IE 2 Partnership Contract.
1 Proposed Changes to the Accreditation Process CDE Briefing for the Colorado State Board of Education March 5, 2008.
Presentation for FAPT February  Public schools operated by private groups  Autonomy in exchange for increased accountability  Exempt from Education.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY: QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS October 5, 2011.
Scenario – Practical Applications of School Law JESSAMY GUERRERO.
Promoting School Business Managers Brad Shortridge John Benedetti David Hill.
DRAFT Building Our Future 2017 Fulton County Schools Strategic Plan Name of Meeting Date.
Governor Introductions How long since your appointment? What type of governor and school? How many meetings attended so far? What do you hope to get out.
21 st Century Maricopa Review of Process Human Resources Projects Steering Team Meeting May 12, 2010.
9/2/20151 Ohio Family and Children First An overview of OFCF structure, membership, and responsibilities.
Creating a New Vision for Kentucky’s Youth Kentucky Youth Policy Assessment How can we Improve Services for Kentucky’s Youth? September 2005.
Effective Management and Compliance 1 ANA GRANTEE MEETING  FEBRUARY 5, 2015.
PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION Office of the State Public Health Director Modernization of Oregon’s Public Health System July 2015.
“An Act Relative to the Achievement Gap” Report of the Superintendent Melinda J. Boone, Ed.D. March 4, 2010.
Charter Schools and Charter Systems in Georgia Georgia Grantmakers Alliance Summer Meeting August 16, 2012.
School Budget (Draft)
District Improvement Plan August 10, 2015.
Presented by: Office of Independent Education and Parental Choice July 2012.
Oregon Public Charter Schools Oregon Department of Education August 2007.
Thirtysomething: EMS in California 30 Years After SB 125 Workshop Presentation by Emergency Medical Services Administrators’ Association of California.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Region Three Pilot “Virtual” Consolidation. Consolidation Legislation and Guidance Title I Schoolwide Fiscal Guidance issued February, 2008 [Section E]
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
District Improvement Plan September 21, 2015.
Reporting Requirements for IR Charters and Authorizing Agencies v2.0, Reporting Requirements for Charter Schools and Authorizing Agencies.
Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s Future” gadoe.org Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s.
The Facts About Schoolsite Councils The Roles and Responsibilities of a Schoolsite Council.
MADISON COUNTY SCHOOL SYSTEM CHARTER SYSTEM PETITION PUBLIC HEARINGS MONDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 5:00 PM TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 8, 6:00 PM PROFESSIONAL.
FACSA Performance Management for Florida Authorizers St. Petersburg, Florida June 16, 17 and 18, 2009.
What is a Charter System?
© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved. Charter Schools in Florida Friday, February 13, 2015 Mid-Year Transportation.
Budget Workshop: Fiscal Policies, Process, and Budget Guidelines Board of Governors April 21, 2005.
Presentation for FAPT June  Public schools operated by private groups  Autonomy in exchange for increased accountability  Exempt from Education.
January 15, Utilization of the Personal Curriculum.
INNOVATION ZONES NOVEMBER 10, WHAT ARE INNOVATION ZONES? A designation by the West Virginia Board of Education that provides schools with the support.
Charter School Information Session: Accountability and Evaluation Cobb County School District September 18, 2013.
Miller County School System STRATEGIC WAIVERS SCHOOL SYSTEM (IE2) FY17-23.
Application Amendments and Budget Transfers Title I University Chris McLaughlin, Title I Specialist Office of Program Administration and Accountability.
1 Senate Bill 130 Innovation Schools Act of 2008.
© 2009 CAMBRIDGE STRATEGIC SERVICES Strategic Planning Bristol Tennessee City Schools.
Summer Summit June 30 – July 1, We needed another acronym in education? TOP REASONS FOR A CHARTER SCHOOL PERFORMANCE FRAMEWORK 4. Our assessment.
RICHMOND COUNTY SCHOOL SYSTEM COMMUNITY MEETING WESTSIDE HIGH SCHOOL JANUARY 12, 2015 School System Flexibility Options.
Charter System School Governance Team Training Orientation to School Governance August 25, 2014.
Strategic Resource Planning Council June 26, 2013 Merit Policy.
Advisory Committee Meeting Richmond County School System Thursday, January 22, 2015.
Utah Charter School Code & Rules
Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015: Highlights and
Strategic Waivers School System/IE2 Application Process
Jackson County Schools Strategic Waiver School System Decision
Corporate Governance for Mutuals
Relentless innovation: Using Charter System Flexibility
Cobb County School District Charter Petition Training
Operational Systems “Decision Time”
Joann Hooper Patty Rooks Paulette Richmond Gary Wenzel
Roles and Responsibilities
Roles and Responsibilities
Title I Document Training, Revision, Input Meeting
Presentation transcript:

