KM3NeT WPF/L 06072010-NIKHEF- MECABAR 1 A.Cosquer on behalf of the KM3NeT consortium MECABAR PROJECT PLAN 1- Context 2- 3D views and responsibilities 3-

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CDR Feb 2006Mar 2008Dec 2009 Mar Design Study Preparatory Phase TDR tendering construction data taking governance legal entity pre-production.
Advertisements

Trigger issues for KM3NeT the large scale underwater neutrino telescope the project objectives design aspects from the KM3NeT TDR trigger issues outlook.
Surface Area & Volume.
WP F/L Development of the Dom support and rope- and cable management for KM3-Net. KM3Net General meeting 2012 Catania - Edward Berbee - Nikhef Edward Berbee.
Rope & Cable management A vertical electro-optical backbone cable for KM3NeT Gertjan Mul On behalf of the km3net collaboration Nikhef.
Using HOURS to evaluate KM3NeT designs A.Leisos, A. G. Tsirigotis, S.E.Tzamarias In the framework of the KM3NeT Design Study VLVnT Athens, 15 October.
Jan 2009 U. Katz: Astroparticle Physics 1 What is KM3NeT – the Vision  Future cubic-kilometre sized neutrino telescope in the Mediterranean Sea  Exceeds.
The Multi-PMT Optical Module P.Kooijman, University of Amsterdam University of Utrecht Nikhef.
Beurthey Stéphan/CPPM/IN2P3 16/04/07 KM3 design to cost Mechanic optimization.
C.Sollima INFN - University of Pisa for the KM3NeT Consortium “Quality Assurance and Risk Assessment in the KM3NeT Neutrino Telescope Design Study” Technical.
P. Sapienza, NOW 2010 The KM3NeT project  Introduction & Main objectives  The KM3NeT Technical Design Report  Telescope physics performance  New developments.
Paolo Piattelli - KM3NeTIAPS - Golden, 6-8 may 2008 KM3NeT: a deep-sea neutrino telescope in the Mediterranean Sea Paolo Piattelli - INFN/LNS Catania (Italy)
C.DistefanoCRIS 2008 – Salina, September The KM3Net Consortium Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare Laboratori Nazionali del Sud Towards a km3-scale.
Report of the HOU contribution to KM3NeT TDR (WP2) A. G. Tsirigotis In the framework of the KM3NeT Design Study WP2 Meeting - Marseilles, 29June-3 July.
WP F/L A mechanical design for a detection unit for a deep- sea neutrino telescope VLVnT11 - Edward Berbee - Nikhef.
Amsterdam 29 March 2011 Fernando Urbano IFIC (CSIC – Universidad de Valencia) KM3NeT Optical Calibration Laser Beacon and Nanobeacon Status.
A sensor architecture for neutrino telescopes on behalf of the KM3NeT consortium Els de Wolf Thank you, Claudio!
KM3NeT Pylos meeting, April, 2007 Some preliminary studies for the positioning calibration of KM3NeT Miguel Ardid Universitat Politècnica de València.
Acoustic Calibration for the KM3NeT Pre-Production Module Alexander Enzenhöfer on behalf of the KM3NeT consortium VLV T 2011 Erlangen, –
VLVnT11 - Erlangen 12-14/10/ Giorgio Cacopardo NEMO Phase2 mechanical design G. Cacopardo on behalf of NEMO collaboration.
ANSYS/LS-DYNA Drop Test Module
Mechanical design of the Pre-Production Detector Unit Model of KM3NeT Mario MUSUMECI and Riccardo PAPALEO KM3NeT PP DU subgroup coordinators on behalf.
1 03/21/2006 GLAST CU Beam Test Workshop Scanning Table.
MQXFB design, assembly plans & tooling at CERN J.C Perez On behalf of MQXF collaboration team MQXF Workshop on Structure, Alignment and Electrical QA.
What? Deployment of the first full KM3NeT string, a.k.a Detection Unit. Thanks to Aart Heijboer for the nice drawings!
C.Sollima INFN - University of Pisa for the KM3NeT Consortium “Quality Control Considerations for the KM3NeT Very Large Volume neutrino Telescope” The.
PPM DU Sea Qualification Tests 1.General constraints & requirements 2.Preliminary tests 3.Full mechanical test.
