Cytometry tutorial: The impact of adjusting PMT voltages on spillover and compensation Thomas Myles Ashhurst1,2,3, Adrian Lloyd Smith3,4 1Viral Immunopathology.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Building a Panel Select markers Select conjugates Method to build panel performance criteria.
Advertisements

Design and optimization of multicolor panels Holden T. Maecker.
Steps to Success with Multicolor Flow Cytometry
What is Flow Cytometry? Flow Cytometry uic Introduction to Flow Cytometry IGC Workshop Multicolor Flow Cytometry IGC – April 28, 2010 Adapted from Holden.
Analog-to-Digital Converter (ADC) And
Issues in Multicolor Flow Cytometry: Beyond 6 Colors
Instrument QC and Qualification
Quality Control in Immunophenotyping Dr. N. Varma Prof. & Head – Hematology Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh.
Selectivity, Sensitivity, Signal to Noise, Detection Limit
Shuvra Das University of Detroit Mercy
Analog to Digital Converters (ADC) 2 ©Paul Godin Created April 2008.
1 Molecular Luminescence Spectroscopy Lecture 31.
Microspectrophotometry General Section. General Comments Why do we use MSP when there are other techniques available for colour comparison? Why do we.
ACQUISITION RATES EFFECT ON MULTIPARAMETRIC RARE EVENT ANALYSIS : AN INSTRUMENT COMPARISON John Tigges, Vasilis Toxavidis, Heidi Mariani Beth Israel Deaconess.
Compensation: It’s not just for pretty pictures. Fluorescence Spillover Compensation Simple in concept… Correct spillover into different parameters Straightforward.
2013 Duke CFAR Flow Cytometry Workshop Data Analysis.
Selection of measuring instruments
COMPENSATION By: Ronald Mathieu. Compensation Why do we need compensation? –1) Because of long emission spectrum of dyes like FITC and PE.
Microwindow Selection for the MIPAS Reduced Resolution Mode INTRODUCTION Microwindows are the small subsets of the complete MIPAS spectrum which are used.
1 Chapter 6 Low-Noise Design Methodology. 2 Low-noise design from the system designer’s viewpoint is concerned with the following problem: Given a sensor.
Excellence Justify the choice of your model by commenting on at least 3 points. Your comments could include the following: a)Relate the solution to the.
Basics of Flow Cytometry Holden Maecker. Outline Definitions, what can be measured by flow cytometry Fluidics: Sheath and sample streams, flow cells,
Classification of Instruments :
Instrument QC and Qualification
Intracellular Cytokine Staining (ICS) Flow Cytometry Assay 1 Kent J. Weinhold, Duke CFAR Director November 6th, 2013 CFAR Director’s Meeting Flow Cytometry.
ENERGY CONVERSION ONE (Course 25741) CHAPTER NINE ….continued DC MOTORS AND GENERATORS.
Calibration & Curve Fitting
Scanning and Image Processing -by Steve Clough. GSI Lumonics cDNA microarrays use two dyes with well separated emission spectra such as Cy3 and Cy5 to.
Handling Data and Figures of Merit Data comes in different formats time Histograms Lists But…. Can contain the same information about quality What is meant.
CORRELATION & REGRESSION
Cube Measurements Tent Crew. Scintillation BNL 241 Am Semi- collimated  Spectralon Diffuse UV Reflector SBD  -Trigger Scint. Light Poisson.
Flow Cytometry at Boston University Medical Campus Introduction to some methods that we offer Yan Deng (X4-5225), Gerald Denis (X4-1371),

