Competition Policy in India: an Overview Pankaj Jain Faculty : Lovely Professional University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GREETINGS TO CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS FOR ICAIS POST QUALIFICATION COURSE VIDEO CONFERENCE FROM HYDERABAD 26 AUGUST 2005.
Advertisements

GAMBIA COMPETITION COMMISSION GAMBIA COMPETITION COMMISSION Levelling the Field for Development BY : EXECUTIVE SECRETARY 5 TH JUNE 2013.
Introduction to Competition Policy & Law Rijit Sengupta Role of Trade Unions in Promoting Competition in Zambia 13 th February 2012, Kitwe, Zambia.
TUME YA USHINDANI 1 IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY AND LAW AND ITS BENEFITS IN TANZANIA 13 th FEBRUARY, 2013 By Fair Competition Commission (FCC)
COMPETITION ACT,  The Finance Minister in his Budget Speech on 27 th February, 1999 stated “The Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act.
IP rights and competition law: Friends or foes? Etienne Wéry Attorney at the bars of Paris and Brussels Lecturer at Robert Schuman University (Strasbourg)
Prepared by Barış EKDİ 1 Competition Law & Policy in Natural Gas Market Cengiz SOYSAL Coordinator of Dept. No. I
COMMISSION For The SUPERVISION Of BUSINESS COMPETITION The REPUBLIC Of INDONESIA REGIONAL ANTITRUST WORKSHOP ON ABUSE OF DOMINANCE.
EU Competition Policy. Internal Market One of the activities of the Community: “an internal market characterised by the abolition, as between member States,
 The Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices was adopted by the government in 1969 and the MRTP Commission was set up in  The act came into.
Competition law and collaboration What does it mean for NHS ambulance trusts? Sharon Lamb, Partner 22 May 2013.
© 2007 by West Legal Studies in Business / A Division of Thomson Learning CHAPTER 20 Promoting Competition.
Indian Competition Regime and Experiences with Cartels Pradeep S Mehta CUTS International.
Welcome to Mergers and Acquisitions uk. Plan of Topic Definitions Importance Patterns in Mergers and Acquisitions –Merger and Acquisition Activity in.
HNC/HND Unit Competition Policy.  To explore the role of market legislation and regulation in the UK. In particular the role of the Competition.
Citizen consumer and civic Action Group Chennai, India
Competition Policy in India: an Overview TCA Anant Department of Economics Delhi School of Economics.
1 Challenges of Competition Reforms in Bangladesh Dr. Md. Mozibur Rahman Chairman Bangladesh Tariff Commission.
CUTS Institute for Regulation & Competition, World Trade Centre, Mumbai & Institute of Company Secretaries of India – Centre for Corporate Training & Research.
“Equal and open access to the market in terms of economic integration and increased competition ” Astana Forum, 24 May 2013 Presented by Hassan Qaqaya,
Elective Part 1 (2) Anti-competitive Behaviours & Competition Policy.
Introductory course on Competition and Regulation Pál Belényesi University of Verona October 2006.
GREETINGS TO DELEGATES OF NATIONAL TRAINING WORKSHOP ON COMPETITION POLICY AND LAW ADDIS ABABA 12 – 16 MAY
1 EVOLUTION OF COMPETITION LAW IN INDIA Pradeep S Mehta CUTS International.
EVOLUTION OF COMPETITION LAW IN INDIA
Competition Law Definition and Scope Dr. A.K. Enamul Haque Professor of Economics United International University.
Copyright© 2010 WeComply, Inc. All rights reserved. 10/17/2015 Canadian Competition Law.