Status and Advances on the Acoustic Positioning System for KM3NeT Giuseppina Larosa, IGIC-UPV KM3NeT General Meeting, Nikhef 28-31/03/2011.
The sector of the Antares line to be deployed in the NEMO site Davide Piombo – INFN sez. Genova
1 Motivations KM3Net VEOC Based on developments on solid cable at NEMO and Antares project and proto cable of Seacon. Optimizing properties like; flexibility.
STATUS AND PHYSICS GOALS OF KM3NET Paolo Piattelli P. Piattelli, ICHEP14 Valencia INFN – LNS, Catania (Italy)
Antares status and plans  Reminder  Project status  Plans M. de Jong.
The KM3NeT-IT sea bed infrastructure Collaboration meeting in Ischia, May 19th sea operations (see talk from Klaus) The new Cable Termination Frame Integration.
Seafloor Network KM3NeT Italia Strategy, Milestones and Cost R. Papaleo 22 june 2012.
05/07/2010P. LamareBackbone dry solution Dry backbone requirements.
SuperB Integration SuperB Experimental hall. Related topics of Slac D&D activities.
KM3NeT – Stautus and Future Uli Katz ECAP / Univ. Erlangen th International Workshop on Next Generation Nucleon Decay and Neutrino Detectors.
WP F/L Dom production. KM3Net meeting 2012 Erlangen - Edward Berbee - Nikhef22/06/20121.
Report from the Erlangen Meeting Uli Katz ECAP, Univ. Erlangen ANTARES collaboration meeting - KM3NeT day Bologna, 5. October 2012.
Site for the PPM-DU String Layout Possible Site / Properties Power / Communication Contribution / Planning R.Papaleo, P.Lamare, E.Heine Bologna.
Deployment Test Program P.Kooijman. Goal of tests Validation of the LOM deployment – Has had three previous tests – First included rudimentary cable –
Mechanical design of the Pre-Production Detector Unit Model of KM3NeT Mario MUSUMECI and Riccardo PAPALEO KM3NeT PP DU subgroup coordinators.
S.BEURTHEY CPPM/IN2P3 anémone ανεμώνη anemone Preliminary Development plan A ntares NEMO NE stor CATANIA 12 of March 2008.
13 Januar 2011 Immanuel Gfall (HEPHY Vienna) Annekathrin Frankenberger (HEPHY Vienna) SVD Cooling Cooling Meeting Karlsuhe.
WP F/L Detection Unit Mechanical Structure and Deployment R. Papaleo 130/03/2011.
Calibration and Instrumentation: Overview and General Issues Robert Lahmann WPFL meeting Amsterdam 6-July-2010.
Organizing future KM3NeT production 06-July-2010.
The PPM project. The PPM PPM-DOM in Antares (already presented) Tests of the Vertical Electro-Optical cable Deployment of a small scale production model.
Status of the NEMO tower validation Integration Tests Improvements Deployment program M.Anghinolfi- km3-day meeting )
The electro-optical cabling system for the NEMO Phase-2 tower Antonio D’Amico INFN - LNS.
Electronic department 5/7 July 2010, KM3NeT meeting at Nikhef - Mar van der Hoek et.al. Status and experiences with oil-filled Pressure Balanced backbone.
LIDO Meeting - Catania 13/01/ Giorgio Cacopardo Arrangement of PCB in LIDO E-POd.
Status procurement of PMTs Oleg Kalekin KM3NeT WPF/L General Meeting Amsterdam
DOM & DU tendering and assembly
Write-up and Definitions for Cost Model
KM3Net General meeting 2012 Catania - Edward Berbee - Nikhef
The Instrumentation Unit (IU) of the Calibration Unit (CU)
P.Kooijman, UVA-GRAPPA, UU, Nikhef
Concluding remarks E. Migneco
The Instrumentation Unit (IU) of the Calibration Unit (CU)
INSTALLATION SEQUENCE
Els de Wolf 20 February 2012, Catania
Simplified Study of Storey Configurations
Sea Operations for “km3” neutrino telescope
as a prototype for Super c-tau factory
Nanobeacon: A low cost calibration instrument for KM3NeT
Work Unit AIK 11.2 CDR of the CDS-SL Mechanics
Acoustic Measurements in ANTARES: Status and Aims
Maker Education Manipulator
________________________________________________________________
Presentation transcript:

KM3NeT WPF/L NIKHEF- MECABAR 1 A.Cosquer on behalf of the KM3NeT consortium MECABAR PROJECT PLAN 1- Context 2- 3D views and responsibilities 3- Qualification Plans and objectives 4- Next steps and conclusions

KM3NeT WPF/L NIKHEF- MECABAR Context Some fundamentals hypothesis : - Reliability of DU (10 years) and deployment - crew safety - Compactness DU - Storey length around 6 m, net buoyancy for equipped storey 300 N - The distance between storey is 40m - The design of DU and deployment concept is totally imbricated In the TDR, there are three options for the detection unit structure : The bar detection unit The string detection unit The triangle detection unit The mecabar project is based on ‘a bar unit concept’ Design of TDR

KM3NeT WPF/L NIKHEF- MECABAR Context Before to speak about compactness : some value of value about Nemo And Antares project … Volume of the package : Lenght : 16m Width : 3.50 Height : around 3m Deployment and recovery on the sea surface TDR bar detection unit Volume of the package (20 storeys) : Lenght : 6 m Width : 2.5m Height : 2.5 m (TDR) 16m 3.50m 3 m Deployment on the sea bed, by the top

KM3NeT WPF/L NIKHEF- MECABAR 4 2.1) Package of the DU 2 – 3D Views and responsibilities Deployment tools 20 storeys with 6 OMs 13’ Anchor + base (CPPM) (INFN Pise) Release system (INFN Pise, CPPM) 1.25 m 6m 1.7 m Basket OMs INFN Genova

KM3NeT WPF/L NIKHEF- MECABAR 5 Before to describe each subsystem, principal components of DU DU Storey + assembly storey anchor Mechanical ropes Floatation system -Mechanical structure Witch contains 6 OMs - Improve compactness with 6 storeys assembly. -Attachment of electronics vessels - Storage of backbone cable 2 – 3D Views and responsibilities -anchoring the string on the sea bed -contains the release system witch unlocking DT and package of DU - Link between the storey - Orienting the storey - Due to compactness safety margins for the buoyancy Deployment tools base Allow the immersion of the structure in the water Put the package on the seabed with a cable Connexion of line Release of the line

KM3NeT WPF/L NIKHEF- MECABAR 6 2 – 3D View ans responsibilities 2.2) Assembly of 6 storey ‘exploded’ of 6 storeys 6 stacked storeys Height : 530 mm Rm : yellow cone with angular acceptance Rm : rotation of 90 degree floor 5, 3 and 1 Translation vector : 40 meters Data for Physics simulation

KM3NeT WPF/L NIKHEF- MECABAR 7 2 – 3D Views and responsibilities Details of baskets witch support OMs Basket One OM INFN genova contribution One prototype built Work in progress : Integration of multi PM on the lightly modified squeleton Fredom area for electronics vessels Floor N1 Floor N2

KM3NeT WPF/L NIKHEF- MECABAR 8 40 m of backbone Cable outer diameter 16mm (capo passero backbone) Thin panel to to put backbone Details of thin panel Details of the support of the backbone 2 – 3D Views and responsibilities External face to receive cartridge of Dynema Ø 4mm Witch can accept 16 at 25 mm outer diameter

KM3NeT WPF/L NIKHEF- MECABAR 9 2 – 3D Views and responsibilities Some words about safety margins safety Possibilities to increase buoyancy 1)Use the area of electronics vessels to put additional buoyancy (empty glass sphere, SF) 2) Use the inside of pipe (80 X 50 X 4) And integrate Syntactic foam 18daN of buoyancy Or put inside Glass sphere (3M firm) working in progress (INFN Catania) X

KM3NeT WPF/L NIKHEF- MECABAR 10 12/201009/2010 Qualification phase N1 Qualification phase N2 Schedule of DU Qualification phase N3 05/2011 Iterative design Testing tank 3 – Qualification plan and objectives

KM3NeT WPF/L NIKHEF- MECABAR ) Qualification phase one 3 – Qualification plan and objectives Objectives : four successful deployment (DU contains 4 equipped storeys, 2 separators, 1 base) shallow water between 250 m and 350 m Immersion of DU in the water : OK Release of the deployment tools on the seabed : OK Unfurling command and validation of the bottom unfurling ligne sous tension : OK Instrumented line (LNS instrumentation)

KM3NeT WPF/L NIKHEF- MECABAR ) Qualification phase two 3 – Qualification plan and objectives Objectives : successful deployment (DU contains 10 equipped storeys, 2 separators, 1 base) shallow water around 700m Storeys are equipped With empty glass sphere 13’ 3.3) Qualification phase three Deployment of full mechanical DU (20 storeys)

KM3NeT WPF/L NIKHEF- MECABAR Conclusion 4 – Next steps and conclusions Thank your very much for your attention Status Drawings of all the components of storey have been done and send to subcontractors for The studies of anchor is almost finished : there is an interface work between the release system, deployment tools and the Deployment and recovery procedure has been done for the first qualification test Next steps Go on all the design aspect of Φ 1, 2, Work on the attachment of electronics vessel on the storey Conclusions : The qualification phase 1, 2, 3 is very interesting because from the ‘knowledge of the line (buoyancy, center of gravity, hydrodynamics calculation). It will be possible to make comparaison between test / calculations. Moreover, it will allow the validation of mechanical fonction (release, indexing, …).

KM3NeT WPF/L NIKHEF- MECABAR Conclusion 4 – Next steps Thank your very much for your attention