Navy Pilot Emission Control Prog. (NPECP) Marine Diesel Engines NAVSEA - Philadelphia Lab Test Phase: Preliminary Results Shipboard Evaluation Phase: Plans.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Effect of Fuel Quality and Engine Technology on Particle Emissions
Advertisements

Refining Crude Oil The cat-cracking process breaks up heavier fuels. Diesel fuel and heating oil are the product of severe catalytic cracking and want.
Diesel Engine Technology 2007 and Beyond Diesel Engine Technology 2007 and Beyond Vice President, Chief Technical Officer International Truck and Engine.
Fairfax County School Bus Diesel Retrofit Project Fairfax County Department of Vehicle Services April 29, 2004.
Advanced Powertrain Research Facility Downloadable Dynamometer Database MSU September 9 th, 2013 Henning Lohse-Busch, Ph.D.
MASS EMISSION RATES AND CHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF PM 2.5 EMISSIONS FROM TWO MOTORCYCLES Deniz Karman and Colin Welburn Department of Civil and Environmental.
Office of Research and Development Frank Princiotta, Director, Air Pollution Prevention & Control Division, National Risk Management Research laboratory.
Robert Tekniepe Clark County Department of Air Quality and Environmental Management Air Quality Forum November 14, 2006 Clean Diesel Strategies.
Diesel emission reduction Student: Group: E Scientific adviser: Language adviser:
EXHAUST GAS RECIRCULATION IN DIESEL ENGINE
Retrofit Emission Control Technologies for On-Road, Off-Road, and Stationary Diesel Engines Manufacturers of Emission Controls Association May 2000.
1 VOLUNTARY DIESEL RETROFIT PROGRAM “Partnerships for Pollution Prevention” Outreach and Planning Group Certification and Compliance Division Office of.
Retrofit Emission Controls for On-Road Diesel Engines OCA Air Quality Summit Fresno, CA October 27, 2005 Manufacturers of Emission Controls Association.
Retrofit Emission Control Technologies for On- and Off-Road Diesel Engines Manufacturers of Emission Controls Association May 2002.
DIESEL RETROFITS FOR HEAVY-DUTY VEHICLES ROUNDTABLE ON CLEAN FUELS AND VEHICLES in TURKEY May 4, 2006 Katherine Buckley, US EPA.
Experimental Evaluation of Various Biofuel-Diesel Blends as Diesel Engine Fuels Georgios Fontaras and Zissis Samaras Laboratory of Applied Thermodynamics.
California’s Experience: Air Quality Successes and Challenges Bart Croes, P.E. Chief, Air Quality Data Branch California Air Resources Board (CARB) April.
Southeast Diesel Collaborative Carol L. Kemker, Deputy Director Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division.
1 Motor Vehicle Emission Control in Japan Better Air Quality Workshop 2002 ( 16th Dec 2002 ) Environmental Management Bureau, Ministry of the Environment.
Introduction and Overview Sub Workshop 4 Mobile Sources Better Air Quality 2002 Hong Kong December 16-18, 2002.
Performance and Emission Analysis on Oxygen Enriched variable
Tier 3 Vehicle and Fuel Standards: Final Rule National Tribal Forum on Air Quality May 21,
Creating an Environmentally Friendly Bus Service Steve Newsome EMTA General Meeting, Oslo.
May 1, 2007 Great Lakes Task Force Washington, DC Teresa Harten ETV Director, USEPA, ORD National Risk Management Research Laboratory May 1, 2007 Great.
Modeling Diesel Fuel Effects on Emissions FACA/CAAAC Mobile Sources Technical Review Subcommittee 1/17/01 Tia Sutton, US EPA Office of Transportation and.
Jordan Purvis Ryan Saunders Sam Slaten Nicholas Ryan Walker Daniel Yacobucci Advisor: Dr. Dan Olsen John Deere: Curtis Stovall John Deere SVO Engines and.
Environmental Emissions: Industry and Automobiles DR. MD. EHSAN CES, BUET, NOV 2009.
Founded 1989 “Hybrid” transportation provider 150+ Vehicles in Fleet 97% of Miles Driven are “GREEN” Largest Private “GREEN” Fleet in United States. About.
Reducing Emissions from Existing Diesel Engines (AKA Retrofit) STAPPA/ ALAPCO May 7, 2002 Pam Jones Coeur D’Alene, Idaho Diesel Technology Forum
Summer Meeting – 2012 Diesel Emissions (Tier 4) Scott Weyant Chris Knipfer John Hale Chris Vernon.