LECTURER PROF.Dr. DEMIR BAYKA AUTOMOTIVE ENGINEERING LABORATORY I.
Basic Principles in Flow Cytometry
FLC Group Test-beam Studies of the Laser-Wire Detector 13 September 2006 Maximilian Micheler Supervisor: Freddy Poirier.
The Examination of Residuals. Examination of Residuals The fitting of models to data is done using an iterative approach. The first step is to fit a simple.
ELECTRONIC INSTRUMENTATION & PLC DKT Signal Conditioning Circuits.
MS Calibration for Protein Profiles We need calibration for –Accurate mass value Mass error: (Measured Mass – Theoretical Mass) X 10 6 ppm Theoretical.
Quality Assurance How do you know your results are correct? How confident are you?
Data Analysis: Quantitative Statements about Instrument and Method Performance.
6.1 Inference for a Single Proportion  Statistical confidence  Confidence intervals  How confidence intervals behave.
Sources of noise in instrumental analysis
Quality Controls: Get your instruments under control!
BME 353 – BIOMEDICAL MEASUREMENTS AND INSTRUMENTATION MEASUREMENT PRINCIPLES.
F Don Lincoln, Fermilab f Fermilab/Boeing Test Results for HiSTE-VI Don Lincoln Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory.
06/2006I.Larin PrimEx Collaboration meeting  0 analysis.
 Remember Chemistry panel Quality Control:-  In a medical laboratory, it is a statistical process used to monitor and evaluate the analytical process.
1 Chapter No. 17 Radiation Detection and Measurements, Glenn T. Knoll, Third edition (2000), John Willey. Measurement of Timing Properties.
Lecture 8 Peak Parameters and Quantitative chromatography
Diagnostic clinical chemistry
Dotplots CD3 CD4 Allow for visualizing relationship between two different parameters that is not apparent by histogram analysis.
TERMINAL CHARCATERISTIC of a SHUNT DC MOTOR
Multicolor Flow Cytometry: Optimizing Performance for Expanding Colors into High Parameter DATA collection How we are going to do this, we have the talks.
Cytometry tutorial: The impact of adjusting PMT voltages on spillover and compensation Thomas Myles Ashhurst1,2,3, Adrian Lloyd Smith3,4 1Viral Immunopathology.
Time Independent Analysis
Figure 2 Percentage of CD19+/CD34+ cells with decreased CD81 median fluorescence intensity (MFI;
Charge Coupled Device Advantages
COMPENSATION + FITC - PE - + PE - FITC - FITC detector FITC PE
UV laser fluorophore options Fortessa HCI 5 Laser FACSAria Cell Sorter
MECH 373 Instrumentation and Measurements
FLUCTUATIONS OF MUON ENERGY LOSSES
Spectral Flow Cytometry
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages e5 (May 2018)
The Art of Flow Cytometry
Electron probe microanalysis
Objectives 6.1 Estimating with confidence Statistical confidence
Objectives 6.1 Estimating with confidence Statistical confidence
1. Use the brightest fluorophores available. Brightness Expression
S.varasteh 10/11/2012.
Presentation transcript:

Cytometry tutorial: The impact of adjusting PMT voltages on spillover and compensation Thomas Myles Ashhurst1,2,3, Adrian Lloyd Smith3,4 1Viral Immunopathology Laboratory, Discipline of Pathology, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney 2Marie Bashir Institute for Infectious Disease and Biosecurity (MBI), The University of Sydney 3Ramaciotti Facility for Human Systems Biology (RFHSB), The Centenary Institute and The University of Sydney) 4Sydney Cytometry Facility, The Centenary Institute and The University of Sydney) Contact: thomas.ashhurst@sydney.edu.au, a.smith@centenary.org.au

Voltage adjustment to reduce spillover? Misconception: “I need to adjust my voltage to lower the compensation required between two overlapping fluorophores.” Case study My APC comp bead (A) spills into the APC/Cy7 detector (R780) (B) The compensation value is 64.5% (B) My supervisor thinks this is too high and wants me to reduce the compensation value by lowering the voltage of R780 If I reduce the voltage from 800V to 700V or 600V I can reduce the compensation value from 64.5% (high) (B) to 24.6 (medium) (C) or 7.78% (low) (D) A B R780: 800 V COMP: 64.5% R780: 700 V COMP: 24.6% C R780: 600 V COMP: 7.78% D

Refresher: what is compensation? Compensation is “correcting” fluorescence spillover PE+ comp bead Compensation value (extracting PE from the PECF594 (YG610) detector): 6,824 / 40,362 x 100 = 16.9% This compensation value is dependent on voltages Comp(YG610) = Measure(YG610) - %Measure(YG582) 40,362 Target detector (YG582) 6,824 Correct compensation: Median Fluorescence Intensity (MFI) of PE+ and PE- beads in the PECF594 (YG610) detector are equal Why is this spreading? Non-target detector (YG610) Over-compensated 0% 2% 5% 10% 16.9% 17.5%

