Applying Statistical Seismology to Image the Physical Properties of the Crust Egill Hauksson, Caltech, Pasadena, CA 91125 Presented at Statsei9 in Potsdam,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SPP 1257 Modelling of the Dynamic Earth from an Integrative Analysis of Potential Fields, Seismic Tomography and other Geophysical Data M. Kaban, A. Baranov.
Advertisements

The SCEC Community Stress Model (CSM) Project Jeanne Hardebeck USGS, Menlo Park, CA.
Slab deformation and seismicity Thorsten W. Becker Lisa A. Alpert Iain W. Bailey Melanie Gerault Meghan S. Miller University of Southern California Los.
This presentation relies on: 1) 2)
Constraining crustal rheology and lower crustal flow in the Tibetan plateau Update from CIDER 2011: Dynamics of Mountain Building Marianne Karplus 1,2,
Sendai Earthquake NE Japan March 11, 2011 Some explanatory slides Bob Stern, Dave Scholl, others updated March
Scaling of viscous shear zones with depth dependent viscosity and power law stress strain-rate dependence James Moore and Barry Parsons.
3-D Finite Element Modeling of the Rise and Fall of the Himalayan-Tibetan Plateau Mian Liu and Youqing Yang Dept. of Geological Sciences, University of.
Dynamic elevation of the Cordillera, western United States Anthony R. Lowry, Neil M. Ribe and Robert B. Smith Presentation by Doug Jones.
Pacific Secular Variation A result of hot lower mantle David Gubbins School of Earth Sciences University of Leeds.
Strength of the lithosphere: Constraints imposed by laboratory experiments David Kohlstedt Brian Evans Stephen Mackwell.
Global Distribution of Crustal Material Inferred by Seismology Nozomu Takeuchi (ERI, Univ of Tokyo) (1)Importance of Directional Measurements from geophysicists’
Anisotropic seismic tomography: Potentials and pitfalls Mark Panning University of Florida CIDER Research Talk 7/5/2010.
American Samoa Seismic Hazard Maps Mark D. Petersen, Stephen C. Harmsen, Kenneth S. Rukstales, Charles S. Mueller, Daniel E. McNamara, Nicolas Luco, and.
Strength of the Lithosphere
GreatBreak: Grand Challenges in Geodynamics. Characteristics of a Desirable Geodynamic Model Ties together observational constraints on current state.
NEW MADRID: A dying fault? GPS seismology geology Heat flow Recent data, taken together, suggest that the New Madrid seismic zone may be shutting down.
A little more on earthquakes and faulting
NEW MADRID: A dying fault? GPS seismology geology Heat flow Recent data, taken together, suggest that the New Madrid seismic zone may be shutting down.
Lecture #13- Focal Mechanisms
Why North China is seismically active while South China remains largely aseismic? Youqing Yang & Mian Liu, Dept. of geol. University of Missouri-Columbia.
(Chapter 10 in D & R) Geometry and Kinematics: Plates.
NETWORK LEVELING & CONTOURING 1 A contour line is a line that passes through points having the same elevation. It is produced by intersecting imaginary.
Roland Burgmann and Georg Dresen
Double-difference earthquake relocation of Charlevoix Seismicity, Eastern Canada implication for regional geological structures Meng Pang.
Lecture 16 Earthquakes What are earthquakes? Elastic rebound theory Waves generated by earthquakes: P waves, S waves, Surface waves Locating earthquakes.
Earthquake scaling and statistics
GEO 5/6690 Geodynamics 24 Oct 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 Read for Fri 31 Oct: T&S Last Time: Flexural Isostasy Isostasy is a stress balance resulting.
Heat Flow and the Seismogenic Zone in Southern California Colin F. Williams USGS, Menlo Park, CA U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey.
SISMA Seismic Information System for Monitoring and Alert Galileian Plus Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Università di Milano, Italy Politecnico di.
FULL EARTH HIGH-RESOLUTION EARTHQUAKE FORECASTS Yan Y. Kagan and David D. Jackson Department of Earth and Space Sciences, University of California Los.
Cooling of the Earth: A parameterized convection study of whole versus layered models by McNamara and Van Keken 2000 Presentation on 15 Feb 2005 by Group.
Large Low Shear Velocity Provinces in the lowermost mantle, and Plume Generation Zones at their margins Bernhard Steinberger Collaborators: Kevin Burke.
Department of Geology & Geophysics
Dynamics of decompression melting of upper mantle rocks above hot spots under continental plates Yu.V. Perepechko, K.E. Sorokin, V.N. Sharapov Institute.
RESOLVING FOCAL DEPTH WITH A NEAR FIELD SINGLE STATION IN SPARSE SEISMIC NETWORK Sidao Ni, State Key Laboratory of Geodesy and Earth’s Dynamics, Institute.
GLOBAL TOPOGRAPHY. CONTINENTAL & OCEANIC LITHOSPHERE.
Influence of Magma on Rift Evolution: A Modeler’s Perspective Mark D. Behn Department of Geology & Geophysics, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Roger.
1.Introduction 2.Description of model 3.Experimental design 4.Ocean ciruculation on an aquaplanet represented in the model depth latitude depth latitude.
Rheological Controls on Strain Partioning during Continental Extension (When does E=MC 2 ?) Chris Wijns, Klaus Gessner, Roberto Weinberg, Louis Moresi.
S. Sobolev, GFZ Potsdam “Geodynamic modeling and integrative interpretation” group in the GFZ Potsdam S. Sobolev, GFZ Potsdam.
Continental Faults at Depth: the roots of the debate Ge Summary: How continents deform is a much debated question. Whether surface strain is localized.
Intraplate Seismicity Finite element modeling. Introduction Spatial patterns (Fig. 1) –Randomly scattered (Australia) –Isolated “seismic zones” (CEUS)
Fault Mechanics and Strain Partitioning Session Axen, Umhoefer, Stock, Contreras, Tucholke, Grove, Janecke.
The Lithosphere There term lithosphere is in a variety of ways. The most general use is as: The lithosphere is the upper region of the crust and mantle.
How Faulting Keeps Crust Strong? J. Townend & M.D. Zoback, 2000 Geology.
GEO 5/6690 Geodynamics 15 Oct 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 Read for Wed 22 Oct: T&S Last Time: RHEOLOGY Dislocation creep is sensitive to: Temperature.
High Resolution Finite Fault Inversions for M>4.8 Earthquakes in the 2012 Brawley Swarm Shengji Wei Acknowledgement Don Helmberger (Caltech) Rob Graves.
California Project Seismicity in the oil and gas fields Tayeb A. Tafti University of Southern California July 2, 2013.
Correlating aftershock sequences properties to earthquake physics J. Woessner S.Wiemer, S.Toda.
Latitudinal Trend of Roughness and Circumpolar Mantles on Mars M. A. Kreslavsky J. W. Head III Brown University.
The influence of the geometry of the San Andreas fault system on earthquakes in California Qingsong Li and Mian Liu Geological Sciences, 101 Geol. Bldg.,
There are Mantle Plumes originating from the CMB!.
Colloquium Prague, April, A Numerical Approach to Model the Accretion of Icelandic Crust Gabriele Marquart and Harro Schmeling.
Gravity anomalies and flexure at the West Taiwan basin:
GEO 5/6690 Geodynamics 24 Oct 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 Read for Wed 29 Oct: T&S Last Time: Brittle-field rheology The “Seismogenic Zone” is observed.
Structure of Earth as imaged by seismic waves
Velocity and Attenuation in the Eastern Bay Area and the Delta Donna Eberhart-Phillips UC Davis USGS Delta workshop 10 Sept 2015.
Temperature in the Crust Lijuan He Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
January 24, Earthquake Engineering GE / CEE - 479/679 Lecture 2. Plate Tectonics January 24, 2008 John G. Anderson Professor of Geophysics.
Seismotectonics Mathilde B. Sørensen and J. Havskov.
2010/11/01 Workshop on "Earthquake Forecast Systems Based on Seismicity of Japan: Toward Constructing Base-line Models of Earthquake Forecasting" Seismicity.
Earth’s Interior “Seeing into the Earth”
Raúl R. Castro1, Joann Stock2 , Egill Hauksson2 and Robert Clayton2
Nils Holzrichter, Jörg Ebbing
Crust, Mantle, & Convection Jagmark
Viscoelastic-coupling model for the earthquake cycle driven from below
Lijuan He Institute of Geology and Geophysics, CAS, Beijing,
Layer Thickness and Map Width
Roland Bürgmann and Georg Dresen
Presentation transcript:

Applying Statistical Seismology to Image the Physical Properties of the Crust Egill Hauksson, Caltech, Pasadena, CA Presented at Statsei9 in Potsdam, Germany, 16 June 2015

Purpose: Determine Seismogenic Thickness Map the top, and bottom of the seismogenic zone Compare the seismogenic thickness with geophysics parameters Infer strength of lower crust at the bottom of the seismogenic zone from orientation of the stress field

Caltech/US GS Southern California Seismic Network Catalog The data set used

Method to determine seismogenic thickness Grid of 0.1° latitude and 0.1° longitude Require 10 or more events per grid node Calculate: – Shallow depth: 5% seismicity above it – Average depth – Deepest depth: 95% seismicity above it – Seismogenic thickness = D95% - D05%

Number of events per bin

Focal Depth Distribution Average Seismogenic- Thickness

Average depth versus seis-thickness

Seismicity Depth surfaces: One color scale

Width of the Brittle-Ductile Transition Zone 98%-Depth – 94%-Depth Cumulative Percent

Width of the Brittle-Ductile Transition Zone Complete catalog D98% - D94%

Width of the Brittle-Ductile Transition Zone Waveform relocated catalog only D98% - D94%

Geophysics and Seismogenic thickness Does the seismogenic thickness depend on crustal geophysics? - Heat flow - Topography -GPS strain rate

Heat flow & depth of seismicity

Seismogenic- thickness Topographic Elevation [m] Seismogenic Thickness [km] GPS Strain Rate Heat flow [mW/m^2] 100

B-value Spada et al. (2013) Depth [km] Bear & Platt (2011) D05% D95% S T N

Rheology of Crust and Upper Mantle Burgmann & Dresen (2008)

Stress rotations at bottom of seismogenic zone Stresses align with traction free boundary conditions: Bokelmann and Beroza (2000) – Alignment of principal stress axes with vertical and horizontal directions Use events above/below D05% and D95% and compare to events at average depth Looking for: – Stress orientation signature of a weak zone in the lower crust

Bokelmann & Beroza (2000) Northern Calif. P- and T- axes are strongly aligned near the surface & at the bottom of the seis- thickness P-axes T-axes

P- and t-axes: 1) complete data set 2) strike-slip solutions Complete catalog Ave±3km

AverageD05%D95% PP P T T T 0 60 P-axes Average Plunge

Conclusions The average depth of seismicity: 9 km Average Seismogenic Thickness: 9 km Steepness of the termination of seismicity at the BT varies with deep seismicity hot spots The stress does not seem to exhibit changes near the BT; thus suggesting a some stronger lower crust than in northern Calif. Crème brule ́e --- Southern Calif. Jelly sandwich ---- Northern Calif.