Diesel Emissions. Emissions Task Force Divided into 6 sub groups  Locomotive Group  Car Group  Ventilation Group  Fuel Group  Emissions Testing Group.
The results of IMPCO’s GM 3.0 liter certified engine program
CARB Off-Road Mobile Source Technology Workshop February 2-3, 2000 El Monte, California Emissions Technologies for Off-Highway Compression Ignition Engines.
TECHNICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT OF LNG CARRIER’S PROPULSION MACHINERY USING JATROPHA BIAO DIESEL FUEL 1 Prof. M. A. Mosaad Naval Architecture and.
TECHNICAL ISSUES OF INCREASED ETHANOL BLENDS Dr. Bruce Jones Director Minnesota Center for Automotive Research (MnCAR) Minnesota State University, Mankato.
Expediting the Use of Clean-Diesel Engines with Retrofit Emission Control Technologies Air Quality Conference for Local Elected Officials May 10-11, 2001.
1 EPA’s Proposal for Nonroad Diesel Engines & Fuel May 2003 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Transportation and Air Quality Informal document.
0 WRAP Member Offroad Retrofit Program Workshop January 27-28, 2005 San Diego, CA.
© MAN Diesel A/S Vision < 1 >< 1 > (AE3/PYJ) PrimeServ – the Service arm of MAN Diesel – wants to be your preferred partner for After.
Technology For 2007 And Beyond Dr. Steve Charlton Executive Director – Advanced Engineering Cummins Inc.
Diesel Risk Reduction Plan California Environmental Protection Agency Air Resources Board.
2015 INTERNATIONAL EMISSIONS INVENTORY CONFERENCE: APRIL 14, 2015 DEVELOPING CALIFORNIA EMISSION INVENTORIES: INNOVATION AND CHALLENGES.
Diesel Fuel Quality and Sulfur Effects on Catalyst-Based Exhaust Emission Controls: Manufacturers of Emission Controls Association May 2000.
WRAP Offroad Mobile Source Retrofit Program Lee Alter Western Governors’ Association WRAP Board Meeting Salt Lake City November 10, 2004.
Diesel Emissions Regulation and Control Impact of ARB Regulation.
The Clean Air Act First Clean Air Act passed in 1967: 1970 Amendments established current relationship between states and federal government and required.
EPA Clean Diesel Engine Implementation Workshop Jim Blubaugh U.S. Environmental Protection Agency August 6-7, 2003.
Matt Donovan Environmental Specialist Knox County (TN) Department of Air Quality Management February 12 th, 2009.
Update on Vehicle Emissions Research California Air Resources Board Board Hearing, April 23 rd
Diesel Retrofit Projects: An Introduction National Tribal Forum on Air Quality April 19, 2007 Ken Cronin.
Petrochemistry-2015, Atlanta, USA
DIESEL EXHAUST EMISSIONS
Offroad Mobile Source Emissions and Retrofit Options in the WRAP Region Lee Alter Western Governors’ Association WRAP Mobile Sources Forum Call March 4,
30th Space Wing Team Vandenberg - HAWKS 1 California Airborne Toxic Control Measures for Particulate Matter Emissions from Diesel-Fueled Engines John Gilliland.
PARTICULATE MATTER: REGULATORY RESPONSE Presented by: Karl Loos.
© 2005 Northeast States for Coordinated Air Use Management (NESCAUM) Advanced Mobile Source Training Course MS Diesel III. Emission Testing and Diagnostics.
Novel Sampling Techniques for Measurement of Turbine Engine Total Particulate Matter Emissions Office of Research and Development National Risk Management.
Bio Diesel Update Green Ship Initiative – B100 Inter Agency Task Force Army Corps of Engineers – B100 Navy – HR-D 2 nd Generation Bio Diesel.
2007 Emissions Inventory. Topics First emissions inventory under Clean Air Action Plan (CAAP) Emissions inventory methodology Cargo throughput changes.
Novel Sampling Techniques for Measurement of Turbine Engine Total Particulate Matter Emissions Office of Research and Development National Risk Management.
2008 Air Emissions Inventory. Topics CAAP Initiatives Cargo throughput changes Comparison of emissions in 2008 vs Conclusion.
Evaluation of MTBE as a Component of Reformulated Gasoline
Nonroad Diesel Engine and Fuel Standards
Current Event Brief!.
Andrey Khlystov and Dave Campbell
Freight, Fuel, & Emissions
Freight, Fuel, & Emissions Presented to: Prof. Berezniak
Department of the Navy
EGR and Air Injection Systems
Presentation transcript:

Navy Pilot Emission Control Prog. (NPECP) Marine Diesel Engines NAVSEA - Philadelphia Lab Test Phase: Preliminary Results Shipboard Evaluation Phase: Plans California ARB Maritime Air Quality Technical Working Group 10 Nov 04 Presenters: Jonathan DeHart Naval Sea Systems Command – Phila. Dr. Mike Kass Oak Ridge National Laboratory

Lab Test Objectives and Scope Lab Test Results Shipboard Evaluation Plans Summary Overview Navy Pilot Emission Control Prog. (NPECP) Marine Diesel Engines NAVSEA - Philadelphia

Objectives  Evaluate emission control cost effectiveness: legacy DDC 2-S engines  Assess performance of 5 fuels and 5 technologies  Investigate combination synergies  Compare PM measurement methods  Gravimetric  characterization Background  contribution to Navy mission  Environmental quality core component of 21st Century Fleet  Identify measurement tools to yield high quality Navy data  Safeguard Navy’s most valuable asset – sailors and their health  Quantify conformity options Navy Pilot Emission Control Prog. (NPECP) Laboratory Test Phase NAVSEA - Philadelphia

Accomplishments  Completed all but one planned test  Catastrophic engine failure brought lab test phase to early conclusion  Test data reduction largely completed Approach  Broad partnership: industry & regulators  ISO 8178 protocol, C1/D1/E5 cycles  Performance  Criteria emittents  PM physical/chemical  Aldehydes & organics Navy Pilot Emission Control Prog. (NPECP) Laboratory Test Phase NAVSEA - Philadelphia

Program funds/scope leveraging for NPECP Fuels (sulfur / mono-arom. [wt%]) 1.F-76 (0.47 / ~30) – baseline 2.B-20 (0.38 / ~24) 3.JP-5 (0.12 / ~17) 4.ULSD (0.004 / 28) 5.Fischer-Tropsch (0.003 / 10) Technology Concepts 1.Std. configuration – baseline 2.Air humidification 3.Cylinder catalytic coating 4.In-cylinder EGR 5.Fuel combustion enhancement 6.Actively-regenerated PM filter Constituent Pollutants PM Analysis 1.Gravimetric msmt. 2.Characterization – phys. / chem. Gaseous Toxics ONR Funded Naval F/L IPT Funded CARB Funded (also field verification) NAVSEA 05M Funded DOE / MARAD Funded ORNL Funded In-Kind Contributions NAVSEA – Phila. Technology developers/providers WVU Navy shore fclt’s field EPA verification Navy Pilot Emission Control Prog. (NPECP) Laboratory Test and Shipboard Evaluation Phases NAVSEA - Philadelphia

NAVSEA Marine Diesel Engine Test Facility Lab 4,000 bhp medium- speed engine size capability Navy Pilot Emission Control Prog. (NPECP) Laboratory Test Phase NAVSEA - Philadelphia

