The EASA System Tallinn, 6 May 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EU/US Annual Conference 1st extension of scope : General presentation Rulemaking Directorate Eric Sivel, Deputy Rulemaking Director.
Advertisements

Module N° 4 – ICAO SSP framework
Module N° 3 – ICAO SARPs related to safety management
UAS: Regulatory developments in EASA Michael Smethers Chairman of EASA Management Board 13 September 2011.
EASA and the EU Regulatory Framework
Experiences on the road to Fatigue Risk Management Regulation
Aviation Safety Management at global, European and Member State level (ICAO, EASP, EASp, SSP, SMS and ESSI) Juan Anton Continuing Airworthiness Manager.
Contents of the Presentation
1 AeroSpace and Defence Industries Association of Europe Proper distribution of general/technical requirements between hard and soft laws Kyle Martin Airworthiness.
JAA 19th Annual FAA/JAA International Conference 1 TRANSITION FROM JAA to EASA Institutional changes in Europe Klaus KOPLIN JAA Chief Executive.
1 30/31 January 2013EASA/Estonian CAA Rulemaking Workshop From national to EU rules - Continuing Airworthiness Juan Anton Continuing Airworthiness Manager.
ICAO Provisions for Safety Management
European Aviation Safety Agency Airworthiness certificates - general Airworthiness Certificates – General introduction Peter Corbeel Rulemaking Directorate.
The European Railway Agency in development
Hervé JULIENNE EASA – Standardisation Team Leader - Operations
European Aviation Safety Agency
BALTIC RAC 28 Feb 2007 STOCKHOLM. Objectives and mission Organise operational coordination of fisheries control and inspection activities by MS. Assist.
EASA Airborne Separation Assistance Systems (ASAS) Certification
Review of Draft AC 021 – Maintenance Contracting Draft AC 022 – Task and Shift Handovers Nie Junjian Airworthiness Inspector COSCAP-NA.
EASA & UAS Airworthiness Policy – Presented at the Military Airworthiness Harmonisation Workshop, Olomouc, 5 June 2009 EASA & UAS AIRWORTHINESS POLICY.
Regulatory matters è The newly created European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) is harmonising most regulations in aviation across Europe: è Licensing è.
Romanian Court of Accounts years of existence.
CEBS in Brief. The Lamfalussy approach The Lamfalussy approach was first implemented in the securities field following the recommendations of the Committee.
Module N° 8 – SSP implementation plan. SSP – A structured approach Module 2 Basic safety management concepts Module 2 Basic safety management concepts.
Second expert group meeting on Draft fiche on delegated act on the European code of conduct on partnership (ECCP) Cohesion Policy
WORKSHOP, Nicosia 2-3rd July 2008 “Extension of SAFETY & QUALITY Common Requirements to the EMAC States” Item 3 : Regulatory Context Peter Stastny EUROCONTROL.
EATS 2009 Evolving European Regulatory Environment Prague November 2009 Jean-Marc Cluzeau EASA Rulemaking Directorate.
2008 © European Aviation Safety Agency European Aviation Safety Agency Preparing for new responsibilities Patrick Goudou Executive Director 2008 US/Europe.
Legislative Texts. The legislative process in the EU Proposal, recommendation, communication from Commission, Green Paper, consultation, studies, draft.
U.S./Europe International Aviation Safety Conference By: Eric Sivel Date: 8 June 2006 “Global Aviation Safety Processes: Refining, Reinforcing, and Streamlining”
Recommendation 2001/331/EC: Review and relation to sectoral inspection requirements Miroslav Angelov European Commission DG Environment, Unit A 1 Enforcement,
