Participatory Tools Used in Food Security Assessments Session 2.4 Qualitative Approaches for FS Assessments.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Participatory Research Aden Aw-Hassan Aleppo, April 28, 2005.
Advertisements

Participatory Rural Appraisal (Chambers 1992, Korten 1996) Diane Pruneau January 2003.
Emergency Assessments. Session 3.1 In pairs Share your reaction to the case study. What did the partner do well? What could they have done better?
Participatory Rural Appraisal and Rapid Rural Appraisal Sundar Neupane.
Centre for Environmental Resources and Hazards Research, University of Jos, Nigeria Institut d”Economie Rural C/o Ministere du Developpement Rural, Mali.
SIMS 213: User Interface Design & Development Marti Hearst Tues, Feb 3, 2004.
Part 4: Evaluation Chapter 20: Why evaluate? Chapter 21: Deciding on what to evaluate: the strategy Chapter 22: Planning who, what, where, and when Chapter.
Embedding NVivo in postgraduate social research training Howard Davis & Anne Krayer 6 th ESRC Research Methods Festival 8-10 July 2014.
Assessment, Data collection methods Baseline Survey Module 3 – Session 1 Assessment – Time line Data collection methods Baseline survey.
Chapter 14 Business Process Management Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
UBSUP : Area Assessment and Site Selection Prepared by the UBSUP Team July 2014 WATER SERVICES TRUST FUND (WSTF) 1 ‘’Good area assessment and selection.
Why & When to Use Qualitative Assessment Approaches Session 1.2 Qualitative Approaches for FS Assessments.
1.3. Food Security Assessments: Phases & Tools Food Security Cluster Needs Assessment Workshop Dhaka, Bangladesh 19 – 20 February 2012.
Data Collection and Storage Tools (and effective note-taking techniques) Session 1.4 Qualitative Approaches for FS Assessments.
Needs Assessment: Collecting information, making decisions, and accomplishing results Ryan Watkins, Ph.D. George Washington University Maurya West Meiers.
Data Analysis Session 5.1. Session 12: 1 Qualitative Approaches for FS Assessments.
TST Session 4.2. Step 4.a. & 4.b. Supervision & Analysis WFP Markets Learning Programme1 Trader Survey Training.
Introduction to SDLC: System Development Life Cycle Dr. Dania Bilal IS 582 Spring 2009.
TST Session 3.2. Steps 3.b. & 3.c. Questionnaires & Enumerator Training WFP Markets Learning Programme1 Trader Survey Training.
PRA Roeland Kindt. Outline Introduction Introduction Basic rules for surveys Basic rules for surveys What is PRA What is PRA PRA tools PRA tools Selection.
PRA TOOLS. Informing Outsiders merely let people know about projects to be undertaken Consulting Villagers are given the opportunity to express their.
Ensuring the quality of Qualitative Data Presented by Lorie Broomhall, Ph.D. Senior HIV/AIDS Advisor Nigeria Monitoring and Evaluation Management Services.
ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES FOR NUTRITION DATA COLLECTION IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES.
Qualitative Methods to Assess Community Issues. What are qualitative methods of assessment? Qualitative methods of assessment are those whose results.
Qualitative Assessment Methods Session 1.3 Qualitative Approaches for FS Assessments.
Participatory Methods of research Geog 316 JA Yaro.
Advanced EFSA Learning Programme Session 3.1. Situation Analysis Step 2 Qualitative Data Analysis in EFSA.
Participatory Decision Making
Legume CHOICE: a simple tool for prioritizing legume interventions Alan Duncan Legume CHOICE Co-ordination Meeting, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia Feb 2-4, 2015.
Methods: Pointers for good practice Ensure that the method used is adequately described Use a multi-method approach and cross-check where possible - triangulation.
Session 3 Identifying Those Most at Risk of Food Insecurity During a Pandemic.
Planning and Conducting Data Collection – Community and Focus Group Discussions Session 3.1 Qualitative Approaches for FS Assessments.
Participatory methods for vulnerability assessments: Selected examples Gina Ziervogel Stockholm Environment Institute.
WFP Initial EFSA Learning Session 1.3. Initial EFSA Overview 1.
Ensuring rigour in qualitative research CPWF Training Workshop, November 2010.
Windshield Surveys and Site Reconnaissance i.e., Windshield and Walking Surveys.
CSI PLA Workshop Feb PARTICIPATORY LEARNING AND ACTION Linda Biersteker ELRU Vivienne Bozalek Department of Social Work UWC.
PAT Market Information for Food Security Analysis Session 1.3 WFP Markets Learning Programme Price Analysis Training.
1 Commissioned by PAMSA and German Technical Co-Operation National Certificate in Paper & Pulp Manufacturing NQF Level 3 Develop learning strategies and.
Planning and Conducting Data Collection – Semi- Structured Interviews Session 2.3 Qualitative Approaches for FS Assessments.
Qualitative Approaches for FS Assessments Summary of Day 1.
PCB Take-Aways. Take-Aways  Learn and apply systematic approach for assessing and improving process capability using such tools (Minitab and Excel) as:
Developing the Assessment Work Plan and Data Collection Tools Session 3.3 Session 11: 1 Qualitative Approaches for FS Assessments.
Sociology 12. Outcome analyze a variety of appropriate sociological research methods Describe common sociological research methods
Monitoring and evaluation Objectives of the Session  To Define Monitoring, impact assessment and Evaluation. (commonly know as M&E)  To know why Monitoring.
WHY IS THIS HAPPENING IN THE PROGRAM? Session 5 Options for Further Investigation & Information Flow.
Developing monitoring and evaluation indicators Day 10 Session 3.
Chapter 1 Getting Started Understanding Basic Statistics Fifth Edition By Brase and Brase Prepared by Jon Booze.
Improved socio-economic services for a more social microfinance.
Comparing Classroom Instruction that Works- Identifying Similarities and Differences.
Master in Human Development and Food Security
Overview Module 2: Problem/Project Identification
Participatory Toolbox
Participatory Rural Appraisal in developing countries
Master in Human Development and Food Security
Rural Community Development
RES 728 RANK Education for Service-- res728rank.com.
Mark Scheme Veale and Riley
The Scientific Method.
PRA TOOLS.
The Scientific Method.
Planning and Conducting Data Collection – Structured Observations
Session 1.4. The EFSA Analysis Plan
The Scientific Method.
Participatory Rural Appraisal.
TECHNIQUES FOR GENDER SENSITIZATION
Session 5.3. Team Presentations
Session 2.4. Step 1: Formulating Assumptions
Chapter VI Community Awareness
Presentation transcript:

Participatory Tools Used in Food Security Assessments Session 2.4 Qualitative Approaches for FS Assessments

Session Objectives After this session, participants should be able to: Be familiar with participatory data collection and analysis tools commonly used in qualitative assessments. Be able to facilitate data collection and analysis using three participatory mapping and piling techniques. Qualitative Approaches for FS Assessments

Basket of Participatory Tools Observational Tools Visual ToolsDiscussion Participant Observation Transect Walk Mapping (many) Ranking (many) Calendars (many) Venn Diagrams Flow Diagrams Other variations Discussions Interviews Qualitative Approaches for FS Assessments

Resource Map What did we learn from this exercise? Was the map accurate? Does it need to be? How can the Resource Map be applied to qualitative food security assessments? What questions can it help us answer? How can we augment our learning from the Resource Map? When is it appropriate to use the Map? What are the limitations/potential biases? How can these be reduced Qualitative Approaches for FS Assessments

Resource Cards Senior Management Middle Management Both Qualitative Approaches for FS Assessments

Income and Expenditure Matrix Wealthy Average Poor Source of Income Qualitative Approaches for FS Assessments

Pairwise Ranking A participatory method used for prioritizing or ranking lists prepared by communities. Common examples are lists of problems, needs, crops, coping strategies. It not only gives us a quantitative data (rank or number of votes), but also provides analytical insights; i.e. explains preferences and ranks. Principle: each item on a list is compared in a systematic way with all other items on the list. Qualitative Approaches for FS Assessments

Reflection