RICHMOND COUNTY SCHOOL SYSTEM COMMUNITY MEETING GLENN HILLS MIDDLE SCHOOL JANUARY 7, 2015 School System Flexibility Options

Richmond County School System Vision, Mission and Motto Vision Create a World Class School System where all students graduate college and career ready and globally competitive. Mission The Mission of the Richmond County School system is educate students to become lifelong learners and productive citizens. Motto Learning Today…Leading Tomorrow

1. Guarantee High Academic Achievement for All 2. Ensure Communication and Collaboration within the Community 3. Provide a Safe, Orderly and Healthy Learning Environment RCSS Strategic Goals

The Academic Bottom Line Improving Student Academic Results Shorthand phrase for Georgia education law and all related rules and guidelines Title 20 Freedom granted through waivers of Title 20 law, rules, and guidelines Flexibility Operational approaches school systems and schools can take to implement flexibility in exchange for a performance contract from the State Board of Education (IE 2 and Charter System) Flexibility Options Waivers of state class size, expenditure control, certification, and salary schedule requirements The Big Four 4 What are we talking about and why?

SELECTING A FLEXIBILITY OPTION No later than June 30, 2015 each school district must notify GaDOE that it will operate as an: 1.Investing in Educational Excellence (IE2) School System 2.Charter System 3. Status Quo School System

FLEXIBILITY OPTIONS: BACKGROUND INFORMATION O.C.G.A. § states that “[n]o later than June 30, 2015, each local school system shall notify the [Department of Education] of its intention to request increased flexibility pursuant to this article or shall comply with subsection (b) of Code Section ” According to O.C.G.A. § subsection (b) “a local school system may elect not to request increased flexibility in exchange for increased accountability and defined consequences and opt to remain under current laws, rules, regulations, policies, and procedures

FLEXIBILITY OPTIONS: The Trade-Off * * from GA DOE documents

THE FLEXIBILITY TO INNOVATE: TITLE 20 The Georgia Legislature is allowing school systems to trade- off increased accountability and expected student achievement for local school district autonomy and flexibility from state laws and GA DOE policies. This opportunity will cease to exist on July 1, 2015.

The Flexibility to Innovate: Title 20 School Systems have already been obtaining waivers from Title 20 and DOE regulations. As an example, districts have been granted state class size waivers due to fiscal emergencies associated with the Recession. What is different about this flexibility option is the ability for school systems to be innovative and request broad flexibility since almost all of Title 20 and DOE policies can be waived; however, after June 30, 2015, no waivers will be granted except in cases of natural disasters!