Eurostat ESTP course on International Trade in Goods Statistics April 2013 Point 2 of the agenda Legal framework for EU trade statistics.
16-17 November 2005 COSCAP – NA Project Steering Group Guangzhou, China 1 Co-operating with the European Aviation safety Agency.
U.S./Europe International Aviation Safety Conference By: James Ballough, FAA, and Claude Probst, EASA Date: June 4, 2008 “Global Safety Management: Revolution.
Victor Kourenkov ICAO EUR/NAT Regional Officer Almaty, 5 to 9 September 2005 LEGISLATION AND ORGANISATION CONSIDERATIONS.
International Atomic Energy Agency Roles and responsibilities for development of disposal facilities Phil Metcalf Workshop on Strategy and Methodologies.
Directorate General for Enterprise and Industry European Commission The New Legislative Framework - Market Surveillance UNECE “MARS” Group meeting Bratislava,
European Aviation Safety Agency Head of Aircraft Product Certification
News from Cologne: Recent developments at the European Aviation Safety Agency Patrick Goudou EASA Executive Director Portland, USA, 6 June 2006.
MEDICAL ASPECTS OF LICENSING ……………….. WHAT’S NEW? Easa April 2013.
8 June 2006Portland, Oregon, USAE. Sivel EASA Working Group on regulation of non-complex motor aircraft engaged in non-commercial operations E Sivel (EASA)
1 ATCO licensing – by the BR Art. 8c Air Traffic Controllers Art. 3 (Reg 1108/2009) Annex Vb (ERs) Art. 8c.1 “ATCOs as well as persons/organisations training,
European Aviation Safety Agency Agence Européenne de la Sécurité Aérienne Europäische Agentur für Flugsicherheit Agência Europeia para a Segurança da Aviação.
SEVESO II transposition and implementation: Possible approaches and lessons learned from member states and new member states SEVESO II transposition and.
Gdansk International Air & Space Law Conference November 2013 Authority and Organisation Requirements “effective management systems for authorities and.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 6 – Company Law Bilateral screening:
Harmonised use of accreditation for assessing the competence of various Conformity Assessment Bodies Dr Andreas Steinhorst, EA ERA workshop 13 April 2016,
Flight and Duty Time Limitations and Rest Requirements Fatigue Risk Management Virgilijus Valentukevicius, EASA.
Authority Requirements Margit Markus Tallinn, 7 May 2009.
2005 Europe/US International Aviation Safety Conference, Cologne 7-9 June The Europe-US International Aviation Safety Conference 2005 ‘ Aviation Safety.
Information day on EUROCONTROL Guidance Material on the application of Common Requirements for Service Provision OVERVIEW OF THE SINGLE EUROPEAN SKY Roderick.
Module 02 Essential Requirements for ATCOs. Training Objectives  Appreciate the content of the essential requirements for ATCOs as described within EASA.
EU rules for Third Country operators ??
A European Community Contribution to World Aviation Safety Improvement
Public Participation in Biofuels Voluntary
Association of African Aviation Training Organisations
IIASA Governance Review
Claude Probst European Aviation Safety Agency
Co-operating with the European Aviation safety Agency
PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO
EU Reference Centres for Animal Welfare
IFATSEA Director Europe
years of existence.
Workshop for Licensing and Operations
Institutional changes The role of Bilateral Oversight Boards
European Aviation Safety Agency
A concept for better regulation in general aviation
CAP decision making process
ESTP course on International Trade in Goods Statistics
EASA ATM/ADR rulemaking – safety related personnel
Presentation transcript:

The EASA System Tallinn, 6 May 2009

AGENDA I. EASA structure II. The institutional and regulatory framework III. The EASA Rulemaking procedure IV. Differences with the JAA system V. Structure of future EASA rules DGINT/2

I. EASA structure DGINT/2

DGINT/2

Institutional framework: EASA structure Executive Director P. Goudou Plans and Programmes Communications Rulemaking J. Kneepkens Internal Audit and Quality Safety Analysis and Research Policy Officers ATM/Airport Safety Dpt. Approvals & Standardisation F. Banal Certification N. Lohl Administrative M. Junkkari Legal Dept. Process Support Products Standardisation Finance & Procurement Executive Directorate prepares all plans of the Agency (business, financial,…), manages contracts with NAAs for tasks outsourcing. provides support to all Directorates wrt any legal issue and defines Agency’s policies conducts studies and provides reports concerning the safety of European and world-wide aviation. It provides also coordination for internal and external safety improvement initiatives and acts as the focal point for aviation accident investigation safety recommendations manages the Agency’s Quality Management System and performs audits manage internal and external communications Rulemaking Directorate The Rulemaking Directorate contributes to the production of all EU legislation and implementation material related to the regulation of civil aviation safety and environmental compatibility. It submits opinions to the European Commission and must be consulted by the Commission on any technical question in its field of competence. It is also in charge of the related international co-operation. Certification Directorate The Certification Directorate is the operational directorate of the Agency, contributing to a safe and environmentally compatible aviation system by: Investigating the airworthiness of new type designs and granting certificates to products, parts & appliances performing safety oversight over approved products, parts and appliances ensuring their continuing airworthiness during the complete life cycle taking corrective action by means of airworthiness directives Standardisation Directorate The Standardisation Directorate is responsible for ensuring that regulations and standards applicable in the EASA system are properly, uniformly and consistently implemented and maintained by the Member States. The Directorate also support the certification activity by accreditation inspection visits to NAAs in order to assess their capability for carrying out certain certification tasks on behalf of the Agency. In addition, the Directorate also focuses on the oversight of Organisations Approval (Design, Continued Airworthiness, Production). Administrative Directorate The Administrative Directorate provides for a strong infrastructure on which to build the organisation, managing facilities, human resources, finance, information technology, procurement and outsourcing contracts.  Changes since ICAO audit in 2005: P&P moves from Certification to Executive (responsible of administrative part of certif/approvals) Organisations move from Certification to Standardisation Expert department has been created (was a section under products department Quality moves from Standardisation to Executive and Internal Audit and quality department created SAFA has been created Flight standard in Certification has been created Legal moves from ADMIN to Executive – Policy Officers has been created – Process Support has been created in Rulemaking Corporate Services has been created in Administrative Environmental Protection Organisations Experts Human Resources Products Safety Technical Training ICT Flight Standards Flight Standards SAFA Coordination Corporate Services International Cooperation Policy and Planning DGINT/2

Mission of Directorates Certification Conduct technical inspections and issue certificates where centralised action is more efficient Quality & Standardisation Assist the European Commission in monitoring the application of European Community legislation regarding aviation safety Quality assurance function to monitor the Agency procedures DGINT/2

Mission of Directorates The Executive Directorate Works partly as an operational directorate for horizontal issues such as communication and safety analysis or risk assessment and partly as the strategic lead of the Agency

Mission of Directorates The Administrative Directorate Provides for a strong infrastructure on which to build the organization, managing facilities, human resources, finance, information technology, procurement and outsourcing contracts

Mission of Directorates Rulemaking Assist the European Commission in preparing legislation, (Opinions) and support the Member States and industry in putting the legislation into effect Adopt our own certification specifications and guidance material

II. The institutional and regulatory framework DGINT/2

Institutional framework European Community (EC) Agency Legal personality Independence Legal, administrative and financial autonomy. Vision: EU citizens should benefit from the safest and the most environmentally friendly civil aviation system in the world. Mission: Our mission is to promote the highest common standards of civil aviation safety and environmental protection in Europe and worldwide. DGINT/2

Institutional framework Objectives of the Agency: establish and maintain a high uniform level of aviation safety in Europe; ensure a high uniform level of environmental protection; promote cost efficiency in the regulatory process, assist Member States in fulfilling their ICAO obligations; promote Community views through co-operation with third countries and international organisations.