What is spreading error? Spreading error is what causes problems for resolving true positive populations due to spreading of the negative population. Diagrammatic example: PerCP/Cy5.5 (with marker “A”) spreads into the BV711 and BV650 detectors, leading to a loss of resolution in both. Figure 1: BV711 is bright enough, and marker “B” is expressed highly enough that A+B+ cells can be resolved from A+B- cells. Figure 2: However, BV650 is not bright enough to resolve A+B+ cells from A+B- cells. Figure 1: resolvable Figure 2: not resolvable A+B- cells A+B- cells A+B+ cells A+B+ cells PerCP/Cy5.5 anti-A PerCP/Cy5.5 anti-A A-B+ cells A-B+ cells BV711 anti-B BV650 anti-B The process of correct compensation reveals (not creates) measurement error, known as spreading error (SE)

What is spreading error? For more information on spreading error, see the following publication Reference: Nguyen, R., Perfetto, S., Mahnke, Y. D., Chattopadhyay, P., Roederer, M. 2013. Quantifying spillover spreading for comparing instrument performance and aiding in multicolor panel design. Cytometry A, 83(3): 306-315

What is spreading error? The process of correct compensation reveals (not creates) measurement error, known as spreading error (SE) Uncompensated Compensated Low SE Medium SE High SE SE: 1.93 SE: 6.68 SE: 11.60 COMP: ~8% COMP: ~71.43% COMP: ~57.14% PE+ beads BV711+ beads Example: Higher compensation values tend to correlate with higher spreading error values (i.e. more spillover, more the measurement error will spread) However, higher compensation values cannot predict higher spreading error values BV711 into BV785 detector Comp = 71.43% SE = 6.68 BV711 into AF700 detector Comp = 57.14% SE = 11.60 Despite the higher compensation value, the SE is lower

Detector voltages What happens when we adjust the voltages for a given detector FITC detector Dim bead:negative bead Separation ratio Bright bead:negative bead CS&T beads (neg, dim, and bright) run at various voltages CS&T beads Negative bead Dim bead Bright bead Electronic noise rSD: 53.7 A B Each detector uses a photomultiplier (PMT) that amplifies any signal picked up in that detector. The voltage applied dictates the level of amplification At a specific voltage (~600 volts for the FITC detector in this example), fluorescence signal is a) detectible above background, and b) is consistently and proportionately separated Voltages above this value do not increase the separation of signal (A) (including dim-neg, dim-bright, bright-neg) Voltages below this value compromise the detection of low-end (dim) signal (B) This is true of any signal (target fluorophore or spillover fluorophore) appearing in the detector ‘Voltage scan’ approach to determine minimum voltage: Perfetto, S. P., Ambrozak, D., Nguyen, R., Chattopadhyay, P. K., & Roederer, M. (2012). Quality assurance for polychromatic flow cytometry using a suite of calibration beads, 7(12), 2067–2079. doi:10.1038/nprot.2012.126i

APC/Cy7 and APC in the R780 detector Let’s take a look at the performance of the APC/Cy7 detector (R780) COMP beads were recorded, where the R780 voltage was increased in 50V increments from 350 V up to 800 V At a specific voltage (550 volts in this case), fluorescence signal is a) detectible above background, and b) is consistently separated for any voltages above this This is clearly seen with the APC/Cy7 comp bead in the R780 detector However, this is also true of contaminating signals, such as the uncompensated APC comp bead in the R780 detector A A 550 volts 550 volts B B The minimum voltage required for optimal separation of signal from noise is between 500-550 volts Voltages above the minimum for separation (550 volts) do not increase the separation of signal (A) Voltages below the minimum for separation (550 volts) compromise the detection of low-end (dim) signal (B) The separation of bright from dim signal occurs at lower voltages (~350 volts) This is true of any signal (target fluorophore or spillover fluorophore) appearing in the R780 detector In this case lowering the voltage below 500-550 volts would result in the loss of dim APC/Cy7 signal ‘Voltage scan’ approach to determine minimum voltage: Perfetto, S. P., Ambrozak, D., Nguyen, R., Chattopadhyay, P. K., & Roederer, M. (2012). Quality assurance for polychromatic flow cytometry using a suite of calibration beads, 7(12), 2067–2079. doi:10.1038/nprot.2012.126i