FLEXIBILITY OPTIONS: IE2 * from GA DOE documents

FLEXIBILITY OPTIONS: CHARTER SYSTEM * from GA DOE documents

FLEXIBILITY OPTIONS: STATUS QUO SYSTEM * from GA DOE documents

SIDE-BY-SIDE COMPARISONS

* from GA DOE documents IE 2 System* Charter System Status Quo State Board of Education Local Board of Education *Required by statute that the Governor’s Office of Student Achievement participate in the IE 2 performance target setting and monitoring process State Board of Education Local Board of Education N/A CONTRACTUAL PARTNERS

* from GA DOE documents LENGTH OF CONTRACT IE 2 System Charter System Status Quo Initial term of contract is for 5 years Contract may be renewed if contract performance goals are met for at least three years Initial term of contract is for 5 years Contract status is reviewed annually, based on student performance Subsequent contract term may range from 5 to 10 years if the charter contract goals are met N/A

* from GA DOE documents FLEXIBILITY IE 2 System Charter System Status Quo School System seeks waivers – must include at least one of the following: class size; expenditure control; certification; salary schedule School System must provide examples of how broad flexibility permitted by the Charter Schools Act will be utilized to improve student achievement Waivers to be granted only in the case of a extraordinary circumstance, e.g. natural disaster, financial exigency Statewide waivers expire June 30, 2015

* from GA DOE documents WAIVER LIMITATIONS IE 2 System Charter System Status Quo Cannot waive: o Federal rules/ regulations o State and local rules/regulations such as: insurance; physical health; school safety; accountability; QBE funding; etc. o Court orders o Civil rights statutes o Conflicts of interest; o Unlawful conduct Cannot waive: o Federal rules/ regulations o State and local rules/regulations such as: insurance; physical health; school safety; accountability; QBE funding; etc. o Court orders o Civil rights statutes o Conflicts of interest; o Unlawful conduct No waivers except if extraordinary circumstances, but cannot waive: o Federal rules/ regulations o State and local rules/regulations such as: insurance; physical health; school safety; accountability; QBE funding; etc. o Court orders o Civil rights statutes o Conflicts of interest; o Unlawful conduct

* from GA DOE documents UNIQUE FEATURES IE 2 System Charter System Status Quo Flexibility proportionate to student performance goals School System Strategic Plan is required School System must conduct a public hearing to share Strategic Plan Approved by the Local School Board at a public meeting Emphasis on parent/ community involvement and school level governance Approved by the Local School Board at a public meeting School System must conduct a public hearing to provide notice of the system’s intent to select Status Quo Local board of education must sign a statement that the school system has selected Status Quo

19 * from GA DOE documents FISCAL IMPACT IE 2 System Charter System Status Quo Possible savings through flexibility Regular QBE funding with more local school system expenditure controls Possible savings through flexibility Regular QBE funding with more local school system expenditure controls Possible $89 per pupil in supplemental funding through QBE No savings through flexibility

IE 2 System Charter System Status Quo School System may maximize school- level governance by granting local schools authority to determine how to reach goals – but no change is required School System must provide each school with substantial autonomy and maximize school- level governance and decision making over budgets, programs, personnel, and innovation No change in school-level governance GOVERNANCE

* from GA DOE documents PERFORMANCE EVALUATION IE 2 System Charter System Status Quo Student performance goals must meet contract goals and exceed state averages and previous system performance Student performance must meet all federal and state accountability measures Student performance goals must meet contract goals and exceed state averages and previous system performance Student performance must meet all federal and state accountability measures

* from GA DOE documents CONSEQUENCES IE 2 System Charter System Status Quo Loss of governance of non-performing schools: 1. Conversion to charter school 2. Operation by another school system, or 3. Operation by private or non-profit entity Charter status revoked and school system reverts to Status Quo Possible fiscal impact when converting from Charter System to Status Quo due to loss of flexibility N/A

Flexibility Options: RCSS Timeline

Flexibility Options Work Session 1.Is flexibility from waivers needed to support our strategic direction? 2. Important Key Questions To Consider When Evaluating the Models Broad flexibility? Focus on system level accountability and performance? School level governance required? 3. Of the operating models, which model do you believe benefits RCSS the most? 4. Possible Courses of Action for Operating Models IE2 Charter System Status Quo The Flexibility Options Nuts & Bolts Advantages Disadvantages Key Considerations