Institutional framework: EASA governance scheme European Commission European Commission Liechtenstein Switzerland Switzerland Member State Member State Member State Member State Member State Norway Norway Observers Observers Iceland Iceland Agency Agency Management Board Management Board Agency Advisory Agency Advisory Board Board Board(s) of Appeal Board(s) of Appeal Certification Certification Panels of Panels of Experts Rulemaking Rulemaking Executive Director Executive Director Safety Standards Safety Standards Advisory Group of Advisory Group of Consultative Committee Consultative Committee National Authorities National Authorities DGINT/2

Regulatory framework The principles DECENTRALISATION IS THE RULE... The EC Treaty is based on the principle that the Community acts as a legislator, while Member States apply Community law under Community control. Community law is directly applicable (full part of Member States legal order). Legal remedies for individuals and enforcement means are provided by Member States judicial systems. DGINT/2

Regulatory framework The principles … CENTRALISATION THE EXCEPTION The EC Treaty provides however for the delegation of executive powers to the Commission (hard law) or an executive agency (soft law) In such cases: Delegated powers shall be strictly defined to allow judicial control of executive acts Judicial remedies available to individuals and enforcement means shall be specified when delegated powers allow individual decisions

Regulatory framework: the Basic Regulation The Parliament and the Council define the Scope of Powers transferred from the Member States to the Community. adopt the Essential Requirements specifying the objectives to be met The Commission adopts standards for implementing the essential requirements. The Agency adopts non binding standards for implementing the essential requirements DGINT/2

Regulatory framework: present regulations structure Basic Regulation Regulation (EC) 216/2008 of 20/02/2008 ER : Annexes I to V Agency Opinion Regulation (EC) 1702/2003 on Airworthiness and Environmental Certification Regulation (EC) 2042/2003 on Continuing Airworthiness Agency Opinion Annex I (Part-M): Continuing Airworthiness Requirements Section A: Technical Requirements Section A: Application Requirements Section B: Administrative Procedures Annex (Part 21) Section B: administrative Procedures Annex II (Part-145): Maintenance Organisation Approvals Appendices: EASA forms Appendices: EASA forms Annex III (Part-66): Certifying Staff Annex IV (Part-147): Training Organisation Requirements Guidance Material Part 21 Certification Specifications AMC & Guidance Material Part M, 145,66,147 Agency CS , AMC & GM AMC 20 AMC 21 CS 25 CS 34 CS 36 CS E CS P CS APU CS AWO CS ETSO CS Definitions CS 22 CS 23 CS 27 CS 29 CS VLA CS VLR Parliament and Council European Commission EASA

Regulatory framework: division of competences The Commission: adopts implementing rules (Commission Regulations 1702/2003 and 2042/2003) oversees the implementation of common rules by NAAs, including use of safeguard provisions (art. 14 of EASA Regulation) negotiates international agreements DGINT/2

Regulatory framework: division of competences The Agency: develops opinions for common rules (Basic Regulation and implementing rules) adopts material for the application of common rules (certification specifications, airworthiness codes, acceptable means of compliance and guidance material) acts as focal point vis-à-vis third countries and international organisations for the harmonisation of rules and the recognition / validation of certificates DGINT/2

Regulatory framework: division of competences The Agency adopts non binding standards (“soft law”) for implementing the essential requirements AMC & Guidance Material Part 21 Parts M, 145, 66, 147 Certification Specifications AMC 20 CS 25 CS 34 CS 36 CS E CS P CS APU CS 22 CS 23 CS 27 CS 29 CS VLA CS VLR CS AWO CS ETSO CS Definitions CS FTL

ER’s IRs CS’s AMC’s GM Adopted by Legislator EC Agency Comment by small Aerodromes: The manual is not the same thing as a fully fledged SMS. The Manual can be done by the smaller aerodromes without much difficulty. In their opinion Essential Requirement 2c can be done by all. AMC’s Agency GM DGINT/2

Regulatory framework: division of competences Member States National Aviation Authorities: provide expertise as appropriate for rulemaking tasks; develop national administrative rules for the implementation and enforcement of common rules (administrative procedures) may take action on a case by case basis if so required to ensure safety or appropriate operational flexibility (safeguards).

