Introduction Experimental Methods Conclusions Emissions of volatile organic compounds and particulate matter from small-scale peat fires I. George 1, R.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Black carbon aerosol in emissions from biomass burning in the laboratory and field G.R. McMeeking 1, J.W. Taylor 1, A.P. Sullivan 2, M.J. Flynn 1, S.K.
Advertisements

PM 2.5 Carbon Measurements in EPA Region 10 Robert Kotchenruther, Ph.D. NW-AIRQUEST June, 2011.
Open agro-burning in Asia and potential impact on air quality and climate Kim Oanh N.T. Asian Institute of Technology Thailand BAQ06-Yogjakarta.
Nez Perce Tribe Air Quality Program Air Toxics Monitoring.
Investigation of primary and secondary aerosols from wood combustion with a high resolution time of flight aerosol mass spectrometer Maarten Heringa Laboratory.
Chemical Composition of Organic Carbon Fractions Barbara Zielinska.
Carbon artifact adjustments for the IMPROVE and CSN speciated particulate networks Mark Green, Judith Chow, John Watson Desert Research Institute Ann Dillner.
Kentucky Division for Air Quality Taimur Shaikh Ph.D.
George Pouliot, Ana Rappold, Amber Soja, Wayne Cascio Estimating Emissions for the 2008 Evans Road Fire in North Carolina Office of Research and Development.
Future emissions of carbonaceous aerosols David G. Streets Argonne National Laboratory ICAP Workshop Research Triangle Park, NC October , 2004.
Sources of PM 2.5 Carbon in the SE U.S. RPO National Work Group Meeting December 3-4, 2002.
U. Dusek 1, R. Holzinger 1, T. Röckmann 1 Institute for Marine and Atmospheric research Utrecht (IMAU), Utrecht University, The Netherlands Combined measurements.
Source apportionment of Swiss carbonaceous aerosols using radiocarbon analyses of different fractions References: S. Szidat et al., 2007: Dominant impact.
Fossil and modern sources of aerosol carbon in the Netherlands – A year-long radiocarbon study Fossil and modern sources of aerosol carbon in the Netherlands.
Commentary on the Critical Review Public Health and Components of Particulate Matter: The Changing Assessment of Black Carbon Michael T. Kleinman Department.
Evaluation of Secondary Organic Aerosols in Atlanta
Air Quality Impacts from Prescribed Burning Karsten Baumann, PhD. Polly Gustafson.
Environmental Investigators Lonnie Gilley Robin Pugh.
Impact of Cold Climates on Vehicle Emissions: The Cold Start Air Toxics Pulse Tom Jobson, Yibo Huangfu, Graham VanderSchelden, Serena Chung Laboratory.
J. Zhou 1, X. Zhu 1, T. Wang 1, and X. Zhang 2 J. Zhou 1, X. Zhu 1, T. Wang 1, and X. Zhang 2 1 College of Resources and Information Tech., China University.
Estimates of global biogenic isoprene emissions from the terrestrial biosphere with varying levels of CO 2 David J. Wilton 1,2*, Kirsti Ashworth 2, Juliette.
Organic Chemistry - Carbon Compounds Carbon - C, atomic number 6, molecular weight 12 Electron configuration: 1s 2 2s 2 2p 2 Tetravalent – 4 single bonds.
Proposed Identification of Environmental Tobacco Smoke as a Toxic Air Contaminant Public Workshop Cal/EPA Headquarters Building Sierra Hearing Room Sacramento,
Air Quality Impact Analysis 1.Establish a relationship between emissions and air quality. AQ past = a EM past + b 2.A change in emissions results in an.
Presentation Overview Alaska air pollution Pollutants Sources What is an emissions inventory?
Surface-Atmosphere Fluxes Part II Christine Wiedinmyer
Results of Ambient Air Analyses in Support of Transport Rule Presentation for RPO Workshop November 2003.
Examination of the impact of recent laboratory evidence of photoexcited NO 2 chemistry on simulated summer-time regional air quality Golam Sarwar, Robert.
June 12 &13, 2007 Mickey Leland National Urban Air Toxics Workshop II – Houston, Texas 1 Albuquerque, New Mexico Community Scale Ambient Air Monitoring.
MODELS3 – IMPROVE – PM/FRM: Comparison of Time-Averaged Concentrations R. B. Husar S. R. Falke 1 and B. S. Schichtel 2 Center for Air Pollution Impact.
Particulate Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Aerosol Active Surface Area in Different Environments of Mexico City Dwight A. Thornhill 1, Linsey C.
Low-Wind/High Particulate Matter Episodes in the Calexico/Mexicali Region 1 The University of Utah 2 Universidad Autónoma de Baja California 3 San Diego.
CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF NORTH AMERICAN OUTFLOW: INSIGHTS FROM CHEBOGUE POINT, NOVA SCOTIA Allen Goldstein, Dylan Millet, James Allan, Eben Cross, Rupert.
Properties of Particulate Matter Physical, Chemical and Optical Properties Size Range of Particulate Matter Mass Distribution of PM vs. Size: PM10, PM2.5.
Study of Air Quality Impacts Resulting from Prescribed Burning on Military Facilities Karsten Baumann, Mei Zheng, Michael Chang, and Ted Russell.
Molecular Characterization of Organic Aerosols from the Los Angeles Ground Site during the CalNex 2010 Campaign Using High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry.
Urban Air Pollution GISAT 112. Learning Objectives Regions of the atmosphere Amount, composition of air we breathe Names of selected air pollutants Health.
Talking About Air Toxics John D. Wilson Galveston-Houston Association for Smog Prevention
Model Evaluation Comparing Model Output to Ambient Data Christian Seigneur AER San Ramon, California.
Secondary Organic Aerosols
KINETICS OF SURFACE-BOUND BENZO[A]PYRENE AND OZONE ON ORGANIC AND INORGANIC AEROSOLS N.-O. A. Kwamena, J. A. Thornton, J. P. D. Abbatt Department of Chemistry,
Recent Trends In Ambient Air VOC and RSC Concentrations In The Athabasca Oil Sands Region Kevin E. Percy 1 & Tom Dann 2 1 Wood Buffalo Environmental Association,
Pollutant Emissions from Large Wildfires in the Western United States Shawn P. Urbanski, Matt C. Reeves, W. M. Hao US Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research.
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division 16 October 2012 Integrating source.
The effects of biomass burning from Amazon region in human lung cells
Air Pollution Research Group Analysis of 1999 TRI Data to Identify High Environmental Risk Areas of Ohio by Amit Joshi.
Fairbanks PM 2.5 Source Apportionment Using the Chemical Mass Balance (CMB) Model Tony Ward, Ph.D. The University of Montana Center for Environmental Health.
CHARACTERIZING IMPACTS OF WILD AND PRESCRIBED FIRES ON AMBIENT FINE PARTICLE CONCENTRATIONS CSU Atmospheric Science Department National Park Service/CIRA.
Fairbanks PM 2.5 Source Apportionment Using the Chemical Mass Balance (CMB) Model Tony Ward, Ph.D. The University of Montana Center for Environmental Health.
New technologies and architectures for sensing gases and particles in air are emerging for criteria pollutants, air toxics, and greenhouse gases. These.
Novel Sampling Techniques for Measurement of Turbine Engine Total Particulate Matter Emissions Office of Research and Development National Risk Management.
Office of Research and Development National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Air Pollution Prevention and Control Division Photo image area measures.
Characterization of the Particulate Emissions from the BP Deepwater Horizon Spill Surface Oil Burns Brian Gullett Dennis Tabor Michael Hays U.S. Environmental.
Office of Research and Development National Risk Management Research Laboratory Photo image area measures 2” H x 6.93” W and can be masked by a collage.
1 Urban Community Air Toxics Monitoring Project, Paterson City, NJ UCAMPP Update 5/07 Charlie Pietarinen (609)
AIR CLIMATE & ENERGY RESEARCH PROGRAM B U I L D I N G A S C I E N T I F I C F O U N D A T I O N F O R S O U N D E N V I R O N M.
Garfield County Air Quality Monitoring Network Cassie Archuleta Project Scientist Board of County Commissioners – Regular Meeting.
University of Wisconsin -- Engine Research Center slide 1 Chemical characterization of particulate emissions from diesel engines: A review Author: M. Matti.
Novel Sampling Techniques for Measurement of Turbine Engine Total Particulate Matter Emissions Office of Research and Development National Risk Management.