Antitrust. “Is there not a causal connection between the development of these huge, indomitable trusts and the horrible crimes now under investigation?
16 August Capacity Building on Competition Policy in Namibia Rehabeam Shilimela NEPRU.
1 On the Conspiracy Requirement of Cartels --through the analysis of a practical case Wen-Hsiu,Lee Fair Trade Commission of Taiwan April 5, 2006.
RESEARCH IN THE CONTEXT OF COMPETITION BY MOKUBUNG N. MOKUBUNG 1.
Russell Pittman “Economics at Community Colleges” October 5, 2012 The views expressed are not purported to reflect the views of the U.S. Department of.
Regulation of Mergers & Acquisitions Presentation by Magdeline Gabaraane GICC 14 th March
Erlinda M. Medalla April 27-28, 2006 Hanoi Understanding Competition Policy.
Introduction to Competition Policy & Law
UNCTAD The interface between competition policy, trade, investment and development Geneva, 23 July 2007 Abuse of Market Power Presentation by: Ursula Ferrari.
Chapter 20 Antitrust and Regulation of Competition Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE By: Group C Aneesh Srivastava (B12008) Ankan J Bhattacharyya (B12010) Mandeep Singh (B12022) Priti (B12030) Trisha Chakrabarty (B12053)
1 Economic Analysis in Competition Law – A Lawyer’s Perspective A. Douglas Melamed March 23, 2009.
1 CCI: ICSI-NIRC Company secretaries and the Competition Act, th October 2015 Surendra U. Kanstiya Practising Company Secretary
Industrial Policy Faculty – Lovely School Of Business LPU.
FEDERAL ANTIMONOPOLY SERVICE Moscow 2006 New Antimonopoly Law of the Russian Federation.
Private Sector Development Competition and Anti Monopoly The World Bank Mission February-March, 2004.
UNCTAD Competition Law and Policy for Practitioners The Rationale For Introducing Competition Law and Policy By Michael Adam, Competition law and Consumer.
1 Pre-Independence Laws: PRIVATE CAPITAL Constitution (1950); IDR Act (1951); IPR (1956); MRTP Act, 1969; State Ownership Reserved Lists & Licensing Post.
EU Business Law: Anticompetitive agreements (Art. 101 TFEU) Dr. Agata Jurkowska-Gomułka.
© 2004 West Legal Studies in Business, a Division of Thomson Learning 20.1 Chapter 20 Antitrust Law.
COMPETITION POLICY AND LAW 1 2 EXTANT COMPETITION LAW OF INDIA MONOPOLIES AND RESTRICTIVE TRADE PRACTICES ACT, 1969 BROUGHT INTO FORCE IN 1970.
The Economic Environment of Business – Lecture 5 Competition Policy.
LEB Slide Set 14 Competition Law Matti Rudanko. LEB Slide Set 14 2 A Constitution of Market Economy Well-functioning markets – an unwritten fundamental.
Amity School of Business Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices (MRTP) Act,
PHILIPPINE COMPETITION ACT
competition rules in inland transport
Markkinoiden juridinen toimintaympäristö Kalvot 15
European Union Law Week 10.
Competition Law (EU, USA, Turkey)
Competition Law (EU, USA, Turkey)
Chapter 37 Antitrust Law.
Chapter 22 Promoting Competition.
Lear - Laboratorio di economia, antitrust, regolamentazione
Introduction to Competition Policy & Law
IPR AND CONCENTRATIONS
Subject : law aspects of corporate business
THE COMPETITION ACT Presented by : Ripal Makwana Roll no : 27
Legal Aspects Of Corporate Business
Name: Jani Radhika A. Roll no: 19 M
NAME:- MAGRA ASHISH CLASS:- M.COM (SEM-II) ROLL NO.:- 26
Legal Aspects Of Corporate Business
Competition law.
The strategic plans of the Competition Commission
Presentation transcript:

Competition Policy in India: an Overview Pankaj Jain Faculty : Lovely Professional University

Competition Law – Definition. Modern competition law can be viewed as basic system of rules which are designed as far as possible to allow markets to function properly. It is designed to prohibit abuses of market power, whether by an individual firm or by a group of firms acting collectively, but otherwise to allow markets to operate unhindered. – Scherer and Ross (1990) Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance.

Competition Policy Objectives Case for competition rests mainly on  economic grounds.  That competition increases economic efficiency and welfare. Political Objectives  Equity  Power Market Integration

The origins of Indian Law Directive Principles Art 38 and 39  1. that the ownership and control of material resources of the community are so distributed as best to subserve the common good; and  2. that the operation of the economic system does not result in the concentration of wealth and means of production to the common detriment. MRTP Act 1969 amended 1984 and then again in 1991  Primary focus was size  Primary intervention was Bureaucratic Competition in a Command and Control Regime!

Indian Law Competition Act 2002 Agreement among enterprises Abuse of dominance Mergers or, more generally, Combinations among enterprises

Anti competitive agreements  3. (1) No enterprise or association of enterprises or person or association of persons shall enter into any agreement in respect of production, supply, distribution, storage, acquisition or control of goods or provision of services, which causes or is likely to cause an appreciable adverse effect on competition within India.

Approaches to Agreements Horizontal versus Vertical Agreements Per Se Rule of Reason

Per Se …. Any agreement entered into between enterprises or associations of enterprises or persons or associations of persons or between any person and enterprise or practice carried on, or decision taken by, any association of enterprises or association of persons, including cartels, engaged in identical or similar trade of goods or provision of services, which  (a) directly or indirectly determines purchase or sale prices;  (b) limits or controls production, supply, markets, technical development, investment or provision of services;  (c) shares the market or source of production or provision of services by way of allocation of geographical area of market, or type of goods or services, or number of customers in the market or any other similar way;  (d) directly or indirectly results in bid rigging or collusive bidding, shall be presumed to have an appreciable adverse effect on competition Provided that nothing contained in this sub-section shall apply to any agreement entered into by way of joint ventures if such agreement increases efficiency in production, supply, distribution, storage, acquisition or control of goods or provision of services

Per Se Rule Minimises the costs of enforcement because removes requirement to show that an arrangement is harmful; Risk of error reduced by limiting per se rule to behaviour that is clearly harmful.

Rule of Reason (4) Any agreement amongst enterprises or persons at different stages or levels of the production chain in different markets, in respect of production, supply, distribution, storage, sale or price of, or trade in goods or provision of services, including—  (a) tie-in arrangement;  (b) exclusive supply agreement;  (c) exclusive distribution agreement;  (d) refusal to deal;  (e) resale price maintenance, shall be an agreement in contravention of sub-section (1) if such agreement causes or is likely to cause an appreciable adverse effect on competition in India.

Abuse of Dominance 4. (1) No enterprise shall abuse its dominant position. unfair or discriminatory condition or price (including predatory price) in purchase or sale of goods or service limits or restricts Production, Technical development Prevents Markets Access Uses dominance to enter into or protect other markets

Mergers The acquisition of one or more enterprises by one or more persons or merger or amalgamation of enterprises shall be a combination of such enterprises and persons or enterprises, if  in India, the asset value of more than rupees four thousand crores or turnover more than rupees twelve thousand crores; or outside India, in aggregate, the assets of more than two billion US dollars or turnover more than six billion US dollars;  Merger or Acquisition of similar industries with assets greater than 1000 Crores or Turnover of 3000 crores ….  Post Merger Size Such Mergers are Void if they have an appreciable adverse affect on competition

Mergers & Acquisitions Till 1991: Size elements of MRTP came into play Thereafter…  Income Tax Act  SEBI Neither looks at the Market Competition Act comes into play

Some Concerns High Thresholds  What if it is a small merger with localized impact!  Possible Areas Cement, Ambiguous application  The act restricts the CCI from investigating one year after the merger but one year from when?

The Consumer Angle Consumer Protection is under COPRA  Unfair Trade Practice - UTP provisions of MRTP now shifted exclusively to COPRA  But Business access to Copra is a problem Copra reaches to the local level  But the commission does not  Can they cooperate Using Consumer Associations

The Broader Policy Domain Govt is till an important player in economic markets  As regulator  As participant Supply and Demand Promoting Competition requires good Governance Participation and Political Commitment Transparency Accountability Predictability

To Conclude Synergy between Government Action and Competition  Assess all laws and government policies on the touchstone of competition  All government policies should have an explicit statement about the likely impact of the policy on competition  Governments at the union and the state level should frame and implement policies by acknowledging the market process  Government should evolve a system of ‘competition audit’ which could be applied to all existing and future policies