Regulatory framework: division of executive powers PL Ratings, certificates MC ATO FSTD AeMC OPS EASA country MS MS1 Non-EASA 1) EASA, when requested by a MS

III. The EASA Rulemaking procedure DGINT/2

EASA Rulemaking Procedure Phase 1: Programming Annual Rulemaking Programme Advance Planning Phase 2: Processing of rulemaking deliverables Opinions, Certification specifications, Acceptable Means of Compliance and Guidance material 2 phases: Programming and Processing of rulemaking deliverables 1. Output of the programming phase: Programme contains all the rulemaking tasks, for which a final deliverable will be produced within the year N and which commits the Agency while the AP contains the tasks already started or initiated in year N and will lead to a rule during the subsequent years; AP is not published on the website and only circulated to the advisory bodies to provide visibility in the Agency rulemaking work and to allow planning their resources . DGINT/2

Rulemaking process flowchart

IV. Differences with the JAA system DGINT/2

Differences with the JAA system For Rulemaking : As EASA implementing rules are binding in their entirety (not minimum standards nor recommended practices), they shall be less prescriptive to provide for flexibility (performance based). To provide for uniformity, Acceptable Means of Compliance have to be issued and deviations thereto controlled by the Agency. As a consequence, some rule material included in Sections 1 of JARs was ‘downgraded’ to AMC. DGINT/2

Differences with the JAA system For Rulemaking (cont.): Because the scope of the EASA system extends well beyond that of the JAA (ex: JAR-FCL only applies to aeroplanes and helicopters, EASA rules shall cover all other aircraft); and Because drafting principles of Community law require that a requirement applicable to various persons be set in a single text It is not possible to have one rule per type of activity or aircraft

Differences with the JAA system For Rulemaking (cont.): The Agency proposals also contain differences in the drafting style resulting from the application of EU principles. Community legislative acts shall be drafted clearly, simply and precisely. The drafting of a legislative act must be: clear, easy to understand and unambiguous; simple, concise, containing no unnecessary elements; precise, leaving no uncertainty in the mind of the reader. DGINT/2

Differences with the JAA system For Member States: Because of the nature of the EC, Member States may no more: deviate from common rules - except in the case of art. 14 of the Basic Regulation impose additional requirements - to ensure a level playing field and no discrimination conclude international arrangements with third countries - transfer of competence produces effects also for international competence DGINT/2

V. Structure of future EASA rules DGINT/2

EASA Rule Structure (1st step) Authority Requirements GEN AeMC MED ATO FCL CC OPS Organisations Requirements GEN AeMC ATO OPS Performance Standards MED FCL CC OPS

EASA Rule Structure (2nd step) Authority Requirements GEN AeMC MED ATO Licensing CC OPS 145 etc Organisations Requirements GEN AeMC ATO OPS 145 etc Performance Standards MED 147 FCL 66 CC OPS 145 etc

NPA’s Structure Authority Requirements GEN AeMC MED ATO FCL CC OPS Organisations Requirements GEN AeMC ATO OPS Performance Standards MED FCL CC OPS

NPA Planning Publication Date Title End of Comment Period Opinion to Commission Publication Official Journal 05 Jun 2008 Pilot Licensing NPA 2008-17(a)-(c) 28 Feb 2009 Aug 2009 May 2010 31 Oct 2008 Organisation & Authority Requirements (general elements and those related to NPA-2008-17) 28 May 2009 Nov 2009 Aug 2010 30 Jan 2009 Air Operations; (elements related to air operations) 31 Jul 2009 Jan 2010 Oct 2010 16 Jan 2008 Operational Suitability Certificate 30 Jun 2009 Dec 2009 Sep 2010 16 Apr 2009 Third Country Operators 16 Jul 2009

The NPA’s The NPA’s: will be published on the Agency’s website www.easa.europa.eu Anyone can comment! please send your comments using the Comment Response Tool (CRT) http://hub.easa.europa.eu/crt/ DGINT/2

Dr. Virgilijus Valentukevicius Thank you Dr. Virgilijus Valentukevicius virgilijus.valentukevicius@easa.europa.eu