NAVSEA Marine Diesel Engine Test Facility Exterior of 2 adjacent test cells Very tall doors Tall man Navy Pilot Emission Control Prog. (NPECP) Laboratory Test Phase NAVSEA - Philadelphia

Test Lay-Out Scanning Mobility Particle Sizer Micro- dilution Tunnel Micro-dilution Tunnel Control Cabinet Test Engine Exhaust Filter Holder Gaseous Emissions Analyzers Test Cell Navy Pilot Emission Control Prog. (NPECP) Laboratory Test Phase NAVSEA - Philadelphia

Test Set-Up Scanning Mobility Particle Sizer Gaseous Emissions Analyzers Test Cell Micro-dilution Tunnel Control Cabinet Exhaust Test Engine Micro-dilution Tunnel & Filter Holder Test Set-Up Scanning Mobility Particle Sizer Gaseous Emissions Analyzers Test Cell Micro-dilution Tunnel Control Cabinet Exhaust Test Engine Micro-dilution Tunnel & Filter Holder Exhaust Emissions Sampling Trains Navy Pilot Emission Control Prog. (NPECP) Laboratory Test Phase NAVSEA - Philadelphia

FTIR Exhaust flow PM,SOF,OC-EC SOF Extraction NOx, CO, CO 2 HC, Aldehydes SO 2, DNPH: aldehydes Flourosil: nitro-oganics Impingers: Dilution Tunnel ORNL Sampling Train and Analytical Tools Navy Pilot Emission Control Prog. (NPECP) Laboratory Test Phase NAVSEA - Philadelphia

Soluble Organic Fraction Results for Collected PM Navy Pilot Emission Control Prog. (NPECP) Laboratory Test Phase NAVSEA - Philadelphia

Brake Specific Formaldehyde Levels Navy Pilot Emission Control Prog. (NPECP) Laboratory Test Phase NAVSEA - Philadelphia

Brake Specific Fuel Consumption Navy Pilot Emission Control Prog. (NPECP) Laboratory Test Phase NAVSEA - Philadelphia

Brake Specific NOx Emissions Navy Pilot Emission Control Prog. (NPECP) Laboratory Test Phase NAVSEA - Philadelphia

Brake Specific PM Emissions Navy Pilot Emission Control Prog. (NPECP) Laboratory Test Phase NAVSEA - Philadelphia

Comparison of Emission Control Technologies Navy Pilot Emission Control Prog. (NPECP) Laboratory Test Phase NAVSEA - Philadelphia

Objectives  Real world reliability and durability evaluation  Assess performance of 1 low sulfur fuel and 1-2 technologies Background  Maritime Administration (MARAD) YSD self-propelled barge crane  High operating hour installation  Propulsion: twin DDC 12V-71N engines  Representative marine work boat load profile 25% idle, 25 % 30% load, and 50% 95% load Navy Pilot Emission Control Prog. (NPECP) Shipboard Evaluation Phase Suison Bay Ready Reserve Force (RRF) – San Francisco

Accomplishments  Completed one failure analysis  Engine ready to be shipped for teardown/analysis  Initiated planning to coordinate Approach  Continued partnership: MARAD, tech. providers, ORNL, & navy  Refurbish lab test engine for eval. engine  Baseline port propulsion engine  Switch out port engine w/ eval. engine  Break in eval. engine  Measure perf. and emis. of eval. engine  Operate for 6-9 mo.  Measure perf. and emis. degradation Navy Pilot Emission Control Prog. (NPECP) Shipboard Evaluation Phase Suison Bay Ready Reserve Force (RRF) – San Francisco

For the DDC 12V-72, fuel substitution has mixed emissions results NOx Emissions –little change: JP-5, Fischer-Trospch –decrease: Ultra low Sulfur Diesel –increase: Biodiesel blend PM changes depend on load Formaldehyde increases with all but F-T Summary Navy Pilot Emission Control Prog. (NPECP) Marine Diesel Engines NAVSEA - Philadelphia