 Harder than you might think  There are many examples in history where the results were disputed.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 10: The Manipulability of Voting Systems Lesson Plan
Advertisements

Math for Liberal Studies.  Harder than you might think  There are many examples in history where the results were disputed  We care about this because.
Math 1010 ‘Mathematical Thought and Practice’ An active learning approach to a liberal arts mathematics course.
IMPOSSIBILITY AND MANIPULABILITY Section 9.3 and Chapter 10.
The Plurality Method Fails The Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives Criterion.
Math for Liberal Studies.  We have studied the plurality and Condorcet methods so far  In this method, once again voters will be allowed to express.
MAT 105 Fall  Harder than you might think  There are many examples in history where the results were disputed  We care about this because we.
Math for Liberal Studies.  In most US elections, voters can only cast a single ballot for the candidate he or she likes the best  However, most voters.
Social Choice: The Impossible Dream Michelle Blessing February 23, 2010 Michelle Blessing February 23, 2010.
MAT 105 Spring  As we have discussed, when there are only two candidates in an election, deciding the winner is easy  May’s Theorem states that.
Chapter 9: Social Choice: The Impossible Dream Lesson Plan
How the Electoral College Works STEPS TO BECOMING A PRESIDENT
Jana Behm Math 320 July 7,  Voting Systems and how they can effect outcomes  *Majority Rule  *Plurality Voting  *Electoral College.
How is this math? Mathematics is essentially the application of deductive reasoning to the study relations among patterns, structures, shapes, forms and.
 Organizing the Election Process  Facilitating Voter Choice  Recruiting & Aiding Candidates  Organizing a Complex Government  Educating Citizens.
MAT 105 Spring  We have studied the plurality and Condorcet methods so far  In this method, once again voters will be allowed to express their.
Intro 5 Click the mouse button or press the Space Bar to display the information. Chapter Objectives Section 4: The 2000 Election Describe the unusual.
The Electoral College Does your vote count?. Review! What is the difference between a primary and a caucus convention? Who is in the line of succession.
The 2000 Presidential Election CICERO © 2010 START.
American Government and Organization PS1301 Monday, 2 February.
The Electoral College Chapter 23 Section 3.
America by 2000 ■ By the late 1990s, the U.S. was changing – The economic boom was slowing down & the “tech bubble” was about to burst – Party politics.
MAT 105 Spring  Harder than you might think  There are many examples in history where the results were disputed  We care about this because we.
 Overall people happy with the economy but disappointed with Clinton’s personal behavior  Republican nomination was between George W. Bush & John.
The Electoral Process Road to the Presidency. Nomination CaucusesState Primary.
■. America by 2000 ■ By the late 1990s, the U.S. was changing – The economic boom was slowing down & the “tech bubble” was about to burst – Party politics.
2000 Presidential Election “The American people have spoken, but it's going to take a little while to determine what they said”- Bill Clinton.
Chapter 10: The Manipulability of Voting Systems Lesson Plan An Introduction to Manipulability Majority Rule and Condorcet’s Method The Manipulability.
Math for Liberal Studies.  We have seen many methods, all of them flawed in some way  Which method should we use?  Maybe we shouldn’t use any of them,
The American Electoral College: The Voting Process in the United States Ms. Amundsen United States Government and Politics 12 th Grade
Decisions How do we make choices?. Types of Decisions Individual—our opinion is our decision. Group—Individual opinions are expressed by voting(at least.
Executive Branch Unit: Ch
05/27 Bellringer 5+ sentences On September 11, 2001, the United States endured a deadly terrorist attack. How do you think the nation has changed since.
Chapter 9: Social Choice: The Impossible Dream Lesson Plan Voting and Social Choice Majority Rule and Condorcet’s Method Other Voting Systems for Three.
October 22, The Electoral College is the system established in the Constitution for the indirect election of the president and vice president. It.
Politics & Government Session 11 April 28, Federal Elections Senators & Representatives elected by plurality vote – the candidate winning the most.
Page 11. George Bush Governor of Texas Republican Al Gore Vice President under Clinton Democrat.
Voting: Does the Majority Always Rule?
Chapter 13: The Presidency Section 5
The 2000 Presidential Election
Chapter 9: Social Choice: The Impossible Dream Lesson Plan
Chapter 10: The Manipulability of Voting Systems Lesson Plan
General Election Phase
Chapter 9: Social Choice: The Impossible Dream Lesson Plan
The Electoral College Political Science Module Developed by PQE
Chapter 9: Social Choice: The Impossible Dream Lesson Plan
Chapter 13: The Presidency Section 5
Mean Standard deviation.
Elections with More Than Two Candidates
THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE Each State has as many electoral votes as it has U.S. Senators and Representatives. NOVEMBER Voters go to polls in the general election.
The Political System of the United States
American Government and Organization
The Electoral College Political Science Module Developed by PQE
Chapter 13: The Presidency Section 5
The Electoral College Political Science Module Developed by PQE
America Enters a New Century
Voting systems Chi-Kwong Li.
America by 2000 By the late 1990s, the U.S. was changing
Electoral College.
13-5 focus question The Electoral College remains controversial. In this section, we will look at problems and potential solutions.
Chapter 13: The Presidency Section 5
Wednesday, April 20, 2016 Objective: Students will be able to evaluate the process of electing the President. Notes/Discussion over electoral college.
Essential Question: What were the important events of the George W. Bush and Barack Obama presidencies?
The Electoral College Political Science Module Developed by PQE
Who Gets to Be President?
The Electoral College Chapter 23 Section 3.
The Electoral College Political Science Module Developed by PQE
The Electoral College Political Science Module Developed by PQE
The Electoral College Political Science Module Developed by PQE
Chapter 9: Social Choice: The Impossible Dream Lesson Plan
Presentation transcript:

 Harder than you might think  There are many examples in history where the results were disputed

 Al Gore vs. George W. Bush  There were two other candidates: Ralph Nader (Green Party) and Pat Buchanan (Reform Party)  The result of the popular vote was:  Gore 48.4%  Bush 47.9%  Nader 2.7%  Buchanan 0.4%

 Even though Al Gore won the popular vote, George W. Bush won the electoral college  The result of Florida was in dispute for several weeks, but eventually Florida’s electoral votes were given to Bush after the Supreme Court ordered a stop to recounts  The official margin of victory for Bush in Florida was 537 votes, out of 5.8 million votes cast

 Three main candidates:  Norm Coleman (R)  Hubert Humphrey (D)  Jesse Ventura (Reform Party)  The results of the vote were:  Ventura (37%)  Coleman (34%)  Humphrey (28%)

 Few people expected the former professional wrestler to win the election  Most of the people who voted for Coleman or Humphrey probably had Ventura as their last choice  That means that Ventura was elected governor even though 63% of the voters would have ranked him last!

 There are many different systems, as we will learn  The most common system used in US elections is the plurality system  The candidate who gets more votes than any other candidate is said to receive a “plurality”  A candidate receives a “majority” if they earn more than half of the total number of votes  Al Gore won a plurality of the popular vote in 2000  Jesse Ventura won a plurality of the vote in 1998  Neither of these candidates won a majority

 In most US elections, voters can only cast a single ballot for the candidate he or she likes the best  However, most voters will have “preference lists”: a ranking of the candidates in order of most preferred to least preferred  For example, many (but not all) of the people who voted for Ralph Nader in 2000 would have had Al Gore as their second choice

 Suppose a class of children is trying to decide what drink to have with their lunch  The choices are milk, soda, and juice  Each child votes for their top choice  The results are:  Milk 6  Soda 5  Juice 4  Milk wins a plurality of the votes

 What if we examine the full voting preferences of the children?  6 have the preference Milk > Soda > Juice  5 have the preference Soda > Juice > Milk  4 have the preference Juice > Soda > Milk  Is the outcome fair? If we choose Milk as the winner of this election, 9 of the 15 students are stuck with their last choice

 We will not allow ties on individual preference lists, though some methods will result in a tie  All candidates must be listed in a specific order  We will sometimes assume that the number of voters is odd to avoid ties (remember we will think about applying these methods to situations where we have thousands or millions of voters)

 We’ll start off simple and only consider the case where we have two candidates  There are only two preferences: A > B and B > A  Voters with preference A > B vote for A  Voters with preference B > A vote for B  The candidate with the most votes wins  This method is called majority rule

 Notice that one of the two candidates will definitely get a majority (they can’t both get less than half of the votes)  Majority rule has three desirable properties  All voters are treated equally  Both candidates are treated equally  Monotone

 If any two voters exchange (marked) ballots before submitting them, the outcome of the election does not change

 If a new election were held and every voter reversed their vote (people who voted for A now vote for B, and vice versa), then the outcome of the election is also reversed

 If a new election were held and a single voter were to change his or her ballot from being a vote for the loser of the previous election to being a vote for the winner of the previous election, and everyone else voted exactly as before, then the outcome of the new election would be the same as the outcome of the previous election.

 Majority rule is not the only way to determine the winner of an election with two candidates  May’s Theorem states that majority rule is the only method for determining the winner of an election with two candidates that treats all voters equally, treats both candidates equally, and is monotone