PTR-MS Measurements of Atmospheric VOCs
T. Higgs May 25, 2017 AESA Stack Testing Seminar
Beneficial Use of Contaminated Sediment
Karsten Baumann, Mei Zheng, Michael Chang, and Ted Russell
Karsten Baumann, Mei Zheng, Michael Chang, and Ted Russell
Svetlana Tsyro, David Simpson, Leonor Tarrason
Air Monitoring Trends in New Jersey
A Review of Time Integrated PM2.5 Monitoring Data in the United States
On-going developments of SinG: particles
Time-Integrated Sampling
Svetlana Tsyro, David Simpson, Leonor Tarrason
Presentation transcript:

Introduction Experimental Methods Conclusions Emissions of volatile organic compounds and particulate matter from small-scale peat fires I. George 1, R. Black 1,2, J. Walker 1, M. Hays 1, B. Preston 3, D. Tabor 1, B. Gullett 1 1 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Research Triangle Park, NC ORISE Fellow. 3 Arcadis, Durham, NC #A31C-0076 Volatile Organic Compounds Organic PM Characterization PM2.5 Mass, OC, EC  Peatland contains a significant fraction of terrestrial organic carbon and may become more vulnerable to fire due to human activities and climate change.  Air pollution emitted from peat fires can negatively impact regional air quality, visibility, climate and human health (Page et al., 2002; Rappold et al., 2011).  Peat fires tend to smolder over long periods of time and can release greater amounts of carbon into the atmosphere per unit area compared to burning of other types of biomass.  Despite the potential negative environmental impacts of peat fires, the gas and particulate emissions from peat burning have been poorly characterized.  The objective of this study was to quantify particulate matter (PM) and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from controlled small-scale peat fire experiments to assess the atmospheric impact of peat burning emissions.  Peat samples were collected in two locations near the NC coast. Table 1 summarizes the composition of the samples.  Laboratory burning experiments of the peat samples were conducted in an open burning test facility located at Research Triangle Park, NC.  Continuous CO 2, CO, THC and O 2 were measured with a continuous emissions monitor (CEM). Typical CEM measurements for a burn test are shown in Figure 1.  VOCs were sampled using Summa canisters and analyzed by EPA Method TO-15 and gas-phase carbonyls were sampled and analyzed using EPA Method TO-11A.  OC, EC and organic particulate matter (PM) speciation analyses were conducted with Thermal Optical Analyzer and GC-MS on extracts of quartz filter samples taken during burning experiments, and PM2.5 mass was determined from teflon filter samples.  Emission factors (g/kg fuel burned) were calculated by the following equation: where C x is concentration of compound X (g/m 3 ), Q is dilution flow rate (m 3 /min), t is sampling time (min), M fb is mass of fuel burned (kg) determined from CO 2 and CO emitted. Table 1. Chemical composition of peat samples. Figure 1. Example CEM measurements for peat burn. MCE = ([CO2]/([CO 2 ]+[CO])). Figure 3. Emission factors for PM2.5 organic compounds: A) straight-chained alkanes and B) PAHs. Figure 2. Emission factors for A) VOCs and B) gas-phase carbonyls. Figure 4. PM2.5, OC and EC emission factors and EC/OC ratios averaged over 1 st and 2 nd half of burn tests. Figure 5. Organic chemical classes as fraction of PM2.5 mass averaged over 1 st and 2 nd half of burn tests. EF = C x × Q × t M fb AB  Highest emissions of VOCs from peat burning included propylene, BTEX, chloromethane (Figure 2A)  Acetaldehyde, formaldehyde and acetone had the highest EFs of gas-phase carbonyls (Figure 2B).  Pocosin sample had greater VOC and carbonyl emissions consistent with its higher carbon content.  Stumpy point peat produced greater CH 3 Cl as it has a higher Cl content.  Literature EF values are somewhat higher than measured in this work.  Several classes of organic compounds present in the PM organic fraction were quantified including alkanes, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), methoxyphenols and levoglucosan.  Straight-chained alkanes (Figure 3A) made up 0.6-9% of organic PM mass and indicate an odd over even carbon preference (odd/even ~1.3).  PAHs (Figure 3B) and methoxyphenols each made up less than 1% of the organic PM mass.  Major biomass burning biomarkers were detected in PM, including levoglucosan, retene, syringaldehyde, vanillin.  PM2.5 mass EF values ranged from ~ g/kg with higher values observed during the first half of the burn tests (Figure 4).  OC mass made up a significant fraction of the PM2.5 mass.  EC/OC ratios were in the range of and were consistent with literature values for peat fires.  The known OC fraction was composed mostly of alkanes and levoglucosan, the latter making up % of PM2.5 mass  First study to report emission factors of both gas- and particle-phase chemically-speciated organics from peat fires.  Emissions of toxic VOCs such as BTEX, chloromethane, formaldehyde, acetaldehyde and acrolein varied based on peat composition.  PM mass consisted mostly of organic matter, of which alkanes and levoglucosan made up significant fractions.  Several important biomass burning tracers were quantified in PM mass.  This work will improve the accuracy of models to predict the atmospheric and health impacts of peat fires. References Akagi, S.K., Yokelson, R.J., Wiedinmyer, C., Alvarado, M.J., Reid, J.S., Karl, T., Crounse, J.D., Wennberg, P.O., 2011, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, Christian, T.J., Kleiss, B., Yokelson, R.J., Holzinger, R., Crutzen, P., Hao, W.M., Saharjo, B.H., Ward, D.E., J. Geophys. Res., 108 (D23), Page, S.E., Siegert, F., Rieley, J.O., Boehm, H.V., Jaya, A., Limin, S., 2002, Nature, 420, Rappold et al., 2011, Environment Health Perspectives, 119, A B