APC/Cy7 and APC in the R780 detector Looking at the uncompensated plots individually: above the 550 volt cut off the separation of the target fluorophore (APC/Cy7) from the spillover fluorophore (APC) is fixed, even though the compensation value increases. This is also true for the separation of APC/Cy7 from the background. Voltage: 350 V Comp: 0.148% Fixed 400 V 0.38% Fixed 450 V 0.915% Fixed 500 V 1.99% 550 V 4.06% Fixed Fixed 600 V 7.78% Fixed 650 V 13.9% Fixed 700 V 24.6% Fixed 750 V 40.2% Fixed 800 V 64.5% R780: APC/Cy7 APC Consistent with the principles of our previous slide The minimum voltage required for optimal separation of signal from background is between 500-550 volts (APC/Cy7+ signal and APC+ signal above background) The separation of bright from dim signal occurs earlier (separation of APC+ from APC/Cy7+ signal is consistent above above 350V)

APC/Cy7 and APC in the R780 detector Looking at the compensated plots individually: above the 550 volt cut off the separation of the target fluorophore (APC/Cy7) from the spread of the compensated spillover fluorophore (APC) is fixed, even though the compensation value increases. Voltage: 350 V Comp: 0.148% 400 V 0.38% 450 V 0.915% 500 V 1.99% Fixed 550 V 4.06% Fixed 600 V 7.78% Fixed 650 V 13.9% Fixed 700 V 24.6% Fixed 750 V 40.2% Fixed 800 V 64.5% Fixed R780: APC/Cy7 APC The minimum voltage required for optimal separation of signal from background is between 500-550 volts The separation of compensated APC+ (now in the negative/low region scale of the R780 detector) from APC/Cy7+ signal is consistent above above 550 V

APC/Cy7 and APC in the R780 detector Overlay of the compensated data: 350-800 volts in R780 800 V Fixed 550 V Fixed 500 V Fixed 700 V Fixed 750 V Fixed Fixed 650 V Fixed 600 V 350 V 400 V 450 V R780: APC/Cy7 APC To replay

So what does compensation >100% look like? Despite compensation values of ~140%, the spreading error, and resolution of target (UVLD) from non-target (BUV395) signal is reasonable.

So how do I set my voltages? On-the-fly method for setting voltages (not a full optimisation procedure) Start with the CS&T assigned voltages (this will set an approximate minimum for separation of dim signal) Run through your full set of compensation beads/cells — reduce voltages for any detector where the signal is off-scale/in the non-linear range (typically reduce if the peak is above 10^5). Even if reducing the voltage compromises the resolution of dim signal, it is more important to have linear signals (signal on-scale), as it is absolutely required for correct compensation Run through the compensation controls again and check the spillover values. Voltages should not be modified to reduce these values, as this will not impact resolution Check each of your sample types (especially samples from any stimulation or inflammatory situation) to ensure signals are all on scale/in the linear range Record compensation controls, apply compensation, and record samples Full optimisation procedure: see the following resources Sydney Cytometry Facility optimisation and tracking (email thomas.ashhurst@sydney.edu.au or a.smith@centenary.org.au) BD Application settings using unstained cells (https://www.bdbiosciences.com/documents/BD_FACSDiva_Stndrd_App_Setup_TechBulletin.pdf) VRC bead suite optimisation method (http://www.nature.com/nprot/journal/v7/n12/abs/nprot.2012.126.html)

Summary and application Summary: changing voltages does not impact resolution Users are often concerned by high compensation values, especially values above 100%, and want to reduce the voltage of the detector receiving spillover to reduce the compensation value However, decreasing/increase voltages will only modify the compensation value, and will not change the impact of spillover/spreading on the resolution of positive signal PMT voltages: properly optimised Each detector will have a minimum voltage where signal is consistently and proportionally detected above background Decreasing the voltage for a given PMT below this minimum, then resolution of dim populations will be lost. Increase the voltage for a given PMT above this gives no advantage to population resolution. Often the cause for abnormally high compensation values (values >100% in particular) are a result of improperly optimised PMT voltages, for example, such as unnecessarily high default voltages being set by the CS&T program in some detectors. Use a proper optimisation protocol (or at least an on-the-fly method) to optimise PMT voltages What do I do if I have spillover/spreading error causing a loss of resolution in my data Firstly, optimise your instrument If spillover/spreading error is causing a loss of resolution in your data on an optimised system, the solution is to modify your panel, not to modify the voltages